The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-019-09780-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Socio-ecological models indicate that family, school, and community environment explains children’s physical activity and body weight. This study investigated whether parental perceptions of school/community-based physical activity (PA) promotion programs as well as parental and child perceptions of parental instrumental support for child PA (transportation provision) would predict child body weight. Child moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was hypothesized to mediate these associations.
Data of 879 parent-child dyads were collected at two measurement points: the baseline (T1) and the 7–8-month follow-up (T2). Parents were 23–68 years old (83.3% women), while children were 5–11 years old (52.4% girls). Parents and children reported their perceptions of environment, support (T1), and MVPA (T1, T2). Parental and child body weight and height were measured objectively (T1, T2).
Path analyses indicated indirect effects of parental perceptions of school/community-based PA policies (T1) and parental perceptions of transportation provision (T1) on child body weight (T2), with child MVPA (T2) operating as the mediator. There were no direct or indirect effects of child perceptions of parental transportation provision (T1) on child MVPA or body weight (T2). Similar patterns of associations were found for the total sample and the subsample of children with overweight/obesity.
Parental perceptions of school/community-based PA policies and transportation provision may explain changes in child MVPA and body weight. Interventions aimed at prevention of child overweight/obesity may benefit from a focus on parental transportation provision to PA facilities and parental awareness of PA promotion at local environment.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. 2008. https://health.gov/paguidelines/guidelines/. Accessed February 22, 2018.
World Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. 2003. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/en/. Accessed February 22, 2018.
Konstabel K, Veidebaum T, Verbestel V, Moreno LA, Bammann K, Tornaritis M, et al. Objectively measured physical activity in European children: the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes. 2014;38(Suppl2):S135–43. CrossRef
Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, Vereecken C, Mulvihill C, Roberts C, et al. Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obes Rev. 2005;6:123–32.
Sallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2004. pp. 403–424.
Edwardson CL, Gorely T. Parental influences on different types and intensities of physical activity in youth: a systematic review. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010;11:522–35. CrossRef
Welk GJ, Wood K, Morss G. Parental influences on physical activity in children: an exploration of potential mechanisms. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2003;15:19–33. CrossRef
Liszewska N, Scholz U, Radtke T, Horodyska K, Liszewski M, Luszczynska A. Association between children’s physical activity and parental practices enhancing physical activity: the moderating effects of children’s BM-z score. Front Psychol. 2018;8:2356. CrossRef
Yao CA, Rhodes RE. Parental correlates in child and adolescent physical activity: a meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;11(12):10. CrossRef
Sallis JF, Alcaraz JE, McKenzie TL, Hovell MF, Kolody B, Nader PR. Parental behavior in relation to physical activity and fitness in 9-year-old children. Am J Dis Child. 1992;146:1383–8.
Pyper E, Harrington D, Manson H. The impact of different types of parental support behaviours on child physical activity, healthy eating, and screen time: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;24:16:568.
Faulkner G, Zeglen L, Leatherdale S, Manske S, Stone M. The relationship between school physical activity policy and objectively measured physical activity of elementary school students: a multilevel model analysis. Arch Public Health. 2014;16(72):20. CrossRef
Horodyska K, Boberska M, Knoll N, Scholz U, Radtke T, Liszewska N, et al. What matters, parental or child perceptions of physical activity facilities? A prospective parent-child study explaining physical activity and body fat among children. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;34:39–46.
Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford; 2006.
Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10:141–6. PubMed
Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010.
Cook WL, Kenny DA. The actor-partner interdependence model: a model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. Int J Behav Dev. 2005;29:101–9. CrossRef
Lüscher J, Stadler G, Ochsner S, Rackow P, Knoll N, Hornung R, et al. Daily negative affect and smoking after a self-set quit attempt: the role of dyadic invisible social support in a daily diary study. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20:708–23.
Silvia PJ. Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2006;36:673–85. CrossRef
Horodyska K, Luszczynska A, Hayes CB, O’Shea MP, Langøien LJ, Roos G, et al. Implementation conditions for diet and physical activity interventions and policies: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health. 2015;17(15):1250. CrossRef
Bergkvis L, Rossiter JR. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. J Mark Res. 2007;44:175–84. CrossRef
Luszczynska A, Hagger MS, Banik A, Horodyska K, Knoll N, Scholz U. Self-efficacy, planning, or a combination of both? A longitudinal experimental study comparing effects of three interventions on adolescents’ body fat. PLoS One. 2016;13(11):e0159125. CrossRef
- Perceptions of Physical Activity Promotion, Transportation Support, Physical Activity, and Body Mass: an Insight into Parent-Child Dyadic Processes
- Springer US