Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2019

30.11.2018 | Interventional Radiology

Percutaneous drainage and management of fluid collections associated with necrotic or cystic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis

verfasst von: David H. Ballard, Mahati Mokkarala, Horacio B. D’Agostino

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous drainage for palliation of symptoms and sepsis in patients with cystic or necrotic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis.

Materials and methods

This is a single center retrospective study of 36 patients (18 men, mean age = 51.1 years) who underwent percutaneous drainage for management of cystic or necrotic tumors in the non-postoperative setting over an 11-year period. Nineteen patients with intraabdominal fluid collections associated with primary malignancies included: cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 3), urothelial (n = 3), and others (n = 6). The 17 patients with fluid collections associated with intraabdominal metastases stemmed from the following primary malignancies: oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 3), colorectal (n = 3), ovarian (n = 2), lung (n = 2), melanoma (n = 2) along with others (n = 5). Indications for percutaneous drainage were as follows: pain (36/36; 100%); fever and/or leukocytosis (34/36; 94%), and mass effect (21/36; 58%). Seven patients underwent additional sclerosis with absolute alcohol. Criteria for drainage success were temporary or definitive relief of symptoms and sepsis control.

Results

Successful sepsis control was achieved in all patients with sepsis (34/34; 100%) and 30/36 (83%) patients had improvement in pain. Duration of catheterization ranged from 2 to 90 days (mean = 22 days). There were four cases of fluid re-accumulation and one patient developed catheter tract seeding. Alcohol ablation was successful in two patients (2/7; 29%). Nearly all patients (34/36; 94%) died during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Percutaneous drainage was effective for palliative treatment of symptomatic cystic and necrotic tumors in the majority of patients in this series.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat vanSonnenberg E, Wittich GR, Goodacre BW, et al. (2001) Percutaneous abscess drainage: update. World J Surg 25:370–372 (discussion 370-372)CrossRef vanSonnenberg E, Wittich GR, Goodacre BW, et al. (2001) Percutaneous abscess drainage: update. World J Surg 25:370–372 (discussion 370-372)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Politano AD, Hranjec T, Rosenberger LH, et al. (2011) Differences in morbidity and mortality with percutaneous versus open surgical drainage of postoperative intra-abdominal infections: a review of 686 cases. Am Surg 77:862–867PubMedPubMedCentral Politano AD, Hranjec T, Rosenberger LH, et al. (2011) Differences in morbidity and mortality with percutaneous versus open surgical drainage of postoperative intra-abdominal infections: a review of 686 cases. Am Surg 77:862–867PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramondetta LM, Dunton CJ, Shapiro MJ, et al. (1996) Percutaneous abscess drainage in gynecologic cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 62:366–369CrossRefPubMed Ramondetta LM, Dunton CJ, Shapiro MJ, et al. (1996) Percutaneous abscess drainage in gynecologic cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 62:366–369CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Maldjian C, Mitty H, Garten A, Forman W (1995) Abscess formation in desmoid tumors of Gardner’s syndrome and percutaneous drainage: a report of three cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 18:168–171CrossRefPubMed Maldjian C, Mitty H, Garten A, Forman W (1995) Abscess formation in desmoid tumors of Gardner’s syndrome and percutaneous drainage: a report of three cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 18:168–171CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Percutaneous drainage and management of fluid collections associated with necrotic or cystic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis
verfasst von
David H. Ballard
Mahati Mokkarala
Horacio B. D’Agostino
Publikationsdatum
30.11.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1854-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Abdominal Radiology 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

The “honeycomb” gallbladder

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.