Introduction
Recently, PET radiotracers targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), labeled with either
68Ga or
18F, have demonstrated favorable results for imaging men with prostate cancer (PCa) in a variety of clinical contexts [
1‐
3]. Moreover, the potential utility of imaging non-prostate malignancies such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has begun to be more widely reported [
4]. Compared to the more commonly used
68Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted agents, the
18F-labeled PSMA-targeted radioligand
18F-DCFPyL possesses the inherent advantages of a longer physical half-life, lower positron energy, and higher positron yield, and there have also been suggestions of a higher detection rate for sites of disease as well as an increased tumor-to-background ratio [
5].
Regarding the biodistribution of PSMA-targeted agents, the variability of
18F-DCFPyL uptake in several solid organs was recently assessed and demonstrated a visually homogenous uptake in the normal liver along with intrinsic variability even lower than 2-deoxy-2-[
18F]fluoro-
d-glucose (
18F-FDG). Uptake was also noted in the lacrimal glands, salivary glands, spleen, kidneys, and small bowel [
6].
68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC, the most commonly used of the
68Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted radiotracers, parallels the biodistribution of
18F-DCFPyL, with focal uptake in all the same organs and with both radiotracers having the highest uptake in the kidneys [
6]. The similar biodistributions of these PSMA-targeted agents suggest that normal variant sites of uptake and potential interpretive pitfalls will be similar between these compounds. Indeed, a number of potential false-positive findings have been described that the interpreting imaging specialist should be aware of while analyzing
18F-DCFPyL or
68Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted PET scans, including increased radiotracer accumulation in various benign entities (e.g., in adrenal or thyroid adenomas as well as in Paget’s disease [
7‐
9]).
Interestingly, PSMA expression has been described in nervous tissue, where this protein is known as glutamate carboxypeptidase II or
N-acetylated-alpha-linked acidic dipeptidase (NAALADase). In fact, PSMA has been recognized as a potential therapeutic target in several neurological disorders [
10,
11]. PSMA-targeted PET radiotracer uptake has also been seen in sympathetic chain and ganglion structures and should be considered physiologic rather than pathologic, particularly in the celiac and stellate ganglia [
12]. To further investigate the pattern of PSMA-targeted radiotracer uptake within ganglia on a larger scale, we performed a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the peripheral ganglia of patients with PCa and RCC who were imaged with
18F-DCFPyL PET/CT on one of several prospective protocols evaluating this radiotracer. We would anticipate that the results of this study would be applicable to other PSMA-targeted radiotracers.
Results
A total of 76 PCa patients with a mean age of 64 ± 7.2 years (range 47–81 years) and 22 RCC patients with a mean age of 57.8 ± 10.1 (range 34–73 years) were included in our analysis. The majority of the subjects were of white race for both the PCa (n = 65, 85.5%) and the RCC (n = 21, 95.5%) cohort. The clinical indication for imaging included preoperative PCa staging (18/76, 23.7%) and evaluation of recurrent/metastatic disease (58/76, 76.3%). For the RCC patients, similar indications were noted with preoperative staging in 6/22 (27.3%) and recurrent/metastatic disease evaluation in 16/22 (72.7%).
All patients
In 95/98 (96.9%) patients, visually discernible PSMA-targeted ligand uptake in at least one of the above-indicated peripheral ganglia were identified (96.0% of PCa and 100.0% RCC patients). PSMA-ligand uptake above background was found in 70/98 (71.4%) patients in cervical ganglia, 60/98 (61.2%) patients in stellate ganglia, 57/98 (58.2%) patients in celiac ganglia, 75/98 (76.5%) patients in lumbar ganglia, and 8/98 (8.2%) patients in sacral ganglia. The mean SUVmax ± SD were 1.82 ± 0.34, 1.67 ± 0.47, 1.77 ± 0.59, 1.76 ± 0.31, and 1.91 ± 0.45 in the cervical, stellate, celiac, lumbar and sacral ganglia, respectively.
No laterality preference was found in 18F-DCFPyL uptake in cervical, stellate, celiac, lumbar and sacral ganglia when comparing the left and right SUV values, neither for the PCa nor for the RCC cohort (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).
Table
1 summarizes the frequency of
18F-DCFPyL uptake and the involved peripheral ganglia in both the PCa and RCC cohorts. The mean SUV
max, SUL
max and the background ratios (Aorta
mean, Gluteus
mean) of the detected ganglia are given in Table
2. The displayed uptake values are generally quite low; however, the low blood pool and background activity of
18F-DCFPyL enable a robust differentiation of ganglia from surrounding tissue [
3].
Table 1
Characteristics of peripheral ganglia identified on 18F-DCFPyL PET in patients with prostate cancer (n = 76) and renal cell carcinoma (n = 22)
Prostate cancer |
Cervical | 51/76 (67.1%) | 30/51 (58.8%) | 102 R, 86 L |
C3 | 16/76 | 11/16 | 14 R, 13 L |
C4 | 22/76 | 10/22 | 18 R, 14 L |
C5 | 20/76 | 11/20 | 19 R, 12 L |
C6 | 29/76 | 14/29 | 23 R, 20 L |
C7 | 20/76 | 11/20 | 14 R, 17 L |
C8 | 19/76 | 5/19 | 14 R, 10 L |
Stellate | 50/76 (65.8%) | 20/50 (40.0%) | 41 R, 29 L |
Celiac | 45/76 (59.2%) | 30/45 (66.7%) | 39 R, 36 L |
Lumbar | 55/76 (72.4%) | 44/55 (80.0%) | 111 R, 103 L |
L2 | 13/76 | 8/13 | 10 R, 11 L |
L3 | 38/76 | 29/38 | 34 R, 33 L |
L4 | 46/76 | 30/46 | 40 R, 36 L |
L5 | 28/76 | 22/28 | 27 R, 23 L |
Sacral | 5/76 (6.6%) | 2/5 (40.0%) | 4 R, 3 L |
Renal cell carcinoma |
Cervical | 19/22 (86.4%) | 15/19 (78.9%) | 44 R, 48 L |
C3 | 12/22 | 9/12 | 10 R, 11 L |
C4 | 5/22 | 2/5 | 2 R, 5 L |
C5 | 10/22 | 5/10 | 7 R, 8 L |
C6 | 9/22 | 4/9 | 6 R, 7 L |
C7 | 12/22 | 9/12 | 10 R, 11 L |
C8 | 10/22 | 5/10 | 9 R, 6 L |
Stellate | 10/22 (45.4%) | 7/10 (70.0%) | 8 R, 9 L |
Celiac | 12/22 (54.5%) | 1/12 (8.3%) | 5 R, 8 L |
Lumbar | 20/22 (90.9%) | 17/20 (85.0%) | 43 R, 44 L |
L2 | 7/22 | 4/7 | 6 R, 5 L |
L3 | 15/22 | 12/15 | 13 R, 14 L |
L4 | 17/22 | 11/17 | 13 R, 15 L |
L5 | 13/22 | 8/13 | 11 R, 10 L |
Sacral | 3/22 (13.6%) | 1/3 (33.3%) | 1 R, 3 L |
Table 2
Quantitative analysis of the investigated peripheral ganglia identified on 18F-DCFPyL PET for both cohorts
Prostate cancer |
Cervical | 1.82 (0.36) | 1.36 (0.26) | 4.37 (1.30) | 4.16 (1.21) | 1.36 (0.39) | 1.49 (1.00) |
Stellate | 1.69 (0.49) | 1.28 (0.37) | 4.23 (1.48) | 3.93 (1.31) | 1.30 (0.45) | 1.45 (1.05) |
Celiac | 1.69 (0.58) | 1.28 (0.46) | 4.29 (2.11) | 4.11 (1.70) | 1.26 (0.57) | 1.43 (1.43) |
Lumbar | 1.78 (0.31) | 1.34 (0.22) | 4.55 (1.14) | 4.26 (1.34) | 1.35 (0.36) | 1.47 (0.74) |
Sacral | 1.85 (0.52) | 1.33 (0.30) | 4.20 (1.97) | 3.85 (1.16) | 1.37 (0.39) | 1.37 (0.39) |
Renal cell carcinoma |
Cervical | 1.81 (0.29) | 1.30 (0.22) | 3.73 (1.33) | 3.67 (1.39) | 1.48 (0.91) | 1.60 (1.13) |
Stellate | 1.56 (0.36) | 1.17 (0.36) | 3.45 (1.90) | 3.35 (2.00) | 1.06 (0.29) | 1.08 (0.30) |
Celiac | 2.06 (0.55) | 1.44 (0.42) | 4.30 (1.61) | 3.90 (1.84) | 2.18 (2.14) | 2.09 (2.03) |
Lumbar | 1.71 (0.32) | 1.21 (0.17) | 3.43 (1.13) | 3.43 (1.21) | 1.43 (0.88) | 1.52 (1.05) |
Sacral | 2.03 (0.38) | 1.42 (0.38) | 4.30 (2.59) | 4.29 (2.63) | 3.73 (2.26) | 3.64 (2.14) |
Uptake in ganglia of PCa patients
With regard to the cervical ganglia, 51/76 (67.1%) PCa patients had uptake in at least one cervical ganglia with similar findings for both sides [left 86 ganglia, right 102 ganglia, with bilateral uptake in at least one ganglion in 30/51 (58.8%) patients]. The most frequent site of radiotracer accumulation was observed at the C6 level with 29/76 (38.2%) patients having positive uptake. Regarding the stellate ganglia, 50/76 (65.8%) were positive [left 29 ganglia, right 41 ganglia, and bilateral 20/50 (40.0%)], whereas for celiac ganglia, 45/76 (59.2%) showed 18F-DCFPyL uptake [left 36 ganglia, right 39 ganglia, and bilateral 30/45 (66.7%)]. Of note, the lumbar ganglia were positive in the majority of the subjects (55/76, 72.4%) with closely analogous findings for both sides [left 103 ganglia, right 111 ganglia, and bilateral 44/55 (80.0%)]. Discernible radiotracer uptake was most commonly observed at the L4 level with 46/76 (60.5%) positive subjects. Regarding sacral ganglia, only 5/76 (6.6%) demonstrated 18F-DCFPyL accumulation [left 3 ganglia, right 4 ganglia, and bilateral 2/5 (40%)].
Uptake in ganglia of RCC patients
Radiotracer uptake was observed in the cervical ganglia in 19/22 patients with RCC [86.4%; left 48 ganglia, right 44 ganglia, and bilateral 15/19 (78.9%)]. Most frequently uptake could be found in the level of C3 and C7 in 12/22 (54.5%), respectively. In the stellate ganglia, 10/22 (45.5%) of the patients demonstrated discernible radiotracer uptake and in the celiac ganglia, 12/22 (54.5%) subjects were positive. Of note, the most frequent site of uptake was in the lumbar ganglia [20/22 (90.9%), left 44 ganglia, right 43 ganglia and bilateral, 17/20 (85%)] with most frequent findings in L4 [17/22 (77.3%)]. Only 3/22 (13.6%) of the RCC patients demonstrated 18F-DCFPyL accumulation in sacral ganglia.
Discussion
The present study describes the uptake patterns in peripheral ganglia, which can act as potential pitfalls when clinically interpreting 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT scans for both PCa and RCC. There was a general trend with a descending frequency of radiotracer accumulation in lumbar, cervical, stellate, celiac, and sacral ganglia. An inexperienced clinical reader could identify uptake in these physiological structures as potential sites of metastatic disease, although many of the peripheral ganglia that have been observed to have uptake are somewhat separated anatomically from typical lymph nodes that become involved with metastatic disease (the most clear exception being the celiac ganglia). Additionally, the cervical, lumbar, and sacral ganglia could potentially be mistaken for bone metastatic disease, particularly if there is slight misregistration between the PET and CT acquisitions or if the uptake is distinctly unilateral.
Generally, the stellate ganglion can also be easily identified on anatomical imaging and this was a common site of uptake in our study (65.8% in PCa) [
14]. The ganglia most likely to be misinterpreted as disease-involved lymph nodes are the celiac, as described in a manuscript with extensive pathologic correlation by Krohn and coworkers who were utilizing the PSMA-targeted agent
68Ga-PMSA-HBED [
12]. Recently, using the same radiotracer, Kanthan et al. reported similar results, with up to 81% positive uptake findings in the celiac and 74% in the stellate ganglia [
15]. In the present study, we evaluated the PSMA-targeted ligand uptake across all peripheral ganglia, both in RCC and PCa patients using
18F-DCFPyL. Compared to the above-mentioned investigations, our number of positive findings was lower in the celiac (59.2%) and stellate ganglia (65.8%). This may be due to a variety of factors including potential improved spatial/contrast resolution of an
18F-labeled radiotracer [
16] or perhaps the different underlying chemical structures of the radiotracers which could profoundly impact localization in a primarily hydrophobic environment such as a ganglion [
5,
17]. Moreover, the study population of our cohort was almost 10 years younger than the populations in the studies by Krohn [
12] and Kanthan [
15]. In a study of more than 7400 participants, Steiber and coworkers concluded that the average physical health in an elder population declines age-dependently [
18]. Keeping in mind that physical inactivity is an important cause of most chronic diseases as well as playing a role in pain perception [
19], our “younger” population included in the current study might have suffered from less biological chronic disease/pain-associated sensation of the celiac ganglia.
Investigating lumbar DRG by 3D magnetic resonance imaging in healthy volunteers, 90% of the DRG showed an intermediate signal intensity, which is in line with the frequency of uptake in our PCa (72.4%) and RCC (90.9%) cohorts [
20]. Hence, while interpreting
18F-DCFPyL PET, a clinical reader should keep in mind that physiological uptake in the lumbar region is a frequent phenomenon which could be falsely mistaken as a metastatic site, similar to potential false-positive findings in the celiac ganglia [
12]. The same tendency of gradually increasing findings of DRG from L1 to L5 [entire cohort: L2, 20/98 (20.4%) vs. L4, 63/98 (64.3%)], the more frequent occurrence of bilateral ganglia in L4 (entire cohort: 41/63, 65.1%) as well as the fact that the right-left difference in PSMA-uptake reached no significance, could also be observed in the present study [
20,
21].
This study has several limitations. First, given its retrospective nature, further confirmatory studies are warranted. Second, no histologic proof of the obtained PET results can be given in light of the benign nature and characteristic locations of ganglia. Moreover, ganglia uptake may be underestimated as partial volume effects have to be considered in small structures less than 15 mm.
Compliance with ethical standards