nach oben

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Erschienen in:

02.01.2019 | Review

Peer support interventions for breast cancer patients: a systematic review

verfasst von: Jieman Hu, Xue Wang, Shaoning Guo, Fangfang Chen, Yuan-yu Wu, Fu-jian Ji, Xuedong Fang

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Due to the clear efficacy of peer support as a means of improving emotional well-being and healthy behaviors in a highly cost-effective manner, this program is widely used. Controversy remains, however, with regard to its efficacy in breast cancer patients. Given the heterogeneity of peer support interventions, this review aimed to categorize, assess, and synthesize the existing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to clarify the effects of different types of peer support on breast cancer patients.

Methods

We searched Pubmed, EMBase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Data for English and Chinese language RCTs. The Cochrane Collaboration ‘risk of bias’ tool for systematic reviews was used to assess the methodological quality of each RCT.

Results

Of the 1494 studies screened, 15 studies met eligibility criteria for inclusion, comprising 1695 breast cancer patients. Overall, there were more positive effects than invalid or negative effects across peer interventions, with notable exceptions: unmoderated and unstructured group peer support interventions as well as Internet-based models without peer training had no effect or adverse effects on proximal and distal outcomes. However, adding other peer roles to the peer support structure or using one-on-one models could significantly improve the patients’ negative emotions. Peer education showed promising effects on stress management, quality of life, and healthy behaviors.

Conclusions

This systematic review found that different types of peer support have different effects on outcomes for breast cancer patients. Web-based group peer support without peer training must be avoided or used with caution in the future. Peer education is recommended for breast cancer patient support models, given its excellent results and cost-effectiveness.

DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, Alteri R, Robbins AS, Jemal A (2014) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA A Cancer J Clin 64(4):252–271. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21235

Ganz PA, Goodwin PJ (2015) Breast cancer survivorship: where are we today? Adv Exp Med Biol 862:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16366-6_1 CrossRefPubMed

Maass SW, Roorda C, Berendsen AJ, Verhaak PF, de Bock GH (2015) The prevalence of long-term symptoms of depression and anxiety after breast cancer treatment: a systematic review. Maturitas 82(1):100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.04.010 CrossRefPubMed

Dunn LB, Langford DJ, Paul SM, Berman MB, Shumay DM, Kober K, Merriman JD, West C, Neuhaus JM, Miaskowski C (2015) Trajectories of fear of recurrence in women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 23(7):2033–2043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2513-8 CrossRefPubMed

Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Habash DL, Fagundes CP, Andridge R, Peng J, Malarkey WB, Belury MA (2015) Daily stressors, past depression, and metabolic responses to high-fat meals: a novel path to obesity. Biol Psychiat 77(7):653–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.018 CrossRefPubMed

Jenkins I, Djuric Z, Darga L, DiLaura NM, Magnan M, Hryniuk WM (2003) Relationship of psychiatric diagnosis and weight loss maintenance in obese breast cancer survivors. Obes Res 11(11):1369–1375. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2003.185 CrossRefPubMed

Satin JR, Linden W, Phillips MJ (2009) Depression as a predictor of disease progression and mortality in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Cancer 115(22):5349–5361. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24561 CrossRefPubMed

Park J, Morley TS, Kim M, Clegg DJ, Scherer PE (2014) Obesity and cancer–mechanisms underlying tumour progression and recurrence. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(8):455–465. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.94 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ligibel JA, Strickler HD (2013) Obesity and its impact on breast cancer: tumor incidence, recurrence, survival, and possible interventions. In: American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting, pp. 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.52

10.

Park HY, Kim MJ, Kim JY, Kim S, Choi JY, Kim JH, Jeong HY (2018) Could peer support programs be a good resource for managing the unmet needs of cancer patients? J Cancer Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1399-4 CrossRefPubMedCentral

11.

Munce SEP, Shepherd J, Perrier L, Allin S, Sweet SN, Tomasone JR, Nelson MLA, Guilcher SJT, Hossain S, Jaglal S (2017) Online peer support interventions for chronic conditions: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 7(9):e017999. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017999 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Gidugu V, Rogers ES, Harrington S, Maru M, Johnson G, Cohee J, Hinkel J (2015) Individual peer support: a qualitative study of mechanisms of its effectiveness. Commun Ment Health J 51(4):445–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-014-9801-0 CrossRef

13.

Solomon P (2004) Peer support/peer provided services underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatr Rehabil J 27(4):392–401CrossRefPubMed

14.

Vilhauer RP, McClintock MK, Matthews AK (2010) Online support groups for women with metastatic breast cancer: a feasibility pilot study. J Psychosoc Oncol 28(5):560–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2010.504504 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Ramchand R, Ahluwalia SC, Xenakis L, Apaydin E, Raaen L, Grimm G (2017) A systematic review of peer-supported interventions for health promotion and disease prevention. Prev Med 101:156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.008 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Fisher EB, Boothroyd RI, Elstad EA, Hays L, Henes A, Maslow GR, Velicer C (2017) Peer support of complex health behaviors in prevention and disease management with special reference to diabetes: systematic reviews. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 3:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-017-0042-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Venne VL, Hamann HA (2007) Successful use of peer educators for sharing genetic information. J Genet Couns 16(4):515–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-007-9087-2 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Gatlin TK, Serafica R, Johnson M (2017) Systematic review of peer education intervention programmes among individuals with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Nurs 26(23–24):4212–4222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13991 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Qi L, Liu Q, Qi X, Wu N, Tang W, Xiong H (2015) Effectiveness of peer support for improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Public Health 15:471. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1798-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Patil SJ, Ruppar T, Koopman RJ, Lindbloom EJ, Elliott SG, Mehr DR, Conn VS (2018) Effect of peer support interventions on cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 18(1):398. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5326-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Ford P, Clifford A, Gussy K, Gartner C (2013) A systematic review of peer-support programs for smoking cessation in disadvantaged groups. Int J Environ Res Public Health 10(11):5507–5522. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10115507 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Jolly K, Ingram L, Khan KS, Deeks JJ, Freemantle N, MacArthur C (2012) Systematic review of peer support for breastfeeding continuation: metaregression analysis of the effect of setting, intensity, and timing. BMJ 344:d8287. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8287 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Hoey LM, Ieropoli SC, White VM, Jefford M (2008) Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Educ Couns 70(3):315–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.016 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Legg M, Hyde MK, Occhipinti S, Youl PH, Dunn J, Chambers SK (2018) A prospective and population-based inquiry on the use and acceptability of peer support for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4358-z CrossRefPubMed

25.

Mens MG, Helgeson VS, Lembersky BC, Baum A, Scheier MF (2016) Randomized psychosocial interventions for breast cancer: impact on life purpose. Psycho-Oncol 25(6):618–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3891 CrossRef

26.

Napoles AM, Ortiz C, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Gregorich S, Lee HE, Duron Y, McGuire P, Luce J (2015) Nuevo Amanecer: results of a randomized controlled trial of a community-based, peer-delivered stress management intervention to improve quality of life in Latinas with breast cancer. Am J Public Health 105(Suppl 3):e55–e63. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.302598 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Salzer MS, Palmer SC, Kaplan K, Brusilovskiy E, Ten Have T, Hampshire M, Metz J, Coyne JC (2010) A randomized, controlled study of Internet peer-to-peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol 19(4):441–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1586 CrossRef

28.

Klemm P (2012) Effects of online support group format (moderated vs peer-led) on depressive symptoms and extent of participation in women with breast cancer. Comput Inf Nurs 30(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182343efa CrossRef

29.

Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2008) Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, edition. Wiley, Chichester, pp 187–241CrossRef

30.

Napoles AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, Stewart AL, Ortiz C, Garcia-Jimenez M (2018) Evaluating the implementation of a translational peer-delivered stress management program for spanish-speaking Latina breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Educ 33(4):875–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1202-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Schover LR, Jenkins R, Sui D, Adams JH, Marion MS, Jackson KE (2006) Randomized trial of peer counseling on reproductive health in African American breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 24(10):1620–1626. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.04.7159 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Lee R, Lee KS, Oh EG, Kim SH (2013) A randomized trial of dyadic peer support intervention for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in Korea. Cancer Nurs 36(3):E15–E22. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182642d7c CrossRefPubMed

33.

Gotay CC, Moinpour CM, Unger JM, Jiang CS, Coleman D, Martino S, Parker BJ, Bearden JD, Dakhil S, Gross HM et al (2007) Impact of a peer-delivered telephone intervention for women experiencing a breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol 25(15):2093–2099. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.07.4674 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Schover LR, Rhodes MM, Baum G, Adams JH, Jenkins R, Lewis P, Jackson KE (2011) Sisters peer counseling in reproductive issues after treatment (SPIRIT): a peer counseling program to improve reproductive health among African American breast cancer survivors. Cancer 117(21):4983–4992. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26139 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Rosenzweig M, Brufsky A, Rastogi P, Puhalla S, Simon J, Underwood S (2011) The attitudes, communication, treatment, and support intervention to reduce breast cancer treatment disparity. Oncol Nurs Forum 38(1):85–89. https://doi.org/10.1188/11.onf.85-89 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Chen Z (2018) The effect of peer education on the psychological resilience of breast cancer patients. Jilin Med J 39(03):580–582

37.

