Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Breastfeeding Journal 1/2018

Open Access 01.12.2018 | Research

Perception of donor breast milk and determinants of its acceptability among mothers in a developing community: a cross-sectional multi-center study in south-east Nigeria

verfasst von: Kenechukwu K. Iloh, Chidiebere DI. Osuorah, Ikenna K. Ndu, Isaac N. Asinobi, Ijeoma N. Obumneme-Anyim, Chijioke E. Ezeudu, Ukoha M. Oluchi, Onyinye U. Anyanwu, Uchenna Ekwochi, Christian C. Ogoke, Adaeze C. Ayuk, Herbert U. Obu

Erschienen in: International Breastfeeding Journal | Ausgabe 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Due to the health and economic benefits of breast milk, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that for infants who cannot receive breast milk from their own mothers, the next preferred option is donated breast milk. This recommendation is however rarely practiced in most developing countries where donor milk is not widely accepted.

Methods

This cross-sectional multi-center study enrolled mothers attending antenatal or pediatric clinics in six tertiary institution in south-east Nigeria using purposive and convenient sampling method. Data collection was done using pretested questionnaires. The study aimed to assess the knowledge, acceptability and willingness to donate breast milk and/or use donated breast milk for their infants It also explored factors that determine this behavior.

Results

A total of 1235 mothers participated; 39% (480/1225) have heard about the concept of donor milk, while only 10% (79/759) and 7% (81/1179), respectively, had adequate knowledge of the concept and policy on donor milk. Sixty percent indicated willingness to use donor milk or donate breast milk if need arises. Respondents with lower age (p = 0.049) and with higher occupational status (p = 0.001) were more likely to have adequate knowledge of donor breast milk, while respondents with lower educational attainment (p = 0.002) and those who are non-Christians (p = 0.004) were more likely to request financial inducement for donating their breast milk. Adequate knowledge of the concept of donor milk (p = 0.001), preference of donor milk to infant formula (p = 0.001) and requirement of financial remuneration (p = 0.001) were the only significant predictors of willingness to donate and/or receive donated breast milk.

Conclusion

The knowledge of the concept of donor breast milk and awareness of policies regulating its practice in Nigeria is low, but the prospect of its acceptability is high among mothers surveyed in south-east Nigeria. Targeted public education by relevant government agencies in collaboration with clinicians, community and religious leaders about the concept of donor breast milk to families may help increase the acceptance and practice of donating breast milk and/or use of donated breast milk among mothers in the region.
Abkürzungen
CI
Confidence Interval
DBM
Donor Breast Milk
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
HMB
Human Milk Bank
HMBANA
Human Milk Banking Association of North America
NICE
National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence
OR
Odd ratio
UN
United Nations
UNICEF
United Nation Children’s Fund
WHO
World Health Organization

Background

Breastmilk has been well-established as the most optimal source of nutrient for infants particularly in the first six months of life [1]. This is partly because it contains bioactive substances that are essential to the development of the newborn’s immature immune system. This singular attribute of breastmilk makes it even more important for the preterm and/or low birthweight newborn whose weak immune system is vital for its survival. Apart from the immune system, other long-term benefits of the use of human breast milk in preterm is well documented. These include but not limited to decreased incidences of retinopathy and necrotizing enterocolitis of the newborn, better neuro-cognitive development and lower risk of development of childhood obesity and diabetes [24]. It has been noted that newborns most susceptible to morbidity and mortality are those at greatest risk of not receiving the lifesaving benefits of breast milk [5].
Based on the benefits, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that all mothers should feed their infants solely with breast milk, exclusive of any other nutritional sources for the first six months of their infant’s life [6]. The recommendation further states that for infants who cannot receive breast milk from their own mothers, the next preferred option is donated human breastmilk. Donated breastmilk according to the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is breast milk expressed by a mother that is then processed by a donor milk bank for use by a recipient that is not the mother’s own baby [7]. The use of donor breastmilk over infant formulas in vulnerable newborns has been shown to significantly impact on neonatal mortality rates in countries around the world. In Brazil for instance, there has been a drastic reduction in neonatal mortality by a whopping 73% between 1990 and 2013, since it incorporated milk banks into its newborn health policy [8, 9]. Unfortunately, most developing countries with the highest burden of global neonatal mortality lag in the implementation of donor breastmilk as the best alternative for vulnerable infants.
In Nigeria, it is estimated that of the seven million children born every year only about 25% are exclusively breastfed from 0 to 6 months of age [10]. Sadly, this poor practice of breastfeeding has to a certain degree been implicated in the current high rate of neonatal morbidity and mortality in the country [10]. Even more worrying is the fact that there is currently no human breastmilk bank in the whole of the west Africa sub-region. Due to strong religious and cultural belief system, establishing human breastmilk bank in these settings for use in precarious situation where maternal milk is limited or not available such as prematurity, low birthweight or orphaned newborns requires an in-depth consideration of the acceptability of the concept by mothers in these settings. There is little discussion in local medical literature regarding the knowledge and willingness to use donor breastmilk among mothers in many developing communities. This study therefore sets out to assess the perception of the concept of donor breastmilk among mothers in several communities in south-east Nigeria. It further evaluated the factors that determine the willingness to participate in donation and/or use of donor breast milk among these mothers.

Methods

This cross-sectional multi-center study was conducted concurrently over a six months period between August 2016 to January 2017 in six different tertiary health facilities namely the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Enugu, Federal Teaching Hospital Abakiliki (FETHA) Ebonyi State, Federal Medical Centre Owerri, Imo State, Federal Medical Centre Umuahia, Abia State and Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH) Anambra State. Each of these hospital offers specialized medical services and serves as a referral center to primary, secondary and private health facilities from within and outside their respective state. These six tertiary health institutions are all located in the south-east area of Nigeria and were chosen out of the 10 tertiary institutions in the region using convenient sampling method. This was based on the presence of one or more authors of this work being a staff in the institutions and/or supervisor(s) of the data collection team. The study aimed to enroll two hundred and fifty mothers attending antenatal and postnatal clinics in each of the selected center using purposive sampling method. A structured pre-tested questionnaire was administered by self and/or interviewer-based supervision depending on the educational abilities of respondent.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All women who were pregnant or breastfeeding or have a child that is less than one year attending the antenatal and/or pediatrics clinic in the various study centers were included in the study while mother with children one year or above and those who refused to give consent to participate were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination

The sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula with 95% confidence level, exclusive breastfeeding rate of 25% in Nigeria [10] and a non-response rate of 10%. This gave a minimum sample size of 317. To enhance the power of this study, we aimed to enroll 250 mothers from each of the 6-study site giving a working total sample size of 1500 respondents.

Measures

The study variables were collected into the relevant sections of the questionnaire. In the first section predictor variables which included sociodemographic features of participants were collected and categorized as follows: i) Respondents age in years categorized as, < 20, 20–29, 30–39 and ≥ 40 years. ii) Educational level of respondents categorized as primary education or less (≤ 6 years of education), completed secondary (6–12 years of education) and post-secondary education (> 12 years of education). iii) Respondents occupation was categorized as unemployed (i.e. house wives, students etc.), unskilled (i.e. petty traders, cleaners, hairdressers etc.), semi-skilled (clerical secretaries, teachers etc.) and skilled (doctors, bankers, accountants etc.). iv) Socioeconomic class of respondent was calculated based on maternal education and paternal occupation using a scale [11] developed and validated for Nigeria and other developing setting and categorized as low, middle and high. v) Religion of respondent was grouped into Christianity, Islam, Traditional and others. This was further re-grouped into Christians and non-Christians. vi) Respondents tribe was classified into Igbo, Hausa, Yoruba and others for minorities tribes. vii) Marital status was categorized as married and single. viii) Spouse age was categorized as < 30 years, 30–39 years, 40–49 years and ≥ 50 years. ix) Spouse education was primary education or less, completed secondary and post-secondary education.
The second section of the questionnaire collected information on outcome variable that measured parameters that assessed respondents’ attitude towards donor breast milk. Donor breast milk was defined based on the NICE clinical guideline [7]. These parameters included i) If respondents have ever heard of the concept of breast milk donation (categorized as yes or no). ii) Knowledge of the concept of donor milk (categorized as none, partial and adequate). iii). Awareness of policy on breast milk donation was categorized as yes or no based on the knowledge of section 2.2.4 of the policy that states that for motherless and/or adopted infants’ relactation of a wet nurse (a foster mother or caregiver) who is HIV negative shall be encouraged and such wet nurse shall be encouraged to remain HIV negative throughout the period of breastfeeding [12]. iv) Willingness to donate or receive donated milk (categorized as yes or no). v) Requirement of monetary remuneration for donating breast milk (categorized as yes or no). vi) Requirement of spousal consent before receiving or donating breast milk (categorized as yes or no). vii) Milk preference in serious medical conditions when own breast milk is contraindicated or impossible (categorized as donor breast milk and infant formulas). viii) Recommendation of donor breast milk to babies of other mothers (categorized as yes or no). See Table 1.
Table 1
Summary of definitions and measure used in the study
Variables
Measures
Dimensions measuring respondent’s sociodemographic characteristics
 Age
<  20; 20–29; 30–39; ≥ 40 years
 Educational level
≤ 6 years; 6–12; >  12 years
 Occupation
unemployed; unskilled; semi-skilled; skilled
 Socioeconomic class
Low; middle; high
 Religion
Christianity; Islam; traditional; others
 Tribe
Igbo; Hausa; Yoruba; others
 Marital status
Married; single
 Spouse age
<  30 years; 30–39 years; 40–49; ≥ 50 years
 Spouse education
≤ 6 years; 6–12; >  12 years
Dimensions measuring knowledge, awareness and attitude towards the concept of donor milk
 Ever heard of DBMa
Yes; no
 Knowledge of the concept of DBM
None; partial; adequate
 Awareness of policy on DBM
Yes; no
 Willingness to donate/receive DBM
Yes; no
 Requirement monetary remuneration
Yes; no
 Requirement of spousal consent
Yes; no
 Milk preference in medical condition
Donor breast milk; infant formulas
 Will recommendation DBM
Yes; no
aDonor Breast Milk

Data collection and analysis

Data collection was done using questionnaires administered by self and/or trained research assistants. Information were inputted into the relevant sections of the questionnaire and subsequently transferred into a Microsoft Excel Sheet. Distribution of the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents (predictor variables) and parameters related to perception of the concept of donor milk (outcome variable) were analyzed and reported in percentages. The Chi-square analysis was used to assess initial associations between the predictor and outcome variables. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine sociodemographic characteristics of respondents that predicted willingness to donate breast milk or receive donated breast milk among respondents. Measures of this association was presented as odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Data analysis was done using IBM® SPSS version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Respondents with grossly missing information were excluded from the data analysis.

Results

Description of study participants

A total of one thousand five hundred (1500) questionnaires were administered through self and/or interviewer-based administration depending on the respondents’ abilities. Of these, two hundred and sixty-five respondents had grossly missing information and were excluded from the data analysis. One thousand two hundred and thirty-five women (1235) were successfully enrolled giving a response rate of 82.3% (Figure 1). Table 2 shows the characteristics of respondents. Approximately 40% were each within the 20–29 and 30–39-years age bracket. Another six and 11% were less than 20 and ≥ 40 years respectively. The mean age of the respondents in this study was 31.1 ± 7.3 and 38.9 ± 7.6 for their spouses. The majority (63%) of the mothers had a post-secondary school education and 68% were within the high socio-economic class. About a quarter of the study participants were unemployed and the remaining three quarters were employed in an unskilled (23%), semi-skilled (35%) and skilled (17%) occupational category. Almost all respondents (98%) were Christians and from the Igbo tribe (94%). Ninety-five percent were in a marital relationship and the other 5% were single i.e. never married, divorced or widowed.
Table 2
Characteristics of study respondents enrolled in the study
Characteristics
Variables
Number
Percentage
  
(n)
(%)
Respondents age (n = 1235)
<  20 years
68
6
20–29 years
509
41
30–39 years
519
42
≥ 40 years
139
11
Respondents education (n = 1134)
Primary education or less
60
5
Completed secondary
362
32
Post-secondary
712
63
Respondents occupation (n = 1157)
Unemployed
294
25
Unskilled or low earners
264
23
Semi-skilled or middle earners
403
35
Skilled or high earners
196
17
Socio-economic class (n = 1040)
Low
120
12
Middle
205
20
High
715
68
Respondents religion (n = 1194)
Christianity
1173
98
Islam
15
1.5
Traditional
4
0.3
Others
2
0.1
Respondents tribe (n = 1170)
Igbo
1099
94
Hausa
14
1
Yoruba
30
3
Others
27
3
Marital status (n = 1162)
Married
1107
95
Single
55
5
Spouses age (n = 1040)
<  30 years
290
24
30–39 years
507
41
40–49 years
358
29
≥ 50 years
80
6
Spousal education (n = 1062)
Completed primary or less
87
8
Completed secondary
363
34
Post-secondary
612
58

Perception of the concept of breast milk donation among respondents

Most of the respondents (61%) had never heard of the concept of breast milk donation. Of the 480 (39%) that had heard of it, only 81/480 (17%) were aware of government policies on breast milk donation. Source of information for respondents that have heard of donor milk were doctors 176/679 (25%), nurses and other health workers 145/679 (21%), electronic and print media 110/679 (16%) and internet users 88/679 (13%). Others include books 69/679 (10%), religious houses 38/679 (6%) and from family members 67/679 (9%). See Table 3. When asked to define the concept of donor breast milk/feeding, 186/759 (25%) had no knowledge of what it means, 494/759 (65%) had partial knowledge, while only 79/759 (10%) had a correct idea of the concept of donor milk donation. Some of the partially correct explanation given by respondents include but not limited to:
[AB 45 years]: “To be fed by a different mother that is not yours”-; [CD 36 years]: “A case were the mother is sick or dead and another woman breast feeds her child”-; [EF 21 years]: “Breastfeeding a baby who needs it-; [GH 67 years]"A situation where your sister or cousin breastfeeds your child”-;
Table 3
Parameters on knowledge, awareness and attitude towards the concept of donor breast milk amongst respondents
Parameters of Donor Breast milk
Variables
Number
Percentage
  
(n)
(%)
Ever heard of breast milk donation (n = 1225)
Yes
480
39
No
745
61
Knowledge of the concept of donor milk (n = 759)
None
186
25
Partial
494
65
Adequate
79
10
Awareness of policy on milk donation (n = 1179)
Yes
81
7
No
1098
93
Willingness to receive donated milk (n = 1172)
Yes
707
60
No
465
40
Would require monetary remuneration for donating breast milk (n = 1134)
Yes
150
13
No
984
87
Would require spousal consent before reeving or donating breast milk (n = 1134)
Yes
885
80
No
220
20
Preference for milk donor (n = 948)
Relatives
853
90
Non-relatives
95
10
Would recommend donor breast milk for babies of other mothers (n = 1176)
Yes
587
50
No
589
50
Milk preference in serious medical conditions where breastfeeding is contraindicated or impossible (n = 1040)
Donor Breast milk
555
55
Infant formula
463
45
Experiences excessive breast milk flow during lactation (n = 1139)
Yes
514
55
No
625
45
Some of the correct definitions included but also not limited to:
[BC 55 years]: “Screened mother breast milk to feed another woman’s baby”-; [XY 27 years]: “Breast milk donated to babies not yours”-; [FT 34 years]: “Expressing or extracting breast milk and donating it”-; and [SB 45 years]: “Mothers donating breast milk for other mothers who do not wish to feed their babies with their own breast milk”-;
Five hundred and fourteen study participants (45%) said they usually experience excessive breast milk flow during lactation. Seven hundred and seven (60%) respondents expressed willingness to receive donated breast milk if the need arises while the remaining 465 (40%) would prefer not to receive breast milk. Among the latter group, 195/465 (43%) would receive donated breast milk if the donor is well screened and deemed safe. A hundred and fifty of them (13%) will desire financial remuneration to donate while 885 (80%) will require spousal consent to either donate or receive breast milk in case of need. A significant proportion of those who require spousal consent were more educated (postsecondary 84% vs. secondary 76% vs. primary 67%, p = 0.001), of higher socio-economic class (high 83% vs. middle 76% and low 71%, p = 0.003) and in the lower occupational category (unemployed 87% vs. unskilled 72% vs. semi-skilled 81% and skilled 82%, p = 0.001).
Almost all respondents 1199 (98%) believed breast milk was the best feed for the newborns. The most common reasons for this belief was that breast milk was nutritionally superior to infant formula 829/3669 (23%) and protective against disease 797/3669 (22%). Others included affordability (14%), convenience (12%), warmth (10%), bonding (12%) and other unspecified reasons (7%). Based on these reasons, 587 (50%) of the respondents supposed they would recommend donated breast milk to other mothers who may need it. Five hundred and fifty-five respondents (55%) would prefer donated breast milk to infant formula if there is a medical condition that prevents the use of their own milk and about 9 in 10 of the respondents would prefer the donation of breast milk to be from a relative. See Table 3.
Finally, respondents who expressed unwillingness to donate breast milk or use donor milk were asked to give reasons for their perceived belief for and against the use of donor milk. Table 4 shows summarizes some of the reason given by the respondents.
Table 4
Perceived reasons for and against the belief and use of donor milk amongst respondents
Reasons for Donor Milka
n (%)
 • Mothers breast milk is not flowing
127 (31.4)
 • Baby is crying, and mother is not around
75 (18.6)
 • Mother is sick and cannot breast feed
139 (34.4)
 • Mothers breast milk is not safe for baby
12 (3.0)
 • Baby is not gaining weight because of inadequate milk
4 (1.0)
 • Donor milk is convenient and safe
1 (0.2)
 • To prevent breast from sagging
1 (0.2)
 • Other unspecified reasons
45 (11)
 Total
404
Reasons against Donor Milka
N (%)
 • Donor milk is not culturally accepted
191 (11.8)
 • Donor milk is not religiously accepted
109 (6.7)
 • There is risk of infection transmission
426 (26.3)
 • Not sure its hygienically prepared
217 (13.4)
 • Concerns about HIV, Hepatitis B and C
241 (14.9)
 • Social and societal stigma
92 (5.7)
 • Not a common practice and generally unacceptable
160 (9.9)
 • Fear of transmission of bad genetic traits
185 (11.3)
 Total
1621
aMultiple responses were allowed

Maternal sociodemographic factors and the concept of breast milk donation

Of the maternal sociodemographic characteristics considered in the study, age of respondents, religion, tribe of origin and marital status were significantly associated with being aware of the policy on breast milk donation. Mothers that were older (≥ 40 yrs. 13%, 30–39 yrs. 7%, 20–29 yrs. 5% and <  20 yrs. 7%; p = 0.008), non-Christians (Christian 6%, vs. other religion 22%; p = 0.001), non-Igbos (Igbos 6%, Hausas 21%, Yorubas 20%, others 19%; p = 0.001) and those unmarried (28% vs. 6%; p = 0.001) were more aware of policies related to breast milk donation.
Furthermore, only respondent’s age and occupational status was significantly associated with adequate knowledge of donor milk (Table 3). More respondents below the age of 20 years (19%) had adequate knowledge of the concept compared to those in other age categories (≥ 40 yrs. 8%, 30–39 yrs. 9%, and 20–29 yrs. 12%; p = 0.049), educational attainment (post-secondary 42%, secondary 31% and primary 45%; p = 0.001), occupational status (unemployed 31%, unskilled 31%, semi-skilled 48% and skilled 44%; p = 0.0010).
Finally, more respondents with lower educational attainment, primary (27%) would require financial inducement to donate breast milk compared to those with secondary (15%) and postsecondary (11%) education; p = 0.002. Similarly, non-Christians (26%) were 2.4 times more likely to require financial inducement before donating breast milk than Christian (13%); p = 0.004]. See Table 5.
Table 5
Sociodemographic factors and association with parameters accessing acceptability of the concept of donor milk
Respondent Variables
Willingness to donate or receive donated Breast milk
Awareness of government policy on Donor milk
Financial remuneration for donation of milk
Knowledge of Donor Milk
 
Yes
No
n
p
Yes
No
n
p
Yes
No
n
p
None
Partial
adequate
n
p
Age (years)
707
465
1172
 
81
1098
1179
 
150
984
1134
 
186
494
79
759
 
  < 20
32(53)
29(47)
61
.121
4(7)
57(93)
61
.008
9(15)
50(85)
59
.851
9(26)
20(57)
6(17)
35
.049
 20–29
287(52)
198(48)
485
 
24(5)
465(95)
489
 
65(14)
403(86)
468
 
85(28)
187(61)
37(12)
309
 
 30–39
314(64)
178(36)
492
 
35(7)
459(93)
494
 
61(13)
417(87)
478
 
79(25)
215(67)
29(9)
323
 
  ≥ 40
74(55)
60(45)
134
 
18(13)
117(87)
135
 
15(12)
114(88)
129
 
13(14)
72(78)
7(8)
92
 
Education
660
420
1080
 
73
1014
1087
 
138
904
1042
 
184
454
78
716
 
 Primary
31(53)
27(47)
58
.000
7(12)
52(88)
59
.051
15(27)
40(73)
55
.002
5(15)
27(82)
1(3)
33
.098
 Secondary
181(53)
160(47)
341
 
15(4)
326(96)
341
 
49(15)
279(85)
328
 
57(30)
111(59)
19(10)
187
 
 Postsecondary
448(66)
233(34)
681
 
51(7)
636(93)
687
 
74(11)
585(89)
659
 
122(25)
316(64)
5811)
496
 
Occupation
673
428
1101
 
78
1029
1107
 
139
69
1063
 
183
466
76
723
 
 Unemployed
173(62)
107(38)
280
.004
11(4)
268(93)
279
.076
32(12)
16(36)
269
.192
67(37)
92(51)
21(12)
180
.000
 Unskilled
130(54)
113(46)
243
 
16(7)
228(93)
244
 
38(16)
13(32)
237
 
23(18)
93(71)
15(11)
131
 
 Semi-skilled
246(63)
142(37)
388
 
33(8)
358(92)
391
 
41(11)
40(24)
377
 
55(20)
190(69)
3111)
276
 
 Skilled
124(65)
66(35)
190
 
18(9)
175(91)
193
 
28(16)
154(84)
180
 
38(28)
89(65)
9(7)
136
 
SES
616
374
990
 
69
927
996
 
131
824
955
 
177
404
68
649
 
 Low
60(52)
56(48)
116
.019
10(9)
109(91)
117
.141
20(19)
87(81)
107
.134
17(29)
36(61)
6(10)
59
.980
 Middle
110(60)
75(40)
185
 
7(4)
182(96)
189
 
29(16)
154(84)
182
 
30(25)
77(65)
12(10)
119
 
 High
446(65)
243(35)
689
 
52(8)
638(92)
690
 
82(12)
583(88)
665
 
130(28)
291(62)
50(10)
471
 
Religion
707
465
1172
 
81
1098
1179
 
150
984
1134
 
186
494
79
759
 
 Christianity
677(61)
436(39)
1113
.127
68(6)
1052(94)
1120
.000
135(13)
941(87)
1076
.004
184(25)
475(65)
72(10)
731
.080
 Others
30(51)
29(49)
59
 
13(22)
46(78)
59
 
15(26)
43(74)
58
 
2(7)
19(68)
7(25)
28
 
Tribe
671
439
1039
 
73
1044
1117
 
141
932
1073
 
186
465
74
725
 
 Igbo
628(52)
411(40)
1039
.763
59(6)
988(94)
1047
.000
130(13)
875(87)
1005
.265
174(26)
436(64)
69(10)
679
.940
 Hausa
9(64)
5(36)
14
 
3(21)
11(79)
14
 
4(29)
10(71)
14
 
2(25)
5(63)
1(12)
8
 
 Yoruba
16(53)
14(47)
30
 
6(20)
24(80)
30
 
5(17)
24(83)
29
 
4(19)
14(67)
3(14)
21
 
 Others
18(67)
9(33)
27
 
5(19)
21(81)
26
 
2(8)
23(92)
25
 
61(35)
10(59)
1(6)
17
 
Marital status
667
431
1048
 
74
1035
1109
 
138
927
1065
 
185
459
74
718
 
 Married
636(61)
412(39)
1048
.631
59(6)
996(94)
1055
.000
130(13)
881(87)
1011
.677
180(27)
429(63)
68(10)
677
.106
 Single
31(57)
23(43)
54
 
15(28)
39(72)
54
 
8(15)
46(85)
54
 
5(12)
30(73)
6(15)
41
 

Determinants of willingness to donate breast milk or accept donated breast milk

Tables 5 and 6 show cross-tabulation of maternal factors associated with willingness to donate breast milk or accept donated milk. Maternal education (p = 0.001), occupational strata (p = 0.004), knowledge of the concept of donor milk (p = 0.001), awareness of government policies (p = 0.001), seeking financial remuneration (p = 0.001) and spousal consent to donate/receive donated milk (p = 0.001) were significantly associated with willingness of respondents to donate and/or receive donated milk. Others include preference for donor (p = 0.001), donor tested and safe (p = 0.001), and milk preference in serious medical condition (p = 0.001).
Table 6
Other associated parameters amongst respondents that determines willingness to donate breast milk and/or receive donated breast milk
Parameters
Willingness to donate/receive DBM
 
Yes
n (%)
No
n (%)
Total
p
Knowledge of donor breast milk
n = 480
n = 258
n = 738
 
 None
144 (78)
40 (22)
184
0.001†
 Partial
295 (62)
183 (38)
478
 
 Adequate
41 (54)
35 (46)
76
 
 2
    
Awareness of Policies regarding DBM
n = 704
n = 460
n = 1164
 
 Yes
66 (82)
15 (18)
81
0.001†
 No
638 (59)
445 (41)
1083
 
Would require financial numeration to donate
n = 702
n = 418
n = 1120
 
 Yes
126 (84)
24 (16)
150
0.001†
 No
576 (59)
394 (41)
970
 
Have heard of Donor breast milk
n = 701
n = 464
n = 1165
 
 Yes
283 (61)
178 (39)
461
0.492
 No
418 (59)
286 (41)
704
 
Spouse consent to donate/receive DBM
n = 694
n = 400
n = 1094
 
 Yes
613 (70)
265 (30)
878
0.001†
 No
81 (38)
135 (62)
216
 
Experience excessive milk flow
n = 681
n = 448
n = 1129
 
 Yes
320 (62)
193 (38)
513
0.197
 No
361 (59)
255 (41)
616
 
Preference for donor
n = 629
n = 306
n = 935
 
 Relatives
587 (70)
258 (30)
845
0.001†
 Non-relatives
42 (47)
48 (62)
90
 
Would accept DBM if donor tested and safe
n = 579
n = 441
n = 1020
 
 Yes
245 (42)
339 (58)
584
0.001†
 No
334 (77)
102 (23)
436
 
Milk preference in serious medical conditions
n = 571
n = 420
n = 921
 
 Donor milk
425 (77)
127 (23)
552
0.001†
 Infant formula
146 (33)
293 (67)
439
 
DBM donated breast milk, †P value is statistically significant
Table 7 shows the multivariable logistic regression analysis of maternal characteristics and their willingness to donate or receive donated breast milk. After adjusting for other maternal variables of interest, only having knowledge of the concept of donor milk (p = 0.001), seeking financial remuneration (p = 0.001) and milk preference in serious medical condition (p = 0.001) retained significance as determinants of willingness to donate or accept donated breast milk among respondents (Table 7). Respondents with adequate knowledge of the concept of donor milk were about 10.8 times OR 10.76, CI 2.78, 23.67; (p = 0.001) while those with partial knowledge were 3.41 times OR 3.41, CI 0.98, 11.84; (p = 0.054) more likely to donate breast milk or accept donated breast milk for their newborns. Similarly, respondents that indicated financial remuneration as perquisite for breast milk donation were 0.18 less likely to donate their breast milk compared to those that would donate without charge OR 0.18, CI 0.10, 0.44; (p = 0.001). In other words, respondents willing to donate without financial incentives were about 5.5 times more likely to donate their breast milk compared to those that require financial remuneration to donate. Lastly, it was noted that in serious medical conditions where respondents cannot breastfeed their babies or situations where their breast milk is contraindicated, those that prefer donor milk to infant formula were 6.64 times more willing to donate their breast milk or receive donor milk than those that prefer infant formula in such conditions (OR 6.64, CI 2.87, 15.36; p = 0.001).
Table 7
Regression analysis of factors significantly associated with willingness to donate breast milk or receive donated breast milk among respondents
Variables
Crude OR
[95% CI]
P
Adjusted OR†2
[95% CI]
P
Mothers education
 Completed primary or less
3.89 (0.55, 12.22)
0.371
2.99 (0.33, 12.01)
0.330
 Completed secondary
1.49 (0.63, 3.50)
0.365
1.16 (0.42, 3.16)
0.777
 Post-secondary
1
1
Mothers occupation
 Unemployed
1
1
 Unskilled or low earner
2.18 (0.86, 5.48)
0.099
2.41 (0.89, 6.49)
0.081
 Semi-skilled or middle earner
1.69 (0.74, 3.87)
0.213
1.99 (0.81, 4.92)
0.132
 Skilled or high earner
2.13 (0.85, 5.32)
0.105
2.62 (0.98, 7.03)
0.055
Mothers socioeconomic class
 Low
1
1
 middle
0.20 (0.04, 1.06)
0.058
0.11 (0.01, 1.14)
0.064
 High
1.41 (0.57, 3.49)
0.452
1.07 (0.31, 3.71)
0.917
Knowledge of donor milk
 None
1
1
 Partial
3.94 (1.34, 11.56)
0.013†
3.41 (0.98, 11.84)
0.054
 Adequate
12.22 (3.53, 24.31)
0.001†
10.76 (2.78, 23.67)
0.001†
Awareness of donor milk policies
 Yes
0.58 (0.22, 1.51)
0.259
0.47 (0.16, 1.36)
0.163
 No
1
1
Financial remuneration involved
 Yes
0.20 (0.12, 0.47)
0.001†
0.18 (0.10, 0.44)
0.001†
 No
1
1
Spouse consent to donate/receive
 Yes
1
1
 No
2.04 (0.96, 4.33)
0.063
2.16 (0.99, 4.73)
0.052
Preference for donor
 Relatives
1
1
 Non-relatives
1.93 (0.73, 5.13)
0.188
2.16 (0.78, 5.96)
0.136
Donor tested and safe
 Yes
1.11 (0.54, 2.29)
0.782
1.03 (0.49, 2.18)
0.931
 No
1
 
1
Milk preference in medical conditions
 Donor milk
6.87 (3.07, 15.39)
0.001†
6.64 (2.87, 15.36)
0.001†
 Infant formula
1
1
P value is statistically significant, †2 Adjusted for maternal age, tribe, religion, marital status and spousal factors

