nach oben

Immunologic Research

Erschienen in:

21.11.2019 | Original Article

Personalized inherent randomness of the immune system is manifested by an individualized response to immune triggers and immunomodulatory therapies: a novel platform for designing personalized immunotherapies

verfasst von: Madi El-Haj, Dimitri Kanovitch, Yaron Ilan

Erschienen in: Immunologic Research | Ausgabe 4-5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The considerable variability of responses amongst subjects to disease triggers and immunotherapies is a major obstacle to designing better immune-based therapies. Therefore, development of patient-tailored precision medicine that improves the efficacy of immunomodulatory drugs is necessary. The individualized response to disease triggers and immunomodulatory therapies was studied using the concanavalin A (ConA) immune-mediated hepatitis model and the oral administration of anti CD3 or β-glucosylceramide (GC). Mice were treated with anti-CD3 antibodies or GC followed by an injection of ConA. The effects of these treatments on liver damage and the immune profile were then analyzed. An individualized response to ConA and orally administered immunomodulatory agents was observed in eight consecutive experiments. While alleviation of the immune-mediated liver injury, as measured by serum levels of liver enzymes, was seen, and high intra-group and inter-experimental variabilities were detected. A similar individualized response was observed for the effect on serum levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-10 and on CD4+CD25+, CD8+CD25+, and CD3+NK1.1+ lymphocytes. A personalized form of inherent randomness in an isolated system was documented, which may underlie the variability in responses to immune triggers and immunomodulatory therapies. The data support the use of personalized randomness-based platforms for improving the response to chronic therapies.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Kucuksezer UC, Ozdemir C, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Precision/Personalized Medicine in Allergic Diseases and Asthma. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2018;66:431–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-018-0526-6.CrossRef

Doestzada M, Vila AV, Zhernakova A, Koonen DPY, Weersma RK, Touw DJ, et al. Pharmacomicrobiomics: a novel route towards personalized medicine? Protein Cell. 2018;9(5):432–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-018-0547-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Currie G, Delles C. Precision Medicine and Personalized Medicine in Cardiovascular Disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1065:589–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_36.CrossRefPubMed

Tavakolpour S. Towards personalized medicine for patients with autoimmune diseases: Opportunities and challenges. Immunol Lett. 2017;190:130–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2017.08.002.CrossRefPubMed

Doria A, Gershwin ME, Selmi C. From old concerns to new advances and personalized medicine in lupus: The end of the tunnel is approaching. J Autoimmun. 2016;74:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2016.08.007.CrossRefPubMed

Biesen R, Rose T, Hoyer BF, Alexander T, Hiepe F. Autoantibodies, complement and type I interferon as biomarkers for personalized medicine in SLE. Lupus. 2016;25(8):823–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203316640922.CrossRefPubMed

Bauer C, Stec K, Glintschert A, Gruden K, Schichor C, Or-Guil M, et al. BioMiner: Paving the Way for Personalized Medicine. Cancer Informat. 2015;14:55–63. https://doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S20910.CrossRef

Wardill HR, Tissing WJE. Determining risk of severe gastrointestinal toxicity based on pretreatment gut microbial community in patients receiving cancer treatment: a new predictive strategy in the quest for personalized cancer medicine. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017;11(2):125–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000265.CrossRefPubMed

Tiegs G. Cellular and cytokine-mediated mechanisms of inflammation and its modulation in immune-mediated liver injury. Z Gastroenterol. 2007;45(1):63–70.CrossRef

10.

Erhardt A, Biburger M, Papadopoulos T, Tiegs G. IL-10, regulatory T cells, and Kupffer cells mediate tolerance in concanavalin A-induced liver injury in mice. Hepatology. 2007;45(2):475–85.CrossRef

11.

Margalit M, Ghazala SA, Alper R, Elinav E, Klein A, Doviner V, et al. Glucocerebroside treatment ameliorates ConA hepatitis by inhibition of NKT lymphocytes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;289(5):G917–25.CrossRef

12.

Ogura M, Deng S, Preston-Hurlburt P, Ogura H, Shailubhai K, Kuhn C, et al. Oral treatment with foralumab, a fully human anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, prevents skin xenograft rejection in humanized mice. Clin Immunol. 2017;183:240–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2017.07.005.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Kuhn C, Weiner HL. Therapeutic anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies: from bench to bedside. Immunotherapy. 2016;8(8):889–906. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2016-0049.CrossRefPubMed

14.

da Cunha AP, Weiner HL. Induction of immunological tolerance by oral anti-CD3. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:425021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/425021.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Wu HY, Maron R, Tukpah AM, Weiner HL. Mucosal anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody attenuates collagen-induced arthritis that is associated with induction of LAP+ regulatory T cells and is enhanced by administration of an emulsome-based Th2-skewing adjuvant. J Immunol. 2010;185(6):3401–7. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1000836.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Ilan Y, Maron R, Tukpah AM, Maioli TU, Murugaiyan G, Yang K, et al. Induction of regulatory T cells decreases adipose inflammation and alleviates insulin resistance in ob/ob mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(21):9765–70. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908771107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Abraham M, Karni A, Dembinsky A, Miller A, Gandhi R, Anderson D, et al. In vitro induction of regulatory T cells by anti-CD3 antibody in humans. J Autoimmun. 2008;30(1-2):21–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2007.11.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Ilan Y, Shailubhai K, Sanyal A. Immunotherapy with oral administration of humanized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody: a novel gut-immune system-based therapy for metaflammation and NASH. Clin Exp Immunol. 2018;193(3):275–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Ilan Y. Review article: novel methods for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis - targeting the gut immune system to decrease the systemic inflammatory response without immune suppression. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44(11-12):1168–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13833.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Ilan Y, Zigmond E, Lalazar G, Dembinsky A, Ben Ya'acov A, Hemed N, et al. Oral administration of OKT3 monoclonal antibody to human subjects induces a dose-dependent immunologic effect in T cells and dendritic cells. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30(1):167–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-009-9323-7.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Lalazar G, Mizrahi M, Turgeman I, Adar T, Ben Ya'acov A, Shabat Y, et al. Oral Administration of OKT3 MAb to Patients with NASH, Promotes Regulatory T-cell Induction, and Alleviates Insulin Resistance: Results of a Phase IIa Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Clin Immunol. 2015;35(4):399–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-015-0160-6.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Halota W, Ferenci P, Kozielewicz D, Dybowska D, Lisovoder N, Samira S, et al. Oral anti-CD3 immunotherapy for HCV-nonresponders is safe, promotes regulatory T cells and decreases viral load and liver enzyme levels: results of a phase-2a placebo-controlled trial. J Viral Hepat. 2015;22(8):651–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.12369.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ilan Y. Compounds of the sphingomyelin-ceramide-glycosphingolipid pathways as secondary messenger molecules: new targets for novel therapies for fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;310(11):G1102–17. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00095.2016.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Zigmond E, Tayer-Shifman O, Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, Weksler-Zangen S, Shasha D, et al. beta-glycosphingolipids ameliorated non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in the Psammomys obesus model. J Inflamm Res. 2014;7:151–8. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S50508.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Zigmond E, Zangen SW, Pappo O, Sklair-Levy M, Lalazar G, Zolotaryova L, et al. Beta-glycosphingolipids improve glucose intolerance and hepatic steatosis of the Cohen diabetic rat. Am J Physiol. 2009;296(1):E72–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.90634.2008.CrossRef

26.

Zhang W, Moritoki Y, Tsuneyama K, Yang GX, Ilan Y, Lian ZX, et al. Beta-glucosylceramide ameliorates liver inflammation in murine autoimmune cholangitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2009;157(3):359–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.03971.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Shuvy M, Ben Ya'acov A, Zolotarov L, Lotan C, Ilan Y. Beta glycosphingolipids suppress rank expression and inhibit natural killer T cell and CD8+ accumulation in alleviating aortic valve calcification. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009;22(4):911–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/039463200902200406.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, Livovsky DM, El Haj M, Pappo O, Preston S, et al. Beta-glycoglycosphingolipid-induced alterations of the STAT signaling pathways are dependent on CD1d and the lipid raft protein flotillin-2. Am J Pathol. 2009;174(4):1390–9. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2009.080841.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Ben Ya'acov A, Lalazar G, Livovsky DM, Kanovich D, Axelrod E, Preston S, et al. Decreased STAT-1 phosphorylation by a thio analogue of beta-D-glucosylceramide is associated with altered NKT lymphocyte polarization. Mol Immunol. 2009;47(2-3):526–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2009.07.030.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Zigmond E, Shalev Z, Pappo O, Alper R, Zolotarov L, Ilan Y. NKT lymphocyte polarization determined by microenvironment signaling: a role for CD8+ lymphocytes and beta-glycosphingolipids. J Autoimmun. 2008;31(2):188–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2008.07.003.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Livovsky DM, Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, Pappo O, Preston S, Zolotaryova L, et al. Administration of beta-glycolipids overcomes an unfavorable nutritional dependent host milieu: a role for a soy-free diet and natural ligands in intrahepatic CD8+ lymphocyte trapping and NKT cell redistribution. Int Immunopharmacol. 2008;8(9):1298–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2008.05.005.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, Eliakim-Raz N, Livovsky DM, Pappo O, Preston S, et al. Beta-glycosphingolipids-mediated lipid raft alteration is associated with redistribution of NKT cells and increased intrahepatic CD8+ T lymphocyte trapping. J Lipid Res. 2008;49(9):1884–93. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M800113-JLR200.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Zigmond E, Preston S, Pappo O, Lalazar G, Margalit M, Shalev Z, et al. Beta-glucosylceramide: a novel method for enhancement of natural killer T lymphoycte plasticity in murine models of immune-mediated disorders. Gut. 2007;56(1):82–9.CrossRef

34.

