Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2018

29.12.2017 | Original Article

Patient satisfaction with robotic surgery

verfasst von: Emma Long, Fiona Kew

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study is a service evaluation of the robotic-assisted surgery service within the Gynaecology Oncology department at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals. The aim is not only to evaluate and improve this new service within the department, but also to add to the available literature that reviews patient satisfaction with robotic-assisted surgery. An anonymous questionnaire was developed with questions taken from the NHS User Experience Survey Question Bank and additional questions in the same format specific to robotic-assisted surgery. This was posted to the first 140 patients to have undergone robotic-assisted surgery within Gynae Oncology at STH. One hundred completed questionnaires were returned. Over 90% of patients were pleased with the care that they received pre-operatively and felt that they have enough input into the decisions made about treatment. Half of patients (51%) reported having pain post-procedure, with a quarter of these patients experiencing severe pain. The majority of patients (72%) felt that their length of stay in hospital was of the right duration. Almost all patients (99%) were pleased with the overall care that they received and 91% would recommend robotic-assisted surgery as a modality. Patients are very satisfied with the care that they receive when undergoing robotic-assisted surgery within Gynae Oncology at our center and the majority of patients would recommend robotic-assisted surgery as a modality.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schreuder H, Verheijen R (2009) Robotic surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 116:198–213CrossRef Schreuder H, Verheijen R (2009) Robotic surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 116:198–213CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Di Silverio E, Spinillo A (2010) Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 116:1422–1431CrossRefPubMed Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Di Silverio E, Spinillo A (2010) Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 116:1422–1431CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng Ada TL, Tam PC (2014) Current status of robotic-assisted surgery. Hong Kong Med J 20:241–251PubMed Ng Ada TL, Tam PC (2014) Current status of robotic-assisted surgery. Hong Kong Med J 20:241–251PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Oehler MK (2009) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49(2):124–129CrossRefPubMed Oehler MK (2009) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49(2):124–129CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Backes FJ, ElNaggar AC, Farrell MR, Brudie LA, Ahmad S, Salani R, Cohn DE, Holloway RW, Fowler JM, O’Malley DM (2016) Perioperative outcomes for laparotomy compared to robotic surgical staging of endometrial cancer in the elderly: a retrospective cohort. Int J Gynaecol Cancer 26:1717–1721CrossRef Backes FJ, ElNaggar AC, Farrell MR, Brudie LA, Ahmad S, Salani R, Cohn DE, Holloway RW, Fowler JM, O’Malley DM (2016) Perioperative outcomes for laparotomy compared to robotic surgical staging of endometrial cancer in the elderly: a retrospective cohort. Int J Gynaecol Cancer 26:1717–1721CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zakhari A, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Spence AR, Gotlieb WH, Abenhaim HA (2016) Hysterectomy for uterine cancer in the elderly: a comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques. Int J Gynaecol Cancer 26:1222–1227CrossRef Zakhari A, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Spence AR, Gotlieb WH, Abenhaim HA (2016) Hysterectomy for uterine cancer in the elderly: a comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques. Int J Gynaecol Cancer 26:1222–1227CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mäenpää MM, Nieminen K, Tomás EI, Laurila M, Luukkaala TH, Mäenpää JU (2016) Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 215:588.e1–588.e7CrossRef Mäenpää MM, Nieminen K, Tomás EI, Laurila M, Luukkaala TH, Mäenpää JU (2016) Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 215:588.e1–588.e7CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Richard G, Arms III, Sun CC, Burzawa JK, Fleming ND, Nick AM, Rallapalli V, Westin SN, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT, Soliman PT (2015) Improvement in quality of life after robotic surgery results in patient satisfaction. Gynaecol Oncol 138(3):727–730CrossRef Richard G, Arms III, Sun CC, Burzawa JK, Fleming ND, Nick AM, Rallapalli V, Westin SN, Meyer LA, Ramirez PT, Soliman PT (2015) Improvement in quality of life after robotic surgery results in patient satisfaction. Gynaecol Oncol 138(3):727–730CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Health, UK (2012) Greater voice for patients—the health and social care bill. Factsheet B3 Department of Health, UK (2012) Greater voice for patients—the health and social care bill. Factsheet B3
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Health (2010) Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS (Coalition Government White Paper). s.l.: Department of Health Department of Health (2010) Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS (Coalition Government White Paper). s.l.: Department of Health
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Health (2008) High quality care for all—NHS next stage review final report. s.l.: Department of Health Department of Health (2008) High quality care for all—NHS next stage review final report. s.l.: Department of Health
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Health (2014) NHS outcomes framework 2015/16. s.l.: Department of Health Department of Health (2014) NHS outcomes framework 2015/16. s.l.: Department of Health
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulley A, Trimble C, Elwyn G (2012) Patients’ preferences matter. s.l.: The King’s Fund Mulley A, Trimble C, Elwyn G (2012) Patients’ preferences matter. s.l.: The King’s Fund
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Quality-Health, NHS England (2014) National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. s.l.: NHS England Quality-Health, NHS England (2014) National Cancer Patient Experience Survey. s.l.: NHS England
16.
Zurück zum Zitat El Douaihy Youssef et al (2011) A cohort study investigating patient expectations and satisfaction outcomes in men undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 43(2):405–415CrossRefPubMed El Douaihy Youssef et al (2011) A cohort study investigating patient expectations and satisfaction outcomes in men undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 43(2):405–415CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussain A et al (2014) The use of robotics in surgery: a review. Int J Clin Pract 68(11):1376–1382CrossRefPubMed Hussain A et al (2014) The use of robotics in surgery: a review. Int J Clin Pract 68(11):1376–1382CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho C, Tsakonas E, Tran K et al (2011) Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: clinical effectiveness and economic analyses. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Ho C, Tsakonas E, Tran K et al (2011) Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery: clinical effectiveness and economic analyses. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Metadaten
Titel
Patient satisfaction with robotic surgery
verfasst von
Emma Long
Fiona Kew
Publikationsdatum
29.12.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0772-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.