The authors declare that they have no competing interests directly relate to this study. Dr. Najafzadeh is the Principal Investigator of an investigator-initiated unrestricted grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Baxalta to Brigham and Women’s Hospital unrelated to this study. Dr. Kim received research support for unrelated studies from Pfizer and Lilly. Dr. Schneeweiss is a consultant to WHISCON, LLC and to Aetion, Inc., a software manufacturer of which he also owns shares. He is the principal investigator of investigator-initiated grants to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital from Novartis, and Boehringer Ingelheim unrelated to the topic of this study.
MN , SCK, SS, JNK, JMP, and EP conceived and designed the study. MN, CP, JNK, GWB, JER, and EP participated in acquisition of data. MN, CP, and EP participated in analysis and interpretation of data. MN and EP drafted the manuscript. CP, SCK, SS, JNK, GWB, JER, JMP revised the manuscript for important intellectual contents. MN, CP, SCK, SS, JNK, GWB, JER, JMP, and EP approved the final manuscript.
The 9th edition of the American College of Chest Physicians’ Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis guidelines emphasize the importance of considering the risk–benefit ratio of “patient-important” outcomes. However, little is known about patients’ perception and understanding regarding the different outcomes of antithrombotic treatment after orthopedic surgery, and the factors that influence their decision to use these treatments. Using a series of semi-structured interviews, we explored patients’ understanding and perception concerning the benefits and risks of antithrombotic treatment for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after joint replacement surgery.
A series of semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who had undergone knee or hip replacement surgery at a tertiary care hospital (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA) in 2014. Discussions were recorded and transcribed. Two investigators independently coded and analyzed the data to identify important themes and concepts using the constant comparative method.
Of 64 patients who were invited, 12 patients (19 %) completed the interviews. The majority of patients (92 %) were aware of the benefits of antithrombotic therapy for reducing the risk of blood clots, while less than half of them had a clear understanding of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. While all patients were aware of risk of minor bleeding, only 6 patients (50 %) considered the risk of major bleeding as a possible side effect of antithrombotic treatment. Overall, patients perceived bleeding as a less important outcome than a thrombotic event. The lack of awareness about the risk of major bleeding, the assumption that a short-term exposure would not meaningfully affect bleeding risk, and the assumption that bleeding is a controllable event influenced their perception. Most patients (83 %) stated that their decision to use antithrombotic medications was mainly based on the trust in their physician’s expertise.
Patients perceived thrombotic events as more important outcomes than bleeding events. Patients’ understanding of thrombotic and bleeding events varies and may play a key role in their preferences. The majority of patients stated that trust in their physician’s expertise had a large influence on their decision to use antithrombotic medications.
Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA, Curley C, Dahl OE, Schulman S, et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e278S–325S. PubMedCentralPubMed
Guyatt GH, Eikelboom JW, Gould MK, Garcia DA, Crowther M, Murad MH, et al. Approach to outcome measurement in the prevention of thrombosis in surgical and medical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e185S–94S. PubMedCentralPubMed
Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–45. CrossRef
Jacobs JJ, Mont MA, Bozic KJ, Della Valle CJ, Goodman SB, Lewis CG, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(8):746–7. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Engova D, Duggan C, MacCallum P, Bates I. Patients’ understanding and perceptions of treatment as determinants of adherence to warfarin treatment. Int J Pharm Pract. 2002;10(S1):R69. CrossRef
Polk Jr HC, McCafferty MH, Mahid SS, Naidu DK, Lewis JN. Attitudes of surgical specialists toward venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in surgical patients. Am Surg. 2008;74(3):189–94. PubMed
Guyatt GH, Norris SL, Schulman S, Hirsh J, Eckman MH, Akl EA, et al. Methodology for the development of antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis guidelines: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. CHEST Journal. 2012;141(2):53S–70S. CrossRef
MacLean S, Mulla S, Akl EA, Jankowski M, Vandvik PO, Ebrahim S, et al. Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e1S–e23S. PubMedCentralPubMed
Wong A, Kraus PS, Lau BD, Streiff MB, Haut ER, Hobson DB, et al. Patient preferences regarding pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. J Hosp Med. 2015;10(2):108–11.
- Patients’ perception about risks and benefits of antithrombotic treatment for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after orthopedic surgery: a qualitative study
S. C. Kim
J. N. Katz
J. E. Ready
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II