Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6/2019

05.08.2019 | Research Article

Pitch Matching Adapts Even for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Relatively Small Initial Pitch Differences Across the Ears

verfasst von: Justin M. Aronoff, Hannah E. Staisloff, Abbigail Kirchner, Daniel H. Lee, Julia Stelmach

Erschienen in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

There is often a mismatch for bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users between the electrodes in the two ears that receive the same frequency allocation and the electrodes that, when stimulated, yield the same pitch. Studies with CI users who have extreme mismatches between the two ears show that adaptation occurs in terms of pitch matching, reducing the difference between which electrodes receive the same frequency allocation and which ones produce the same pitch. The considerable adaptation that occurs for these extreme cases suggests that adaptation should be sufficient to overcome the relatively minor mismatches seen with typical bilateral CI users. However, even those with many years of bilateral CI use continue to demonstrate a mismatch. This may indicate that adaptation only occurs when there are large mismatches. Alternatively, it may indicate that adaptation occurs regardless of the magnitude of the mismatch, but that adaptation is proportional to the magnitude of the mismatch, and thus never fully counters the original mismatch. To investigate this, six bilateral CI users with initial pitch-matching mismatches of less than 3 mm completed a pitch-matching task near the time of activation, 6 months after activation, and 1 year after activation. Despite relatively small initial mismatches, the results indicated that adaptation still occurred.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aronoff JM, Freed DJ, Fisher LM, Pal I, Soli SD (2011) The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals ’ binaural benefits for speech perception in noise. Ear Hear 32:468–484CrossRef Aronoff JM, Freed DJ, Fisher LM, Pal I, Soli SD (2011) The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals ’ binaural benefits for speech perception in noise. Ear Hear 32:468–484CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aronoff JM, Shayman C, Prasad A, Suneel D, Stelmach J (2015) Unilateral spectral and temporal compression reduces binaural fusion for normal hearing listeners with cochlear implant simulations. Hear Res 320:24–29CrossRef Aronoff JM, Shayman C, Prasad A, Suneel D, Stelmach J (2015) Unilateral spectral and temporal compression reduces binaural fusion for normal hearing listeners with cochlear implant simulations. Hear Res 320:24–29CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bronkhorst AW, Plomp R (1988) The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 83:1508–1516CrossRef Bronkhorst AW, Plomp R (1988) The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 83:1508–1516CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dunn CC, Noble W, Tyler RS, Kordus M, Gantz BJ, Ji H (2010) Bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users compared on speech perception in noise. Ear Hear 31:296–298CrossRef Dunn CC, Noble W, Tyler RS, Kordus M, Gantz BJ, Ji H (2010) Bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users compared on speech perception in noise. Ear Hear 31:296–298CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM (2003) Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am 114:1565–1574CrossRef Long CJ, Eddington DK, Colburn HS, Rabinowitz WM (2003) Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user. J Acoust Soc Am 114:1565–1574CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat MacKeith NW, Coles RR (1971) Binaural advantages in hearing of speech. J Laryngol Otol 85:213–232CrossRef MacKeith NW, Coles RR (1971) Binaural advantages in hearing of speech. J Laryngol Otol 85:213–232CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Reiss LAJ, Ito RA, Eggleston JL, Liao S, Becker JJ, Lakin CE, Warren FM, McMenomey SO (2015) Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience. Ear Hear 36:E23–E34CrossRef Reiss LAJ, Ito RA, Eggleston JL, Liao S, Becker JJ, Lakin CE, Warren FM, McMenomey SO (2015) Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience. Ear Hear 36:E23–E34CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wightman FL, Kistler DJ (1997) Monaural sound localization revisited. J Acoust Soc Am 101:1050–1063CrossRef Wightman FL, Kistler DJ (1997) Monaural sound localization revisited. J Acoust Soc Am 101:1050–1063CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pitch Matching Adapts Even for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Relatively Small Initial Pitch Differences Across the Ears
verfasst von
Justin M. Aronoff
Hannah E. Staisloff
Abbigail Kirchner
Daniel H. Lee
Julia Stelmach
Publikationsdatum
05.08.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-019-00733-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.