nach oben

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Erschienen in:

19.11.2016 | Review

Pedicle screw insertion techniques: an update and review of the literature

verfasst von: F. Perna, R. Borghi, F. Pilla, N. Stefanini, A. Mazzotti, M. Chehrassan

Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Pedicle screw construct have become one of the most practiced procedure in spinal surgery. Despite commonly used, questions remain about their safety especially for the thoracic spine and in deformity where difficulty in positioning can lead to pedicle breach and adjacent structures injury. Misplacement rates have been reported to be from 5 to 41% in the lumbar spine and from 3 to 55% in the thoracic spine. Hence, various procedures have been described in order to improve pedicle screw insertion accuracy. Aim of this study is to evaluate current concepts on pedicle screws placement techniques to better understand recent attitude and clarify some doubts when selecting the most proper method.

Tian N-F, Huang Q-S, Zhou P et al (2011) Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 20:846–859. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1577-5 CrossRef

Youkilis AS, Quint DJ, McGillicuddy JE, Papadopoulos SM (2001) Stereotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Neurosurgery 48:771–779PubMed

Aoude AA, Fortin M, Figueiredo R et al (2015) Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 24:990–1004. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3853-x CrossRef

Puvanesarajah V, Liauw JA, Lo S-F et al (2014) Techniques and accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement. World J Orthop 5:112–123. doi:10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.112 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE (1990) Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine 15:11–14CrossRefPubMed

Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE et al (2012) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 21:247–255. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2011-3 CrossRef

Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J et al (1996) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 21:1320–1324CrossRefPubMed

Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Jost B et al (1997) Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine 22:452–458CrossRefPubMed

Errani C, Vanel D, Gambarotti M et al (2012) Vascular bone tumors: a proposal of a classification based on clinicopathological, radiographic and genetic features. Skeletal Radiol 41:1495–1507. doi:10.1007/s00256-012-1510-6 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Heary RF, Bono CM, Black M (2004) Thoracic pedicle screws: postoperative computerized tomography scanning assessment. J Neurosurg 100:325–331PubMed

11.

Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH et al (2011) Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery 68:170–178. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181fdfaf4 (discussion 178) CrossRefPubMed

12.

Chung KJ, Suh SW, Desai S, Song HR (2008) Ideal entry point for the thoracic pedicle screw during the free hand technique. Int Orthop 32:657–662. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0363-4 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Lehman RA, Polly DW, Kuklo TR et al (2003) Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28:2058–2065. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000087743.57439.4F CrossRefPubMed

14.

Polly DW, Yaszemski AK, Jones KE (2016) Placement of thoracic pedicle screws. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 6:e9. doi:10.2106/JBJS.ST.N.00114 CrossRef

15.

Vialle R, Zeller R, Gaines RW (2014) The “slide technique”: an improvement on the “funnel technique” for safe pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23(Suppl 4):S452–S456. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3342-7 CrossRef

16.

Gaines RW (2000) The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1458–1476CrossRefPubMed

17.

Yingsakmonkol W, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW (2002) The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine using the “funnel technique”: part 1. A cadaveric study. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:445–449CrossRefPubMed

18.

Viau M, Tarbox BB, Wonglertsiri S et al (2002) Thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation using the “funnel technique”: part 2. Clinical experience. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:450–453CrossRefPubMed

19.

Abrahão GS, Rosa RC, Okubo R, Shimano AC (2012) Effect of the pilot hole preparation on the anchorage of pedicle screws. Acta Ortop Bras 20:274–279. doi:10.1590/S1413-78522012000500006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Oktenoğlu BT, Ferrara LA, Andalkar N et al (2001) Effects of hole preparation on screw pullout resistance and insertional torque: a biomechanical study. J Neurosurg 94:91–96PubMed

21.

Moroni A, Cadossi M, Romagnoli M et al (2008) A biomechanical and histological analysis of standard versus hydroxyapatite-coated pins for external fixation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 86:417–421. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31036 CrossRefPubMed

22.

George DC, Krag MH, Johnson CC et al (1991) Hole preparation techniques for transpedicle screws. Effect on pull-out strength from human cadaveric vertebrae. Spine 16:181–184PubMed

23.

Mason A, Paulsen R, Babuska JM et al (2014) The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. J Neurosurg Spine 20:196–203. doi:10.3171/2013.11.SPINE13413 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ughwanogho E, Patel NM, Baldwin KD et al (2012) Computed tomography-guided navigation of thoracic pedicle screws for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis results in more accurate placement and less screw removal. Spine 37:E473–E478. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318238bbd9 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, Mohsen A (2010) Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 19:370–375. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1258-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Manbachi A, Cobbold RSC, Ginsberg HJ (2014) Guided pedicle screw insertion: techniques and training. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 14:165–179. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.029 CrossRef

27.

Frantz DD, Kirsch SR, Wiles AD (2004) Specifying 3D tracking system accuracy one manufacturer’s views. In: Tolxdorff T, Braun J, Handels H et al (eds) Bildverarb. Für Med. 2004. Springer, Berlin, pp 234–238CrossRef

28.

Pechlivanis I, Kiriyanthan G, Engelhardt M et al (2009) Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using a bone mounted miniature robotic system: first experiences and accuracy of screw placement. Spine 34:392–398. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318191ed32 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Barzilay Y, Kaplan L, Libergall M (2008) Robotic assisted spine surgery—a breakthrough or a surgical toy? Int J Med Robot 4:195–196. doi:10.1002/rcs.216 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH (2013) Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients. Eur Spine J 22:661–666. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2499-1 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kim H-J, Jung W-I, Chang B-S et al (2016) A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS. doi:10.1002/rcs.1779

32.

Liu H, Chen W, Wang Z et al (2016) Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. doi:10.1007/s11548-016-1448-6

Titel: Pedicle screw insertion techniques: an update and review of the literature
verfasst von: F. Perna
R. Borghi
F. Pilla
N. Stefanini
A. Mazzotti
M. Chehrassan
Publikationsdatum: 19.11.2016
Verlag: Springer Milan
Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 2035-5106
Elektronische ISSN: 2035-5114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0438-8

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Pedicle screw insertion techniques: an update and review of the literature

Abstract

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Comparison of clinical, MRI and arthroscopic assessments of chronic ACL injuries, meniscal tears and cartilage defects

The Porcellini test: a novel test for accurate diagnosis of posterior labral tears of the shoulder: comparative analysis with the established tests

The use of TightRope fixation for ankle syndesmosis injuries: our experience

Comparing mini-open and arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint repair: functional results and return to sport

Proposal of a therapeutic protocol for selected patients with patellofemoral knee osteoarthritis: arthroscopic lateral retinacular release followed by viscosupplementation

Quantitative assessment and characterization of glenoid bone loss in a spectrum of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie