Skip to main content
main-content

06.10.2018 | Review Article

Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature

Zeitschrift:
Supportive Care in Cancer
Autoren:
Sarah D. Kowitt, Katrina R. Ellis, Veronica Carlisle, Nivedita L. Bhushan, Kristin Z. Black, Kaitlyn Brodar, Nicole M. Cranley, Kia L. Davis, Eugenia Eng, Michelle Y. Martin, Jared McGuirt, Rebeccah L. Sokol, Patrick Y. Tang, Anissa I. Vines, Jennifer S. Walker, Edwin B. Fisher
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-018-4479-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Objective

Evidence suggests peer support (PS) is as an effective strategy for enhancing prevention and control of chronic and infectious diseases, including cancer. This systematic scoping review examines the range and variety of interventions on the use of PS across the cancer care continuum.

Method

We used a broad definition of PS to capture a wide-range of interventions and characterize the current status of the field. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL to identify relevant articles published from January 2011 to June 2016. We screened the title and abstracts of 2087 articles, followed by full-text screening of 420 articles, resulting in a final sample of 242 articles of which the most recent 100 articles were reviewed (published June 2014 to May 2016).

Results

A number of the recent intervention studies focused on breast cancer (32%, breast cancer only) or multiple cancer sites (23%). Although the interventions spanned all phases of the cancer care continuum, only 2% targeted end-of-life care. Seventy-six percent focused on clinical outcomes (e.g., screening, treatment adherence) and 72% on reducing health disparities. Interventions were primarily phone-based (44%) or delivered in a clinic setting (44%). Only a few studies (22%) described the impact of providing PS on peer supporters.

Conclusion

PS appears to be a widely used approach to address needs across the cancer care continuum, with many opportunities to expand its reach.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Zusatzmaterial
ESM 1 (DOCX 17 kb)
520_2018_4479_MOESM1_ESM.docx
ESM 2 (PDF 55 kb)
520_2018_4479_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
ESM 3 (DOCX 49 kb)
520_2018_4479_MOESM3_ESM.docx
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel
  1. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Onkologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise