The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
JFV was the project leader, designed and prepared the questionnaire, mailed questionnaire and received answers; coded and transferred responses from questionnaire to SPSS and EXCEL, drafted the article. PG designed and kept the code book, participated in preparing the questionnaire, transferred all data received from clinic to SPSS and EXCEL, performed primary statistics, participated in drafting the article. LS participated in design and preparing of questionnaire, performed all statistical analyses and participated in drafting the manuscript. HRP conceived of the study and supervised in its design and coordination, participated in preparing the questionnaire, helped to draft the manuscript, performed inclusion and exclusion, information and motivation, and all clinical registrations and follow-up in the clinical intervention study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Most periodontal intervention studies have focused on biomedical qualities like change in pocket depth and clinical attachment levels. Very few studies have described patient response in terms of how patients' general lives are affected by disease, treatment, and communication with therapy providers. Thus the aim of the present study was to investigate patient response to systematic periodontal information, motivation and treatment strategy (primary aim) by comparing the patients’ perception of own efforts and results with those clinically registered in a trans-sectional, observational study (secondary aim).
One year after treatment of 184 patients, 152 completed a questionnaire covering aspects of received oral health information and instruction, expectations, communication with the therapeutic team, behavioral change, self-perceived outcomes and satisfaction.
More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the interaction with the specialist team. 98% were satisfied with the information and instruction they had been given. 84% said that the information had been necessary to make them change their behavior towards better oral hygiene. Pain and discomfort, as well as bleeding were reduced substantially from before to after treatment, and 28 patients reported to have stopped smoking. In all questions regarding well-being there were statistically significant changes towards positive impact following therapy.
Periodontal treatment, including customized information and education on the etiology and pathogenesis, prevention and treatment as well as maintenance of periodontal diseases resulted in a high degree of short- and long term compliance, and very good patient centered outcomes, which again had a positive impact on the patients’ satisfaction. The patient centered outcomes correlated mostly with the compared clinical endpoints.
Locker D. Oral health and quality of life. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004;2 Suppl 1:247–53. PubMed
Altman DG. Clinical trials. In: Altman DG, ed. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1991. p. 456.
Jonsson B, Ohrn K, Oscarson N, Lindberg P. The effectiveness of an individually tailored oral health educational program on oral hygiene behavior in patients with periodontal disease: a blinded randomized-controlled clinical trial (one-year follow-up). J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:1025–34. CrossRefPubMed
Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994;11:3–11. PubMed
Tonetti MS, Claffey N. Advances in the progression of periodontitis and proposal of definitions of a periodontitis case and disease progression for use in risk factor research. Group C consensus report of the 5th European workshop in periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32 Suppl 6:210–3. CrossRefPubMed
Leventhal H, Diefenbach M, Leventhal E. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognitive interaction. Cognit Psychol Res. 1992;16:143–63.
- Patients’ perception of own efforts versus clinically observed outcomes of non-surgical periodontal therapy in a Norwegian population: an observational study
Jon F Vatne
Hans R Preus
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin
Mail Icon II