Purpose of Review
The aim of the present paper was to briefly review the diagnostic criteria for persistent genital arousal disorder/genitopelvic dysesthesia (PGAD/GPD), its symptom characteristics and psychosocial impacts, proposed etiologies, and assessment, and to delve into the treatment literature to evaluate the current state of the literature. The review sought to broadly evaluate the degree of support currently present for various management strategies and to identify future directions for PGAD/GPD treatment research.
Recent Findings
Research on PGAD/GPD treatments remains limited at present, consisting mainly of case studies, chart reviews, and a small number of preliminary treatment outcome studies with small sample sizes.
Summary
Because of the limited treatment literature in PGAD/GPD, our recommendations related to the future directions of PGAD/GPD treatment are informed by the treatment literature of genitopelvic dysesthesias characterized by pain (e.g., vulvodynia). The genitopelvic pain literature supports the efficacy of a variety of treatment options, particularly psychotherapy (including cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness) and pelvic floor physical therapy, suggesting these to be valuable non-medical treatment avenues for future PGAD/GPD research.