Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2018

14.07.2017 | Original Research

Patients’ Knowledge of Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 21

verfasst von: Michal Sheinis, Kira Bensimon, Amanda Selk

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study's objective was to assess the knowledge of prenatal screening for Trisomy 21 in pregnant women in one institution in Canada. A cross-sectional survey measuring demographics, knowledge of screening, and health literacy, was administered to pregnant women. Of the 135 women who completed the survey, 74% had adequate knowledge of Trisomy 21 and associated screening procedures. Twenty-eight point one percent of women did not receive any counseling. Overall, 29.5% of women did not know that the screening test was optional and 10.2% of women underwent screening prior to having been counseled. Multigravidity (p < 0.05) and prior counseling (p < 0.001) were positively correlated with knowledge while first language other than English (p < 0.001) was negatively correlated with knowledge. Given these findings, an effort needs to be made on the part of health care providers to increase counseling rates to 100%, stressing the optional nature of the test to attain true informed consent.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alderson, P. (2001). Prenatal screening, ethics and Down's syndrome: A literature review. Nursing Ethics, 8(4), 360–374.CrossRefPubMed Alderson, P. (2001). Prenatal screening, ethics and Down's syndrome: A literature review. Nursing Ethics, 8(4), 360–374.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Benn, P., & Chapman, A. R. (2016). Ethical and practical challenges in providing noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome abnormalities: An update. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 28, 119–124. Benn, P., & Chapman, A. R. (2016). Ethical and practical challenges in providing noninvasive prenatal testing for chromosome abnormalities: An update. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 28, 119–124.
Zurück zum Zitat Born Ontario. 2016. Born & growing annual report 2012-2014. Born Ontario. 2016. Born & growing annual report 2012-2014.
Zurück zum Zitat Chitayat, D., Langlois, S., & Wilson, R. D. (2011). Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 33(7), 736–750.CrossRefPubMed Chitayat, D., Langlois, S., & Wilson, R. D. (2011). Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 33(7), 736–750.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Colicchia, L. C., Holland, C. L., Tarr, J. A., Rubio, D. M., Rothenberger, S. D., & Chang, J. C. (2016). Patient-health care provider conversations about prenatal genetic screening. Obstetrics and Gynecology., 127, 1145–1152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Colicchia, L. C., Holland, C. L., Tarr, J. A., Rubio, D. M., Rothenberger, S. D., & Chang, J. C. (2016). Patient-health care provider conversations about prenatal genetic screening. Obstetrics and Gynecology., 127, 1145–1152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat de Jong, A., Dondorp, W. J., de Die-Smulders, C. E. M., Frints, S. G. M., & de Wert, G. M. W. R. (2010). Non-invasive prenatal testing: Ethical issues explored. European Journal of Human Genetics., 18, 272–277.CrossRefPubMed de Jong, A., Dondorp, W. J., de Die-Smulders, C. E. M., Frints, S. G. M., & de Wert, G. M. W. R. (2010). Non-invasive prenatal testing: Ethical issues explored. European Journal of Human Genetics., 18, 272–277.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat de Jong, A., Maya, I., & van Lith, J. M. (2015). Prenatal screening: Current practice, new developments, ethical challenges. Bioethics, 29(1), 1–8. de Jong, A., Maya, I., & van Lith, J. M. (2015). Prenatal screening: Current practice, new developments, ethical challenges. Bioethics, 29(1), 1–8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dormandy, E., Michie, S., Hooper, R., & Marteau, T. M. (2005). Low uptake of prenatal screening for down syndrome in minority ethnic groups and socially deprived groups: A reflection of women's attitudes or a failure to facilitate informed choices? International Journal of Epidemiology, 34(2), 346–352.CrossRefPubMed Dormandy, E., Michie, S., Hooper, R., & Marteau, T. M. (2005). Low uptake of prenatal screening for down syndrome in minority ethnic groups and socially deprived groups: A reflection of women's attitudes or a failure to facilitate informed choices? International Journal of Epidemiology, 34(2), 346–352.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Fransen, M. P., Essink-Bot, M. L., Vogel, I., Mackenbach, J. P., Steegers, E. A., & Wildschut, H. I. (2010). Ethnic differences in informed decision-making about prenatal screening for Down's syndrome. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64(3), 262–268.CrossRefPubMed Fransen, M. P., Essink-Bot, M. L., Vogel, I., Mackenbach, J. P., Steegers, E. A., & Wildschut, H. I. (2010). Ethnic differences in informed decision-making about prenatal screening for Down's syndrome. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64(3), 262–268.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Goel, V., Glazier, R., Holzapfel, S., Pugh, P., & Summers, A. (1996). Evaluating patient's knowledge of maternal serum screening. Prenatal Diagnosis., 16(5), 425–430.CrossRefPubMed Goel, V., Glazier, R., Holzapfel, S., Pugh, P., & Summers, A. (1996). Evaluating patient's knowledge of maternal serum screening. Prenatal Diagnosis., 16(5), 425–430.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Gourounti, K., & Sandall, J. (2008). Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey. Midwifery, 24(2), 153–162.CrossRefPubMed Gourounti, K., & Sandall, J. (2008). Do pregnant women in Greece make informed choices about antenatal screening for Down's syndrome? A questionnaire survey. Midwifery, 24(2), 153–162.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hayeems, R. Z., Campitelli, M., Ma, X., Huang, T., Walker, M., & Guttmann, A. (2015). Rates of prenatal screening across health care regions in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open, 3(2), E236–E243.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hayeems, R. Z., Campitelli, M., Ma, X., Huang, T., Walker, M., & Guttmann, A. (2015). Rates of prenatal screening across health care regions in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open, 3(2), E236–E243.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Higuchi, E. C., Sheldon, J. P., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Yashar, B. M. (2016). Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: Consumers’ perspectives. Am J Med Genet Part A, 170A, 375–385.CrossRefPubMed Higuchi, E. C., Sheldon, J. P., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Yashar, B. M. (2016). Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: Consumers’ perspectives. Am J Med Genet Part A, 170A, 375–385.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lepage, N., Chaudhry, A., Konforte, D., Shaw, J., Veljkovic, K., & Dennis, A. (2012). Standardized procedural practices of the Ontario prenatal screening program for aneuploidies and open neural tube defects. Clinical Biochemistry, 45(15), 1152–1157.CrossRefPubMed Lepage, N., Chaudhry, A., Konforte, D., Shaw, J., Veljkovic, K., & Dennis, A. (2012). Standardized procedural practices of the Ontario prenatal screening program for aneuploidies and open neural tube defects. Clinical Biochemistry, 45(15), 1152–1157.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, C., Hill, M., Skirton, H., & Chitty, L. S. (2015). Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(6), 809–816.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lewis, C., Hill, M., Skirton, H., & Chitty, L. S. (2015). Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(6), 809–816.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Norman, W. V., Guilbert, E. R., Okpaleke, C., Hayden, A. S., Lichtenberg, E. S., Paul, M., O’Connell White, K., & Jones, H. E. (2016). Abortion health services in Canada results of a 2012 national survey. Canadian Family Physician, 62, e209–e217.PubMedPubMedCentral Norman, W. V., Guilbert, E. R., Okpaleke, C., Hayden, A. S., Lichtenberg, E. S., Paul, M., O’Connell White, K., & Jones, H. E. (2016). Abortion health services in Canada results of a 2012 national survey. Canadian Family Physician, 62, e209–e217.PubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Norton, M. E., Jacobsson, B., Swamy, G. K., Laurent, L. C., Ranzini, A. C., Brar, H., et al. (2015). Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(17), 1589–1597.CrossRefPubMed Norton, M. E., Jacobsson, B., Swamy, G. K., Laurent, L. C., Ranzini, A. C., Brar, H., et al. (2015). Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(17), 1589–1597.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Portocarrero, M. E. L., Garvelink, M. M., Perez, M. M. B., Giguere, A., Robitaille, H., Wilson, B. J., Rousseau, F., & Legare, F. (2015). Decision aids that support decisions about prenatal testing for down syndrome: An environmental scan. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15, 76.CrossRef Portocarrero, M. E. L., Garvelink, M. M., Perez, M. M. B., Giguere, A., Robitaille, H., Wilson, B. J., Rousseau, F., & Legare, F. (2015). Decision aids that support decisions about prenatal testing for down syndrome: An environmental scan. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15, 76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rowe, H. J., Fisher, J. R., & Quinlivan, J. A. (2006). Are pregnant Australian women well informed about prenatal genetic screening? A systematic investigation using the multidimensional measure of informed choice. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 46(5), 433–439.CrossRef Rowe, H. J., Fisher, J. R., & Quinlivan, J. A. (2006). Are pregnant Australian women well informed about prenatal genetic screening? A systematic investigation using the multidimensional measure of informed choice. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 46(5), 433–439.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Safeer, R. S., & Keenan, J. (2005). Health literacy: The gap between physicians and patients. American Family Physician, 72(3), 463–468.PubMed Safeer, R. S., & Keenan, J. (2005). Health literacy: The gap between physicians and patients. American Family Physician, 72(3), 463–468.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Schoonen, H. M., van Agt, H. M., Essink-Bot, M. L., Wildschut, H. I., Steegers, E. A., & de Koning, H. J. (2011). Informed decision-making in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: What knowledge is relevant? Patient Education and Counseling, 84(2), 265–270.CrossRefPubMed Schoonen, H. M., van Agt, H. M., Essink-Bot, M. L., Wildschut, H. I., Steegers, E. A., & de Koning, H. J. (2011). Informed decision-making in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: What knowledge is relevant? Patient Education and Counseling, 84(2), 265–270.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Schoonen, M., Wildschut, H., Essink-Bot, M. L., Peters, I., Steegers, E., & de Koning, H. (2012). The provision of information and informed decision-making on prenatal screening for down syndrome: A questionnaire- and register-based survey in a non-selected population. Patient Education and Counseling, 87(3), 351–359.CrossRefPubMed Schoonen, M., Wildschut, H., Essink-Bot, M. L., Peters, I., Steegers, E., & de Koning, H. (2012). The provision of information and informed decision-making on prenatal screening for down syndrome: A questionnaire- and register-based survey in a non-selected population. Patient Education and Counseling, 87(3), 351–359.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Seavilleklein, V. (2009). Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening. Bioethics, 23(1), 68–77.CrossRefPubMed Seavilleklein, V. (2009). Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening. Bioethics, 23(1), 68–77.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Steinbach, R. J., Allyse, M., Michie, M., Liu, E. Y., & Cho, M. K. (2016). “this lifetime commitment”: Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening. Am J Med Genet Part A, 170A, 363–374.CrossRefPubMed Steinbach, R. J., Allyse, M., Michie, M., Liu, E. Y., & Cho, M. K. (2016). “this lifetime commitment”: Public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening. Am J Med Genet Part A, 170A, 363–374.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Suter, S. M. (2002). The routinization of prenatal testing. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 28(2–3), 233–270. Suter, S. M. (2002). The routinization of prenatal testing. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 28(2–3), 233–270.
Zurück zum Zitat Swanson, A., Sehnert, A. J., & Bhatt, S. (2013). Non-invasive prenatal testing: Technologies, clinical assays and implementation strategies for Women's healthcare practitioners. Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 1(2), 113–121.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Swanson, A., Sehnert, A. J., & Bhatt, S. (2013). Non-invasive prenatal testing: Technologies, clinical assays and implementation strategies for Women's healthcare practitioners. Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 1(2), 113–121.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat van den Berg, M., Timmermans, D. R., Ten Kate, L. P., van Vugt, J. M., & van der Wal, G. (2005). Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening? Genetics in Medicine, 7(5), 332–338.CrossRefPubMed van den Berg, M., Timmermans, D. R., Ten Kate, L. P., van Vugt, J. M., & van der Wal, G. (2005). Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening? Genetics in Medicine, 7(5), 332–338.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss, B. D., Mays, M. Z., Martz, W., Castro, K. M., DeWalt, D. A., Pignone, M. P., et al. (2005). Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign. Annals of Family Medicine, 3(6), 514–522.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weiss, B. D., Mays, M. Z., Martz, W., Castro, K. M., DeWalt, D. A., Pignone, M. P., et al. (2005). Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: The newest vital sign. Annals of Family Medicine, 3(6), 514–522.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Willems, P. J., Dierickx, H., Vandenakker, E., Bekedam, D., Segers, N., Deboulle, K., et al. (2014). The first 3,000 non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT) with the harmony test in Belgium and the Netherlands. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 6(1), 7–12. Willems, P. J., Dierickx, H., Vandenakker, E., Bekedam, D., Segers, N., Deboulle, K., et al. (2014). The first 3,000 non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT) with the harmony test in Belgium and the Netherlands. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 6(1), 7–12.
Zurück zum Zitat Willis, A. M., Smith, S. K., Meiser, B., Muller, C., Lewis, S., & Halliday, J. (2015). How do prospective parents prefer to receive information about prenatal screening and diagnostic testing? Prenatal Diagnosis, 35(1), 100–102.CrossRefPubMed Willis, A. M., Smith, S. K., Meiser, B., Muller, C., Lewis, S., & Halliday, J. (2015). How do prospective parents prefer to receive information about prenatal screening and diagnostic testing? Prenatal Diagnosis, 35(1), 100–102.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson, B., Jones, K. B., Weedon, D., & Bilder, D. (2015). Care of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Down syndrome. FP Essentials, 439, 20–25.PubMed Wilson, B., Jones, K. B., Weedon, D., & Bilder, D. (2015). Care of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Down syndrome. FP Essentials, 439, 20–25.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wray, A. M., Ghidini, A., Alvis, C., Hodor, J., Landy, H. J., & Poggi, S. H. (2005). The impact of first-trimester screening on AMA patients' uptake of invasive testing. Prenatal Diagnosis, 25(5), 350–353.CrossRefPubMed Wray, A. M., Ghidini, A., Alvis, C., Hodor, J., Landy, H. J., & Poggi, S. H. (2005). The impact of first-trimester screening on AMA patients' uptake of invasive testing. Prenatal Diagnosis, 25(5), 350–353.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Patients’ Knowledge of Prenatal Screening for Trisomy 21
verfasst von
Michal Sheinis
Kira Bensimon
Amanda Selk
Publikationsdatum
14.07.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0126-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.