nach oben

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Erschienen in:

22.01.2020 | Knee Arthroplasty

Patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis achieve the greatest improvement in patient reported outcome after total knee arthroplasty

verfasst von: Iben Rønne Jessing, Mette Mikkelsen, Kirill Gromov, Henrik Husted, Thomas Kallemose, Anders Troelsen

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The osteoarthritic (OA) disease pattern of the knee is one of the determinants for choice of arthroplasty concept when knee replacement is indicated, but whether the disease pattern has a direct effect on postoperative outcome has not previously been investigated. The aim was to investigate if different OA disease patterns have an effect on postoperative outcome after receiving total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Materials and methods

472 patients with pre- and 1-year postoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) undergoing TKA surgery were retrospectively identified and classification of the OA disease pattern was made on preoperative radiographs. Measured resection was the universal technical approach.

Results

The key findings showed greater improvement in mean PROMs for anteromedial OA (AMOA) compared with other OA disease patterns; 3.1 points (95% CI 1.4–4.7, p < 0.001) in Oxford Knee score, 11.7 points (95% CI 0.9–22.5, p = 0.034) in Forgotten Joint score and 0.08 points (95% CI 0.02–0.14, p = 0.007) in EQ 5D score. Similar results were observed when comparing AMOA with AMOA that had only partial thickness cartilage loss (AMOA-PTCL).

Conclusions

Patients with AMOA achieve greater improvement in PROMs after TKA surgery when using measured resection compared with other OA disease patterns. This finding has important implications for reporting, risk stratification and interpretation in TKA outcome studies, including randomized trials, why further investigation of the topic is of highly relevance.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Hamilton TW, Pandit HG, Lombardi AV et al (2016) Radiological Decision Aid to determine suitability for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and preliminary validation. Bone Joint J 98-B:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.BJJ-2016-0432.R1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Goodfellow J, Kershaw C, Benson M, O’Connor J (1988) The Oxford Knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis—the first 103 cases. J Bone Jt Surg 70 B:692–701CrossRef

Berend KR, Berend ME, Dalury DF et al (2015) Consensus statement on indications and contraindications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 24:252–256CrossRef

Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG (2005) Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg 87-A:999–1006CrossRef

Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard DJ et al (2004) Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: a comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplast 19:590–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.082 CrossRef

Pandit H, Gulati A, Jenkins C et al (2017) Unicompartmental knee replacement for patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the affected compartment. Knee 18:168–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2010.05.003 CrossRef

Maier MW, Kuhs F, Streit MR et al (2015) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with full versus partial thickness cartilage loss (PTCL): equal in clinical outcome but with higher reoperation rate for patients with PTCL. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:1169–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2236-4 CrossRefPubMed

Hamilton TW, Pandit HG, Ostlere SJ et al (2017) Unsatisfactory outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with partial thickness cartilage loss. Bone Joint J 99:475–482. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1061.R1 CrossRefPubMed

Polkowski GG II, Ruh EL, Barrack RM, Nunley RLB (2013) Is pain and dissatisfaction after TKA related to early-grade preoperative osteoarthritis ? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2465-6 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Howell RE, Lombardi AV, Crilly R Jr, Opolot S, Berend KR (2015) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does a selection bias exist? J Arthroplast 30:1740–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.010 CrossRef

11.

Williams DP, Blakey CM, Hadfield SG et al (2013) Long-term trends in the Oxford knee score following total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 95-B:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.28573 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM (2010) An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92:413–418. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22913 CrossRef

13.

Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS (2012) The “Forgotten Joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty. Validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplast 27:430–436.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035 CrossRef

14.

Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Clement ND, MacDonald D, Simpson AHRW (2014) The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1933–1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2776-5 CrossRef

16.

Kalairajah Y, Orth F, Azurza K et al (2005) Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties—a comparison between the Harris Hip Score and the Oxford Hip Score. J Arthroplast 20:1037–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.017 CrossRef

17.

Peterfy CG (2002) Imaging of the disease process. Curr Opin Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BOR.0000025608.46603.62 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Weidow J, Mars I, Cederlund C-G, Kärrholm J (2004) Standing radiographs underestimate joint width: comparison before and after resection of the joint in 34 total knee arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 75:315–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470410001259 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Keyes GW, Carra J, Miller RK, Goodfellow JW (1992) The radiographic classification of medial gonarthrosis. Correlation with operation methods in 200 knees. Acta Orthop Scand 63:497–501. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679209154722 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mukherjee K, Pandit H, Dodd CA et al (2008) The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiological perspective. Clin Radiol 63:1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2007.12.017 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mikkelsen M (2016) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiographic indications study. Master thesis, Copenhagen Univ, pp 1–9

22.

Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF (2011) The position and orientation of total knee replacement components. J Bone Jt Surg 93:629–633. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25893 CrossRef

23.

Nishio Y, Onodera T, Kasahara Y, Takahashi D, Iwasaki NMT (2017) Intraoperative medial pivot affects deep knee flexion angle and patient-reported outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 29:702–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.035 CrossRef

24.

Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J et al (2015) Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 68:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Thomsen MG, Latifi R, Kallemose T et al (2016) Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1001-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Wise BL, Niu J, Yang MEI et al (2012) Patterns of compartment involvement in tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in men and women and in Whites and African Americans. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64:847–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21606 CrossRef

27.

Felson DT, Nevitt MC, Zhang Y et al (2002) High prevalence of lateral knee osteoarthritis in Beijing Chinese compared with Framingham Caucasian subjects. Arthritis Rheumatol 46:1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10293 CrossRef

28.

Hadi M, Barlow T, Ahmed I et al (2016) Does malalignment affect patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Springerplus 5:1201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2790-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Parratte S, Pagnano M, Trousdale R, Berry D (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Jt Surg 92:2143–2149. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01398 CrossRef

30.

Lanyon P, O’Reilly S, Jones A, Doherty M (1998) Radiographic assessment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the community: definitions and normal joint space. Ann Rheum Dis 57:595–601. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.57.10.595 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Beattie KA, Duryea J, Pui M et al (2008) Minimum joint space width and tibial cartilage morphology in the knees of healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-119 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis achieve the greatest improvement in patient reported outcome after total knee arthroplasty
verfasst von: Iben Rønne Jessing
Mette Mikkelsen
Kirill Gromov
Henrik Husted
Thomas Kallemose
Anders Troelsen
Publikationsdatum: 22.01.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03337-2

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis achieve the greatest improvement in patient reported outcome after total knee arthroplasty

Abstract

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Influence of poor preparation and sleep deficit on injury incidence in amateur small field football of both gender

Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell implantation for osteoarthritis of the knee

The relationship of the acromion to the distal clavicle in normal and symptomatic degenerated acromioclavicular joints

External iliac artery thrombosis following open reduction of acetabular fracture: a case report and literature review

Correction to: Fewer patients undergo surgery when adding a comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with a hip fracture

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie