Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019

22.04.2019 | Gynecologic Oncology

Pelvic exenteration as ultimate ratio for gynecologic cancers: single-center analyses of 37 cases

verfasst von: N. de Gregorio, A. de Gregorio, F. Ebner, T. W. P. Friedl, J. Huober, R. Hefty, M. Wittau, W. Janni, P. Widschwendter

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Pelvic exenterations are a last resort procedure for advanced gynecologic malignancies with elevated risks in terms of patients’ morbidity.

Methods

This single-center analysis reports surgical details, outcome and survival of all patients treated with exenteration for non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies at our university hospital during a 13-year time period. We collected data regarding patients and tumor characteristics, surgical procedures, peri- and postoperative management, transfusions, complications, and analyzed the impact on survival outcomes.

Results

We identified 37 patients between 2005 and 2013 with primary or relapsed cervical cancer (59.5%), vulvar cancer (24.3%) or endometrial cancer (16.2%). Median age was 60 years and most patients (73%) had squamous cell carcinomas. Median progression-free survival was 26.2 months and median overall survival was 49.9 months. The 5-year survival rates were 34.4% for progression-free survival and 46.4% for overall survival. There were no significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival with regard to disease entity. Patients with tumor at the resection margins (R1) had a nearly significantly worse progression-free survival (median: 28.5 vs. 7.3 months, HR 2.59, 95% CI 0.98–6.88, p = 0.056) and a significantly worse overall survival (median: not reached vs. 10.9 months, HR 4.04, 95% CI 1.40–11.64, p = 0.010) compared to patients with complete tumor resection (R0). In addition, patients without lymphovascular space invasion had a significantly better progression-free survival (p = 0.017) and overall survival (p = 0.034) then patients with lymphovascular space invasion. We observed complications in 14 patients (37.8%), 10 of those were classified as Clavien–Dindo 3 or 4. There was a trend to worse progression-free survival in patients that suffered complications (p = 0.052). Median total amount of transfused blood products was 4 (range 0–20).

Conclusion

Pelvic exenteration is a procedure that provides substantial progression-free survival and overall survival improvement and—in selected patients—can even achieve cure in otherwise hopeless clinical situations. Patients need to be offered earnest counseling for sufficient informed consent with realistic expectations what to expect.
Literatur
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Höckel M (1999) Pelvic recurrences of cervical cancer. Relapse pattern, prognostic factors and the role of extended radical treatment. J Pelvic Surg. 5:255–266 Höckel M (1999) Pelvic recurrences of cervical cancer. Relapse pattern, prognostic factors and the role of extended radical treatment. J Pelvic Surg. 5:255–266
Metadaten
Titel
Pelvic exenteration as ultimate ratio for gynecologic cancers: single-center analyses of 37 cases
verfasst von
N. de Gregorio
A. de Gregorio
F. Ebner
T. W. P. Friedl
J. Huober
R. Hefty
M. Wittau
W. Janni
P. Widschwendter
Publikationsdatum
22.04.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05154-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.