nach oben

Current Anesthesiology Reports

Erschienen in:

01.12.2017 | Advances in Monitoring for Anesthesia (LAH Critchley, Section Editor)

Perioperative Cardiac Output Monitoring Utilizing Non-pulse Contour Methods

verfasst von: Yohei Fujimoto, Koichi Suehiro, Akira Mukai, Kiyonobu Nishikawa

Erschienen in: Current Anesthesiology Reports | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review was to provide an overview of the recent concepts regarding cardiac output measurement devices that utilize non-pulse contour methods, especially in an intraoperative setting. The techniques include inert gas rebreathing method, partial CO₂ rebreathing method, impedance cardiography, and its derivative technologies such as electrical velocimetry and bioreactance, transesophageal echocardiography/Doppler, and transthoracic echocardiography/Doppler. We focused on the invasiveness of the devices and their underlying technology.

Recent Findings

Although various types of cardiac output monitoring devices are available, none of them may be considered as an ideal device in terms of accuracy, trending ability of cardiac output changes, and reproducibility of measurements. There are increasing types of devices applicable for intraoperative use, yet only few data are available regarding the trending ability of cardiac output changes and reproducibility of the measurements. Therefore, the empirical application of these devices for various surgical patients may be done under the consideration of their invasiveness and their underlying technology, and it may provide us with more data over time.

Summary

The non-pulse contour-derived cardiac output measurement devices are classified according to their underlying principles, which closely reflect their advantages and disadvantages in the perioperative setting.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Wiener RS, Welch HG. Trends in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter in the United States, 1993-2004. JAMA. 2007;298(4):423–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.4.423.PubMedCrossRef

Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, Knox L, Pineo GF, Doig CJ, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa021108.PubMedCrossRef

• Teboul JL, Saugel B, Cecconi M, De Backer D, Hofer CK, Monnet X, et al. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(9):1350–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4375-7. A comprehensive review of monitoring devices. PubMedCrossRef

Schloglhofer T, Gilly H, Schima H. Semi-invasive measurement of cardiac output based on pulse contour: a review and analysis. Can J Anaesth = J Can Anesth. 2014;61(5):452–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-014-0135-8.CrossRef

Smart FW, Husserl FE. Complications of flow-directed balloon-tipped catheters. Chest. 1990;97(1):227–8.PubMedCrossRef

Evans DC, Doraiswamy VA, Prosciak MP, Silviera M, Seamon MJ, Rodriguez Funes V, et al. Complications associated with pulmonary artery catheters: a comprehensive clinical review. Scand J Surg. 2009;98(4):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690909800402.PubMedCrossRef

Practice guidelines for pulmonary artery catheterization: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pulmonary Artery Catheterization. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(4):988–1014.

Hadian M, Pinsky MR. Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: impact data and complications. Crit Care. 2006;10(Suppl 3):S8. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc4834.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Lennon M, Zaw NN, Popping DM, Wenk M. Procedural complications of central venous catheter insertion. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78(11):1234–40.PubMed

10.

Malbezin S, Gauss T, Smith I, Bruneau B, Mangalsuren N, Diallo T, et al. A review of 5434 percutaneous pediatric central venous catheters inserted by anesthesiologists. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23(11):974–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12184.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Janik JE, Conlon SJ, Janik JS. Percutaneous central access in patients younger than 5 years: size does matter. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(8):1252–6.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Heidemann L, Nathani N, Sagana R, Chopra V, Hueng M. A contemporary assessment of mechanical complication rates and trainee perceptions of central venous catheter insertion. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(8):646–51. 10.12788/jhm.2784.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Perbet S, Pereira B, Grimaldi F, Duale C, Bazin JE, Constantin JM. Guidance and examination by ultrasound versus landmark and radiographic method for placement of subclavian central venous catheters: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:175. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-175.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

14.

Scheer BV, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Crit Care. 2002;6(3):199. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1489.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

15.

Belda FJ, Aguilar G, Teboul JL, Pestana D, Redondo FJ, Malbrain M, et al. Complications related to less-invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(4):482–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeq377.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Daniel WG, Erbel R, Kasper W, Visser CA, Engberding R, Sutherland GR, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations. Circulation. 1991;83(3):817–21. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.83.3.817.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(2):340–53. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aa0af3.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(5):1220–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ee3130.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Sangkum L, Liu GL, Yu L, Yan H, Kaye AD, Liu H. Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update. J Anesth. 2016;30(3):461–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2154-9.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Hofer CK, Rex S, Ganter MT. Update on minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring in thoracic anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0000000000000034.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Haryadi DG, Orr JA, Kuck K, McJames S, Westenskow DR. Partial CO2 rebreathing indirect Fick technique for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output. J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16(5–6):361–74.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Murias GE, Villagra A, Vatua S, del Mar Fernandez M, Solar H, Ochagavia A, et al. Evaluation of a noninvasive method for cardiac output measurement in critical care patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(10):1470–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-002-1477-1.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Odenstedt H, Stenqvist O, Lundin S. Clinical evaluation of a partial CO2 rebreathing technique for cardiac output monitoring in critically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46(2):152–9.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Levy RJ, Chiavacci RM, Nicolson SC, Rome JJ, Lin RJ, Helfaer MA, et al. An evaluation of a noninvasive cardiac output measurement using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing in children. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(6):1642–1647, table of contents. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000136952.85278.99.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Binder JC, Parkin WG. Non-invasive cardiac output determination: comparison of a new partial-rebreathing technique with thermodilution. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001;29(1):19–23.PubMed

26.

Ng JM, Chow MY, Ip-Yam PC, Goh MH, Agasthian T. Evaluation of partial carbon dioxide rebreathing cardiac output measurement during thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21(5):655–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2007.01.012.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Botero M, Kirby D, Lobato EB, Staples ED, Gravenstein N. Measurement of cardiac output before and after cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison among aortic transit-time ultrasound, thermodilution, and noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(5):563–72.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Nilsson LB, Eldrup N, Berthelsen PG. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and carbon dioxide-rebreathing cardiac output. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(6):680–5.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Mielck F, Buhre W, Hanekop G, Tirilomis T, Hilgers R, Sonntag H. Comparison of continuous cardiac output measurements in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(2):211–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/jcan.2003.49.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Valiatti JL, Amaral JL. Comparison between cardiac output values measured by thermodilution and partial carbon dioxide rebreathing in patients with acute lung injury. Sao Paulo Medical Journal = Revista paulista de Medicina. 2004;122(6):233–8.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Rich JD, Archer SL, Rich S. Noninvasive cardiac output measurements in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(1):125–33. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00102212.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Maxwell RA, Gibson JB, Slade JB, Fabian TC, Proctor KG. Noninvasive cardiac output by partial CO2 rebreathing after severe chest trauma. J Trauma. 2001;51(5):849–53.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Tachibana K, Imanaka H, Takeuchi M, Takauchi Y, Miyano H, Nishimura M. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing is less accurate at settings of reduced minute ventilation and when spontaneous breathing is present. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(4):830–7.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Rocco M, Spadetta G, Morelli A, Dell'Utri D, Porzi P, Conti G, et al. A comparative evaluation of thermodilution and partial CO2 rebreathing techniques for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients during assisted ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(1):82–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2069-4.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Young BP, Low LL. Noninvasive monitoring cardiac output using partial CO(2) rebreathing. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26(2):383–392, table of contents. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2009.12.002.PubMedCrossRef

36.

van Heerden PV, Baker S, Lim SI, Weidman C, Bulsara M. Clinical evaluation of the non-invasive cardiac output (NICO) monitor in the intensive care unit. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;28(4):427–30.PubMed

37.

Sobanski P, Sinkiewicz W, Kubica J, Blazejewski J, Bujak R. The reliability of noninvasive cardiac output measurement using the inert gas rebreathing method in patients with advanced heart failure. Cardiol J. 2008;15(1):63–70.PubMed

38.

Hassan M, Wagdy K, Kharabish A, Selwanos PP, Nabil A, Elguindy A, et al. Validation of noninvasive measurement of cardiac output using inert gas rebreathing in a cohort of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Circ Heart fail. 2017;10(3):e003592. https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.116.003592.PubMedCrossRef

39.

McLure LE, Brown A, Lee WN, Church AC, Peacock AJ, Johnson MK. Non-invasive stroke volume measurement by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and inert gas rebreathing in pulmonary hypertension. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011;31(3):221–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.01004.x.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Farina S, Teruzzi G, Cattadori G, Ferrari C, De Martini S, Bussotti M, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement by inert gas rebreathing in suspected pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113(3):546–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.017.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Saur J, Trinkmann F, Doesch C, Weissmann J, Hamm K, Schoenberg SO, et al. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output during atrial fibrillation: comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and inert gas rebreathing. Cardiology. 2010;115(3):212–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000288712.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Osbak PS, Henriksen JH, Kofoed KF, Jensen GB. Non-invasive measurements of cardiac output in atrial fibrillation: inert gas rebreathing and impedance cardiography. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2011;71(4):304–13. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2011.563790.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Saur J, Trinkmann F, Doesch C, Scherhag A, Brade J, Schoenberg SO, et al. The impact of pulmonary disease on noninvasive measurement of cardiac output by the inert gas rebreathing method. Lung. 2010;188(5):433–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-010-9257-0.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Perrault H, Richard R, Kapchinsky S, Baril J, Bourbeau J, Taivassalo T. Addressing assumptions for the use of non-invasive cardiac output measurement techniques during exercise in COPD. Copd. 2016;13(1):75–81. https://doi.org/10.3109/15412555.2015.1043985.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Marma AK, Opotowsky AR, Fromm BS, Ubeda-Tikkanen A, Porras D, Rhodes J. Noninvasive cardiac output estimation by inert gas rebreathing in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Am Heart J. 2016;174:80–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.01.006.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Reutershan J, Schmitt A, Dietz K, Fretschner R. Non-invasive measurement of pulmonary blood flow during prone positioning in patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clin Sci (Lond). 2004;106(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs20030157.CrossRef

47.

•• Perak AM, Opotowsky AR, Walsh BK, Esch JJ, DiNardo JA, Kussman BD, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output estimation by inert gas rebreathing in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. J Pediatr. 2016;177:184–90.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.07.007. Accuracy and precision data of inert gas rebreathing methods in pediatric mechanically ventilated patients. PubMedCrossRef

48.

Peyton PJ, Bailey M, Thompson BR. Reproducibility of cardiac output measurement by the nitrous oxide rebreathing technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009;23(4):233–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-009-9187-7.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Saur J, Fluechter S, Trinkmann F, Papavassiliu T, Schoenberg S, Weissmann J, et al. Noninvasive determination of cardiac output by the inert-gas-rebreathing method—comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiology. 2009;114(4):247–54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000232407.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Haruna M, Kumon K, Yahagi N, Watanabe Y, Ishida Y, Kobayashi N, et al. Blood volume measurement at the bedside using ICG pulse spectrophotometry. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(6):1322–8.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Hofer CK, Buhlmann S, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Pulsed dye densitometry with two different sensor types for cardiac output measurement after cardiac surgery: a comparison with the thermodilution technique. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(5):653–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00371.x.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Imai T, Takahashi K, Fukura H, Morishita Y. Measurement of cardiac output by pulse dye densitometry using indocyanine green: a comparison with the thermodilution method. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(4):816–22.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Baulig W, Bernhard EO, Bettex D, Schmidlin D, Schmid ER. Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry in cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(10):968–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04296.x.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Kroon M, Groeneveld AB, Smulders YM. Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry: comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution in post-cardiac surgery patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2005;19(6):395–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-005-6865-y.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Taguchi N, Nakagawa S, Miyasaka K, Fuse M, Aoyagi T. Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry using three wavelengths. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5(4):343–50.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Bremer F, Schiele A, Tschaikowsky K. Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry: a comparison with the Fick’s principle and thermodilution method. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(4):399–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-002-1252-3.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Eremenko AA, Safarov PN. Flow-regulated extracorporeal arteriovenous tubing loop for cardiac output measurements by ultrasound velocity dilution: validation in post-cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients. ASAIO J. 2010;56(6):522–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181effdf8.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Lindberg L, Johansson S, Perez-de-Sa V. Validation of an ultrasound dilution technology for cardiac output measurement and shunt detection in infants and children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(2):139–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0000000000000053.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Krivitski NM, Kislukhin VV, Thuramalla NV. Theory and in vitro validation of a new extracorporeal arteriovenous loop approach for hemodynamic assessment in pediatric and neonatal intensive care unit patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9(4):423–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PCC.0b013e31816c71bc.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

60.

Vrancken SL, de Boode WP, Hopman JC, Singh SK, Liem KD, van Heijst AF. Cardiac output measurement with transpulmonary ultrasound dilution is feasible in the presence of a left-to-right shunt: a validation study in lambs. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(3):409–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer401.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Vrancken SL, de Boode WP, Hopman JC, Looijen-Salamon MG, Liem KD, van Heijst AF. Influence of lung injury on cardiac output measurement using transpulmonary ultrasound dilution: a validation study in neonatal lambs. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(6):870–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes297.PubMedCrossRef

62.

• Vrancken SL, van Heijst AF, Hopman JC, Liem KD, van der Hoeven JG, de Boode WP. Hemodynamic volumetry using transpulmonary ultrasound dilution (TPUD) technology in a neonatal animal model. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29(5):643–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-014-9647-6. Providing explanation of transpulmonary ultrasound dilution technique. PubMedCrossRef

63.

Gidwani UK, Mohanty B, Chatterjee K. The pulmonary artery catheter: a critical reappraisal. Cardiol Clin. 2013;31(4):545–565, viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2013.07.008.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Lorne E, Mahjoub Y, Diouf M, Sleghem J, Buchalet C, Guinot PG, et al. Accuracy of impedance cardiography for evaluating trends in cardiac output: a comparison with oesophageal Doppler. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(4):596–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu136.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Fellahi JL, Caille V, Charron C, Deschamps-Berger PH, Vieillard-Baron A. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(5):1553–9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31819cd97e.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Cheung H, Dong Q, Dong R, Yu B. Correlation of cardiac output measured by non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) and thermodilution in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Anesth. 2015;29(3):416–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1938-z.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Ball TR, Culp BC, Patel V, Gloyna DF, Ciceri DP, Culp WC Jr. Comparison of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor to thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24(5):762–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2010.04.008.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Maus TM, Reber B, Banks DA, Berry A, Guerrero E, Manecke GR. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25(5):770–5. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2010.12.017.PubMedCrossRef

69.

van der Kleij SC, Koolen BB, Newhall DA, Gerritse BM, Rosseel PM, Rijpstra TA, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new tracheal impedance cardiography method. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(7):729–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07089.x.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Moller-Sorensen H, Hansen KL, Ostergaard M, Andersen LW, Moller K. Lack of agreement and trending ability of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor compared with thermodilution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(4):433–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02615.x.PubMedCrossRef

71.

•• Leclercq T, Lilot M, Schulz T, Meyer A, Farhat F, Fellahi JL. Endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography improves immediate postoperative outcome: a case-control study in off-pump coronary surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-9996-z. The authors have revealed that utilization of endotracheal bioimpedance cardiography improved postoperative outcome.

72.

Taniguchi Y, Emoto N, Miyagawa K, Nakayama K, Kinutani H, Tanaka H, et al. Noninvasive and simple assessment of cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance with whole-body impedance cardiography is useful for monitoring patients with pulmonary hypertension. Circ J. 2013;77(9):2383–9.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Paredes OL, Shite J, Shinke T, Watanabe S, Otake H, Matsumoto D, et al. Impedance cardiography for cardiac output estimation: reliability of wrist-to-ankle electrode configuration. Circ J. 2006;70(9):1164–8.PubMedCrossRef

74.

Matsuda Y, Kawate H, Shimada S, Matsuzaki C, Nagata H, Adachi M, et al. Perioperative sequential monitoring of hemodynamic parameters in patients with pheochromocytoma using the Non-Invasive Cardiac System (NICaS). Endocr J. 2014;61(6):571–5.PubMedCrossRef

75.

Ram M, Lavie A, Lev S, Blecher Y, Amikam U, Shulman Y, et al. Cardiac hemodynamics before, during and after elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia in low-risk women. J Perinatol: official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.53.

76.

Huang L, Critchley LA, Zhang J. Major upper abdominal surgery alters the calibration of bioreactance cardiac output readings, the NICOM, when comparisons are made against suprasternal and esophageal Doppler intraoperatively. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(4):936–45. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000000889.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Conway DH, Hussain OA, Gall I. A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30(8):501–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283603250.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Dubost C, Bougle A, Hallynck C, Le Dorze M, Roulleau P, Baujard C, et al. Comparison of monitoring performance of bioreactance versus esophageal Doppler in pediatric patients. Ind J Crit Care Med. 2015;19(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.148630.CrossRef

79.

Han S, Lee JH, Kim G, Ko JS, Choi SJ, Kwon JH, et al. Bioreactance is not interchangeable with thermodilution for measuring cardiac output during adult liver transplantation. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127981.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

80.

Shih PY, Lin WY, Hung MH, Cheng YJ, Chan KC. Evaluation of cardiac output by bioreactance technique in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica : Off J Taiwan Soc Anesthesiol. 2016;54(2):57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aat.2016.06.001.CrossRef

81.

Weisz DE, Jain A, McNamara PJ, EL-Khuffash A. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in neonates using bioreactance: a comparison with echocardiography. Neonatology. 2012;102(1):61–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000337295.PubMedCrossRef

82.

Ballestero Y, Urbano J, Lopez-Herce J, Solana MJ, Botran M, Vinciguerra D, et al. Pulmonary arterial thermodilution, femoral arterial thermodilution and bioreactance cardiac output monitoring in a pediatric hemorrhagic hypovolemic shock model. Resuscitation. 2012;83(1):125–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.06.039.PubMedCrossRef

83.

Weisz DE, Jain A, Ting J, McNamara PJ, El-Khuffash A. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in preterm infants undergoing patent ductus arteriosus ligation: a comparison with echocardiography. Neonatology. 2014;106(4):330–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365278.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Vergnaud E, Vidal C, Verchere JM, Taright H, Meyer PG, Carli PA, et al. Noninvasive cardiac output measurement using bioreactance in postoperative pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25(2):160–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12412.PubMedCrossRef

85.

Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22(2):113–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5.PubMedCrossRef

86.

Marque S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care (London). 2009;13(3):R73. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7884.CrossRef

87.

Squara P, Rotcajg D, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A. Comparison of monitoring performance of bioreactance vs. pulse contour during lung recruitment maneuvers. Crit Care (London). 2009;13(4):R125. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7981.CrossRef

88.

• Berlin DA, Peprah-Mensah H, Manoach S, Heerdt PM. Agreement of bioreactance cardiac output monitoring with thermodilution during hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation in adult swine. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(2):e195–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000002071. The report provides accuracy data under the various hemodynamic conditions. PubMedCrossRef

89.

Benomar B, Ouattara A, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Squara P. Fluid responsiveness predicted by noninvasive bioreactance-based passive leg raise test. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(11):1875–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-1990-6.PubMedCrossRef

90.

Marik PE, Levitov A, Young A, Andrews L. The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients. Chest. 2013;143(2):364–70. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-1274.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Lee JY, Kim JY, Choi CH, Kim HS, Lee KC, Kwak HJ. The ability of stroke volume variation measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35(2):289–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-013-0772-7.PubMedCrossRef

92.

Min JJ, Lee JH, Hong KY, Choi SJ. Utility of stroke volume variation measured using non-invasive bioreactance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in the prone position. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(2):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9859-z.PubMedCrossRef

93.

Bernstein DP, Henry IC, Banet MJ, Dittrich T. Stroke volume obtained by electrical interrogation of the brachial artery: transbrachial electrical bioimpedance velocimetry. Physiol Meas. 2012;33(4):629–49. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/4/629.PubMedCrossRef

94.

•• Bernstein DP, Henry IC, Lemmens HJ, Chaltas JL, DeMaria AN, Moon JB, et al. Validation of stroke volume and cardiac output by electrical interrogation of the brachial artery in normals: assessment of strengths, limitations, and sources of error. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29(6):789–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9668-9. The authors have investigated a brand new technology, the transbrachial electrical bioimpedance velocimetry method. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

95.

Schmidt C, Theilmeier G, Van Aken H, Korsmeier P, Wirtz SP, Berendes E, et al. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(5):603–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei224.PubMedCrossRef

96.

Trinkmann F, Berger M, Doesch C, Papavassiliu T, Schoenberg SO, Borggrefe M, et al. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive determination of cardiac output. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(4):399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9731-6.PubMedCrossRef

97.

Raue W, Swierzy M, Koplin G, Schwenk W. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transthoracic thermodilution technique for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(12):1067–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832bfd94.PubMedCrossRef

98.

•• Suehiro K, Joosten A, Murphy LS, Desebbe O, Alexander B, Kim SH, et al. Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(5):603–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9757-9. The literature provides thorough information on agreement of cardiac output monitoring devices in pediatric patients. PubMedCrossRef

99.

Norozi K, Beck C, Osthaus WA, Wille I, Wessel A, Bertram H. Electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in children with congenital heart disease. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100(1):88–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem320.PubMedCrossRef

100.

Noori S, Drabu B, Soleymani S, Seri I. Continuous non-invasive cardiac output measurements in the neonate by electrical velocimetry: a comparison with echocardiography. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97(5):F340–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/fetalneonatal-2011-301090.PubMedCrossRef

101.

Grollmuss O, Demontoux S, Capderou A, Serraf A, Belli E. Electrical velocimetry as a tool for measuring cardiac output in small infants after heart surgery. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(6):1032–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2530-3.PubMedCrossRef

102.

Cote CJ, Sui J, Anderson TA, Bhattacharya ST, Shank ES, Tuason PM, et al. Continuous noninvasive cardiac output in children: is this the next generation of operating room monitors? Initial experience in 402 pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25(2):150–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12441.PubMedCrossRef

103.

Rauch R, Welisch E, Lansdell N, Burrill E, Jones J, Robinson T, et al. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in obese children and adolescents: comparison of electrical cardiometry and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27(2):187–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-012-9412-7.PubMedCrossRef

104.

Grollmuss O, Gonzalez P. Non-invasive cardiac output measurement in low and very low birth weight infants: a method comparison. Front Pediatr. 2014;2:16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00016.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

105.

Blohm ME, Obrecht D, Hartwich J, Mueller GC, Kersten JF, Weil J, et al. Impedance cardiography (electrical velocimetry) and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in pediatric intensive care patients: a prospective single-center observational study. Critical Care (London). 2014;18(6):603. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0603-0.CrossRef

106.

Narula J, Chauhan S, Ramakrishnan S, Gupta SK. Electrical cardiometry: a reliable solution to cardiac output estimation in children with structural heart disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2016.12.009.

107.

Torigoe T, Sato S, Nagayama Y, Sato T, Yamazaki H. Influence of patent ductus arteriosus and ventilators on electrical velocimetry for measuring cardiac output in very-low/low birth weight infants. J Perinatol: official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2015;35(7):485–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.245.CrossRef

108.

Trinkmann F, Berger M, Hoffmann U, Borggrefe M, Kaden JJ, Saur J. A comparative evaluation of electrical velocimetry and inert gas rebreathing for the non-invasive assessment of cardiac output. Clin Res Cardiol. 2011;100(10):935–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-011-0329-9.PubMedCrossRef

109.

Nidorf SM, Picard MH, Triulzi MO, Thomas JD, Newell J, King ME, et al. New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19(5):983–8.PubMedCrossRef

110.

Chong SW, Peyton PJ. A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM). Anaesthesia. 2012;67(11):1266–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07311.x.PubMedCrossRef

111.

• McNamara H, Barclay P, Sharma V. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(4):669–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu162. The authors proved the adequate accuracy of USCOM in pregnant women. PubMedCrossRef

112.

O’Loughlin E, Ward M, Crossley A, Hughes R, Bremner AP, Corcoran T. Evaluation of the utility of the Vigileo FloTrac(), LiDCO(), USCOM and CardioQ() to detect hypovolaemia in conscious volunteers: a proof of concept study. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(2):142–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12949.PubMedCrossRef

113.

• Li H, Critchley LA, Zhang J. Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies? J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(5):559–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9753-0. The authors provide a practical way of measurement to obtain accuracy. PubMedCrossRef

114.

Corley A, Barnett AG, Mullany D, Fraser JF. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(10):1291–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.013.PubMedCrossRef

115.

Dey I, Sprivulis P. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17(3):193–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00722.x.PubMedCrossRef

116.

Huang L, Critchley LA. Study to determine the repeatability of supra-sternal Doppler (ultrasound cardiac output monitor) during general anaesthesia: effects of scan quality, flow volume, and increasing age. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(6):907–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet254.PubMedCrossRef

117.

Zhang J, Critchley LA, Huang L. The effect of aorta unfolding and remodelling on oesophageal Doppler readings as probe depth is varied. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(5):708–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev343.PubMedCrossRef

118.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2011. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg3. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.

119.

• Moller-Sorensen H, Cordtz J, Ostergaard M, Nilsson JC, Hansen KL. Transesophageal Doppler reliably tracks changes in cardiac output in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(1):135–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9806-4. The authors properly validate precision of the method. PubMedCrossRef

120.

Raux O, Spencer A, Fesseau R, Mercier G, Rochette A, Bringuier S, et al. Intraoperative use of transoesophageal Doppler to predict response to volume expansion in infants and neonates. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(1):100–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer336.PubMedCrossRef

121.

Guinot PG, de Broca B, Bernard E, Abou Arab O, Lorne E, Dupont H. Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(4):660–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet430.PubMedCrossRef

122.

Smetkin AA, Hussain A, Fot EV, Zakharov VI, Izotova NN, Yudina AS, et al. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(2):361–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9853-5.PubMedCrossRef

123.

Bataille B, Bertuit M, Mora M, Mazerolles M, Cocquet P, Masson B, et al. Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(6):879–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes298.PubMedCrossRef

124.

Fischer MO, Balaire X, Le Mauff de Kergal C, Boisselier C, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of estimated continuous cardiac output compared with transthoracic echocardiography. Can J Anaesth. 2014;61(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-0055-z.PubMedCrossRef

125.

Sinha AC, Singh PM, Grewal N, Aman M, Dubowitz G. Comparison between continuous non-invasive estimated cardiac output by pulse wave transit time and thermodilution method. Ann Card Anaesth. 2014;17(4):273–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.142059.PubMedCrossRef

126.

Permpikul C, Leelayuthachai T. Non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output (escCO) during severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitation. J Med Assoc Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2014;97(Suppl 3):S184–8.

127.

• Thonnerieux M, Alexander B, Binet C, Obadia JF, Bastien O, Desebbe O. The ability of esCCO and ECOM monitors to measure trends in cardiac output during alveolar recruitment maneuver after cardiac surgery: a comparison with the pulmonary thermodilution method. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(2):383–91. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000000753. The authors properly handled the precision and trending ability. PubMedCrossRef

128.

Feissel M, Aho LS, Georgiev S, Tapponnier R, Badie J, Bruyere R, et al. Pulse wave transit time measurements of cardiac output in septic shock patients: a comparison of the estimated continuous cardiac output system with transthoracic echocardiography. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0130489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130489.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

129.

• Biais M, Berthezene R, Petit L, Cottenceau V, Sztark F. Ability of esCCO to track changes in cardiac output. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(3):403–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev219. The trending ability of esCCO has been validated. PubMedCrossRef

130.

Ball TR, Tricinella AP, Kimbrough BA, Luna S, Gloyna DF, Villamaria FJ, et al. Accuracy of noninvasive estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) compared to thermodilution cardiac output: a pilot study in cardiac patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(6):1128–32. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.019.PubMedCrossRef

131.

Magliocca A, Rezoagli E, Anderson TA, Burns SM, Ichinose F, Chitilian HV. Cardiac output measurements based on the pulse wave transit time and thoracic impedance exhibit limited agreement with thermodilution method during orthotopic liver transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002171.

132.

Terada T, Oiwa A, Maemura Y, Robert S, Kessoku S, Ochiai R. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30(5):621–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9772-x.PubMedCrossRef

133.

Tsutsui M, Araki Y, Masui K, Kazama T, Sugo Y, Archer TL, et al. Pulse wave transit time measurements of cardiac output in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy: a comparison of the esCCO system with thermodilution. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(6):1307–12. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a44c87.PubMedCrossRef

134.

Raissuni Z, Zores F, Henriet O, Dallest S, Roul G. Can we obtain a noninvasive and continuous estimation of cardiac output? Comparison between three noninvasive methods. Int Heart J. 2013;54(6):395–400.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Perioperative Cardiac Output Monitoring Utilizing Non-pulse Contour Methods
verfasst von: Yohei Fujimoto
Koichi Suehiro
Akira Mukai
Kiyonobu Nishikawa
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Anesthesiology Reports / Ausgabe 4/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 2167-6275
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-017-0240-7

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Perioperative Cardiac Output Monitoring Utilizing Non-pulse Contour Methods

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Update AINS

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Improvement Science in Anaesthesia

Intraoperative Noninvasive Cardiovascular and Brain Monitoring in the Elderly

Stroke Volume Monitoring: Novel Continuous Wave Doppler Parameters, Algorithms and Advanced Noninvasive Haemodynamic Concepts

Volume Assessment by Inferior Vena Cava Examination: Bedside Ultrasound Techniques and Practical Difficulties

Teamwork, Safety, and Non-Technical Skills

Neuronal Connectivity, General Anesthesia, and the Elderly

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Update AINS