Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology 2/2017

09.12.2016 | Original Research Article

Phase I/II Randomized Trial of Sorafenib and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial N0745 (Alliance)

verfasst von: Joleen M. Hubbard, Michelle R. Mahoney, William S. Loui, Lewis R. Roberts, Thomas C. Smyrk, Zoran Gatalica, Mitesh Borad, Shaji Kumar, Steven R. Alberts

Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Angiogenesis has been a major target of novel drug development in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is hypothesized that the combination of two antiangiogenic agents, sorafenib and bevacizumab, will provide greater blockade of angiogenesis.

Objective

To determine the optimal dose, safety, and effectiveness of dual anti-angiogenic therapy with sorafenib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced HCC.

Patients and Methods

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic HCC not amenable for surgery or liver transplant were eligible. The phase I starting dose level was bevacizumab 1.25 mg/kg day 1 and 15 plus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (BID) days 1-28. In the phase II portion, patients were randomized to receive bevacizumab and sorafenib at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or sorafenib 400 mg BID.

Results

Seventen patients were enrolled in the phase I component. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 hand/foot skin reaction, fatigue, hypertension, alanine/aspartate aminotransferase increase, dehydration, hypophosphatemia, creatinine increase, hypoglycemia, nausea/vomiting, and grade 4 hyponatremia. Seven patients were enrolled in the phase II component at the MTD: sorafenib 200 mg BID days 1-28 and bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg every other week; 57% (4/7) had grade 3 AEs at least possibly related to treatment. No responses were observed in the phase II portion. Estimated median time to progression and survival were 8.6 months (95% CI: 0.4-16.3) and 13.3 months (95% CI 4.4 – not estimable), respectively.

Conclusions

The MTD of the combination is sorafenib 200 mg twice daily on days 1-28 plus bevacizumab 2.5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. In the phase II portion of the trial, concerns regarding excessive toxicity, low efficacy, and slow enrollment led to discontinuation of the trial. (Clinical Trials ID: NCT00867321.)
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2557–76.CrossRefPubMed El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2557–76.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon RT et al. Quantitative correlation of serum levels and tumor expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63(12):3121–6.PubMed Poon RT et al. Quantitative correlation of serum levels and tumor expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63(12):3121–6.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng IO et al. Microvessel density, vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors Flt-1 and Flk-1/KDR in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116(6):838–45.CrossRefPubMed Ng IO et al. Microvessel density, vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors Flt-1 and Flk-1/KDR in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;116(6):838–45.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilhelm SM et al. BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004;64(19):7099–109.CrossRefPubMed Wilhelm SM et al. BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004;64(19):7099–109.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Llovet JM et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(4):378–90.CrossRefPubMed Llovet JM et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(4):378–90.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel AB et al. Phase II trial evaluating the clinical and biologic effects of bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(18):2992–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siegel AB et al. Phase II trial evaluating the clinical and biologic effects of bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(18):2992–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Azad NS et al. Combination targeted therapy with sorafenib and bevacizumab results in enhanced toxicity and antitumor activity. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(22):3709–14.CrossRefPubMed Azad NS et al. Combination targeted therapy with sorafenib and bevacizumab results in enhanced toxicity and antitumor activity. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(22):3709–14.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31(1):103–15.CrossRefPubMed Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31(1):103–15.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Therasse P et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–16.CrossRef Therasse P et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205–16.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubinstein LV et al. Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(28):7199–206.CrossRefPubMed Rubinstein LV et al. Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(28):7199–206.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53(282):457–81.CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53(282):457–81.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Grothey A. et al. Dual VEGF inhibition with sorafenib and bevacizumab (BEV) as salvage therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results of the phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group study N054C. J Clin Oncol 28:15s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 3549) Grothey A. et al. Dual VEGF inhibition with sorafenib and bevacizumab (BEV) as salvage therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results of the phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group study N054C. J Clin Oncol 28:15s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 3549)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Venook AP. Key research issues in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004;54 Suppl 1:S87–90.PubMed Venook AP. Key research issues in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004;54 Suppl 1:S87–90.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Welker MW, Trojan J. Antiangiogenic treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: the balance of efficacy and safety. Cancer Manag Res. 2013;5:337–47.PubMedPubMedCentral Welker MW, Trojan J. Antiangiogenic treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: the balance of efficacy and safety. Cancer Manag Res. 2013;5:337–47.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng AL et al. Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(32):4067–75.CrossRefPubMed Cheng AL et al. Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(32):4067–75.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson PJ et al. Brivanib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-FL study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3517–24.CrossRefPubMed Johnson PJ et al. Brivanib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-FL study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3517–24.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cainap C. et al. Phase III trial of linifanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 4; abstr 249) Cainap C. et al. Phase III trial of linifanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl 4; abstr 249)
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Llovet JM et al. Brivanib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were intolerant to sorafenib or for whom sorafenib failed: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-PS study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3509–16.CrossRefPubMed Llovet JM et al. Brivanib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were intolerant to sorafenib or for whom sorafenib failed: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-PS study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3509–16.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu AX et al. Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(7):859–70.CrossRefPubMed Zhu AX et al. Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(7):859–70.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruix J et al. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progressing on sorafenib: results of the international, randomized phase 3 RESORCE trial. Ann Oncol. 2016;27 (suppl 2; ii140-ii141; abstr LBA-03) Bruix J et al. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib versus placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progressing on sorafenib: results of the international, randomized phase 3 RESORCE trial. Ann Oncol. 2016;27 (suppl 2; ii140-ii141; abstr LBA-03)
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu AX. et al. Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of REACH trial results by child-Pugh score. JAMA Oncol. 2016. Zhu AX. et al. Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of REACH trial results by child-Pugh score. JAMA Oncol. 2016.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Santoro A et al. Tivantinib for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(1):55–63.CrossRefPubMed Santoro A et al. Tivantinib for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(1):55–63.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Phase I/II Randomized Trial of Sorafenib and Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial N0745 (Alliance)
verfasst von
Joleen M. Hubbard
Michelle R. Mahoney
William S. Loui
Lewis R. Roberts
Thomas C. Smyrk
Zoran Gatalica
Mitesh Borad
Shaji Kumar
Steven R. Alberts
Publikationsdatum
09.12.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Targeted Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1776-2596
Elektronische ISSN: 1776-260X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-016-0467-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Targeted Oncology 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.