Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2016

21.01.2016 | Review article

Percutaneous biopsy facilitates modern treatment of renal masses

verfasst von: E. Jason Abel

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Contemporary approaches to cancer therapy have moved away from a one-size-fits-all model. Precision treatments are based on patients and their individual tumor characteristics. In general, incidental renal masses fall into three categories: aggressive cancers, indolent cancers, and benign tumors. Treatments may include surgery, thermal ablation, or observation. Choosing the best treatment based solely on radiologic information is uninformed and unnecessary, and may lead to overtreatment of benign tumors or inappropriate treatment of aggressive tumors. Percutaneous biopsy is a safe and effective tool that provides prognostic information about unknown masses to guide treatment decision making. The first step for improving personalized treatments for small renal masses is clear: increase utilization of pretreatment renal mass biopsy.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson DC, Vukina J, Smith AB, et al. (2015) Preoperatively misclassified, surgically removed benign renal masses: a systematic review of surgical series and United States population level burden estimate. J Urol 193(1):30–35. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.102 CrossRefPubMed Johnson DC, Vukina J, Smith AB, et al. (2015) Preoperatively misclassified, surgically removed benign renal masses: a systematic review of surgical series and United States population level burden estimate. J Urol 193(1):30–35. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2014.​07.​102 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Heilbrun ME, Yu J, Smith KJ, et al. (2012) The cost-effectiveness of immediate treatment, percutaneous biopsy and active surveillance for the diagnosis of the small solid renal mass: evidence from a Markov model. J Urol 187(1):39–43. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.055 CrossRefPubMed Heilbrun ME, Yu J, Smith KJ, et al. (2012) The cost-effectiveness of immediate treatment, percutaneous biopsy and active surveillance for the diagnosis of the small solid renal mass: evidence from a Markov model. J Urol 187(1):39–43. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2011.​09.​055 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Volanis D, Neal DE, Warren AY, Gnanapragasam VJ (2015) Incidence of needle-tract seeding following prostate biopsy for suspected cancer: a review of the literature. BJU Int 115(5):698–704. doi:10.1111/bju.12849 CrossRefPubMed Volanis D, Neal DE, Warren AY, Gnanapragasam VJ (2015) Incidence of needle-tract seeding following prostate biopsy for suspected cancer: a review of the literature. BJU Int 115(5):698–704. doi:10.​1111/​bju.​12849 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Boorjian SA, et al. (2013) Percutaneous ablation of renal masses measuring 3.0 cm and smaller: comparative local control and complications after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(2):461–466. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8618 CrossRefPubMed Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Boorjian SA, et al. (2013) Percutaneous ablation of renal masses measuring 3.0 cm and smaller: comparative local control and complications after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200(2):461–466. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​12.​8618 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Percutaneous biopsy facilitates modern treatment of renal masses
verfasst von
E. Jason Abel
Publikationsdatum
21.01.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0644-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Abdominal Radiology 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.