Discussion

This study reports a low knowledge of the concept donor breast milk and low awareness of policy regarding the use of Donor Breast Milk (DBM) in Nigeria but a relatively high willingness of mother to participate in the concept. This finding is similar to the results of a comparable survey on 198 mothers in a tertiary hospital in south-south Nigeria which showed that only 25.8% have heard about the concept of DBM but 59.1% strongly believed that human milk banking is necessary to assist orphaned and abandoned babies [13]. Another study that surveyed 448 mothers in Izmir, Turkey also showed that even though only 41.6% were aware of the concept of milk banking, 71.3% were willing to receive milk bank services and 68.8% were willing to donate their breastmilk [14]. Correspondingly, it was noted in our study that the most common source of information about donor breast milk was from healthcare workers which is identical to the 46.1% reported in another study in south-south Nigeria [13]. These is however contrarily to the finding of the study in Turkey where the media accounted for 85.7% of the information source of DBM among respondents. These differences may be related to the better availability of electronic media to mothers in Turkey where for instance 46% of women have access to internet and other electronic media compared to 28% in Nigeria [15, 16].
Like this study, the studies in Benin and Izmir showed a major concern about infection transmission was the common reason mothers were unwilling to accept donated breast milk for their babies [13, 14]. The authors of these studies specifically reported that 59.1% and 62.2% of surveyed mothers in Benin and Izmir respectively, were unwilling to receive donated breast milk stating the risk of contracting infections as a major concern. As noted in our study, the number of mothers who expressed unwillingness to use donor breast milk significantly reduced when they were assured that donor will be screened and tested for transmittable infections. This further strengthens the need for proper enlightenment of mothers and their families about the processes involved in the concept of human breast milk banking. In the same vein, our study showed that less than a tenth of respondents mentioned religion as a concern for their unwillingness to donate or receive donated breast milk, unlike in the Turkey study where a sizable proportion of mothers surveyed expressed religion as a barrier to acceptability of the concept of DBM [14]. To reduce or completely eradicate the distracting influence of religion on the well documented benefit of breast milk, relevant government authorities needs to involve faith and religious leaders in the campaign for DBM in order to eliminate religious prejudices and increase the acceptability of the concept.
Other reasons for unwillingness to receive donor breast milk documented in our study includes cultural unacceptability, unhygienic preparation, societal stigma, generally unacceptability, fear of transmission of bad genetic traits etc. These are realistic and honest concerns that can be allayed through targeted enlightenment programs and sharing of real-life success stories.
Due to the setting where this study was conducted, it is worth mentioning that the willingness to donate or receive donor breast milk was significantly associated with spousal consent even though the association lost significance on adjusted logistic regression analysis. Several studies in Nigeria and other developing countries have reported that most women seek permission from their spouse for use of health-related facilities [1719]. The need for consent by women from their spouses for health-related matters in most developing settings is an unfortunate but unsurprising fact in a patriarch society like Nigeria where polygamy is common and women are usually dependent on their spouse for most decisions due to inequalities in income and age. To the best of authors knowledge, no study has specifically investigated the association between willingness to donate/receive donor breast milk and spouse consent in a developing setting.
We found that knowledge of the donor breast milk concept, not being interested in financial compensation for donating breast milk and preference of donor breast milk over infant formulas were predictive of the mothers that would be potential breast milk donors. This is in line with the findings from a similar multi-center study in eastern Ethiopia which showed that acceptance of donor milk banking was more likely among mothers who had heard about donor milk banking and wet-nurses [20]. Another study in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil found that enhancing the understanding of the donor breast milk concept through encouragement by healthcare professionals, relatives, or friends, receiving information on breast milk expression by the primary health care unit, and receiving help from the unit professionals to breastfeed were associated with a higher prevalence of breast milk donation [21]. These findings are hardly surprising as conceptual understanding of a program or concept causes acceptance and participation where appropriate.
Furthermore, our study noted that mothers without monetary motives were more willing to donate their breast milk compared to those that require financial remuneration. Fortunately, only a small proportion of mothers in our survey indicated interest in monetary compensation before donating their breast milk. This is particularly not unexpected in a developing country like Nigeria where people donate their blood for financial gains [22] and where, over 65% women live in extreme poverty [23]. Financial remuneration for breast milk donation has been the subject of continuing research which has produced some conflicting results. Nonetheless, the Human Milk Banking Association of North America (HMBANA) endorses non- profit donor milk banking to ensure that a valuable healthcare resource is allocated in an ethical and safe manner, keeping the safety and needs of the recipient and donor paramount [24]. In addition, HMBANA has identified several problems associated with introducing the profit motive to milk banks. These includes adulterating milk to increase volume and placing the infant of the lactating mother at risk if she feels pressure to provide a certain volume of milk to a bank or a recipient rather than feeding her own infant [19]. Bloom noted in a study that adulteration of milk for financial gain led to rejection of 73 out of 4935 breast milk donations and that the dilution rejection rate was significantly higher in donors that required financial remuneration [25]. Also, Keim et al. reported that in 102 purchased samples advertised online as breast milk, eleven contained bovine DNA and ten of these had a level of bovine DNA consistent with human milk mixed with at least 10% cow’s milk [26].
Finally, we reported that mothers who would prefer donor breast milk over infant formula for their newborns in situations where they cannot breast their own babies were more likely to donate their breast milk compared to those that favored infant formulas. It is reasonable to assume that mothers that prefer donor breast milk over infant formula would most probably have reasonable knowledge of the social, economic and health benefits of breast milk and would naturally be more willing to donate their own breast milk for mothers and infants in need. The World Health Organization recommends donor breast milk as the next preferred option in situations where women are not able to provide their infants with enough amounts of their own breast milk [27]. Unfortunately, developing countries lag the rest of the world in establishing and promoting human milk banks. As a matter of fact, there is currently no functional human milk bank in the whole of the West African sub-region [28].

Limitations

Firstly, the cross-sectional design of this study makes it difficult to establish causal temporal relationships between the predictor (sociodemographic parameters of mothers) and outcome (willingness to donate or receive donor breast milk) variables considered in this study. Secondly, because only mothers were enrolled in our study, the views of health professionals, policy makers, community leaders and other stakeholders in the breast milk banking service were left out thus eliminating an important source of data regarding this concept. Finally, some inaccurate information from respondents might have resulted in misclassification of variables and subsequent misinterpretation of study conclusions. The authors therefore recommend that the findings of this study be interpreted in the light of these limitations.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study found that the knowledge of the concept of donor breast milk and awareness of policies recommending its practice in Nigeria is low, but the prospect of its acceptability is high among mothers surveyed in south-east Nigeria. Targeted public enlightenment and education to mothers and their families by relevant government agencies in collaboration with clinicians, community and religious leaders about the concept of donor breast milk may help increase the acceptance and practice of donating breast milk and/or use of donated breast milk among mothers in the region.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all management of the centres were the study was conducted. We also appreciate the efforts of the specialist registrars that assisted in data collection during their clinical posting in the Paediatric department of the respective teaching hospitals. We are also grateful to the highly dedicated staff nurses in the unit for their tireless efforts in some study related documentations.

