Skip to main content
main-content

06.02.2017 | Original Article | Ausgabe 4/2017

International Journal of Legal Medicine 4/2017

Persistence of touch DNA on burglary-related tools

Zeitschrift:
International Journal of Legal Medicine > Ausgabe 4/2017
Autoren:
Céline M. Pfeifer, Peter Wiegand
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s00414-017-1551-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Experts are increasingly concerned by issues regarding the activity level of DNA stains. A case from our burglary-related casework pointed out the need for experiments regarding the persistence of DNA when more than one person touched a tool handle. We performed short tandem repeat (STR) analyses for three groups of tools: (1) personal and mock owned tools; (2) tools, which were first “owned” by a first user and then handled in a burglary action by a second user; and (3) tools, which were first owned by a first user and then handled in a moderate action. At least three types of tool handles were included in each of the groups. Every second user handled the tool with and without gloves. In total, 234 samples were analyzed regarding profile completeness of first and second user as well as properties like detectable major profile or mixture attributes. When second users simulated a burglary by using a tool bare handed, we could not detect the first user as major component on their handles but attribute him to the stain in 1/40 cases. When second users broke up the burglary setup using gloves, the first user matched the DNA handle profile in 37% of the cases. Moderate use of mock borrowed tools demonstrated a material-dependent persistence. In total, we observed that the outcome depends mainly on the nature of contact, the handle material, and the user-specific characteristics. This study intends to supplement present knowledge about persistence of touch DNA with a special emphasis on burglary-related cases with two consecutive users and to act as experimental data for an evaluation of the relevance of alleged hypotheses, when such is needed in a court hearing.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner*in

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Zusatzmaterial
Nur für berechtigte Nutzer zugänglich
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

International Journal of Legal Medicine 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

05.10.2021 | Nierenkarzinom | Schwerpunkt: Nierenturmoren | Ausgabe 6/2021

SMARCB1(INI1)-defizientes Nierenzellkarzinom: medullär und darüber hinaus

Neue Konzepte

05.10.2021 | Suizid | CME | Ausgabe 6/2021

Strangulation – Erhängen

Allgemeines, Epidemiologie, Kriminalistik und Pathophysiologie

22.09.2021 | Schwerpunkt: Nierentumoren | Ausgabe 6/2021

Eosinophiles solide und zystisches Nierenzellkarzinom (ESC-NZK)