Lalazar G, Zigmond E, Weksler-Zangen S, Ya'acov AB, Levy MS, Hemed N, et al. Oral Administration of beta-Glucosylceramide for the Treatment of Insulin Resistance and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Results of a Double-Blind. Placebo-Controlled Trial J Med Food. 2017;20(5):458–64. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2016.3753.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Ilan Y, Ohana M, Pappo O, Margalit M, Lalazar G, Engelhardt D, et al. Alleviation of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease in a murine model is associated with glucocerebroside-enhanced natural killer T lymphocyte plasticity. Transplantation. 2007;83(4):458–67.CrossRef

36.

Lalazar G, Preston S, Zigmond E, Ben Yaacov A, Ilan Y. Glycolipids as immune modulatory tools. Mini-Rev Med Chem. 2006;6(11):1249–53.CrossRef

37.

Safadi R, Zigmond E, Pappo O, Shalev Z, Ilan Y. Amelioration of hepatic fibrosis via beta-glucosylceramide-mediated immune modulation is associated with altered CD8 and NKT lymphocyte distribution. Int Immunol. 2007;19(8):1021–9.CrossRef

38.

Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, Lador A, Livovsky DM, Pappo O, Preston S, et al. Modulation of intracellular machinery by beta-glycolipids is associated with alteration of NKT lipid rafts and amelioration of concanavalin-induced hepatitis. Mol Immunol. 2008;45(13):3517–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2008.05.009.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Mizrahi M, Lalazar G, Ben Ya'acov A, Livovsky DM, Horowitz Y, Zolotarov L, et al. Beta-glycoglycosphingolipid-induced augmentation of the anti-HBV immune response is associated with altered CD8 and NKT lymphocyte distribution: a novel adjuvant for HBV vaccination. Vaccine. 2008;26(21):2589–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.026.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Elinav E, Pappo O, Sklair-Levy M, Margalit M, Shibolet O, Gomori M, et al. Amelioration of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and glucose intolerance in ob/ob mice by oral immune regulation towards liver-extracted proteins is associated with elevated intrahepatic NKT lymphocytes and serum IL-10 levels. J Pathol. 2006;208(1):74–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1869.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Dennert G, Aswad F. The role of NKT cells in animal models of autoimmune hepatitis. Crit Rev Immunol. 2006;26(5):453–73.CrossRef

42.

Halder RC, Aguilera C, Maricic I, Kumar V. Type II NKT cell-mediated anergy induction in type I NKT cells prevents inflammatory liver disease. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(8):2302–12.CrossRef

43.

Kawamura T, Takeda K, Kaneda H, Matsumoto H, Hayakawa Y, Raulet DH, et al. NKG2A inhibits invariant NKT cell activation in hepatic injury. J Immunol. 2009;182(1):250–8.CrossRef

44.

Hov JR, Karlsen TH. The Microbiome in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Current Evidence and Potential Concepts. Semin Liver Dis. 2017;37(4):314–31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1608801.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Goulart LR, Santos PS, Carneiro AP, Santana BB, Vallinoto AC, Araujo TG. Unraveling Antibody Display: Systems Biology and Personalized Medicine. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(43):6560–76. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612822666160923112816.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Aabakken L, Karlsen TH, Albert J, Arvanitakis M, Chazouilleres O, Dumonceau JM, et al. Role of endoscopy in primary sclerosing cholangitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49(6):588–608. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-107029.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Li S, Todor A, Luo R. Blood transcriptomics and metabolomics for personalized medicine. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2016;14:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2015.10.005.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Sirotti S, Generali E, Ceribelli A, Isailovic N, De Santis M, Selmi C. Personalized medicine in rheumatology: the paradigm of serum autoantibodies. Auto Immun Highlights. 2017;8(1):10–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13317-017-0098-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Chen P, Huang NT, Chung MT, Cornell TT, Kurabayashi K. Label-free cytokine micro- and nano-biosensing towards personalized medicine of systemic inflammatory disorders. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;95:90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.09.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Brzustewicz E, Bzoma I, Daca A, Szarecka M, Bykowska MS, Witkowski JM, et al. Heterogeneity of the cytokinome in undifferentiated arthritis progressing to rheumatoid arthritis and its change in the course of therapy. Move toward personalized medicine. Cytokine. 2017;97:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2017.05.012.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Rodriguez-Carrio J, Lopez P, Suarez A. EPC dysfunction and immune networks: translating opportunities for the clinical setting in personalized medicine. Curr Med Chem. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867324666170606101823.CrossRef

52.

Sui H, Ma N, Wang Y, Li H, Liu X, Su Y, et al. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Toward Personalized Medicine and Combination Strategies. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:6984948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6984948.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Ilan Y. Advanced Tailored Randomness: A Novel Approach for Improving the Efficacy of Biological Systems. J Comput Biol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2019.0231.

54.

Ilan Y. Why targeting the microbiome is not so successful: can randomness overcome the adaptation that occurs following gut manipulation? Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019;12:209–17. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S203823.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Ilan Y. beta-Glycosphingolipids as Mediators of Both Inflammation and Immune Tolerance: A Manifestation of Randomness in Biological Systems. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Ilan Y. Randomness in microtubule dynamics: an error that requires correction or an inherent plasticity required for normal cellular function? Cell Biol Int. 2019;43(7):739–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.11157.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Ilan Y. Generating randomness: making the most out of disordering a false order into a real one. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):49–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1798-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Buiatti M, Buiatti M. Chance vs. necessity in living systems: a false antinomy. Riv Biol. 2008;101(1):29–66.PubMed

59.

Montevil M, Mossio M, Pocheville A, Longo G. Theoretical principles for biology: Variation. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016;122(1):36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.08.005.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Buiatti M, Longo G. Randomness and multilevel interactions in biology. Theory Biosci. 2013;132(3):139–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-013-0179-2.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Longo G, Montevil M, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. In search of principles for a Theory of Organisms. J Biosci. 2015;40(5):955–68.CrossRef

62.

Longo G, Montevil M, Pocheville A. From bottom-up approaches to levels of organization and extended critical transitions. Front Physiol. 2012;3:232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00232.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Vinks AA. Precision Medicine-Nobody Is Average. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(3):304–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.600.CrossRefPubMed

64.

West J. Where Medicine Went Wrong: Rediscovering the Path to Complexity: Studies of Nonlinear Phenomena in Life Science. 2006.CrossRef

65.

Wu L, Jiang Z, Li C, Shu M. Prediction of heart rate variability on cardiac sudden death in heart failure patients: a systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2014;174(3):857–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.176.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Sima CA, Inskip JA, Sheel AW, van Eeden SF, Reid WD, Camp PG. The reliability of short-term measurement of heart rate variability during spontaneous breathing in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Rev Port Pneumol (2006). 2017;23(6):338–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.06.001.CrossRef

67.

Dingwell JB, John J, Cusumano JP. Do humans optimally exploit redundancy to control step variability in walking? PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(7):e1000856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000856.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Godfrey DI, Kronenberg M. Going both ways: immune regulation via CD1d-dependent NKT cells. J Clin Invest. 2004;114(10):1379–88.CrossRef

69.

Motulsky HJ. Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015;3(1):e00093. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.93.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Robertson D, Cook D. Unrealistic statistics: how average constitutive coefficients can produce non-physical results. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;40:234–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.09.006.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Denny M. The fallacy of the average: on the ubiquity, utility and continuing novelty of Jensen's inequality. J Exp Biol. 2017;220(Pt 2):139–46. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.140368.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Song YS, Patil A, Murphy EE, Slatkin M. Average probability that a "cold hit" in a DNA database search results in an erroneous attribution. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(1):22–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00917.x.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Beck RW, Connor CG, Mullen DM, Wesley DM, Bergenstal RM. The Fallacy of Average: How Using HbA1c Alone to Assess Glycemic Control Can Be Misleading. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(8):994–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0636.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Personalized inherent randomness of the immune system is manifested by an individualized response to immune triggers and immunomodulatory therapies: a novel platform for designing personalized immunotherapies
verfasst von: Madi El-Haj
Dimitri Kanovitch
Yaron Ilan
Publikationsdatum: 21.11.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Immunologic Research / Ausgabe 4-5/2019
Print ISSN: 0257-277X
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-0755
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-019-09101-y

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Personalized inherent randomness of the immune system is manifested by an individualized response to immune triggers and immunomodulatory therapies: a novel platform for designing personalized immunotherapies

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4-5/2019

X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome complicated with interstitial pneumonia and liver injury: a new mutation locus in the CD40LG gene

Meta-analysis of associations between interleukin-10 polymorphisms and susceptibility to Behcet’s disease

Comparison of immunomodulatory properties of exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and dental pulp stem cells

On the immunoregulatory role of statins in multiple sclerosis: the effects on Th17 cells

Infliximab therapy for inflammatory colitis in an infant with NEMO deficiency

Monocyte subsets study in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO