nach oben

Erschienen in:

25.01.2017 | Topic Paper

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique

verfasst von: Thomas Knoll, Francisco Daels, Janak Desai, Andras Hoznek, Bodo Knudsen, Emanuele Montanari, Cesare Scoffone, Andreas Skolarikos, Keiichi Tozawa

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered to be the first line of treatment for large renal stones. Though PCNL comes with higher morbidity, its efficacy is unbeaten by other minimally invasive modalities. However, potential complications, such as bleeding, occur. Improved skills and modifications of the procedure may reduce the probability of adverse outcomes. This article discusses the current trends and standards in PCNL technique with special focus on all important steps as positioning, access, instruments, dilation, disintegration, and exit, including outcomes, complication management, and training modalities.

Agarwal M, Agrawal MS, Jaiswal A et al (2011) Safety and efficacy of ultrasonography as an adjunct to fluoroscopy for renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int 108:1346–1349CrossRefPubMed

Aghamir SM, Salavati A, Aloosh M et al (2012) Feasibility of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy under the age of 14 years: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 26:621–624CrossRefPubMed

Akman T, Binbay M, Aslan R et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 177 patients with chronic kidney disease: a single center experience. J Urol 187:173–177CrossRefPubMed

Al-Kohlany KM, Shokeir AA, Mosbah A et al (2005) Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 173:469–473CrossRefPubMed

Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166:2072CrossRefPubMed

Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R et al (1981) Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol 125:463CrossRefPubMed

Andonian S, Scoffone CM, Louie MK et al (2013) Does imaging modality used for percutaneous renal access make a difference? A matched case analysis. J Endourol 27:24–28CrossRefPubMed

Andonian S, Scoffone CM, Louie MK et al (2012) Does imaging modality used for percutaneous renal access make a difference? A matched case analysis. J Endourol 27:24–28

Armitage JN, Irving SO, Burgess NA et al (2012) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the United kingdom: results of a prospective data registry. In:Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom. jim_armitage@hotmail.com, Switzerland, p 1188–1193

10.

Astroza G, Lipkin M, Neisius A et al (2013) Effect of supine vs prone position on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in staghorn calculi: results from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Study. Urology 82:1240–1244CrossRefPubMed

11.

Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M et al (2011) The “All-Seeing Needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 59:1054–1059CrossRef

12.

Bayrak O, Seckiner I, Erturhan S (2012) Evaluation of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy experience of an adult-trained surgeon. In: Department of Urology, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey. Dromerbayrak@yahoo.com, United States, p 992–995

13.

Bhageria A, Nayak B, Seth A et al (2013) Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Single-centre 10-year experience. In:Elsevier Ltd (Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1 GB, United Kingdom), United Kingdom, p 472–475

14.

Bilen CY, Kocak B, Kitirci G et al (2007) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: lessons learned in 5 years at a single institution. J Urol 177:1867–1871CrossRefPubMed

15.

Clayman RV, Preminger GM, Franklin JF et al (1985) Percutaneous ureterolithotomy. J Urol 133:671–673CrossRefPubMed

16.

Cracco CM, Scoffone CM, Poggio M et al (2010) The patient position for PNL: does it matter? Arch Ital Urol Androl 82:30–31PubMed

17.

De La Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P et al (2008) Prognostic factors and percutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol 180:2489–2493CrossRef

18.

Dehong C, Liangren L, Huawei L et al (2013) A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis 41:523–530CrossRefPubMed

19.

Desai J, Zeng G, Zhao Z et al (2013) A novel technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: introduction and an initial experience for treatment of upper urinary calculi less than 2 cm. BioMed Res Int 2013:490793CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM et al (2004) A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 172:565CrossRefPubMed

21.

Duty B, Waingankar N, Okhunov Z et al (2012) Anatomical variation between the prone, supine, and supine oblique positions on computed tomography: implications for percutaneous nephrolithotomy access. Urology 79:67–71CrossRefPubMed

22.

Ferakis N, Stavropoulos M (2015) Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and upper ureteral stones: Lessons learned from a review of the literature. Urol Ann 7:141–148CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Gupta M, Lee MW (2007) Treatment of stones associated with complex or anomalous renal anatomy. Urol Clin North Am 34:431–441CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hacker A, Wendt-Nordahl G, Honeck P et al (2007) A biological model to teach percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique with ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided access. J Endourol 21:545–550CrossRefPubMed

25.

Hammond L, Ketchum J, Schwartz BF (2004) A new approach to urology training: a laboratory model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 172:1950–1952CrossRefPubMed

26.

Hosseini SR, Mohseni MG, Alizadeh F (2014) One shot tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Is it safe and effective in preschool children? Urol Int 92(4):440–443CrossRefPubMed

27.

Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM et al (2007) Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int 100:233–236CrossRefPubMed

28.

Isac W, Rizkala E, Liu X et al (2013) Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis. In:Stevan B. Streem Center for Endourology and Stone Disease, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA., United States, p 251–256

29.

Kaufmann OG, Sountoulides P, Kaplan A et al (2009) Skin treatment and tract closure for tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: University of California, Irvine, technique. J Endourol 23:1739–1741CrossRefPubMed

30.

Khan F, Borin JF, Pearle MS et al (2006) Endoscopically guided percutaneous renal access: “seeing is believing”. J Endourol 20:451–455 (discussion 455) CrossRefPubMed

31.

Knoll T (2014) Editorial comment for Zeng et al J Endourol 28:267–268CrossRefPubMed

32.

Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS et al (2010) Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol 24:1075–1079CrossRefPubMed

33.

Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S et al (2004) Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 18:715–722CrossRefPubMed

34.

Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL et al (2001) Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 40:619CrossRefPubMed

35.

Lang E, Thomas R, Davis R et al (2009) Risks, advantages, and complications of intercostal vs subcostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Urology 74:751–755CrossRefPubMed

36.

Lee CL, Anderson JK, Monga M (2004) Residency training in percutaneous renal access: does it affect urological practice? J Urol 171:592–595CrossRefPubMed

37.

Li Y, Yang L, Xu P et al (2013) One-shot versus gradual dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis 41:443–448CrossRefPubMed

38.

Liatsikos EN, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg JU et al (2010) Percutaneous management of staghorn calculi in horseshoe kidneys: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 24:531–536CrossRef

39.

Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B et al (1994) Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 151:663CrossRefPubMed

40.

Lojanapiwat B, Prasopsuk S (2006) Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches. J Endourol 20:491–494CrossRefPubMed

41.

Mandal S, Goel A, Gupta DK (2012) Re: Jens J. Rassweiler, Michael Muller, Markus Fangerau, et al iPad-assisted percutaneous access to the kidney using marker-based navigation: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol 2012;61:628–31. In, Switzerland, pp e57–e58

42.

Marcovich R, Jacobson AI, Singh J et al (2004) No panacea for drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 18:743–747CrossRefPubMed

43.

Meretyk S, Gofrit ON, Gafni O et al (1997) Complete staghorn calculi: random prospective comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy and combined with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 157:780–786CrossRefPubMed

44.

Michel MS, Knoll T, Kohrmann KU et al (2002) The URO Mentor: development and evaluation of a new computer-based interactive training system for virtual life-like simulation of diagnostic and therapeutic endourological procedures. BJU Int 89:174CrossRefPubMed

45.

Mishra S, Jagtap J, Sabnis RB et al (2013) Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. In:Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India. mishra@mpuh.org, United States, p 147–151

46.

Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C et al (2011) Prospective comparative study of Miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int 108:896–900

47.

Nagele U, Anastasiadis AG, Schilling DA et al (2007) Introducing a new sealant applicator for easy, safe, and quick closure of a mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy access tract. J Endourol 21:393–396CrossRefPubMed

48.

Opondo D, Tefekli A, Esen T et al (2012) Impact of case volumes on the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. In: Elsevier (P.O. Box 211, Amsterdam 1000 AE, Netherlands), Netherlands, p 1181–1187

49.

Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K et al (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96:875–878CrossRefPubMed

50.

Ritter M, Rassweiler MC, Hacker A et al (2012) Laser-guided percutaneous kidney access with the Uro Dyna-CT: first experience of three-dimensional puncture planning with an ex vivo model. World J Urol 31:1147–1151

51.

Rodrigues PL, Rodrigues NF, Fonseca J et al (2013) Kidney targeting and puncturing during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Recent advances and future perspectives. In: Mary Ann Liebert Inc. (140 Huguenot Street, New Rochelle NY 10801–5215, United States), United States, p 826–834

52.

Schilling D, Gakis G, Walcher U et al (2011) The learning curve in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: a 1-year retrospective evaluation of a novice and an expert. World J Urol 29:749–753CrossRefPubMed

53.

Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Cossu M et al (2008) Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol 54:1393–1403CrossRefPubMed

54.

Segura JW, Patterson DE, Leroy AJ et al (1983) Percutaneous lithotripsy. J Urol 130:1051–1054CrossRefPubMed

55.

Shoma AM, Eraky I, El KMR et al (2002) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone technique. Urology 60:388–392CrossRefPubMed

56.

Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M et al (2007) The Learning Curve in the Training of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 10:10

57.

Türk CK, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Seitz C (ed) (2015) Guideline on urolithiasis. European association of urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands

58.

Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M et al (2011) Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Endourol 25:1619–1625CrossRefPubMed

59.

Valdivia Uria JG, Valle Gerhold J, Lopez Lopez JA et al (1998) Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol 160:1975–1978CrossRefPubMed

60.

Wezel F, Mamoulakis C, Rioja J et al (2009) Two contemporary series of percutaneous tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23:1655–1661CrossRefPubMed

61.

Zhong Q, Zheng C, Mo J et al (2013) Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A meta-analysis. In:Mary Ann Liebert Inc. (140 Huguenot Street, New Rochelle NY 10801–5215, United States), United States, p 420–426

Titel: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique
verfasst von: Thomas Knoll
Francisco Daels
Janak Desai
Andras Hoznek
Bodo Knudsen
Emanuele Montanari
Cesare Scoffone
Andreas Skolarikos
Keiichi Tozawa
Publikationsdatum: 25.01.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2001-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Nachrichten

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Varikozelen bei Jugendlichen: Das Für und Wider der Operation

Update Urologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Reply to: 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Hamdy et al. NEJM October 2016

Androgen deprivation therapy and the risk of parkinsonism in men with prostate cancer

Stone technology: intracorporeal lithotripters

Integration of MRI to clinical nomogram for predicting pathological stage before radical prostatectomy

Urolithiasis: evaluation, dietary factors, and medical management: an update of the 2014 SIU-ICUD international consultation on stone disease

Perioperative chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Varikozelen bei Jugendlichen: Das Für und Wider der Operation

Update Urologie