Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

07.05.2018 | Original Article

Performance of FDG-PET/CT in solitary pulmonary nodule based on pre-test likelihood of malignancy: results from the ITALIAN retrospective multicenter trial

verfasst von: Laura Evangelista, Alberto Cuocolo, Leonardo Pace, Luigi Mansi, Silvana Del Vecchio, Paolo Miletto, Silvia Sanfilippo, Sara Pellegrino, Luca Guerra, Giovanna Pepe, Giuseppina Peluso, Marco Salvatore, Rosj Galicchio, Michele Zuffante, Salvatore Annunziata, Mohsen Farsad, Agostino Chiaravalloti, Marco Spadafora

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), stratifying the risk according to the likelihood of pulmonary malignancy.

Methods

FDG-PET/CT of 502 patients, stratified for pre-test cancer risk, were retrospectively analyzed. FDG uptake in SPN was assessed by a 4-point scoring system and semiquantitative analysis using the ratio between SUVmax in SPN and SUVmean in mediastinal blood pool (BP) and between SUVmax in SPN and SUVmean in liver (L). Histopathology and/or follow-up data were used as standard of reference.

Results

SPN was malignant in 180 (36%) patients, benign in 175 (35%), and indeterminate in 147 (29%). The 355 patients with a definitive SPN nature (malignant or benign) were considered for the analysis. Considering FDG uptake ≥ 2, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and accuracy were 85.6%, 85.7%, 86%, 85.2%, and 85.6% respectively. Sensitivity and PPV were higher (P < 0.05) in intermediate and high-risk patients, while specificity and NPV were higher (P < 0.05) in low-risk patients. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-offs for better discrimination between benign and malignant SPN were 1.56 (sensitivity 81% and specificity 87%) and 1.12 (sensitivity 81% and specificity 86%) for SUVmax/SUVmeanBP and SUVmax/SUVmeanL respectively. In intermediate and high-risk patients, including the SUVmax/SUVmeanBP, the specificity shifted from 85% and 50% to 100%.

Conclusion

Visual FDG-PET/CT has an acceptable performance in patients with SPN, but accuracy improves when SUVratios are considered, particularly in patients with intermediate and high risk of malignancy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansell DM, Bankier A, MacMahon H, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, et al. Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging 1. Radiology. 2008;246:697–722.CrossRefPubMed Hansell DM, Bankier A, MacMahon H, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, et al. Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging 1. Radiology. 2008;246:697–722.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sim YT, Goh Y, Dempsey MF, Han S, Poon FW. PET-CT evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: correlation with maximum standardized uptake value and pathology. Lung. 2013;191:625–32.CrossRefPubMed Sim YT, Goh Y, Dempsey MF, Han S, Poon FW. PET-CT evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: correlation with maximum standardized uptake value and pathology. Lung. 2013;191:625–32.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat van Gómez López O, García Vicente AM, Honguero Martínez AF, Jiménez Londoño GA, Vega Caicedo CH, León Atance P, Soriano Castrejón ÁM. 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of pulmonary solitary nodules: comparison of different analysis methods and risk variables in the prediction of malignancy. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4:228–235.PubMedPubMedCentral van Gómez López O, García Vicente AM, Honguero Martínez AF, Jiménez Londoño GA, Vega Caicedo CH, León Atance P, Soriano Castrejón ÁM. 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of pulmonary solitary nodules: comparison of different analysis methods and risk variables in the prediction of malignancy. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4:228–235.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dabrowska M, Krenke R, Korczynski P, Maskey-Warzechowska M, Zukowska M, Kunikowska J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 18-FDG in identifying malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e666.CrossRef Dabrowska M, Krenke R, Korczynski P, Maskey-Warzechowska M, Zukowska M, Kunikowska J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 18-FDG in identifying malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e666.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurney JW. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory. Radiology. 1993;186:405–13.CrossRefPubMed Gurney JW. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory. Radiology. 1993;186:405–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Swensen SJ, Silverstein M, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Edell ES. The probability ofmalignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:849–55.CrossRefPubMed Swensen SJ, Silverstein M, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Edell ES. The probability ofmalignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:849–55.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG. A clinical model to estimate the pretestprobability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest. 2007;131:383–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG. A clinical model to estimate the pretestprobability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest. 2007;131:383–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat McWilliams A, Tammemagi M, Mayo JR, Roberts H, Liu G, Soghrati K, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med. 2013;396:910–9.CrossRef McWilliams A, Tammemagi M, Mayo JR, Roberts H, Liu G, Soghrati K, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med. 2013;396:910–9.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Herder GJ, van Tinteren H, Golding RP, Kostense PJ, Comans EF, Smit EF, et al. Clinical prediction model to characterize pulmonary nodules: validation and added value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Chest. 2005;128:2490–6.CrossRefPubMed Herder GJ, van Tinteren H, Golding RP, Kostense PJ, Comans EF, Smit EF, et al. Clinical prediction model to characterize pulmonary nodules: validation and added value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Chest. 2005;128:2490–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruilong Z, Daohai X, Li G, Xiaohong W, Chunjie W, Lei T. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38:67–75.CrossRefPubMed Ruilong Z, Daohai X, Li G, Xiaohong W, Chunjie W, Lei T. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38:67–75.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, Mazzone PJ, Midthun DE, Naidich DP, et al. Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:e93S–120S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, Mazzone PJ, Midthun DE, Naidich DP, et al. Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:e93S–120S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Callister MEJ, Baldwin D, Akram AR, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax. 2015;70:i1–ii54.CrossRef Callister MEJ, Baldwin D, Akram AR, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax. 2015;70:i1–ii54.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat MacMahon H, Austin J, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005;237:395–400.CrossRefPubMed MacMahon H, Austin J, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005;237:395–400.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould MK, Maclean C, Kuschner WG, et al. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001;285:914–24.CrossRefPubMed Gould MK, Maclean C, Kuschner WG, et al. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001;285:914–24.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cronin P, Dwamena B, Kelly AM, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy. Radiology. 2008;246:772–82.CrossRefPubMed Cronin P, Dwamena B, Kelly AM, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy. Radiology. 2008;246:772–82.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher JW, Kymes S, Gould M, et al. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:179–85.CrossRefPubMed Fletcher JW, Kymes S, Gould M, et al. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:179–85.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Vos CS, Koopman D, Rijnsdorp S, et al. Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:4–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van der Vos CS, Koopman D, Rijnsdorp S, et al. Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:4–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Evangelista L, Spadafora M, Pace L, Mansi L, Cuocolo A. Italian tailored assessment of lung indeterminate accidental nodule by proposing a segmental PET/computed tomography (s-PET/CT): Rationale and study design of a retrospective, multicenter trial. Curr Radiopharm. 2017;11(1):46–49.CrossRef Evangelista L, Spadafora M, Pace L, Mansi L, Cuocolo A. Italian tailored assessment of lung indeterminate accidental nodule by proposing a segmental PET/computed tomography (s-PET/CT): Rationale and study design of a retrospective, multicenter trial. Curr Radiopharm. 2017;11(1):46–49.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Horeweg N, van Rosmalen J, Heuvelmans MA, et al. Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1332–41.CrossRefPubMed Horeweg N, van Rosmalen J, Heuvelmans MA, et al. Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1332–41.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Li W, Pang H, Liu Q, Zhou J. The role of 18F-FDG PET or18F-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2032–7.CrossRefPubMed Li W, Pang H, Liu Q, Zhou J. The role of 18F-FDG PET or18F-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2032–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Li S, Zhao B, Wang X, et al. Overestimated value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT to diagnose pulmonary nodules: analysis of 298 patients. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:e352–7.CrossRefPubMed Li S, Zhao B, Wang X, et al. Overestimated value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT to diagnose pulmonary nodules: analysis of 298 patients. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:e352–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkhawaldeh K, Bural G, Kumar R, Alavi A. Impact of dual-time-point(18)F-FDG PET imaging and partial volume correction in the assessment ofsolitary pulmonary nodules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:246–52.CrossRefPubMed Alkhawaldeh K, Bural G, Kumar R, Alavi A. Impact of dual-time-point(18)F-FDG PET imaging and partial volume correction in the assessment ofsolitary pulmonary nodules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:246–52.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Hoff J, Oehme L, Schramm G, et al. The PET-derived tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) is superior to tumor SUV as a surrogate parameter of the metabolic rate of FDG. EJNMMI Res. 2013;3:77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van den Hoff J, Oehme L, Schramm G, et al. The PET-derived tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) is superior to tumor SUV as a surrogate parameter of the metabolic rate of FDG. EJNMMI Res. 2013;3:77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofheinz F, van der Hoff J, Steffen IG, et al. Comparative evaluation of SUV, tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR), and dual time point measurements for assessment of the metabolic uptake rate in FDG PET. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hofheinz F, van der Hoff J, Steffen IG, et al. Comparative evaluation of SUV, tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR), and dual time point measurements for assessment of the metabolic uptake rate in FDG PET. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6:53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanner NT, Aggarwal J, Gould MK, Kearney P, Diette G, Vachani A, et al. Management of pulmonary nodules by community pulmonologists: a multicenter observational study. Chest. 2015;148:1405–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tanner NT, Aggarwal J, Gould MK, Kearney P, Diette G, Vachani A, et al. Management of pulmonary nodules by community pulmonologists: a multicenter observational study. Chest. 2015;148:1405–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Shreve P, Townsend D. Clinical PET-CT in radiology: integrated imaging in oncology. New York: Springer; 2011.CrossRef Shreve P, Townsend D. Clinical PET-CT in radiology: integrated imaging in oncology. New York: Springer; 2011.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Performance of FDG-PET/CT in solitary pulmonary nodule based on pre-test likelihood of malignancy: results from the ITALIAN retrospective multicenter trial
verfasst von
Laura Evangelista
Alberto Cuocolo
Leonardo Pace
Luigi Mansi
Silvana Del Vecchio
Paolo Miletto
Silvia Sanfilippo
Sara Pellegrino
Luca Guerra
Giovanna Pepe
Giuseppina Peluso
Marco Salvatore
Rosj Galicchio
Michele Zuffante
Salvatore Annunziata
Mohsen Farsad
Agostino Chiaravalloti
Marco Spadafora
Publikationsdatum
07.05.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4016-1