Funding

Funding for this study was from equal contributions from all authors. No External funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics and Research Committee of the Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTHP/C-MAC/RA/034/066). Informed consent was obtained from the parents of the children. The retrieved information was transferred into a private computer and pass worded. Hard copies of answered questionnaires was securely be locked in a private locker and destroyed after the study. Data was anonymized, and questionnaires had no names and was serially labelled. Participation in the study was entirely voluntary, and no financial inducement whatsoever was involved. Participants were informed that voluntary withdrawal at any stage of interaction was guaranteed for them without any adverse effect to the mother or their baby.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson G, Anthony MY, McGuire W. Formula milk versus preterm human milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;3:CD002971. Henderson G, Anthony MY, McGuire W. Formula milk versus preterm human milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;3:CD002971.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Quigley M, McGuire W. Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD002971. Quigley M, McGuire W. Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD002971.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003. World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rea MF. The Brazilian National Breastfeeding Program: a success story. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990;31(Suppl 1):79–82.PubMed Rea MF. The Brazilian National Breastfeeding Program: a success story. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990;31(Suppl 1):79–82.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Olusanya, O. An original system of social classification for use in Nigeria and other developing countries. 24th Annual Conference of the West African College of Surgeons. Freetown, Sierra Leone, 1984. Olusanya, O. An original system of social classification for use in Nigeria and other developing countries. 24th Annual Conference of the West African College of Surgeons. Freetown, Sierra Leone, 1984.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Abhulimhen-Iyoha BI, Okonkwo IR, Ideh RC, Okolo AA. Mothers’ perception of the use of banked human milk for feeding of the infants. Nigerian Journal of Paediatrics. 2015;42(3):223–37. Abhulimhen-Iyoha BI, Okonkwo IR, Ideh RC, Okolo AA. Mothers’ perception of the use of banked human milk for feeding of the infants. Nigerian Journal of Paediatrics. 2015;42(3):223–37.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekşioğlu A, Yeşil Y, Turfan EÇ. Mothers’ views of milk banking: sample of İzmir. Turk Pediatri Ars. 2015;50(2):83–9.CrossRef Ekşioğlu A, Yeşil Y, Turfan EÇ. Mothers’ views of milk banking: sample of İzmir. Turk Pediatri Ars. 2015;50(2):83–9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Simkhada B, Teijlingen ER, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(3):244–60.CrossRef Simkhada B, Teijlingen ER, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(3):244–60.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogunjuyigbe PO, Ojofeitimi EO, Liasu A. Spousal communication, changes in partner attitude, and contraceptive use among the yorubas of Southwest Nigeria. Indian J Community Med. 2009;34(2):112–6.CrossRef Ogunjuyigbe PO, Ojofeitimi EO, Liasu A. Spousal communication, changes in partner attitude, and contraceptive use among the yorubas of Southwest Nigeria. Indian J Community Med. 2009;34(2):112–6.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Namasivayam A, Osuorah DC, Syed R, Antai D. The role of gender inequities in women’s access to reproductive health care: a population-level study of Namibia, Kenya, Nepal, and India. Int J of Womens Health. 2012;4:351–64. Namasivayam A, Osuorah DC, Syed R, Antai D. The role of gender inequities in women’s access to reproductive health care: a population-level study of Namibia, Kenya, Nepal, and India. Int J of Womens Health. 2012;4:351–64.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelano TF, Bacha YD, Assefa N, Motumma A, Roba AA, Ayele Y, et al. Acceptability of donor breast milk banking, its use for feeding infants, and associated factors among mothers in eastern Ethiopia. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13:23.CrossRef Gelano TF, Bacha YD, Assefa N, Motumma A, Roba AA, Ayele Y, et al. Acceptability of donor breast milk banking, its use for feeding infants, and associated factors among mothers in eastern Ethiopia. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13:23.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Meneses TM, Oliveira MI, Boccolini CS. Prevalence and factors associated with breast milk donation in banks that receive human milk in primary health care units. J Pediatr. 2017;93(4):382–8.CrossRef Meneses TM, Oliveira MI, Boccolini CS. Prevalence and factors associated with breast milk donation in banks that receive human milk in primary health care units. J Pediatr. 2017;93(4):382–8.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Benedict N, Augustina AO, Nosakhare BG. Blood donation in Nigeria: standard of the donated blood. J Lab Physicians. 2012;4(2):94–7.CrossRef Benedict N, Augustina AO, Nosakhare BG. Blood donation in Nigeria: standard of the donated blood. J Lab Physicians. 2012;4(2):94–7.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Usman US. Women and Poverty in Nigeria: agenda for poverty eradication. Developing Country Studies. 2015;5(3):122–6. Usman US. Women and Poverty in Nigeria: agenda for poverty eradication. Developing Country Studies. 2015;5(3):122–6.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat The Human Milk Banking Association of North America (HMBANA). Donor human milk: ensuring safety and ethical allocation. Available and assessed on 13/8/2018 from https://www.hmbana.org/. The Human Milk Banking Association of North America (HMBANA). Donor human milk: ensuring safety and ethical allocation. Available and assessed on 13/8/2018 from https://​www.​hmbana.​org/​.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloom BT. Safety of donor milk: a brief report. J Perinatol. 2016;36(5):392–3.CrossRef Bloom BT. Safety of donor milk: a brief report. J Perinatol. 2016;36(5):392–3.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Keim SA, Kulkarni MM, McNamara K, Geraghty SR, Billock RM, Ronau R, et al. Cow’s milk contamination of human milk purchased via the internet. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):e1157–62.CrossRef Keim SA, Kulkarni MM, McNamara K, Geraghty SR, Billock RM, Ronau R, et al. Cow’s milk contamination of human milk purchased via the internet. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):e1157–62.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO. Infant and young child feeding: Model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009. WHO. Infant and young child feeding: Model chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Coutsoudis I, Petrites A, Coutsoudis A. Acceptability of donated breast milk in a resource limited south African setting. Int Breastfeed J. 2011;6:3.CrossRef Coutsoudis I, Petrites A, Coutsoudis A. Acceptability of donated breast milk in a resource limited south African setting. Int Breastfeed J. 2011;6:3.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Perception of donor breast milk and determinants of its acceptability among mothers in a developing community: a cross-sectional multi-center study in south-east Nigeria
verfasst von
Kenechukwu K. Iloh
Chidiebere DI. Osuorah
Ikenna K. Ndu
Isaac N. Asinobi
Ijeoma N. Obumneme-Anyim
Chijioke E. Ezeudu
Ukoha M. Oluchi
Onyinye U. Anyanwu
Uchenna Ekwochi
Christian C. Ogoke
Adaeze C. Ayuk
Herbert U. Obu
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
International Breastfeeding Journal / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1746-4358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-018-0189-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

International Breastfeeding Journal 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe