Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Dysphagia 6/2022

28.02.2022 | Original Article

Pneumonia, Mortality, and Other Outcomes Associated with Unsafe Swallowing Detected via Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in Patients with Functional Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

verfasst von: Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid, Alirio Rodrigo Bastidas, Jorge Maldonado-Lancheros, Daniel A. Gasca-Zuluaga, Martha Johana Aguilar-Farias, Leonardo Bohorquez-Tibavisco

Erschienen in: Dysphagia | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The association between impairments in swallowing safety detected via fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and dysphagia complications has been evaluated in small studies that have not allowed obtaining precise estimates of the presence of such an association. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of dysphagia complications associated with the detection of premature spillage, residue, penetration, and aspiration via FEES. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature were carried out. A search strategy was established using terms of controlled and free vocabulary (free text) in the PubMed, Lilacs, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases. The initial search in the databases identified 3545 articles, of which 321 were excluded due to duplication, 3224 were selected for review of titles and abstracts, 45 were selected for full-text review, 37 were excluded for not meeting the selection criteria, and 8 were included for the final analysis, with a total population of 1168 patients. Aspiration increased the risk of pneumonia (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.52–5.80, P = 0.001). The number of studies that have evaluated the relationship of other FEES findings with dysphagia complications was limited (≤ 3). One study found a higher risk of mortality in patients with aspiration (OR 4.08, 95% CI 1.60–10.27, P = 0.003). Another study that evaluated the risk of mortality in a combined group of penetration and aspiration found no higher risk of mortality. Penetration, residue, and premature spillage were not found to be associated with an increased risk of pneumonia, mortality, or other outcomes. Aspiration demonstrated via FEES was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia and mortality. There is insufficient evidence for the capacity of premature spillage, penetration, and residue to predict dysphagia complications.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Langmore SE, Shatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2:216–9.CrossRefPubMed Langmore SE, Shatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2:216–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Langmore SE, Terpenning MS, Schork A, Chen Y, Murray JT, Lopatin D, Loesche WJ. Predictors of aspiration pneumonia: how important is dysphagia? Dysphagia. 1998;13:69–81.CrossRefPubMed Langmore SE, Terpenning MS, Schork A, Chen Y, Murray JT, Lopatin D, Loesche WJ. Predictors of aspiration pneumonia: how important is dysphagia? Dysphagia. 1998;13:69–81.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Conte D, Nikolova D, Duca P, Thorlund K, Gluud C. The architecture of diagnostic research: from bench to bedside–research guidelines using liver stiffness as an example. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2014;60:408–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26948.CrossRef Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Conte D, Nikolova D, Duca P, Thorlund K, Gluud C. The architecture of diagnostic research: from bench to bedside–research guidelines using liver stiffness as an example. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD). 2014;60:408–18. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hep.​26948.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt J, Holas M, Halvorson K, Reding M. Videofluoroscopic evidence of aspiration predicts pneumonia and death but not dehydration following stroke. Dysphagia. 1994;9:7–11.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt J, Holas M, Halvorson K, Reding M. Videofluoroscopic evidence of aspiration predicts pneumonia and death but not dehydration following stroke. Dysphagia. 1994;9:7–11.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA editor. Cochrane. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. 2021 Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA editor. Cochrane. www.​training.​cochrane.​org/​handbook. 2021
23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Langmore SE. Scoring a FEES(R) examination. In: Langmore SE, editor. Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 2001. p. 101–43. Langmore SE. Scoring a FEES(R) examination. In: Langmore SE, editor. Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 2001. p. 101–43.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olson N. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991;100:678–81.CrossRefPubMed Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olson N. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991;100:678–81.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hrobjartsson A, Kirkham J, Juni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schunemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355: i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, Savovic J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hrobjartsson A, Kirkham J, Juni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schunemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355: i4919. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​i4919.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JA, Hernán MA, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Higgins JP (2021) Chapter 25: Assessing risk of bias in a non-randomized study. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA editor. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 62 (updated February 2021). Cochrane. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, McAleenan A, Reeves BC, Higgins JP (2021) Chapter 25: Assessing risk of bias in a non-randomized study. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA editor. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 62 (updated February 2021). Cochrane. www.​training.​cochrane.​org/​handbook.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins J, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration (2011). Higgins J, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S editor. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration (2011).
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim SH, Lieu PK, Phua SY, Seshadri R, Venketasubramanian N, Lee SH, Choo PW. Accuracy of bedside clinical methods compared with fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) in determining the risk of aspiration in acute stroke patients. Dysphagia. 2001;16:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004550000038.CrossRefPubMed Lim SH, Lieu PK, Phua SY, Seshadri R, Venketasubramanian N, Lee SH, Choo PW. Accuracy of bedside clinical methods compared with fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) in determining the risk of aspiration in acute stroke patients. Dysphagia. 2001;16:1–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s004550000038.CrossRefPubMed
42.
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:S27–72.CrossRefPubMed Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:S27–72.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Logemann JA. Mechanisms of normal and abnormal swallowing. In: Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund V, Niparko JK, Robbins KT, Thomas JR, Lesperance MM, editors. Cummings: otolaryngology: head & neck surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2015. p. 1500–6. Logemann JA. Mechanisms of normal and abnormal swallowing. In: Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund V, Niparko JK, Robbins KT, Thomas JR, Lesperance MM, editors. Cummings: otolaryngology: head & neck surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2015. p. 1500–6.
45.
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Farneti D. Pooling score: an endoscopic model for evaluating severity of dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28:135–40.PubMedPubMedCentral Farneti D. Pooling score: an endoscopic model for evaluating severity of dysphagia. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008;28:135–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, Bossuyt PM. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999;282:1061–6.CrossRefPubMed Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, Bossuyt PM. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999;282:1061–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pneumonia, Mortality, and Other Outcomes Associated with Unsafe Swallowing Detected via Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in Patients with Functional Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
verfasst von
Luis Fernando Giraldo-Cadavid
Alirio Rodrigo Bastidas
Jorge Maldonado-Lancheros
Daniel A. Gasca-Zuluaga
Martha Johana Aguilar-Farias
Leonardo Bohorquez-Tibavisco
Publikationsdatum
28.02.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Dysphagia / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10427-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Dysphagia 6/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.