Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2018

27.12.2017 | Knee

Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation

verfasst von: B. Kerens, A. M. Leenders, M. G. M. Schotanus, B. Boonen, W. E. Tuinebreijer, P. J. Emans, B. Jong, N. P. Kort

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is a technique to plan and position the prosthesis components in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) surgery. This study assesses whether the definitive component position in the frontal, sagittal and axial plane is according to the preoperative plan, based on the hypothesis that PSI is accurate.

Methods

Twenty-six patients who had PSI Oxford UKA surgery were included prospectively. The component position in vivo was determined with a postoperative CT-scan and compared with the planned component position using MRI-based digital 3D imaging. Adjustments to the preoperative plan and implanted component sizes during surgery were recorded.

Results

Intraoperatively, no femoral adjustments were performed; 12 tibial re-resections were necessary. The median absolute deviation from the plan in degrees (range) in the frontal, sagittal and axial plane was 1.8° (− 1.5°–6.5°), 2.0° (− 6.5°–8.0°) and 1.0° (− 1.5°–5.0°) for the femoral component, and 2.5° (− 1.0°–6.0°), 3.0° (− 1.0°–5.0°) and 5.0° (− 6.5°–12.5°) for the tibial component. The femoral component is positioned 0.5 (− 1°–2.5°) mm more lateral and 0.8 (− 1.0°–2.5°) mm more anterior. The tibial component is positioned 2.0 (− 5.0–0.0) mm more lateral and 1.3 (− 3.0–6.0) mm more distal. The femoral and tibial default plans were changed four times (15.4%) and nine times (34.6%), respectively, before approval by the surgeon.

Conclusion

PSI in Oxford UKA surgery is reliable and accurately translates the preoperative plan into the in vivo situation, except for the tibial rotational position. The preoperative planning is a crucial step in avoiding re-resections that can cause angular deviations in prosthesis position, especially in tibial component rotational position. It is advised to avoid re-resections and to consider this while planning the PSI procedure.

Level of evidence

Prospective comparative study Level II.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B, Hulsmans FJ, Tuinebreijer WE, Kort NP (2015) Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(9):2809–2817CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B, Hulsmans FJ, Tuinebreijer WE, Kort NP (2015) Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(9):2809–2817CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodfellow J, O’Connor J, Dodd C, Murray D (2006) Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 190 Goodfellow J, O’Connor J, Dodd C, Murray D (2006) Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 190
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Saxena A (2011) Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 28:96–100CrossRef Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Saxena A (2011) Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 28:96–100CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J B Jt Surg Br 93:629–633CrossRef Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J B Jt Surg Br 93:629–633CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hooper N, Snell D, Hooper G, Maxwell R, Frampton C (2015) The 5-year radiological results of the uncemented Oxford medial compartment knee arthroplasty. B Jt J 97–B:1358–1363CrossRef Hooper N, Snell D, Hooper G, Maxwell R, Frampton C (2015) The 5-year radiological results of the uncemented Oxford medial compartment knee arthroplasty. B Jt J 97–B:1358–1363CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Iriberri I, Aragón JF (2014) Alignment of the tibial component of the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, assessed in the axial view by CT-scan: does it influence the outcome? Knee 21(6):1269–1274CrossRefPubMed Iriberri I, Aragón JF (2014) Alignment of the tibial component of the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, assessed in the axial view by CT-scan: does it influence the outcome? Knee 21(6):1269–1274CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jenny JY, Boeri C (2003) Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:40–45CrossRefPubMed Jenny JY, Boeri C (2003) Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:40–45CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonkergouw F, Allé F, Chellaoui K, Vander Sloten J, Vangeneugden D (2016) Three-dimensional measurement technique to assess implant position and orientation after total knee arthroplasty. Med Eng Phys 38(12):1513–1517CrossRefPubMed Jonkergouw F, Allé F, Chellaoui K, Vander Sloten J, Vangeneugden D (2016) Three-dimensional measurement technique to assess implant position and orientation after total knee arthroplasty. Med Eng Phys 38(12):1513–1517CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung KA, Kim SJ, Lee SC, Hwang SH, Ahn NK (2010) Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique. Knee 17:387–391CrossRefPubMed Jung KA, Kim SJ, Lee SC, Hwang SH, Ahn NK (2010) Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique. Knee 17:387–391CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendrick BJ, Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Gill HS, Jackson WF, Dodd CA, Price AJ, Murray DW (2015) Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: a randomised controlled trial. B Jt J 97–B:185–191CrossRef Kendrick BJ, Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Gill HS, Jackson WF, Dodd CA, Price AJ, Murray DW (2015) Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: a randomised controlled trial. B Jt J 97–B:185–191CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerens B, Schotanus MG, Boonen B, Kort NP (2015) No radiographic difference between patient-specific guiding and conventional Oxford UKA surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1324–1329CrossRefPubMed Kerens B, Schotanus MG, Boonen B, Kort NP (2015) No radiographic difference between patient-specific guiding and conventional Oxford UKA surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1324–1329CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Liow MH, Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Li G, Kwon YM (2016) Does 3-dimensional in vivo component rotation affect clinical outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 31(10):2167–2172CrossRefPubMed Liow MH, Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Li G, Kwon YM (2016) Does 3-dimensional in vivo component rotation affect clinical outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 31(10):2167–2172CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lisowski LA, van den Bekerom MP, Pilot P, van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE (2010) Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:277–284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lisowski LA, van den Bekerom MP, Pilot P, van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE (2010) Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:277–284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandit H, Hamilton TW, Jenkins C, Mellon SJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2015) The clinical outcome of minimally invasive phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs. B Jt J 97–B:1493–1500CrossRef Pandit H, Hamilton TW, Jenkins C, Mellon SJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2015) The clinical outcome of minimally invasive phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs. B Jt J 97–B:1493–1500CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Renson L, Poilvache P, Van den Wyngaert H (2014) Improved alignment and operating room efficiency with patient-specific instrumentation for TKA. Knee 21:1216–1220CrossRefPubMed Renson L, Poilvache P, Van den Wyngaert H (2014) Improved alignment and operating room efficiency with patient-specific instrumentation for TKA. Knee 21:1216–1220CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Servien E, Fary C, Lustig S et al (2011) Tibial component rotation assessment using CT-scan in medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(3):272–275CrossRefPubMed Servien E, Fary C, Lustig S et al (2011) Tibial component rotation assessment using CT-scan in medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(3):272–275CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Trong MLD, Diezi C, Goerres G, Helmy N (2015) Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Artrosc 23:1993–1998CrossRef Trong MLD, Diezi C, Goerres G, Helmy N (2015) Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Artrosc 23:1993–1998CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Liow MH, Rubash HE, Li G, Kwon YM (2016) Three-dimensional imaging analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty evaluated in standing position: component alignment and in vivo articular. Contact J Arthroplasty 31(5):1096–1101CrossRefPubMed Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Liow MH, Rubash HE, Li G, Kwon YM (2016) Three-dimensional imaging analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty evaluated in standing position: component alignment and in vivo articular. Contact J Arthroplasty 31(5):1096–1101CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat van Leeuwen JA, Röhrl SM (2016) Patient-specific positioning guides do not consistently achieve the planned implant position in UKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:752–758 van Leeuwen JA, Röhrl SM (2016) Patient-specific positioning guides do not consistently achieve the planned implant position in UKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:752–758
Metadaten
Titel
Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation
verfasst von
B. Kerens
A. M. Leenders
M. G. M. Schotanus
B. Boonen
W. E. Tuinebreijer
P. J. Emans
B. Jong
N. P. Kort
Publikationsdatum
27.12.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4826-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.