Pan X, Yuan Q (2018) Effect of peer education on functional compliance of postoperative chemotherapy patients with breast cancer. Chin J Health Care Nutr (7):3

38.

Fu B, Wu J, Li H, Cao M (2015) Influence of peer education on quality of life of breast cancer receiving postoperative chemotherapy. Chin Nurs Res 29(29):3639–3641

39.

Giese-Davis J, Bliss-Isberg C, Wittenberg L, White J, Star P, Zhong L, Cordova MJ, Houston D, Spiegel D (2016) Peer-counseling for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: a randomized community/research collaboration trial. Cancer 122(15):2408–2417. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30036 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Lee CHM, O’Leary J, Kirk P, Lower TA (2018) Breastfeeding outcomes in Washington state: determining the effect of loving support peer counseling program and characteristics of participants at WIC Agencies. J Nutr Educ Behav 50(4):379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2017.09.002 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Kew KM, Carr R, Crossingham I (2017) Lay-led and peer support interventions for adolescents with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD012331. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012331.pub2 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Stubbs B, Williams J, Shannon J, Gaughran F, Craig T (2016) Peer support interventions seeking to improve physical health and lifestyle behaviours among people with serious mental illness: a systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 25(6):484–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12256 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Kaplan K, Salzer MS, Solomon P, Brusilovskiy E, Cousounis P (2011) Internet peer support for individuals with psychiatric disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. Soc Sci Med (1982) 72(1):54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.037 CrossRefPubMed

44.

McCaughan E, Parahoo K, Hueter I, Northouse L, Bradbury I (2017) Online support groups for women with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD011652. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011652.pub2 CrossRefPubMed

45.

Weber BA, Roberts BL, Resnick M, Deimling G, Zauszniewski JA, Musil C, Yarandi HN (2004) The effect of dyadic intervention on self-efficacy, social support, and depression for men with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncol 13(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.718 CrossRef

46.

Boyes A, Turon H, Hall A, Watson R, Proietto A, Sanson-Fisher R (2018) Preferences for models of peer support in the digital era: a cross-sectional survey of people with cancer. Psycho-Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4781 CrossRef

47.

Winzelberg AJ, Classen C, Alpers GW, Roberts H, Koopman C, Adams RE, Ernst H, Dev P, Taylor CB (2003) Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer 97(5):1164–1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11174 CrossRefPubMed

48.

Medley A, Kennedy C, O’Reilly K, Sweat M (2009) Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Educ Prev 21(3):181–206. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2009.21.3.181 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Bagnall AM, South J, Hulme C, Woodall J, Vinall-Collier K, Raine G, Kinsella K, Dixey R, Harris L, Wright NM (2015) A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer education and peer support in prisons. BMC Public Health 15:290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1584-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Bosire R, Betz B, Aluisio A, Hughes JP, Nduati R, Kiarie J, Chohan BH, Merkel M, Lohman-Payne B, John-Stewart G et al (2016) High rates of exclusive breastfeeding in both arms of a peer counseling study promoting EBF among HIV-infected Kenyan women. Breastfeed Med 11(2):56–63. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2015.0071 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Quintiliani LM, Whiteley JA (2016) Results of a nutrition and physical activity peer counseling intervention among nontraditional college students. J Cancer Educ 31(2):366–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0858-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Peer support interventions for breast cancer patients: a systematic review
verfasst von: Jieman Hu
Xue Wang
Shaoning Guo
Fangfang Chen
Yuan-yu Wu
Fu-jian Ji
Xuedong Fang
Publikationsdatum: 02.01.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-5033-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Peer support interventions for breast cancer patients: a systematic review

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Prostatakarzinom: EU initiiert neues Screeningkonzept

Blasenkarzinom – Biomarker statt Zytologie?

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Update Onkologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a nationwide study of 4901 patients in the Netherlands

Ectopic breast tissue and cancer

Association between breast cancer risk factors and molecular type in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer

Overexpression of the cancer stem cell marker CD133 confers a poor prognosis in invasive breast cancer

Diagnostic pathways and management in women with pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC): no evidence of treatment delays following a first healthcare contact

Metformin plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The MYME randomized, phase 2 clinical trial

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Prostatakarzinom: EU initiiert neues Screeningkonzept

Blasenkarzinom – Biomarker statt Zytologie?

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Update Onkologie