Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Investigational New Drugs 4/2018

02.11.2017 | PHASE I STUDIES

Phase I trial of bortezomib daily dose: safety, pharmacokinetic profile, biological effects and early clinical evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumors

Erschienen in: Investigational New Drugs | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Purpose This phase I study investigated bortezomib in solid tumors used as a daily subcutaneous regimen. Previous regimens showed only modest activity in solid tumors which was potentially related to sub-optimal tumor penetration. We aimed at exploring if daily low dose administration of bortezomib may allow a greater and tolerable pharmacokinetic exposure which might be required for antitumor activity in solid tumors. Patients and methods This 3 + 3 design, dose escalation, monocentric study aimed at defining the maximum tolerated dose of daily low dose schedule of bortezomib. Tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antitumor activity, biomarkers for proteasome inhibition, pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies were also evaluated. Results A total of eighteen patients were dosed in 3 bortezomib cohorts (0.5, 0.6 and 0.7 mg/m2), with 3, 11 and 4 patients respectively. Three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities: Grade (G) 3 Sweet's syndrome (at 0.6 mg/m2), G3 asthenia and anorexia or ataxia (2 patients at 0.7 mg/m2). The most common study drug-related adverse events (all grades) were thrombocytopenia (72%), fatigue (56%), neuropathy (50%), anorexia (44%) and rash (39%). Dose 0.6 mg/m2 of bortezomib was considered as the recommended phase II dose. A significant tumor shrinkage (−36% according to WHO criteria) was observed in one patient with heavily pre-treated GIST, and 2 minor responses (−20%) were recorded in two patients with melanoma and mesothelioma. Conclusion This daily subcutaneous regimen of bortezomib showed a dose dependent plasma exposure, evidence of target inhibition and preliminary signs of clinical activity. However, cumulative neurological toxicity of this dose-dense daily regimen might preclude its further clinical development.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukushima T, Nakamura T, Iwao H, Nakajima A, Miki M, Sato T et al (2011) Efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus dexamethasone therapy for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: once-weekly administration of bortezomib may reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events. Anticancer Res 31(6):2297–2302PubMed Fukushima T, Nakamura T, Iwao H, Nakajima A, Miki M, Sato T et al (2011) Efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus dexamethasone therapy for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: once-weekly administration of bortezomib may reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events. Anticancer Res 31(6):2297–2302PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Papandreou CN, Daliani DD, Nix D, Yang H, Madden T, Wang X et al (2004) Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors with observations in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(11):2108–2121CrossRefPubMed Papandreou CN, Daliani DD, Nix D, Yang H, Madden T, Wang X et al (2004) Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors with observations in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(11):2108–2121CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreau P, Pylypenko H, Grosicki S, Karamanesht I, Leleu X, Grishunina M et al (2011) Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority study. Lancet Oncol 12(5):431–440CrossRefPubMed Moreau P, Pylypenko H, Grosicki S, Karamanesht I, Leleu X, Grishunina M et al (2011) Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority study. Lancet Oncol 12(5):431–440CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen D, Frezza M, Schmitt S, Kanwar J, Dou QP (2011) Bortezomib as the first proteasome inhibitor anticancer drug: Current status and future perspectives. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 11(3):239–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen D, Frezza M, Schmitt S, Kanwar J, Dou QP (2011) Bortezomib as the first proteasome inhibitor anticancer drug: Current status and future perspectives. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 11(3):239–253CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lightcap ES, McCormack TA, Pien CS, Chau V, Adams J, Elliott PJ (2000) Proteasome inhibition measurements: Clinical Application. Clin Chem 46(5):673–683PubMed Lightcap ES, McCormack TA, Pien CS, Chau V, Adams J, Elliott PJ (2000) Proteasome inhibition measurements: Clinical Application. Clin Chem 46(5):673–683PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Delforge M, Terpos E, Richardson PG, Shpilberg O, Khuageva NK, Schlag R et al (2011) Fewer bone disease events, improvement in bone remodeling, and evidence of bone healing with bortezomib plus melphalan prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in the phase III VISTAtrial in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haem 86(5):372–384CrossRef Delforge M, Terpos E, Richardson PG, Shpilberg O, Khuageva NK, Schlag R et al (2011) Fewer bone disease events, improvement in bone remodeling, and evidence of bone healing with bortezomib plus melphalan prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone in the phase III VISTAtrial in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haem 86(5):372–384CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Trinh X, Sas L, Van Laere SJ, Prové A, Deleu I, Rasschaert M et al (2012) A phase II study of the combination of endocrine treatment and bortezomib in patients with endocrine resistant metastatic breast cancer. Oncol Rep 27(3):657–663PubMed Trinh X, Sas L, Van Laere SJ, Prové A, Deleu I, Rasschaert M et al (2012) A phase II study of the combination of endocrine treatment and bortezomib in patients with endocrine resistant metastatic breast cancer. Oncol Rep 27(3):657–663PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreau P, Coiteux V, Hulin C, Leleu X, van de Velde H, Acharya M, et al. (2008) Prospective comparison of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica 93(12):1908-1911 Moreau P, Coiteux V, Hulin C, Leleu X, van de Velde H, Acharya M, et al. (2008) Prospective comparison of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica 93(12):1908-1911
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Aghajanian C, Soignet S, Dizon DS, Pien CS, Adams J, Elliott PJ et al (2002) A phase I trial of the novel proteasome inhibitor PS341 in advanced solid tumor malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 8(8):2505–2511PubMed Aghajanian C, Soignet S, Dizon DS, Pien CS, Adams J, Elliott PJ et al (2002) A phase I trial of the novel proteasome inhibitor PS341 in advanced solid tumor malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 8(8):2505–2511PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zobniw CM, Saad S, Kostoff D, Barthel BG (2014) Bortezomib-Induced Sweet's Syndrome Confirmed by Rechallenge. Pharmacotherapy 34(4):e18–e21CrossRefPubMed Zobniw CM, Saad S, Kostoff D, Barthel BG (2014) Bortezomib-Induced Sweet's Syndrome Confirmed by Rechallenge. Pharmacotherapy 34(4):e18–e21CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Llamas-Velasco M, Concha-Garzón MJ, Fraga J, Aragüés M (2015) Histiocytoid sweet syndrome related to bortezomib: A mimicker of cutaneous infiltration by myeloma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 81(3):305–306CrossRefPubMed Llamas-Velasco M, Concha-Garzón MJ, Fraga J, Aragüés M (2015) Histiocytoid sweet syndrome related to bortezomib: A mimicker of cutaneous infiltration by myeloma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 81(3):305–306CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JS, Roh HS, Lee JW, Lee MW, Yu HJ (2012) Distinct variant of Sweet’s syndrome: bortezomib-induced histiocytoid Sweet’s syndrome in a patient with multiple myeloma. Int J Dermatol 51(12):1491–1493CrossRefPubMed Kim JS, Roh HS, Lee JW, Lee MW, Yu HJ (2012) Distinct variant of Sweet’s syndrome: bortezomib-induced histiocytoid Sweet’s syndrome in a patient with multiple myeloma. Int J Dermatol 51(12):1491–1493CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Duensing S, Duensing A (2010) Bortezomib: killing two birds with one stone in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncotarget 1(1):6–8PubMedPubMedCentral Duensing S, Duensing A (2010) Bortezomib: killing two birds with one stone in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncotarget 1(1):6–8PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Tseng M, Perdreau SA, Rossi F, Antonescu C, Besmer P et al (2007) Histone H2AX is a mediator of gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell apoptosis following treatment with imatinib mesylate. Cancer Res 67(6):2685–2692CrossRefPubMed Liu Y, Tseng M, Perdreau SA, Rossi F, Antonescu C, Besmer P et al (2007) Histone H2AX is a mediator of gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell apoptosis following treatment with imatinib mesylate. Cancer Res 67(6):2685–2692CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauer S, Parry JA, Muhlenberg T, Brown MF, Seneviratne D, Chatterjee P et al (2010) Proapoptotic activity of bortezomib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells. Cancer Res 70(1):150–159CrossRefPubMed Bauer S, Parry JA, Muhlenberg T, Brown MF, Seneviratne D, Chatterjee P et al (2010) Proapoptotic activity of bortezomib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells. Cancer Res 70(1):150–159CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Phase I trial of bortezomib daily dose: safety, pharmacokinetic profile, biological effects and early clinical evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumors
Publikationsdatum
02.11.2017
Erschienen in
Investigational New Drugs / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-017-0531-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Investigational New Drugs 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.