Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2013

01.10.2013 | Head and Neck Oncology

Perineural Invasion as a Major Determinant for the Aggressiveness Associated with Increased Tumor Thickness in T1–2 Oral Tongue and Buccal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

verfasst von: Shyh-Kuan Tai, MD, PhD, Wing-Yin Li, MD, Muh-Hwa Yang, MD, PhD, Pen-Yuan Chu, MD, Yi-Fen Wang, MD, PhD, Peter Mu-Hsin Chang, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 11/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Neck management for cN0 neck remains controversial for T1–2 oral tongue and buccal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Increased tumor thickness and perineural invasion (PNI) are two pathologic features that correlated with cervical lymph node (LN) metastasis and poor survival. However, the relationships between these two features remain unclear.

Methods

Detailed histologic reevaluation under hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed in tumors of 212 consecutive patients with T1–2, cN0 oral tongue and buccal SCC. The interrelationships between the impacts of tumor thickness and PNI on cervical LN metastasis and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed.

Results

Increased tumor thickness (>6 mm) correlated with higher LN metastasis and poor 5-year DSS rates in univariate analysis. However, only PNI independently predicted both in multivariate analysis (P = 0.004 and P = 0.039, respectively). When stratified by PNI status, increased tumor thickness did not correlate with higher LN metastasis rate in either PNI-negative or PNI-positive groups (P = 0.337 and P = 0.730). Compared to patients with thin tumors (≤6 mm), patient with thick tumors revealed significantly higher LN metastasis rate (41.9 vs. 16.4 %, P = 0.001) and lower 5-year DSS rate (77.5 vs. 93.7 %, P = 0.006) only at the presence of PNI.

Conclusions

PNI can be a major determinant for higher LN metastasis and poor 5-year DSS rates associated with increased tumor thickness in T1–2 oral tongue and buccal SCC. Careful evaluation of PNI should be mandatory in routine pathologic examination, aside from the measurement of tumor thickness.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Beenken SW, Krontiras H, Maddox WA, Peters GE, Soong S, Urist MM. T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: prognostic factors and the role of elective lymph node dissection. Head Neck. 1999;21:124–30.PubMedCrossRef Beenken SW, Krontiras H, Maddox WA, Peters GE, Soong S, Urist MM. T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: prognostic factors and the role of elective lymph node dissection. Head Neck. 1999;21:124–30.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuen AP, Lam KY, Chan AC, Wei WI, Lam LK, Ho WK, Ho CM. Clinicopathological analysis of elective neck dissection for N0 neck of early oral tongue carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1999;177:90–2.PubMedCrossRef Yuen AP, Lam KY, Chan AC, Wei WI, Lam LK, Ho WK, Ho CM. Clinicopathological analysis of elective neck dissection for N0 neck of early oral tongue carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1999;177:90–2.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuen AP, Ho CM, Chow TL, et al. Prospective randomized study of selective neck dissection versus observation for N0 neck of early tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 2009;31:765–72.PubMedCrossRef Yuen AP, Ho CM, Chow TL, et al. Prospective randomized study of selective neck dissection versus observation for N0 neck of early tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 2009;31:765–72.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuen AP, Wei WI, Wong YM, Tang KC. Elective neck dissection versus observation in the treatment of early oral tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 1997;19:583–8.PubMedCrossRef Yuen AP, Wei WI, Wong YM, Tang KC. Elective neck dissection versus observation in the treatment of early oral tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 1997;19:583–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Cruz AK, Siddachari RC, Walvekar RR, et al. Elective neck dissection for the management of the N0 neck in early cancer of the oral tongue: need for a randomized controlled trial. Head Neck. 2009;31:618–24.PubMedCrossRef D’Cruz AK, Siddachari RC, Walvekar RR, et al. Elective neck dissection for the management of the N0 neck in early cancer of the oral tongue: need for a randomized controlled trial. Head Neck. 2009;31:618–24.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Po Wing Yuen A, Lam KY, Lam LK, et al. Prognostic factors of clinically stage I and II oral tongue carcinoma—a comparative study of stage, thickness, shape, growth pattern, invasive front malignancy grading, Martinez-Gimeno score, and pathologic features. Head Neck. 2002;24:513–20. Po Wing Yuen A, Lam KY, Lam LK, et al. Prognostic factors of clinically stage I and II oral tongue carcinoma—a comparative study of stage, thickness, shape, growth pattern, invasive front malignancy grading, Martinez-Gimeno score, and pathologic features. Head Neck. 2002;24:513–20.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat O-charoenrat P, Pillai G, Patel S, et al. Tumour thickness predicts cervical nodal metastases and survival in early oral tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. 2003;39:386–90.PubMedCrossRef O-charoenrat P, Pillai G, Patel S, et al. Tumour thickness predicts cervical nodal metastases and survival in early oral tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. 2003;39:386–90.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pentenero M, Gandolfo S, Carrozzo M. Importance of tumor thickness and depth of invasion in nodal involvement and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the literature. Head Neck. 2005;27:1080–91.PubMedCrossRef Pentenero M, Gandolfo S, Carrozzo M. Importance of tumor thickness and depth of invasion in nodal involvement and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the literature. Head Neck. 2005;27:1080–91.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra RC, Parida G, Mishra TK, Mohanty S. Tumour thickness and relationship to locoregional failure in cancer of the buccal mucosa. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:186–9.PubMedCrossRef Mishra RC, Parida G, Mishra TK, Mohanty S. Tumour thickness and relationship to locoregional failure in cancer of the buccal mucosa. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999;25:186–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Urist MM, O’Brien CJ, Soong SJ, Visscher DW, Maddox WA. Squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: analysis of prognostic factors. Am J Surg. 1987;154:411–4.PubMedCrossRef Urist MM, O’Brien CJ, Soong SJ, Visscher DW, Maddox WA. Squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: analysis of prognostic factors. Am J Surg. 1987;154:411–4.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jing J, Li L, He W, Sun G. Prognostic predictors of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa with negative surgical margins. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:896–901.PubMedCrossRef Jing J, Li L, He W, Sun G. Prognostic predictors of squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa with negative surgical margins. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:896–901.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuen AP, Lam KY, Wei WI, et al. A comparison of the prognostic significance of tumor diameter, length, width, thickness, area, volume, and clinicopathological features of oral tongue carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2000;180:139–43.PubMedCrossRef Yuen AP, Lam KY, Wei WI, et al. A comparison of the prognostic significance of tumor diameter, length, width, thickness, area, volume, and clinicopathological features of oral tongue carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2000;180:139–43.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Howaldt HP, Kainz M, Euler B, Vorast H. Proposal for modification of the TNM staging classification for cancer of the oral cavity. DOSAK. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:275–88.PubMedCrossRef Howaldt HP, Kainz M, Euler B, Vorast H. Proposal for modification of the TNM staging classification for cancer of the oral cavity. DOSAK. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:275–88.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore C, Kuhns JG, Greenberg RA. Thickness as prognostic aid in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Arch Surg. 1986;121:1410–4.PubMedCrossRef Moore C, Kuhns JG, Greenberg RA. Thickness as prognostic aid in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Arch Surg. 1986;121:1410–4.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Wong GY, Spiro JD, Gnecco CA, Strong EW. Predictive value of tumor thickness in squamous carcinoma confined to the tongue and floor of the mouth. Am J Surg. 1986;152:345–50.PubMedCrossRef Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Wong GY, Spiro JD, Gnecco CA, Strong EW. Predictive value of tumor thickness in squamous carcinoma confined to the tongue and floor of the mouth. Am J Surg. 1986;152:345–50.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Moles MA, Esteban F, Rodriguez-Archilla A, Ruiz-Avila I, Gonzalez-Moles S. Importance of tumour thickness measurement in prognosis of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. 2002;38:394–7.PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez-Moles MA, Esteban F, Rodriguez-Archilla A, Ruiz-Avila I, Gonzalez-Moles S. Importance of tumour thickness measurement in prognosis of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. 2002;38:394–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukano H, Matsuura H, Hasegawa Y, Nakamura S. Depth of invasion as a predictive factor for cervical lymph node metastasis in tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 1997;19:205–10.PubMedCrossRef Fukano H, Matsuura H, Hasegawa Y, Nakamura S. Depth of invasion as a predictive factor for cervical lymph node metastasis in tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 1997;19:205–10.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang SH, Hwang D, Lockwood G, Goldstein DP, O’Sullivan B. Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a meta-analysis of reported studies. Cancer. 2009;115:1489–97.PubMedCrossRef Huang SH, Hwang D, Lockwood G, Goldstein DP, O’Sullivan B. Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a meta-analysis of reported studies. Cancer. 2009;115:1489–97.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat College of American Pathologists. Cancer protocols and checklists. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists; 2012. College of American Pathologists. Cancer protocols and checklists. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists; 2012.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D. Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer. 2009;115:3379–91.PubMedCrossRef Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D. Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer. 2009;115:3379–91.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchesi F, Piemonti L, Mantovani A, Allavena P. Molecular mechanisms of perineural invasion, a forgotten pathway of dissemination and metastasis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21:77–82.PubMedCrossRef Marchesi F, Piemonti L, Mantovani A, Allavena P. Molecular mechanisms of perineural invasion, a forgotten pathway of dissemination and metastasis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21:77–82.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagan JJ, Collins B, Barnes L, D’Amico F, Myers EN, Johnson JT. Perineural invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:637–40.PubMedCrossRef Fagan JJ, Collins B, Barnes L, D’Amico F, Myers EN, Johnson JT. Perineural invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:637–40.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman M, Liu L, Ward K, et al. Invasion characteristics of oral tongue cancer: frequency of reporting and effect on survival in a population-based study. Cancer. 2009;115:4010–20.PubMedCrossRef Goodman M, Liu L, Ward K, et al. Invasion characteristics of oral tongue cancer: frequency of reporting and effect on survival in a population-based study. Cancer. 2009;115:4010–20.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tai SK, Li WY, Yang MH, et al. Treatment for T1–2 oral squamous cell carcinoma with or without perineural invasion: neck dissection and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1995–2002.PubMedCrossRef Tai SK, Li WY, Yang MH, et al. Treatment for T1–2 oral squamous cell carcinoma with or without perineural invasion: neck dissection and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1995–2002.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahima B, Shingaki S, Nagata M, Saito C. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97:423–31.PubMedCrossRef Rahima B, Shingaki S, Nagata M, Saito C. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97:423–31.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tai SK, Li WY, Chu PY, et al. Risks and clinical implications of perineural invasion in T1–2 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2012;34:994–1001.PubMedCrossRef Tai SK, Li WY, Chu PY, et al. Risks and clinical implications of perineural invasion in T1–2 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2012;34:994–1001.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Breslow A. Prognostic factors in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6:208–12.PubMedCrossRef Breslow A. Prognostic factors in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6:208–12.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:644–7.PubMedCrossRef Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:644–7.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sparano A, Weinstein G, Chalian A, Yodul M, Weber R. Multivariate predictors of occult neck metastasis in early oral tongue cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131:472–6.PubMedCrossRef Sparano A, Weinstein G, Chalian A, Yodul M, Weber R. Multivariate predictors of occult neck metastasis in early oral tongue cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131:472–6.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Woolgar JA, Scott J. Prediction of cervical lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue/floor of mouth. Head Neck. 1995;17:463–72.PubMedCrossRef Woolgar JA, Scott J. Prediction of cervical lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue/floor of mouth. Head Neck. 1995;17:463–72.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen YW, Yu EH, Wu TH, Lo WL, Li WY, Kao SY. Histopathological factors affecting nodal metastasis in tongue cancer: analysis of 94 patients in Taiwan. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:912–6.PubMedCrossRef Chen YW, Yu EH, Wu TH, Lo WL, Li WY, Kao SY. Histopathological factors affecting nodal metastasis in tongue cancer: analysis of 94 patients in Taiwan. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:912–6.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Byers RM, El-Naggar AK, Lee YY, et al. Can we detect or predict the presence of occult nodal metastases in patients with squamous carcinoma of the oral tongue? Head Neck. 1998;20:138–44.PubMedCrossRef Byers RM, El-Naggar AK, Lee YY, et al. Can we detect or predict the presence of occult nodal metastases in patients with squamous carcinoma of the oral tongue? Head Neck. 1998;20:138–44.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurtz KA, Hoffman HT, Zimmerman MB, Robinson RA. Perineural and vascular invasion in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: increased incidence on re-review of slides and by using immunohistochemical enhancement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:354–9.PubMed Kurtz KA, Hoffman HT, Zimmerman MB, Robinson RA. Perineural and vascular invasion in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: increased incidence on re-review of slides and by using immunohistochemical enhancement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:354–9.PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallwork BD, Anderson SR, Coman WB. Squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of the mouth: tumour thickness and the rate of cervical metastasis. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:761–4.PubMedCrossRef Wallwork BD, Anderson SR, Coman WB. Squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of the mouth: tumour thickness and the rate of cervical metastasis. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:761–4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Perineural Invasion as a Major Determinant for the Aggressiveness Associated with Increased Tumor Thickness in T1–2 Oral Tongue and Buccal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
verfasst von
Shyh-Kuan Tai, MD, PhD
Wing-Yin Li, MD
Muh-Hwa Yang, MD, PhD
Pen-Yuan Chu, MD
Yi-Fen Wang, MD, PhD
Peter Mu-Hsin Chang, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 11/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3068-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 11/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.