nach oben

Erschienen in:

18.07.2020 | Review Article

Pearl and pitfalls in brain functional analysis by event-related potentials: a narrative review by the Italian Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Society on methodological limits and clinical reliability—part II

verfasst von: Marina de Tommaso, Viviana Betti, Tommaso Bocci, Nadia Bolognini, Francesco Di Russo, Francesco Fattapposta, Raffaele Ferri, Sara Invitto, Giacomo Koch, Carlo Miniussi, Francesco Piccione, Aldo Ragazzoni, Ferdinando Sartucci, Simone Rossi, Massimiliano Valeriani

Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This review focuses on new and/or less standardized event-related potentials methods, in order to improve their knowledge for future clinical applications. The olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs) assess the olfactory functions in time domain, with potential utility in anosmia and degenerative diseases. The transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) could support the investigation of the intracerebral connections with very high temporal discrimination. Its application in the diagnosis of disorders of consciousness has achieved recent confirmation. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and event-related fields (ERF) could improve spatial accuracy of scalp signals, with potential large application in pre-surgical study of epileptic patients. Although these techniques have methodological limits, such as high inter- and intraindividual variability and high costs, their diffusion among researchers and clinicians is hopeful, pending their standardization.

Kobal G, Hummel T (1994) Olfactory (chemosensory) event-related potentials. Toxicol Ind Health 10:587–596PubMed

Landis BN, Negoias S, Friedrich H (2016) Chemosensorisch evozierte Potenziale chemosensory event related potentials. Epileptologie 33:189–196

Kobal G, Plattig KH (1978) Objective olfactometry: methodological annotations for recording olfactory EEG-responses from the awake human. Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb 9:135–145

Kobal G (1985) Gustatory evoked potentials in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Evoked Potentials 62:449–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(85)90055-3CrossRefPubMed

Bonanni E, Borghetti D, Fabbrini M, Maestri M, Cignoni F, Sartucci F (2006) Quantitative EEG analysis in post-traumatic anosmia. Brain Res Bull 71:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.08.004CrossRefPubMed

Hu B, Han D, Zhang L, Li Y, Zang H, Wang T, Xian M, Zhang W, Yang L, Wang H, He F (2010) Olfactory event-related potential in patients with rhinosinusitis-induced olfactory dysfunction. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24(5):330–335. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3517CrossRefPubMed

Lötsch J, Hummel T (2006) The clinical significance of electrophysiological measures of olfactory function. Behav Brain Res 170:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.02.013CrossRefPubMed

Luck SJ (2005). An introduction to event-related potentials and their neural origins. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, London

Murphy C, Morgan CD, Geisler MW, Wetter S, Covington JW, Madowitz MD (2000) Olfactory event-related potentials and aging: normative data. Int J Psychophysiol 36:133–145PubMed

10.

Rombaux P, Mouraux A, Bertrand B, Guerit J, Hummel T (2006) Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials. Neurophysiol Clin 36:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2006.03.005CrossRefPubMed

11.

Wang L (2002) The correlation between physiological and psychological responses to odour stimulation in human subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 113:542–551PubMed

12.

Pause BM, Sojka B, Krauel K, Ferstl R (1996) The nature of the late positive complex within the olfactory event- related potential (OERP). Psychophysiology 33:376–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01062.xCrossRefPubMed

13.

Pause BM, Krauel K (2000) Chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP) as a key to the psychology of odors. Int J Psychophysiol 36:105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00105-1CrossRefPubMed

14.

Kettenmann B, Hummel C, Stefan H, Kobal G (1997) Multiple olfactory activity in the human neocortex identified by magnetic source imaging. Chem Senses 22:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/22.5.493CrossRefPubMed

15.

Geisler MW, Murphy C (2000) Event-related brain potentials to attended and ignored olfactory and trigeminal stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 37:309–315PubMed

16.

Picton TW (1992) The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol 9:456–479. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002CrossRefPubMed

17.

Picton TW (2000) Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37:127–152PubMed

18.

Porter J, Anand T, Johnson B, Khan RM, Sobel N (2005) Brain mechanisms for extracting spatial information from smell. Neuron 47:581–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.028CrossRefPubMed

19.

Auffermann H, Mathe F, Gerull G, Mrowinski D (1993) Olfactory evoked potentials and contingent negative variation simultaneously recorded for diagnosis of smell disorders. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949310200102CrossRefPubMed

20.

Sirous M, Sinning N, Schneider TR, Friese U, Lorenz J, Engel AK (2019) Chemosensory event-related potentials in response to nasal propylene glycol stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 13:99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00099CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, DiNardo LJ, Reiter ER (2001) Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:497–503PubMed

22.

Invitto S, Piraino G, Ciccarese V, Carmillo L, Caggiula M, Trianni G (2018) Potential role of OERP as early marker of mild cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci 10:272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Lorig TS, Schwartz GE (1988) Brain and odor: I. Alteration of human EEG by odor administration. Psychobiology. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327318

24.

Mazzatenta A, Pokorski M, Di Tano A, Cacchio M, Di Giulio C (2016) Influence of sensory stimulation on exhaled volatile organic compounds. Adv Exp Med Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2015_176

25.

Morgan CD, Murphy C (2002) Olfactory event-related potentials in Alzheimer’s disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 8:753–763PubMed

26.

Iannilli E, Stephan L, Hummel T, Reichmann H, Haehner A (2017) Olfactory impairment in Parkinson’s disease is a consequence of central nervous system decline. J Neurol 264:1236–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8521-0CrossRefPubMed

27.

Lorig TS (1989) Human EEG and odor response. Prog Neurobiol 33:387–398PubMed

28.

Doty RL (2012) Smell and taste. In: Sinclair AJ, Morley JE, Vellas B (eds) Pathy’s principles and practice of geriatric medicine, Fifth edn. Wiley, p 1061–1072

29.

Malaty J, Malaty IAC (2013) Smell and taste disorders in primary care. Am Fam Physician 88:852–859

30.

Nigri A, Ferraro S, Bruzzone MG, Nava S, D’Incerti L, Bertolino N et al (2016) Central olfactory processing in patients with disorders of consciousness. Eur J Neurol 23:605–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12907CrossRefPubMed

31.

Croy I, Hummel T (2017) Olfaction as a marker for depression. J Neurol 264:631–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8227-8CrossRefPubMed

32.

Dileo JF, Brewer WJ, Hopwood M, Anderson V, Creamer M (2008) Olfactory identification dysfunction, aggression and impulsivity in war veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychol Med 38:523–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707001456CrossRefPubMed

33.

Vermetten E, Bremner JD (2003) Olfaction as a traumatic reminder in posttraumatic stress disorder: case reports and review. J Clin Psychiatry 64:202–207. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v64n0214CrossRefPubMed

34.

Moberg PJ, Agrin R, Gur RE, Gur RC, Turetsky BI, Doty RL (1999) Olfactory dysfunction in schizophrenia: a qualitative and quantitative review. Neuropsychopharmacology. 21:325–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00019-6CrossRefPubMed

35.

Stevenson RJ (2013) Olfactory perception, cognition, and dysfunction in humans. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1224

36.

Turetsky BI, Hahn CG, Borgmann-Winter K, Moberg PJ (2009) Scents and nonsense: olfactory dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 35:1117–1131. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Olofsson JK, Broman DA, Gilbert PE, Dean P, Nordin S, Murphy C (2006) Laterality of the olfactory event-related potential response:699–704. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjl011

38.

Frasnelli J, Schuster B, Hummel T (2007) Interactions between olfaction and the trigeminal system: what can be learned from olfactory loss. Cereb Cortex 17:2268–2275PubMed

39.

Hummel T, Livermore A (2002) Intranasal chemosensory function of the trigeminal nerve and aspects of its relation to olfaction. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:305–313PubMed

40.

Attems J, Walker L, Jellinger KA (2015) Olfaction and aging: a mini-review. Gerontology 61:485–490. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381619CrossRefPubMed

41.

Schriever VA, Góis-Eanes M, Schuster B, Huart C, Hummel T (2014) Olfactory event-related potentials in infants. J Pediatr 165:372–375.e2PubMed

42.

Brauchli P, Rüegg PB, Etzweiler F, Zeier H (1995) Electrocortical and autonomic alteration by administration of a pleasant and an unpleasant odor. Chem Senses 20:505–515PubMed

43.

Martin GN (2013) The neuropsychology of smell and taste. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070147

44.

Chaudhury D, Manella L, Arellanos A, Escanilla O, Cleland TA, Linster C (2010) Olfactory bulb habituation to odor stimuli. Behav Neurosci 124:490–499PubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Poellinger A, Thomas R, Lio P, Lee A, Makris N, Rosen BR, Kwong KK (2001) Activation and habituation in olfaction--an fMRI study. Neuroimage 13:547–560. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0713CrossRefPubMed

46.

Frank RA, Rybalsky K, Brearton M, Mannea E (2011) Odor recognition memory as a function of odor-naming performance. Chem Senses 36:29–41PubMed

47.

Invitto S, Piraino G, Mignozzi A, Capone S, Montagna G, Siciliano PA et al (2017) Smell and meaning: an OERP study. Smart Innov Syst Technol:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56904-8_28

48.

Invitto S, Mazzatenta A (2019) Olfactory event-related potentials and exhaled organic volatile compounds: the slow link between olfactory perception and breath metabolic response a pilot study on phenylethyl alcohol and vaseline oil. Brain Sci 9:84. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9040084CrossRefPubMedCentral

49.

Kobal G, Hummel T (1998) Olfactory and intranasal trigeminal event-related potentials in anosmic patients. Laryngoscope 108:1033–1035PubMed

50.

Hummel T, Kaehling C, Grosse F (2016) Automated assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Rhinology:54. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin15.002

51.

Boesveldt S, Haehner A, Berendse HW, Hummel T (2007) Signal-to-noise ratio of chemosensory event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 118:690–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.004CrossRefPubMed

52.

Invitto S, Calcagnì A, Piraino G, Ciccarese V, Balconi M, De Tommaso M et al (2019) Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and olfactory perception: an OERP study. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 259:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2018.07.002CrossRefPubMed

53.

Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL (1985) Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1(8437):1106–1107PubMed

54.

Ilmoniemi RJ, Kičić D (2010) Methodology for combined TMS and EEG. Brain Topogr 22(4):233–248PubMed

55.

Amassian VE, Cracco RQ (1987) Human cerebral cortical responses to contralateral transcranial stimulation. Neurosurgery 20(1):148–155PubMed

56.

Cracco RQ, Amassian VE, Maccabee PJ, Cracco JB (1989) Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 74:417–424PubMed

57.

Ilmoniemi RJ, Virtanen J, Ruohonen J, Karhu J, Aronen HJ, Näätänen R (1997) Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity. Neuroreport 8:3537–3540PubMed

58.

Pellicciari MC, Brignani D, Miniussi C (2013) Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach. Neuroimage 83:569–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.076CrossRefPubMed

59.

Romero Lauro LJ, Rosanova M, Mattavelli G, Convento S, Pisoni A, Opitz A, Bolognini N, Vallar G (2014) TDCS increases cortical excitability: direct evidence from TMS-EEG. Cortex 58:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.003CrossRefPubMed

60.

Rajji TK, Sun Y, Zomorrodi-Moghaddam R, Farzan F, Blumberger DM, Mulsant BH, Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ (2013) PAS-induced potentiation of cortical-evoked activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 38(12):2545–2552. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.161CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Mattavelli G, Pisoni A, Romero Lauro LJ, Marino BF, Bonomi M, Rosanova M, Papagno C (2019) TMSEEG approach unveils brain mechanisms underlying conscious and unconscious face perception. Brain Stimul 12(4):1010–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.02.022CrossRefPubMed

62.

Pisoni A, Romero Lauro LJ, Vergallito A, Maddaluno O, Bolognini N (2018) Cortical dynamics underpinning the self-other distinction of touch: a TMS-EEG study. Neuroimage 178:475–484PubMed

63.

Casarotto S, Comanducci A, Rosanova M, Sarasso S, Fecchio M, Napolitani M, Pigorini A, G. Casali A, Trimarchi PD, Boly M, Gosseries O, Bodart O, Curto F, Landi C, Mariotti M, Devalle G, Laureys S, Tononi G, Massimini M (2016) Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity. Ann Neurol 80:718–729PubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Thut G, Miniussi C (2009) New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS–EEG studies. Trends Cogn Sci 13:182–189PubMed

65.

Thut G, Veniero D, Romei V, Miniussi C, Schyns P, Gross J (2011) Rhythmic TMS causes local entrainment of natural oscillatory signatures. Curr Biol 21(14):1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.049CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Rosanova M, Casali A, Bellina V, Resta F, Mariotti M, Massimini MJ (2009) Natural frequencies of human corticothalamic circuits. Neurosci 29(24):7679–7685. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0445-09.2009CrossRef

67.

Bonato C, Miniussi C, Rossini PM (2006) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: a TMS/EEG co-registration study. Clin Neurophysiol 117:1699–1707PubMed

68.

Lioumis P, Kicić D, Savolainen P, Mäkelä JP, Kähkönen S (2009) Reproducibility of TMS-evoked EEG responses. Hum Brain Mapp 30(4):1387–1396. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20608CrossRefPubMed

69.

Nikouline V, Ruohonen J, Ilmoniemi RJ (1999) The role of the coil click in TMS assessed with imultaneous. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 110:1325–1328PubMed

70.

Tremblay S, Rogasch NC, Premoli I, Blumberger DM, Casarotto S, Chen R (2019) Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG. Clin Neurophysiol 12:4534–4577

71.

Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Huber R, Esser SK, Singh H, Tononi G (2005) Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. Science 309(5744):2228–2232PubMed

72.

Premoli I, Castellanos N, Rivolta D, Belardinelli P, Bajo R, Zipser C, Espenhahn S, Heidegger T, Müller-Dahlhaus F, Ziemann U (2014) TMS-EEG signatures of GABAergic neurotransmission in the human cortex. J Neurosci 34:5603–5612PubMedPubMedCentral

73.

Zanon M, Battaglini PP, Jarmolowska J, Pizzolato G, Busan P (2013) Long-range neural activity evoked by premotor cortex stimulation: a TMS/EEG co-registration study. Front Hum Neurosci 7:803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00803CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

74.

Fecchio M, Pigorini A, Comanducci A, Sarasso S, Casarotto S, Premoli I, Derchi CC, Mazza A, Russo S, Resta F, Ferrarelli F, Mariotti M, Ziemann U, Massimini M, Rosanova (2017) The spectral features of EEG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex depend on the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials. PLoS One 12(9):e0184910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184910CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

75.

Salo VC, Ferrari PF, Fox NA (2019) The role of the motor system in action understanding and communication: evidence from human infants and non-human primates. Dev Psychobiol 61(3):390–401PubMed

76.

Pisoni A, Mattavelli G, Papagno P, Rosanova M, Casali AG, Romero Lauro LJ (2018) Cognitive enhancement induced by anodal tDCS drives circuit-specific cortical plasticity. Cereb Cortex 28:1132–1140PubMed

77.

Koch G, Bonnì S, Pellicciari MC, Casula EP, Mancini M, Esposito R, Ponzo V, Picazio S, Di Lorenzo F, Serra L, Motta C, Maiella M, Marra C, Cercignani M, Martorana A, Caltagirone C, Bozzali M (2018) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the precuneus enhances memory and neural activity in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 1(169):302–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.048CrossRef

78.

Koch G, Bonnì S, Casula EP, Iosa M, Paolucci S, Pellicciari MC et al (2019) Effect of cerebellar stimulation on gait and balance recovery in patients with hemiparetic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 76:170–178

79.

Zazio A, Bortoletto M, Ruzzoli M, Miniussi C, Veniero D (2019) Perceptual and physiological consequences of dark adaptation: a TMS-EEG study. Brain Topogr 32:773–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-019-00715-xCrossRefPubMed

80.

Bergmann TO, Karabanov A, Hartwigsen G, Thielscher A, Siebner HR (2016) Combining non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation with neuroimaging and electrophysiology: current approaches and future perspectives. Neuroimage 140:4–19PubMed

81.

Bortoletto M, Veniero D, Thut G, Miniussi C (2015) The contribution of TMS-EEG coregistration in the exploration of the human cortical connectome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 49:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.014CrossRefPubMed

82.

Farzan F, Barr MS, Levinson AJ, Chen R, Wong W, Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ (2010) Reliability of long interval cortical inhibition in healthy human subjects: a TMSEEG study. J Neurophysiol 104:1339–1346PubMed

83.

Koch G, Ponzo V, Di Lorenzo F, Caltagirone C, Veniero D (2013) Hebbian and anti-hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity of human cortico-cortical connections. J Neurosci 33:9725–9733PubMedPubMedCentral

84.

Casula EP, Pellicciari MC, Picazio S, Caltagirone C, Koch G (2016) Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in the human dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 143:204–213PubMed

85.

Ragazzoni A, Cincotta M, Giovannelli F, Cruse D, Young GB, Miniussi C, Rossi S (2017) Clinical neurophysiology of prolonged disorders of consciousness: from diagnostic stimulation to therapeutic neuromodulation. Clin Neurophysiol 128(9):1629–1646PubMed

86.

Sun Y, Farzan F, Mulsant BH, Rajji TK, Fitzgerald PB, Barr MS, Downar J, Wong W, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ (2016) Indicators for remission of suicidal ideation following magnetic seizure therapy in patients with treatment-resistant depression. JAMA Psychiatry 73:337–345PubMed

87.

Casarotto S, Canali P, Rosanova M, Pigorini A, Fecchio M, Mariotti M, Lucca A, Colombo C, Benedetti F, Massimini M (2013) Assessing the effects of electroconvulsive therapy on cortical excitability by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography. Brain Topogr 26(2):326–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0256-8CrossRefPubMed

88.

Pellicciari MC, Ponzo V, Caltagirone C, Koch G (2017) Restored asymmetry of prefrontal cortical oscillatory activity after bilateral theta burst stimulation treatment in a patient with major depressive disorder: a TMS-EEG study. Brain Stimul 10:147–149PubMed

89.

Pellicciari MC, Bonnì S, Ponzo V, Cinnera AM, Mancini M, Casula EP, Sallustio F, Paolucci S, Caltagirone C, Koch G (2018) Dynamic reorganization of TMS-evoked activity in subcortical stroke patients. Neuroimage 175:365–378PubMed

90.

Bagattini C, Mutanen TP, Fracassi C, Manenti R, Cotelli M, Ilmoniemi RJ, Miniussi C, Bortoletto M (2019) Predicting Alzheimer’s disease severity by means of TMS-EEG coregistration. Neurobiol Aging 80:38–45PubMed

91.

Mutanen TP, Kukkonen M, Nieminen JO, Stenroos M, Sarvas J, Ilmoniemi RJ (2016) Recovering TMS-evoked EEG responses masked by muscle artifacts. Neuroimage 139:157–166PubMed

92.

Mutanen TP, Metsomaa J, Liljander S, Ilmoniemi RJ (2018) Automatic and robust noise suppression in EEG and MEG: the SOUND algorithm. Neuroimage 166:135–151PubMed

93.

Conde V, Tomasevic L, Akopian I, Stanek K, Saturnino GB, Thielscher A, Bergmann TO, Siebner HR (2019) The non-transcranial TMS evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies. Neuroimage 185:300–312PubMed

94.

Belardinelli P, Biabani M, Blumberger DM, Bortoletto M, Casarotto S, David O, Desideri D, Etkin A, Ferrarelli F, Fitzgerald PB, Fornito A, Gordon PC, Gosseries O, Harquel S, Julkunen P, Keller CJ, Kimiskidis VK, Lioumis P (2019) Reproducibility in TMS-EEG studies: a call for data sharing, standard procedures and effective experimental control. Brain Stimul 12:787–790PubMed

95.

Siebner HR, Conde V, Tomasevic L, Thielscher A, Bergmann TO (2019) Distilling the essence of TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs): a call for securing mechanistic specificity and experimental rigor. Brain Stimul 12:1051–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.03.076CrossRefPubMed

96.

Zrenner C, Belardinelli P, Müller-Dahlhaus F, Ziemann U (2016) Closed-loop neuroscience and non-invasive brain stimulation: a tale of two loops. Front Cell Neurosci 10:92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00092CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

97.

Cohen D, Cuffin BN, Yunokuchi K, Maniewski R, Purcell C, Cosgrove GR, Ives J, Kennedy JG, Schomer DL (1990) MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann Neurol 28(6):811–817PubMed

98.

Baillet S (2017) Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nat Neurosci 20(3):327–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4504CrossRefPubMed

99.

Hari R, Puce A, Baillet S, Barnes G, Burgess R, Forss N, Gross J (2018) IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG). Clin Neurophysiol 129(8):1720–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.042CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

100.

Parkkonen L (2010) Instrumentation and data preprocessing. In: Hansen C, Peter M, Kringelbach L, Salmelin R (eds) MEG: an introduction to methods. Oxford university press, New York, pp 24–64

101.

Hulten A, Schoffelen J, Udd J, Lam NHL, Hagoort P (2019) NeuroImage How the brain makes sense beyond the processing of single words – an MEG study. Annika Hult 186:586–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.035CrossRef

102.

van Es MWJ, Van Schoffelen JS (2019) Stimulus-induced gamma power predicts the amplitude of the subsequent visual evoked response. NeuroImage 186:703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.029CrossRefPubMed

103.

Näätänen R, Pakarinen S, Rinne T, Takegata R (2004) The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 115(1):140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.04.001CrossRefPubMed

104.

Recasens M, Uhlhaas PJ (2017) Test–retest reliability of the magnetic mismatch negativity response to sound duration and omission deviants. NeuroImage 157:184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.064CrossRefPubMed

105.

Thönnessen H, Zvyagintsev M, Harke KC, Boers F, Dammers J, Norra C, Mathiak K (2008) Optimized mismatch negativity paradigm reflects deficits in schizophrenia patients. A combined EEG and MEG study. Biol Psychol 77(2):205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.10.009CrossRefPubMed

106.

Tiitinen H, Alho K, Huotilainen M, Ilmoniemi RJ, Simola J, Näätänen R (1993) Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 30(5):537–540PubMed

107.

Hsiao FJ, Wu ZA, Ho LT, Lin YY (2009) Theta oscillation during auditory change detection: an MEG study. Biol Psychol 81(1):58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.01.007CrossRefPubMed

108.

Rossini PM, Tecchio F, Pizzella V, Lupoi D, Cassetta E, Pasqualetti P, Orlacchio A (1998) On the reorganization of sensory hand areas after mono-hemispheric lesion: a functional (MEG)/anatomical (MRI) integrarive study. Brain Res 782(1–2):153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01274-2CrossRefPubMed

109.

Polich J, Kok A (1995) Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review. Biol Psychol 41(2):103–146PubMed

110.

Polich J (2007) Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118(10):2128–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

111.

Mecklinger A, Maess B, Opitz B, Pfeifer E, Cheyne D, Weinberg H (1998) A MEG analysis of the P300 in visual discrimination tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Evoked Potent 108(1):45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00092-0CrossRef

112.

Linden DEJ (2005) The P300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us? Neuroscientist 11(6):563–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858405280524CrossRefPubMed

113.

Bagić AI, Knowlton RC, Rose DF, Ebersole JS (2011) American Clinical Magnetoencephalography Society Clinical Practice Guideline 1: recording and analysis of spontaneous cerebral activity*. J Clin Neurophysiol 28(4):348–354. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182272fedCrossRefPubMed

114.

Burgess RC, Funke ME, Bowyer SM, Lewine JD, Kirsch HE, Bagić AI (2011) American Clinical Magnetoencephalography Society Clinical Practice Guideline 2: presurgical functional brain mapping using magnetic evoked fields*. J Clin Neurophysiol 28(4):355–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182272ffeCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

115.

Hari R, Baillet S, Barnes G, Burgess R, Forss N, Gross J, Taulu S (2018) IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG). Clin Neurophysiol 129:1720–1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.042CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

116.

Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Chowdhury R, Hall JA, Lina J, Dubeau F, Grova C (2016) Source localization of the seizure onset zone from ictal EEG / MEG Data. 2546:2528–2546. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23191

117.

Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Chowdhury RA, Hall JA, Dubeau F, Lina JM, Grova C (2018) Clinical yield of magnetoencephalography distributed source imaging in epilepsy: a comparison with equivalent current dipole method. Hum Brain Mapp 39(1):218–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23837CrossRefPubMed

118.

Hedrich T, Pellegrino G, Kobayashi E, Lina JM, Grova C (2017) Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG. NeuroImage 157:531–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.022CrossRefPubMed

119.

Ottenhausen M, Krieg SM, Meyer B, Ringel F (2015) Functional preoperative and intraoperative mapping and monitoring: increasing safety and efficacy in glioma surgery. 38:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.FOCUS14611.Disclosure

120.

Frye RE, Rezaie R, Papanicolaou AC (2009) Functional neuroimaging of language using magnetoencephalography. Phys Life Rev 6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2008.08.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

121.

Papanicolaou C, Simos PG, Breier JI, Zouridakis G, Willmore LJ, Wheless JW, Gormley WB (1999) Magnetoencephalographic mapping of the language-specific cortex. J Neurosurg 90(1):85–93. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.1.0085CrossRefPubMed

122.

Pang EW, Wang F, Malone M, Kadis DS, Donner EJ (2011) Localization of Broca’s area using verb generation tasks in the MEG: validation against fMRI. Neurosci Lett 490(3):215–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.12.055CrossRefPubMed

123.

Salmelin R (2007) Clinical neurophysiology of language: the MEG approach. Clin Neurophysiol 118(2):237–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.07.316CrossRefPubMed

124.

Betti V, Zappasodi F, Rossini PM, Aglioti SM, Tecchio F (2009) Synchronous with your feelings: sensorimotor {gamma} band and empathy for pain. J Neurosci 29(40):12384–12392. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2759-09.2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

125.

Betti V, Della Penna S, de Pasquale F, Mantini D, Marzetti L, Romani GL, Corbetta M (2013) Natural scenes viewing alters the dynamics of functional connectivity in the human brain. Neuron 79(4):782–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.022CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

126.

Pellegrino G, Maran M, Turco C, Weis L, Pino G, Di Piccione F, Arcara G (2018) Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation reshapes resting-state brain networks: a magnetoencephalography assessment. Neural Plast 2018:2782804. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2782804

127.

Sorrentino P, Rucco R, Jacini F, Trojsi F, Lardone A, Baselice F, Sorrentino G (2018) Brain functional networks become more connected as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progresses: a source level magnetoencephalographic study. NeuroImage 20:564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.08.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

128.

Paggiaro A, Birbaumer N, Cavinato M, Turco C, Formaggio E, Del Felice A, Piccione F (2016) Magnetoencephalography in stroke recovery and rehabilitation. Front Neurol 7:35PubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Pearl and pitfalls in brain functional analysis by event-related potentials: a narrative review by the Italian Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Society on methodological limits and clinical reliability—part II
verfasst von: Marina de Tommaso
Viviana Betti
Tommaso Bocci
Nadia Bolognini
Francesco Di Russo
Francesco Fattapposta
Raffaele Ferri
Sara Invitto
Giacomo Koch
Carlo Miniussi
Francesco Piccione
Aldo Ragazzoni
Ferdinando Sartucci
Simone Rossi
Massimiliano Valeriani
Publikationsdatum: 18.07.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Elektronische ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04527-x

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

18.04.2024 | Arterielle Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Pearl and pitfalls in brain functional analysis by event-related potentials: a narrative review by the Italian Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience Society on methodological limits and clinical reliability—part II

Abstract

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Spinale Muskelatrophie: Neugeborenen-Screening lohnt sich

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Parkinson: Größere Studie bestätigt Genauigkeit von Hauttest

Update Neurologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2020

Cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and motor profile in post tick-borne flaviviral encephalomyelitis

Idiopathic (genetic) generalized epilepsies with absences: clinical and electrographic characteristics and seizure outcome

Visual hallucinations as psychiatric onset of a primary central nervous system lymphoma: a case report and a brief review of literature on neoplasm-correlated neuropsychiatric disorders

The role of microglia in the development of neurodegeneration

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 cosegregating with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type 2

Balint-Holmes syndrome due to stroke following SARS-CoV-2 infection: a single-case report

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Spinale Muskelatrophie: Neugeborenen-Screening lohnt sich

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Parkinson: Größere Studie bestätigt Genauigkeit von Hauttest

Update Neurologie