Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2021

22.11.2021 | Editorial

Peer Review at JGIM

verfasst von: Jeffrey L. Jackson, MD MPH, Carol Bates, MD, Steven M. Asch, MD MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 12/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The JGIM editorial team thanks the many talented people who have volunteered their time as peer reviewers for the journal from July 2020 to June 2021. The pandemic has had an enormous impact, and journals including JGIM have also had to pivot. JGIM submissions increased from 1624 in 2017 to 3716 in 2020. While we had a brand new content area related to COVID-19, there was a steady stream of wonderful work unrelated to COVID-19. In 2020, submissions came from 57 different countries. While most submissions (n = 2419) were from the USA, 374 came from China, 98 from Canada, and 76 from Japan; 20 countries submitted 15 or more manuscripts. We could not have handled this dramatic increase without the dedicated work of our pool of associate editors and reviewers; we are very grateful for their hard work and dedication to professionalism. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman SN, Berline J, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994;121(1):11–21. Goodman SN, Berline J, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994;121(1):11–21.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shattell MM, Chinn P, Thomas S, Cowling WR. Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. J Nurs Scholar. 2010;42(1):58–65. Shattell MM, Chinn P, Thomas S, Cowling WR. Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. J Nurs Scholar. 2010;42(1):58–65.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wager E, Middleton P. Effects of technical editing in biomedical journals: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2821–4. Wager E, Middleton P. Effects of technical editing in biomedical journals: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2821–4.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts JC, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:119–2. Roberts JC, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:119–2.
Metadaten
Titel
Peer Review at JGIM
verfasst von
Jeffrey L. Jackson, MD MPH
Carol Bates, MD
Steven M. Asch, MD MPH
Publikationsdatum
22.11.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07250-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2021

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.