Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2021

31.10.2020 | Cornea

Peripheral-to-central ratio of Guttae: validity and reliability of an objective method to characterize severity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy

verfasst von: Rohan P. Bajaj, Michael J. Fliotsos, Tejus Pradeep, Allen O. Eghrari

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Common methods of measuring severity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) are limited in objectivity, reliability, or start with a variable baseline that prevents distinguishing healthy from affected eyes. The aim of this study was to describe a method of grading FECD that overcomes these limitations.

Methods

Fifteen patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy were included in the study. Guttae were imaged with a slit lamp beam 8 mm tall; the bottom 4 mm half of each image was divided into two equally-sized sections. Guttae were counted by four independent graders blinded to disease severity scores. The peripheral:central guttae ratio was compared to modified Krachmer clinical severity scores. The peripheral:central guttae ratio was compared between mild (severity 0.5–3) versus moderate-to-severe (severity 4–5) disease. Receiver operating characteristics defined optimal ratio cutoffs for mild versus moderate-to-severe disease.

Results

Increased peripheral guttae and peripheral:central guttae ratio correlated with Krachmer severity (p = 0.021 and p = 0.009, respectively). The difference between mild and moderate-to-severe cases for the peripheral:central guttae ratio was significant (p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability of total guttae count was high (coefficient = 0.82, p < 0.001). A peripheral:central guttae ratio of 0.16 was the ideal cut-off point (area under the curve = 0.79, sensitivity = 0.78, and specificity = 0.80).

Conclusion

In this pilot study, the peripheral:central ratio of guttae correlates with subjective clinical severity of Fuchs dystrophy. It starts at a common baseline, has good inter-rater reliability, does not require dilation, and can be conducted with a smartphone and slit-lamp.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Eghrari AO, Riazuddin SA, Gottsch JD (2015) Fuchs corneal dystrophy. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 134:79–97 Eghrari AO, Riazuddin SA, Gottsch JD (2015) Fuchs corneal dystrophy. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 134:79–97
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Eghrari AO, Gottsch JD (2010) Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 5(2):147–159CrossRef Eghrari AO, Gottsch JD (2010) Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 5(2):147–159CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Patel DV (2015) The pathophysiology of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy – A review of molecular and cellular insights. Exp Eye Res 130:97–105CrossRef Zhang J, Patel DV (2015) The pathophysiology of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy – A review of molecular and cellular insights. Exp Eye Res 130:97–105CrossRef
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopplin LJ, Przepyszny K, Schmotzer B et al (2012) Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness. Arch Ophthalmol 130(4):433–439CrossRef Kopplin LJ, Przepyszny K, Schmotzer B et al (2012) Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness. Arch Ophthalmol 130(4):433–439CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng MT, Kim JT, Ambrósio RJ et al (2012) International values of central Pachymetry in Normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 1:13–18CrossRef Feng MT, Kim JT, Ambrósio RJ et al (2012) International values of central Pachymetry in Normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 1:13–18CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Repp DJ, Hodge DO, Baratz KH et al (2013) Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: Subjective grading versus objective grading based on the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio. Ophthalmology 120(4):687–694CrossRef Repp DJ, Hodge DO, Baratz KH et al (2013) Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: Subjective grading versus objective grading based on the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio. Ophthalmology 120(4):687–694CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat McLaren JW, Bachman LA, Kane KM, Patel SV (2014) Objective assessment of the corneal endothelium in Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:1184–1190CrossRef McLaren JW, Bachman LA, Kane KM, Patel SV (2014) Objective assessment of the corneal endothelium in Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:1184–1190CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamis AP, Filatov V, Tripathi BJ et al (1993) Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. Surv Ophthalmol 38(2):149–168CrossRef Adamis AP, Filatov V, Tripathi BJ et al (1993) Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. Surv Ophthalmol 38(2):149–168CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Krachmer JH, Purcell JJ Jr, Young CW, Bucher KD (1978) Corneal endothelial dystrophy. A study of 64 families. Arch Ophthalmol 96(11):2036–2039CrossRef Krachmer JH, Purcell JJ Jr, Young CW, Bucher KD (1978) Corneal endothelial dystrophy. A study of 64 families. Arch Ophthalmol 96(11):2036–2039CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Afshari N, Igo R, Morris N et al (2017) Genome-wide association study identifies three novel loci in Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy. Nat Commun 8:148–198CrossRef Afshari N, Igo R, Morris N et al (2017) Genome-wide association study identifies three novel loci in Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy. Nat Commun 8:148–198CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Eghrari AO, Mumtaz AA, Garrett B, Rezaei M, Akhavan MS, Riazuddin SA, Gottsch JD (2017) Automated Retroillumination photography analysis for objective assessment of Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy. Cornea 36(1):44–47CrossRef Eghrari AO, Mumtaz AA, Garrett B, Rezaei M, Akhavan MS, Riazuddin SA, Gottsch JD (2017) Automated Retroillumination photography analysis for objective assessment of Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy. Cornea 36(1):44–47CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Eghrari AO, Garrett BS, Mumtaz AA, Edalati AE, Meadows DN, McGlumphy EJ, Iliff BW, Gottsch JD (2015) Retroillumination photography analysis enhances clinical definition of severe Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy. Cornea. 34(12):1623–1626CrossRef Eghrari AO, Garrett BS, Mumtaz AA, Edalati AE, Meadows DN, McGlumphy EJ, Iliff BW, Gottsch JD (2015) Retroillumination photography analysis enhances clinical definition of severe Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy. Cornea. 34(12):1623–1626CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Maamari RN, Ausayakhun S, Margolis TP, et al (2014) Novel telemedicine device for diagnosis of corneal abrasions and ulcers in resource-poor settings. JAMA Ophthalmol 132:894–895 Maamari RN, Ausayakhun S, Margolis TP, et al (2014) Novel telemedicine device for diagnosis of corneal abrasions and ulcers in resource-poor settings. JAMA Ophthalmol 132:894–895
16.
Zurück zum Zitat He L, Myung D, Pershing S, Chang R (2014) iPhone photography of eye pathology for remote triage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55(13):4875 He L, Myung D, Pershing S, Chang R (2014) iPhone photography of eye pathology for remote triage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55(13):4875
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163CrossRef Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Moloney G, Petsoglou C, Ball M et al (2017) Descemetorhexis without grafting for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy-supplementation with topical Ripasudil. Cornea 36(6):642–648CrossRef Moloney G, Petsoglou C, Ball M et al (2017) Descemetorhexis without grafting for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy-supplementation with topical Ripasudil. Cornea 36(6):642–648CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yen CH, Wang GQ, Lin TY, Liu CH (2019) Semi-permanent smartphone adapter for microscopes: Design demonstration and workflow testing using a slit-lamp biomicroscope. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 9(2):111–117CrossRef Yen CH, Wang GQ, Lin TY, Liu CH (2019) Semi-permanent smartphone adapter for microscopes: Design demonstration and workflow testing using a slit-lamp biomicroscope. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 9(2):111–117CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Peripheral-to-central ratio of Guttae: validity and reliability of an objective method to characterize severity of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy
verfasst von
Rohan P. Bajaj
Michael J. Fliotsos
Tejus Pradeep
Allen O. Eghrari
Publikationsdatum
31.10.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04985-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.