To explore and better understand how patients evaluate satisfaction in dental care and elicit information from them to develop a dental satisfaction instrument.
Patients currently receiving dental treatment in a teaching hospital were invited to be part of a qualitative research project which involved focus group discussion. Focus groups were conducted in Cantonese and discussions were recorded (audio and video) and later transcribed.
Thirty patients participated and a thematic analysis of data from four focus groups helped generate a questionnaire on dental satisfaction. Six themes were extracted from the contents of the focus group: (i) attitude, (ii) cost, (iii) convenience, (iv) pain management, (v) quality, and (vi) patients’ perceived need for prevention of oral disease. Compared to the existing Dental Satisfaction Questionnaire (DSQ), majority of the dental satisfaction aspects mentioned in focus group discussions were similar to items in DSQ supporting its content validity. Focus groups covered more aspects including attitude of dental supporting staff, convenience of emergency services, admission of patients and treatment duration. Consideration of the clinical skills of the operator, hospital infection control, and knowledge on prevention of oral disease were also expressed.
The focus group discussions elicited the views of patients not covered by DSQ items thereby suggesting areas for development of a new satisfaction questionnaire.
Mills I, Frost J, Cooper C, Moles DR, Kay E. Patient-centred care in general dental practice - a systematic review of the literature. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(64):1–13.
Davies AR, Ware JE. Measuring patient satisfaction with dental care. Soci Sci & Med. 1981;15:751–60.
Stewart JF, Spencer AJ. Dental satisfaction survey 1999 - University of Adelaide. http://www.adelaide.edu.au/arcpoh/downloads/publications/reports/working-papers/2002-satisfaction.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
Baldwin A, Sohal A. Service quality factors and outcomes in dental care. J Service Theory and Prac. 2003;13:207–16.
D G, Milgrom P, Mancl L. Dental care satisfaction: the reliability and validity of the DSQ in a low-income population. J Public Health Dent. 1995;55(4):210–7. CrossRef
MCM W, Schwarz E. Factors determining Hong Kong adults' satisfaction with dental care. J Dent Res. 1998;77(5):1354.
Drost EA. Validity and reliability in social science research. Edu Res and Perspec. 2003;38(1):105–23.
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. 2009. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
Rosemarie A. Thematic content analysis, descriptive presentation of qualitative data. 2007. http://rosemarieanderson.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ThematicContentAnalysis.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
M R, Burke L, Erickson P, Leidy NK, Patrick DL, Petrie CD. Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR good research practices for evaluating and documenting content validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO task force report. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1075–83. CrossRef
Morgan DL. Focus group as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997. CrossRef
Baker SE, Edward RE. How many qualitative interviews is enough? 2012 http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
- Patients’ satisfaction with dental care: a qualitative study to develop a satisfaction instrument
Jennifer Yu Ning Luo
Pearl Pei Liu
May Chun Mei Wong
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin
Mail Icon II