Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2017

05.01.2017 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Percutaneous Peritoneal Lavage for the Rapid Staging of Gastric and Pancreatic Cancer

verfasst von: Linda M. Pak, MD, Daniel G. Coit, MD, Anne A. Eaton, MS, Peter J. Allen, MD, Michael I. D’Angelica, MD, Ronald P. DeMatteo, MD, William R. Jarnagin, MD, Vivian E. Strong, MD, T. Peter Kingham, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Positive peritoneal cytology is classified as M1 disease in gastric and pancreatic cancer. While peritoneal cytology is typically obtained by laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, this study sought to examine the feasibility and safety of performing this percutaneously, with monitored anesthesia care and in combination with other diagnostic procedures to condense and expedite the staging process.

Methods

Patients with gastric or pancreatic cancer scheduled for laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage were prospectively enrolled to undergo intraoperative percutaneous peritoneal lavage prior to laparoscopic peritoneal lavage. Saline was infused through a percutaneously-inserted catheter and fluid was collected for peritoneal cytology. Three-quadrant washings collected during laparoscopy were also sent for peritoneal cytology. The primary outcome was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of percutaneous peritoneal lavage for detecting positive peritoneal cytology compared with the gold standard of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage, while the secondary outcome was to determine safety.

Results

Percutaneous peritoneal lavage was successfully performed in 70 of 76 patients (92%). Ten of 48 gastric cancer patients (21%) and three of 22 pancreatic cancer patients (14%) had positive percutaneous and laparoscopic peritoneal cytology. Two additional gastric cancer patients had positive laparoscopic peritoneal cytology only. Sensitivity and specificity of percutaneous peritoneal lavage compared with laparoscopic peritoneal lavage were 87% and 100%, respectively. No complications occurred with percutaneous peritoneal lavage.

Conclusions

Percutaneous peritoneal lavage is a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for the diagnosis of metastatic gastric and pancreatic cancer. It is possible this can be utilized in an outpatient setting, such as during endoscopy, to allow for earlier diagnosis of M1 disease and decreased time to appropriate treatment.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3077–9.CrossRefPubMed Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3077–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CF, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Spinger; 2010. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CF, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Spinger; 2010.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Leach SD, Rose JA, Lowy AM, et al. Significance of peritoneal cytology in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Surgery. 1995;118(3):472–8.CrossRefPubMed Leach SD, Rose JA, Lowy AM, et al. Significance of peritoneal cytology in patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Surgery. 1995;118(3):472–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lei S, Kini J, Kim K, et al. Pancreatic cancer. Cytologic study of peritoneal washings. Arch Surg. 1994;129(6):639–42.CrossRefPubMed Lei S, Kini J, Kim K, et al. Pancreatic cancer. Cytologic study of peritoneal washings. Arch Surg. 1994;129(6):639–42.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Midwinter MJ, Watson A, Wadehra V, et al. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage cytology and immunocytology in pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2001;3(3):207–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Midwinter MJ, Watson A, Wadehra V, et al. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage cytology and immunocytology in pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2001;3(3):207–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jimenez RE, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, et al. Impact of laparoscopic staging in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg. 2000;135(4):409–14; discussion 414–5. Jimenez RE, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, et al. Impact of laparoscopic staging in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg. 2000;135(4):409–14; discussion 414–5.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieveen van Dijkum EJ, Sturm PD, de Wit LT, et al. Cytology of peritoneal lavage performed during staging laparoscopy for gastrointestinal malignancies: is it useful? Ann Surg. 1998;228(6):728–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nieveen van Dijkum EJ, Sturm PD, de Wit LT, et al. Cytology of peritoneal lavage performed during staging laparoscopy for gastrointestinal malignancies: is it useful? Ann Surg. 1998;228(6):728–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jimenez RE, Warshaw AL, Fernandez-Del Castillo C. Laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology in the staging of pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(1):15–20.CrossRefPubMed Jimenez RE, Warshaw AL, Fernandez-Del Castillo C. Laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology in the staging of pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(1):15–20.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark CJ, Traverso LW. Positive peritoneal lavage cytology is a predictor of worse survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg. 2010;199(5):657–62.CrossRefPubMed Clark CJ, Traverso LW. Positive peritoneal lavage cytology is a predictor of worse survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg. 2010;199(5):657–62.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Root HD, Hauser CW, McKinley CR, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Surgery. 1965;57:633–7.PubMed Root HD, Hauser CW, McKinley CR, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Surgery. 1965;57:633–7.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat 11. Cue JI, Miller FB, Cryer HM 3rd, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison between open and closed peritoneal lavage techniques. J Trauma. 1990;30(7):880–3.CrossRefPubMed 11. Cue JI, Miller FB, Cryer HM 3rd, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison between open and closed peritoneal lavage techniques. J Trauma. 1990;30(7):880–3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders CJ, Battistella FD, Whetzel TP, et al. Percutaneous diagnostic peritoneal lavage using a Veress needle versus an open technique: a prospective randomized trial. J Trauma. 1998;44(5):883–8.CrossRefPubMed Saunders CJ, Battistella FD, Whetzel TP, et al. Percutaneous diagnostic peritoneal lavage using a Veress needle versus an open technique: a prospective randomized trial. J Trauma. 1998;44(5):883–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgson NF, Stewart TC, Girotti MJ. Open or closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage for abdominal trauma? A meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2000;48(6):1091–5.CrossRefPubMed Hodgson NF, Stewart TC, Girotti MJ. Open or closed diagnostic peritoneal lavage for abdominal trauma? A meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2000;48(6):1091–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer RP, Beverlin BC, Engrav LH, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: fourteen years and 2,586 patients later. Am J Surg. 1978;136(6):701–4.CrossRefPubMed Fischer RP, Beverlin BC, Engrav LH, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: fourteen years and 2,586 patients later. Am J Surg. 1978;136(6):701–4.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Henneman PL, Marx JA, Moore EE, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: accuracy in predicting necessary laparotomy following blunt and penetrating trauma. J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1345–55.CrossRefPubMed Henneman PL, Marx JA, Moore EE, et al. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: accuracy in predicting necessary laparotomy following blunt and penetrating trauma. J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1345–55.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis JW, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC, et al. Complications in evaluating abdominal trauma: diagnostic peritoneal lavage versus computerized axial tomography. J Trauma. 1990;30(12):1506–9.CrossRefPubMed Davis JW, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC, et al. Complications in evaluating abdominal trauma: diagnostic peritoneal lavage versus computerized axial tomography. J Trauma. 1990;30(12):1506–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagy KK, Roberts RR, Joseph KT, et al. Experience with over 2500 diagnostic peritoneal lavages. Injury. 2000;31(7):479–82.CrossRefPubMed Nagy KK, Roberts RR, Joseph KT, et al. Experience with over 2500 diagnostic peritoneal lavages. Injury. 2000;31(7):479–82.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA. 1983;249(13):1743–5.PubMed Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA. 1983;249(13):1743–5.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke EC, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, et al. Peritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer: an independent predictor of outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5(5):411–5.CrossRefPubMed Burke EC, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, et al. Peritoneal lavage cytology in gastric cancer: an independent predictor of outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5(5):411–5.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bando E, Yonemura Y, Takeshita Y, et al. Intraoperative lavage for cytological examination in 1,297 patients with gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1999;178(3):256–62.CrossRefPubMed Bando E, Yonemura Y, Takeshita Y, et al. Intraoperative lavage for cytological examination in 1,297 patients with gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1999;178(3):256–62.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Makary MA, Warshaw AL, Centeno BA, et al. Implications of peritoneal cytology for pancreatic cancer management. Arch Surg. 1998;133(4):361–5.CrossRefPubMed Makary MA, Warshaw AL, Centeno BA, et al. Implications of peritoneal cytology for pancreatic cancer management. Arch Surg. 1998;133(4):361–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirabayashi K, Imoto A, Yamada M, et al. Positive intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology is a negative prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective single-center study. Front Oncol. 2015;5:182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hirabayashi K, Imoto A, Yamada M, et al. Positive intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology is a negative prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective single-center study. Front Oncol. 2015;5:182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat 23. Ferrone CR, Haas B, Tang L, et al. The influence of positive peritoneal cytology on survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(10):1347–53.CrossRefPubMed 23. Ferrone CR, Haas B, Tang L, et al. The influence of positive peritoneal cytology on survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(10):1347–53.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Mezhir JJ, Posner MC, Roggin KK. Prospective clinical trial of diagnostic peritoneal lavage to detect positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107(8):794–8.CrossRefPubMed Mezhir JJ, Posner MC, Roggin KK. Prospective clinical trial of diagnostic peritoneal lavage to detect positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107(8):794–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mezhir JJ, Shah MA, Jacks LM, et al. Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3173–80.CrossRefPubMed Mezhir JJ, Shah MA, Jacks LM, et al. Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3173–80.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Percutaneous Peritoneal Lavage for the Rapid Staging of Gastric and Pancreatic Cancer
verfasst von
Linda M. Pak, MD
Daniel G. Coit, MD
Anne A. Eaton, MS
Peter J. Allen, MD
Michael I. D’Angelica, MD
Ronald P. DeMatteo, MD
William R. Jarnagin, MD
Vivian E. Strong, MD
T. Peter Kingham, MD
Publikationsdatum
05.01.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5757-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.