Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Dermatology and Therapy 12/2022

Open Access 18.10.2022 | Original Research

Pooled Safety Analysis of Baricitinib in Adult Participants with Atopic Dermatitis in the Japanese Subpopulation from Six Randomized Clinical Trials

verfasst von: Norito Katoh, Yasushi Takita, Yoshitaka Isaka, Atsushi Nishikawa, Hitoe Torisu-Itakura, Hidehisa Saeki

Erschienen in: Dermatology and Therapy | Ausgabe 12/2022

Abstract

Introduction

Baricitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor approved in Japan and the European Union for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). The aim of this study is to report pooled safety data for baricitinib in the Japanese subpopulation of the clinical development program in moderate-to-severe AD.

Methods

This analysis included participant-level safety data from five double-blind, randomized clinical studies and one double-blind, randomized, long-term extension study, reported in three datasets for the Japanese subpopulation: (1) placebo-controlled, (2) baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg extended (“2-mg—4-mg extended”), and (3) all baricitinib doses (“All-bari-AD”). The data cutoff was 13 December 2019. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events, adverse events of special interest, and abnormal laboratory changes. Proportions of participants with events and incidence rates were calculated.

Results

Data were collected for 341 participants from Japan who received baricitinib for 371.7 participant-years (median duration 371.0 days). In the placebo-controlled dataset, the frequencies of serious infections and herpes zoster were low and similar between treatment groups, and the incidence of treatment-emergent infections, in particular herpes simplex, was higher in the baricitinib groups compared with the placebo group. No gastrointestinal perforations, tuberculosis, positively adjudicated cardiovascular events, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism were reported with exposure up to 2 years in the All-bari-AD dataset. There were no deaths in the Japanese subpopulation.

Conclusions

This integrated safety analysis in the subpopulation of Japanese participants is consistent with the established safety profile of baricitinib in the global study population with moderate-to-severe AD.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers

NCT02576938, NCT03334396, NCT03334422, NCT03428100, NCT03733301, and NCT03334435.
Key Summary Points
Why carry out this study?
A pooled analysis of safety data for baricitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from eight clinical studies confirmed the established safety profile of baricitinib.
In this pooled analysis, the safety data for baricitinib in the Japanese subpopulation, which represented one of the major subpopulations in the pooled analysis, are reported from five placebo-controlled clinical studies and one long-term extension study with exposure up to 2 years.
What was learned from the study?
In the placebo-controlled dataset, the frequencies of serious infections and herpes zoster were low and similar between treatment groups, and the incidence of treatment-emergent infections, in particular herpes simplex, was higher in the baricitinib groups compared with the placebo group.
In the dataset that included all baricitinib doses, no gastrointestinal perforations, tuberculosis, positively adjudicated cardiovascular events, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism were reported with baricitinib exposure up to 2 years, and there were no deaths.
These findings in the subpopulation of Japanese participants are consistent with the established safety profile of baricitinib in the global study population with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin condition characterized by scaly, pruritic, erythematous lesions that can be located on almost any part of the body. The prevalence of AD in adults in Japan has been estimated to range from 2% to 9% [14]. While this estimated prevalence in Japan is similar to that of Western countries [4], there are likely to be some differences in disease phenotype for people from Japan. For instance, there is higher activation of Th17 in people from Asia compared with people from European and American countries [5]. Furthermore, mutations in the gene encoding filaggrin, which is a predisposing factor for AD, is less frequent in people from Japan compared with people from Europe [6].
Baricitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor approved in Japan and the European Union for the treatment of AD [7]. Baricitinib has also been approved in Japan for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) since July 2017, COVID-19 since April 2021, and alopecia areata since June 2022.
In completed phase 2 and 3 studies, baricitinib either as monotherapy or in combination with topical corticosteroids has been shown to significantly improve the signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe AD compared with placebo [79]. A pooled analysis of safety data for baricitinib in 2531 participants with moderate-to-severe AD from six double-blind, randomized controlled studies, one double-blind, randomized, long-term extension study, and one open-label, long-term extension study, confirmed the established safety profile of baricitinib [10]. The frequency of serious infections, opportunistic infections, and conjunctival disorders was low and similar between treatment groups in the placebo-controlled dataset [10]. No malignancies, gastrointestinal perforations, positively adjudicated cardiovascular events, or active tuberculosis were reported in the placebo-controlled dataset in participants treated with baricitinib [10]. In participants who received any dose of baricitinib (the “All-bari-AD” dataset), there were two positively adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, two venous thrombosis events, and one death [10].
Participants from Japan represented one of the major subpopulations in the pooled analysis of safety data for baricitinib [10]. However, the effect of baricitinib on the Japanese subpopulation with AD has not been explored in depth. In this pooled analysis, we report the safety data for baricitinib in moderate-to-severe AD from five placebo-controlled clinical studies and one long-term extension study with exposure up to 2 years in the Japanese subpopulation.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

The study designs, eligibility criteria, datasets, safety outcomes, and statistical analyses for each study have been published previously [10]. Safety data were included from five double-blind, randomized clinical studies (phase 2: NCT02576938; phase 3: NCT03334396 [BREEZE-AD1], NCT03334422 [BREEZE-AD2], NCT03428100 [BREEZE-AD4], and NCT03733301 [BREEZE-AD7]) and one double-blind, randomized, long-term extension study (NCT03334435 [BREEZE-AD3]). All studies included participants from Japan. Overall, 341 participants (13.5%) were from Japan [10].
The study protocols were approved by local ethics committees and were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, Council of International Organizations of Medical Sciences International Ethical Guidelines, and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All participants gave written informed consent before participation in the study.

Analysis Datasets

Three integrated datasets were analyzed:
1.
The “placebo-controlled” dataset assessed the safety profile of baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg versus placebo during the 16-week, placebo-controlled period for participants in the phase 2 study and four phase 3 studies (BREEZE-AD1, BREEZE-AD2, BREEZE-AD4, and BREEZE-AD7).
 
2.
The baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg extended (“2-mg—4-mg extended”) dataset assessed the long-term safety profile from the randomized, long-term extension study BREEZE-AD3, and the 16-week placebo-controlled data, including the phase 2 study and BREEZE-AD4. BREEZE-AD3 enrolled participants from originating studies BREEZE-AD1, BREEZE-AD2, and BREEZE-AD7, giving a total exposure up to 105 weeks of treatment. Data after dose change were treated as censored at dose change.
 
3.
The all baricitinib doses (“All-bari-AD”) dataset provided estimates for incidence rates (IRs) of all adverse events (AEs), as well as assessment for less common event types, and included safety data during treatment with baricitinib, as well as the follow-up period after baricitinib treatment.
 

Safety Outcomes

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), deaths, events leading to interruption or discontinuation of study drug, AEs of special interest (AESI), and abnormal laboratory changes were evaluated. For some AESI, cluster analyses grouped preferred terms (PTs) and terms associated with related clinical disease presentations. These clusters were informed by combining Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) standardized MedDRA queries, medical assessment of PTs, and clusters previously used to establish the safety profile of baricitinib in RA.

Statistical Analysis

As the ratio for randomization of baricitinib to placebo varied across all the studies, adjusted percentages and adjusted IRs were calculated for AEs to provide appropriate direct comparisons between treatment groups for the placebo-controlled and 2-mg—4-mg extended datasets. Adjusted percentages were derived using study weights based on total sample size per study. Adjusted IRs per 100 participant-years at risk of observation time, with observation time censored at event date, were derived using study weights based on total participant-years of exposure per study. For the All-bari-AD dataset, IRs were calculated as the number of participants with an event per 100 participant-years at risk of observation time, with observation time censored at event date. The observation time included a 30-day follow-up period following discontinuation of baricitinib treatment.

Results

Study Participants in the Japanese Subpopulation

At baseline, participant demographics and measures of disease activity were similar between baricitinib doses (2 mg and 4 mg) and placebo and across all datasets (Table 1).
Table 1
Baseline demographics and measures of disease activity in the Japanese subpopulation
 
Placebo controlled (to week 16)
All-bari-ADa, N = 341
Placebo, N = 134
Baricitinib 2 mg, N = 101
Baricitinib 4 mg, N = 89
Age, years
35.9 (10.9)
35.6 (11.1)
34.2 (11.3)
35.7 (11.0)
Female, n (%)
36 (26.9)
22 (21.8)
19 (21.3)
87 (25.5)
Body mass index, kg/m2
24.0 (4.5)
23.8 (4.1)
23.6 (3.9)
23.8 (4.1)
Duration since AD diagnosis, years
25.3 (13.5)
23.2 (12.7)
23.1 (12.9)
24.9 (12.7)
Geographic region Japan, n (%)
134 (100)
101 (100)
89 (100)
341 (100)
Prior topical therapy
 Corticosteroids, n (%)
132 (98.5)
101 (100)
89 (100)
337 (98.8)
 Calcineurin inhibitor, n (%)
80 (64.5)
60 (70.6)
58 (73.4)
211 (68.7)
Prior systemic therapy
 Cyclosporine, n (%)
17 (14.9)
17 (25.0)
11 (15.7)
49 (17.8)
Disease characteristics
 vIGA-AD score of 4 (severe disease), n (%)
55 (43.7)
40 (42.1)
35 (42.2)
143 (43.5)
 EASI score
35.2 (14.2)
33.9 (13.4)
34.7 (12.5)
34.9 (13.5)
 SCORAD
69.8 (14.5)
67.9 (14.4)
69.1 (13.1)
69.2 (14.2)
 Percent body surface area affected
63.2 (21.6)
60.5 (20.9)
62.1 (21.5)
62.2 (21.4)
 DLQI
11.2 (6.3)
11.8 (6.7)
10.6 (6.2)
11.4 (6.6)
 Itch NRS
6.7 (2.0)
6.7 (2.1)
6.3 (2.2)
6.5 (2.1)
Data presented as mean (standard deviation) unless otherwise indicated
AD atopic dermatitis, All-bari-AD participants who received any dose of baricitinib, DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, EASI Eczema Area and Severity Index, NRS numeric rating scale, SCORAD SCORing Atopic Dermatitis; vIGA-AD, validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis
aAll baricitinib doses includes the baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg doses

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events in the Japanese Subpopulation

In the placebo-controlled dataset, 44.9%, 54.4%, and 57.3% of participants in the placebo, baricitinib 2 mg, and baricitinib 4 mg groups, respectively, reported ≥ 1 TEAE (Table 2). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity (data not shown).
Table 2
Overview of safety measures including drug exposure, treatment-emergent adverse events, and adverse events of special interest in the Japanese subpopulation
 
Placebo controlled (to week 16)
2-mg—4-mg extended
All-bari-ADa, N = 341
Placebo, N = 134
Baricitinib 2 mg, N = 101
Baricitinib 4 mg, N = 89
Baricitinib 2 mg, N = 101
Baricitinib 4 mg, N = 89
Exposure
 
 Total participant-years
39.1
30.7
26.9
78.6
93.2
371.7
 Participants with ≥ 52 weeks, n (%)
32 (31.7)
43 (48.3)
201 (58.9)
 Median duration, days
113.0
113.0
113.0
315.0
362.0
371.0
 Longest exposure, days
121
120
119
675
702
703
Adverse events, n (adj %) [adj IR]b
 
 Any TEAE
63 (44.9)
[229.1]
51 (54.4)
[261.0]
52 (57.3)
[310.3]
60
[197.7]
69
[200.7]
245
[149.3]
 SAE
3 (1.9)
[6.7]
0
3 (2.9)
[9.3]
2
[1.6]
6
[6.0]
13
[3.5]
 Interruption of study drug due to AE
0
1 (1.4)
[4.7]
2 (2.5)
[8.6]
3
[3.3]
5
[6.4]
17
[4.6]
 Discontinuation of study drug due to AE
0
2 (2.2)
[6.9]
5 (4.5)
[13.8]
2
[2.6]
7
[7.0]
16
[4.2]
 Death, n (IR)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Infections, n (adj %) [adj IR]b
 
 Treatment-emergent infections
34 (25.2)
[100.0]
35 (36.3)
[146.9]
35 (40.0)
[165.0]
45
[108.6]
51
[105.7]
187
[84.9]
 Serious infection
0
0
1 (1.3)
[4.0]
2
[1.6]
2
[1.8]
5
[1.3]
 Herpes zoster
0
1 (1.4)
[4.7]
0
1
[1.4]
2
[2.6]
9
[2.4]
 Herpes simplexc
3 (1.9)
[6.5]
5 (5.4)
[18.3]
7 (8.0)
[27.0]
9
[10.9]
9
[10.1]
29
[8.1]
 Eczema herpeticumd
0
1 (1.4)
[4.7]
4 (5.2)
[17.9]
2
[2.5]
4
[4.7]
8
[2.1]
 Skin infections needing antibiotic treatment
8 (7.1)
[24.6]
6 (5.1)
[17.3]
3 (3.5)
[11.2]
6
[7.1]
3
[3.0]
13
[3.6]
 TB
0
0
0
0
0
0
 Opportunistic infection excl TB
0
0
0
0
1
[1.7]
1
[0.3]
Malignancy, n (adj %) [adj IR]b
 
 Malignancy excluding NMSC
0
0
0
0
0
2
[0.52]
 NMSC
0
0
0
0
0
0
Adverse CV events, n (adj %) [adj IR]b
    
 MACE
0
0
0
0
0
0
 VTE (DVT and/or PE)
0
0
0
0
0
0
 PE
0
0
0
0
0
0
GI disorders, n (adj %) [adj IR]b
      
 GI perforations
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ocular adverse events, n (adj %) [adj IR]b
     
 Conjunctival disorders
4 (2.8)
[9.7]
0
1 (1.3)
[4.2]
0
1
[0.9]
7
[1.9]
adj adjusted, AE adverse events, All-bari-AD participants who received any dose of baricitinib, CV cardiovascular, DVT deep vein thrombosis, excl excluding, GI gastrointestinal, IR incidence rate, MACE major adverse cardiovascular events, NMSC nonmelanoma skin cancer, PE pulmonary embolism, SAE serious adverse event, TB tuberculosis, VTE venous thromboembolism
aAll baricitinib doses includes the baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg doses
bIRs for the placebo-controlled datasets and the baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg datasets are study-size adjusted rates; adjusted percentages are only shown for the placebo-controlled dataset
cHerpes simplex included preferred terms of herpes simplex, oral herpes, Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption, eczema herpeticum, ophthalmic herpes simplex, genital herpes, and genital herpes simplex
dContains the preferred terms eczema herpeticum and Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption
In the placebo-controlled dataset, 1.9%, 0%, and 2.9% of participants in the placebo, baricitinib 2 mg, and baricitinib 4 mg groups, respectively, reported SAEs (Table 2). There were no deaths among participants from Japan.
Treatment-emergent infections were the most common AESI in all three datasets (Table 2). In the placebo-controlled dataset, the incidence of treatment-emergent infections, in particular herpes simplex, was higher in the baricitinib groups compared with the placebo group. However, there did not appear to be a noteworthy difference between baricitinib doses. The IRs for treatment-emergent infections did not increase in the 2-mg—4-mg extended and All-bari-AD datasets compared with the placebo-controlled dataset for both doses of baricitinib. In the placebo-controlled dataset, there were no serious infections with placebo and baricitinib 2 mg, whereas one participant (1.3%) had a serious infection with baricitinib 4 mg (tonsillitis). No cases of tuberculosis, gastrointestinal perforations, or adverse cardiovascular events, including major adverse cardiovascular events, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism, were reported.
Treatment-emergent adverse events are presented in detail in Table 3. The most common TEAE with baricitinib was nasopharyngitis in the placebo-controlled, the 2-mg—4-mg extended, and All-bari-AD datasets. The IRs for the most common TEAEs generally did not increase in the 2-mg—4-mg extended and All-bari-AD datasets compared with the placebo-controlled dataset.
Table 3
Adverse event details for participants in the Japanese subpopulation
 
Placebo controlled (to week 16)
2-mg—4-mg extended
All-bari-ADa,
N = 341
Placebo, N = 134
Baricitinib 2 mg, N = 101
Baricitinib 4 mg, N = 89
Baricitinib 2 mg, N = 101
Baricitinib 4 mg, N = 89
TEAE occurring in ≥ 2% of participants in any group in the placebo-controlled datasets, n (adj %) [adj IR]
 
 Nasopharyngitis
18 (13.3)
[48.1]
16 (16.9)
[60.8]
21 (24.0)
[90.5]
23
[44.3]
32
[51.7]
97
[32.8]
 Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption
0
1 (1.4)
[4.7]
4 (5.2)
[17.9]
2
[2.5]
4
[4.7]
8
[2.1]
 Acne
3 (1.9)
[6.6]
1 (1.4)
[4.7]
4 (4.6)
[15.4]
5
[6.9]
8
[9.8]
26
[7.2]
 Herpes simplex
2 (1.3)
[4.3]
2 (2.7)
[8.9]
3 (3.3)
[10.9]
4
[5.5]
6
[5.9]
17
[4.6]
 Headache
2 (1.3)
[4.3]
5 (6.3)
[21.2]
3 (2.9)
[9.2]
6
[9.6]
3
[3.1]
14
[3.8]
 Folliculitis
3 (2.7)
[9.1]
5 (4.8)
[16.8]
3 (2.8)
[9.4]
9
[11.5]
4
[4.1]
29
[8.1]
 Abdominal pain upper
1 (0.6)
[2.2]
0
2 (2.6)
[8.3]
0
2
[1.9]
2
[0.5]
 Tonsillitis
2 (1.3)
[4.4]
1 (0.6)
[2.2]
2 (2.5)
[8.5]
2
[1.7]
2
[2.7]
4
[1.1]
 Blood creatine increased
0
0
2 (2.5)
[8.0]
0
2
[1.8]
2
[0.5]
 Hyperuricemia
0
0
2 (2.1)
[6.6]
0
2
[2.0]
2
[0.5]
 Upper respiratory tract infection
2 (1.4)
[4.8]
0
2 (2.0)
[6.4]
0
3
[2.9]
8
[2.1]
 Skin papilloma
0
2 (2.0)
[6.9]
1 (1.3)
[4.6]
4
[5.7]
4
[4.6]
13
[3.5]
 Eczema
0
2 (2.7)
[8.9]
1 (1.3)
[4.0]
3
[5.2]
2
[1.8]
5
[1.3]
 Otitis externa
0
4 (3.5)
[11.4]
1 (1.3)
[4.1]
5
[6.2]
1
[0.9]
12
[3.2]
 Dyshidrotic eczema
0
3 (3.5)
[11.6]
1 (0.7)
[2.4]
4
[6.4]
3
[2.9]
10
[2.7]
Permanent discontinuation of study drug due to adverse event by system organ class, n (adj %) [adj IR]
 
 Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersb
0
1 (0.9)
[2.3]
3 (2.4)
[7.3]
1
[0.9]
3
[3.1]
5
[1.3]
 Infections and infestations
0
1 (1.4)
[4.6]
1 (1.3)
[4.0]
1
[1.7]
1
[0.9]
3
[0.8]
 Investigations
0
0
1 (0.9)
[2.5]
0
3
[3.0]
4
[1.1]
 Cardiac disorders
0
0
0
0
0
1
[0.3]
 Eye disorders
0
0
0
0
0
1
[0.3]
 Neoplasms benign, malignant, and unspecifiedc
0
0
0
0
0
1
[0.3]
 Psychiatric disorders
0
0
0
0
0
1
[0.3]
adj adjusted, All-bari-AD participants who received any dose of baricitinib, IR incidence rate, TEAE treatment-emergent adverse event
aAll baricitinib doses includes the baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg doses
bThe preferred terms under the system organ class of skin and subcutaneous disorders were toxic skin eruption, dermatitis atopic, eczema, skin ulcer, dermatitis exfoliative generalized, rash, alopecia areata, angioedema, drug eruption, and pityriasis rosea
cNeoplasms comprised benign, malignant and unspecified, including cysts and polyps
There were seven permanent discontinuations of study drug due to AEs in the placebo-controlled dataset and 16 discontinuations in the All-bari-AD dataset (Table 2). Permanent discontinuations of study drug in the All-bari-AD dataset were most commonly due to AEs in the system organ classes of skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (five participants), investigations (four participants; one with alanine aminotransferase increased, one with neutrophil count decreased, one with ultrasound abdomen abnormal, and one with white blood cell count increased), and infections and infestations (three participants).

Laboratory Values and Clinical Chemistry in the Japanese Subpopulation

The most frequent treatment-emergent changes in laboratory values and clinical chemistry with baricitinib in participants in both the placebo-controlled and All-bari-AD datasets were high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≥ 60 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 130 mg/dL, and creatine phosphokinase greater than the upper limit of normal (> ULN) (Table 4).
Table 4
Changes in selected laboratory values and clinical chemistry in the Japanese subpopulation
Treatment-emergent changes, n/NAR (%)
Placebo-controlled (to week 16)
2-mg – 4-mg extended
All-bari-ADa, N = 341
Placebo, N = 134
Baricitinib 2 mg, N = 101
Baricitinib 4 mg, N = 89
Baricitinib 2 mg, N = 101
Baricitinib 4 mg, N = 89
LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL
5/105
(4.8)
12/90
(13.3)
14/73
(19.2)
16/90
(17.8)
22/73
(30.1)
69/278
(24.8)
HDL-C ≥ 60 mg/dL
16/71
(22.5)
15/62
(24.2)
17/49
(34.7)
21/62
(33.9)
20/49
(40.8)
67/186
(36.0)
Triglycerides ≥ 500 mg/dL
3/125
(2.4)
1/100
(1.0)
2/88
(2.3)
1/100
(1.0)
3/88
(3.4)
7/335
(2.1)
Creatine phosphokinase (U/L)
 > ULN
8/124
(6.5)
14/95
(14.7)
18/85
(21.2)
18/95
(18.9)
27/85
(31.8)
78/314
(24.8)
 > 2.5 × ULN
2/132
(1.5)
2/99
(2.0)
2/87
(2.3)
3/99
(3.0)
6/87
(6.9)
20/334
(6.0)
 > 5 × ULN
2/133
(1.5)
1/101
(1.0)
2/89
(2.2)
2/101
(2.0)
4/89
(4.5)
13/340
(3.8)
 > 10 × ULN
1/134
(0.7)
1/101
(1.0)
0
2/101
(2.0)
1/89
(1.1)
7/340
(2.1)
Hemoglobin
 < LLN
9/126
(7.1)
7/98
(7.1)
12/84
(14.3)
11/98
(11.2)
18/84
(21.4)
44/312
(14.1)
 < 10 mg/dL
0
0
1/89
(1.1)
1/100
(1.0)
1/89
(1.1)
3/339
(0.9)
 < 8 mg/dL
0
0
0
0
0
0
Neutrophils < 1000 cells/mm3
0
0
0
0
1/89
(1.1)
1/340
(0.3)
Lymphocytes < 500 cells/mm3
0
0
2/89
(2.2)
0
2/89
(2.2)
2/340
(0.6)
Platelets > 600 billion/L
0
2/101
(2.0)
0
4/101
(4.0)
0
7/339
(2.1)
Patients with any postbaseline elevation in ALT, n/N (%)
 ≥ 3 × ULN
0
0
0
0
2/89
(2.1)
4/340
(1.2)
 ≥ 5 × ULN
0
0
0
0
0
0
 ≥ 10 × ULN
0
0
0
0
0
0
All-bari-AD participants who received any dose of baricitinib, ALT alanine aminotransferase, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LLN lower limit of normal, NAR number of participants at risk for the specified abnormality, ULN upper limit of normal
aAll baricitinib doses includes the baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg doses
Values over time for platelets, lymphocytes, hemoglobin, neutrophils, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, LDL-C, HDL-C, and creatine phosphokinase are shown in Fig. 1. Mean LDL-C increased through 24 weeks compared with baseline, most notably with the baricitinib 4 mg dose, and then steadily decreased to near baseline levels through 68 weeks. Both doses of baricitinib resulted in modest increases in median creatine phosphokinase up to 12 weeks, which then remained steady through 68 weeks. There was a dose-dependent increase in mean platelets over the first 8 weeks, which remained steady thereafter.

Discussion

A previous pooled analysis of safety data from eight global studies confirmed the established safety profile of baricitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe AD [10]. This pooled analysis builds on the previously published global findings and shows that the safety profile of baricitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe AD in the Japanese subpopulation is similar to that of the global study population.
The mean age of participants in the Japanese subpopulation was similar compared with the global study population (35.7 versus 36.4 years) [10]. Therefore, as safety information in patients with AD aged ≥ 75 years is limited compared with younger patients, this should be taken into consideration when choosing the dose of baricitinib for these patients. Compared with the global study population, a smaller proportion of the Japanese subpopulation was female (25.5% versus 39.3%) and had severe disease (43.5% versus 46.9%), the Eczema Area and Severity Index was higher (34.9 versus 31.1), and a greater proportion of participants had ≥ 1 year exposure to baricitinib (58.9% versus 41.9%) [10].
Similar to the global study population [10], the proportion of participants with TEAEs in the Japanese subpopulation was similar between the baricitinib 2 mg and 4 mg doses in the placebo-controlled dataset (Japanese subpopulation 50.5% and 58.4%, respectively; global study population 49.3% and 51.0%, respectively), and both doses were associated with a higher frequency of TEAEs than placebo [10]. The IRs for any TEAE were also similar for both doses of baricitinib in the 2-mg—4-mg extended dataset (Japanese subpopulation 197.7 and 200.7, respectively; global study population 237.3 and 248.3, respectively) [10]. The most common TEAE for participants in the All-bari-AD dataset was nasopharyngitis for the Japanese subpopulation, which was consistent with the global study population [10]. Permanent discontinuations of study drug due to AEs were low for both the Japanese and global populations [10].
In the placebo-controlled dataset in the Japanese subpopulation, the proportion of participants with SAEs was similar in the placebo group compared with the baricitinib 4 mg group (1.9% versus 2.9%), and there were no SAEs with the baricitinib 2 mg dose. Furthermore, the proportion of participants within the Japanese subpopulation who experienced SAEs was similar compared with the global study population (1.4–2.3% for baricitinib versus 2.3% for placebo) in the placebo-controlled dataset [10]. The IR for SAEs in the All-bari-AD dataset was lower for the Japanese subpopulation (3.5) compared with the global study population (6.1) despite a greater proportion of Japanese participants having ≥ 1 year exposure to baricitinib compared with the global study population (58.9% versus 41.9%) [10]. However, this may have been due to differences in baseline demographics between the two populations, such as a lower proportion with severe disease (43.5% versus 46.9%) and prior systemic therapy with cyclosporine (17.8% versus 34.0%) for the Japanese subpopulation compared with the global study population [10]. There were no deaths in the Japanese subpopulation compared with one death in the global study population [10].
People with AD generally have an increased risk of cutaneous and noncutaneous bacterial and viral infections as a result of a defective skin barrier and immune system dysregulation [11]. Consequently, treatment-emergent infections were investigated as AESI. The proportion of participants with serious infections with baricitinib was similar compared with placebo in the Japanese subpopulation in the placebo-controlled dataset (baricitinib 2 mg: 0%; baricitinib 4 mg: 1.3%; placebo: 0%), and remained low and similar over time compared with the global study population (1.3 versus 2.1) in the All-bari-AD dataset [10]. The most commonly reported infections in participants in the All-bari-AD dataset were the same for both the Japanese subpopulation and the global study population (nasopharyngitis and herpes simplex), indicating that the types of infections were similar for both populations [10].
Malignancies, cardiovascular AEs, gastrointestinal perforations, and ocular AEs were also investigated as AESI. The IRs for malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer in participants in the All-bari-AD dataset were 0.52 for the Japanese subpopulation and 0.2 for the global study population [10]. There were no major adverse cardiovascular outcomes or venous thromboembolisms in the Japanese subpopulation compared with an IR of 0.09 for both event types in the global study population [10]. There were no gastrointestinal perforations for both the Japanese and global populations [10]. The IR for conjunctival disorders was 1.9 in participants who received any baricitinib dose in the Japanese subpopulation compared with 4.3 in the global study population [10]. Overall, these findings indicate that the incidence and type of AESI were low and similar for both the Japanese and global populations.
Treatment-emergent changes in laboratory values, including LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL (24.8% versus 21.8%), triglycerides ≥ 500 mg/dL (2.1% versus 1.0%), creatine phosphokinase (> ULN, 24.8% versus 28.8%), and alanine aminotransferase ≥ 3 × ULN (1.2% versus 1.6%), were similar for the Japanese and global populations for participants in the All-bari-AD dataset, and are known adverse drug reactions for baricitinib [10].
The safety profile of baricitinib in RA has been investigated in an analysis of 514 Japanese participants with RA from five phase 2 and phase 3 studies, and one long-term extension study [12]. In this analysis, the IRs for several TEAEs, including serious infections and herpes zoster, appeared higher than in the Japanese subpopulation in the All-bari-AD dataset in this study [12], and suggest that AEs may be less frequent in Japanese people with AD compared with RA. These differences in IRs are likely related to the older age, greater disease severity, higher concomitant use of systemic corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressant drugs, and associated greater susceptibility for these AEs in people with RA compared with people with AD.
Other treatments for AD, including the JAK inhibitors abrocitinib and upadacitinib, and the interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 inhibitor dupilumab, have been approved in Japan for the treatment of AD. Unlike baricitinib, dupilumab has not been evaluated in people with RA, who are generally older and more likely to be taking concomitant systemic corticosteroids and other immunosuppressant drugs, particularly those with a higher risk for major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, malignancies, and serious infections. The Japanese Dermatological Association updated their Guidelines for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis in December 2021. In recognition of its benefits, baricitinib has been added to the recommended treatment algorithm, along with dupilumab and delgocitinib [13].
There are several limitations to this study. For instance, the IRs can be compared with other studies for context only, and inferences cannot be made as study and treatment are confounded because of the possibility of rescue treatment in nonresponders and downtitration of responders, among other factors. Moreover, risk over time can change owing to reasons other than treatment exposure. There are also inherent limitations to observational data. An additional limitation is that a longer treatment duration is required to evaluate malignancies and major adverse cardiovascular events. Another limitation is that total exposure to baricitinib in the Japanese subpopulation was relatively low compared with the global study population [10], which was consequently a more reliable source of safety data, particularly for rare events. In addition, the results may be prospective, which could limit the applicability of the study to real-world clinical practice.

Conclusions

This pooled analysis of safety data for baricitinib in moderate-to-severe AD from six placebo-controlled clinical studies and one long-term extension study with exposure up to 2 years supports the established safety profile of baricitinib in participants with moderate-to-severe AD from Japan.

Acknowledgements

Funding

This study was sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. The Rapid Service Fee was paid for by the sponsor.

Medical Writing, Editorial, and Other Assistance

Medical writing support was provided by Andrew Sakko, PhD, CMPP, and editorial support was provided by Antonia Baldo, of Syneos Health and funded by Eli Lilly and Company in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines (http://​www.​ismpp.​org/​gpp3).

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to analyzing and interpreting the data, and developing and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Disclosures

Norito Katoh has received honoraria as a speaker and/or consultant for AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Maruho, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Sanofi, and Taiho Pharmaceutical, and has received grants as an investigator from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Maruho, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Hidehisa Saeki reports consultation fees from AbbVie, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Japan Tobacco, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, Leo Pharma, Maruho, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Tokiwa Pharmaceutical, and Torii Pharmaceutical. Yasushi Takita, Yoshitaka Isaka, Atsushi Nishikawa, and Hitoe Torisu-Itakura are employees of Eli Lilly Japan K.K. and own stock in Eli Lilly and Company.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

The studies were approved by all institutions. Details of the institutions and their ethics committees have been previously published. This study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, and its later amendments. All subjects provided informed consent to participate in the study.

Data Availability

Eli Lilly provides access to all individual participant data collected during the trial, after anonymization, with the exception of pharmacokinetic or genetic data. Data are available to request 6 months after the indication studied has been approved in the US and EU and after primary publication acceptance, whichever is later. No expiration date of data requests is currently set once data are made available. Access is provided after a proposal has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose and after receipt of a signed data sharing agreement. Data and documents, including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, clinical study report, and blank or annotated case report forms, will be provided in a secure data sharing environment. For details on submitting a request, see the instructions provided at www.vivli.org.

Study Participants

The authors thank the study participants, their families, the study sites, and the study personnel who participated in the 6 randomized clinical trials.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​4.​0/​.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Katayama I, Kohno Y, Akiyama K, et al. Japanese guideline for atopic dermatitis 2014. Allergol Int. 2014;63:377–98.CrossRefPubMed Katayama I, Kohno Y, Akiyama K, et al. Japanese guideline for atopic dermatitis 2014. Allergol Int. 2014;63:377–98.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Muto T, Hsieh SD, Sakurai Y, et al. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Japanese adults. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148:117–21.CrossRefPubMed Muto T, Hsieh SD, Sakurai Y, et al. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Japanese adults. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148:117–21.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Saeki H, Oiso N, Honma M, Iizuka H, Kawada A, Tamaki K. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Japanese adults and community validation of the UK diagnostic criteria. J Dermatol Sci. 2009;55:140–1.CrossRefPubMed Saeki H, Oiso N, Honma M, Iizuka H, Kawada A, Tamaki K. Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Japanese adults and community validation of the UK diagnostic criteria. J Dermatol Sci. 2009;55:140–1.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbarot S, Auziere S, Gadkari A, et al. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in adults: Results from an international survey. Allergy. 2018;73:1284–93.CrossRefPubMed Barbarot S, Auziere S, Gadkari A, et al. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in adults: Results from an international survey. Allergy. 2018;73:1284–93.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Noda S, Suárez-Fariñas M, Ungar B, et al. The Asian atopic dermatitis phenotype combines features of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis with increased TH17 polarization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136:1254–64.CrossRefPubMed Noda S, Suárez-Fariñas M, Ungar B, et al. The Asian atopic dermatitis phenotype combines features of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis with increased TH17 polarization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136:1254–64.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Osawa R, Konno S, Akiyama M, et al. Japanese-specific filaggrin gene mutations in Japanese patients suffering from atopic eczema and asthma. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:2834–6.CrossRefPubMed Osawa R, Konno S, Akiyama M, et al. Japanese-specific filaggrin gene mutations in Japanese patients suffering from atopic eczema and asthma. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:2834–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wollenberg A, Nakahara T, Maari C, et al. Impact of baricitinib in combination with topical steroids on atopic dermatitis symptoms, quality of life and functioning in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from the BREEZE-AD7 phase 3 randomized trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:1543–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wollenberg A, Nakahara T, Maari C, et al. Impact of baricitinib in combination with topical steroids on atopic dermatitis symptoms, quality of life and functioning in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from the BREEZE-AD7 phase 3 randomized trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:1543–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Guttman-Yassky E, Silverberg JI, Nemoto O, et al. Baricitinib in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 2 parallel, double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled multiple-dose study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:913-21.e9.CrossRefPubMed Guttman-Yassky E, Silverberg JI, Nemoto O, et al. Baricitinib in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 2 parallel, double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled multiple-dose study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:913-21.e9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson EL, Lacour JP, Spelman L, et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomized monotherapy phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183:242–55.CrossRefPubMed Simpson EL, Lacour JP, Spelman L, et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomized monotherapy phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183:242–55.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bieber T, Thyssen JP, Reich K, et al. Pooled safety analysis of baricitinib in adult patients with atopic dermatitis from 8 randomized clinical trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:476–85.CrossRefPubMed Bieber T, Thyssen JP, Reich K, et al. Pooled safety analysis of baricitinib in adult patients with atopic dermatitis from 8 randomized clinical trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:476–85.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Langan SM, Abuabara K, Henrickson SE, Hoffstad O, Margolis DJ. Increased risk of cutaneous and systemic infections in atopic dermatitis: a cohort study. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:1375–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Langan SM, Abuabara K, Henrickson SE, Hoffstad O, Margolis DJ. Increased risk of cutaneous and systemic infections in atopic dermatitis: a cohort study. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:1375–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Harigai M, Takeuchi T, Smolen JS, et al. Safety profile of baricitinib in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with over 1.6 years median time in treatment: an integrated analysis of Phases 2 and 3 trials. Mod Rheumatol. 2020;30:36–43.CrossRefPubMed Harigai M, Takeuchi T, Smolen JS, et al. Safety profile of baricitinib in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with over 1.6 years median time in treatment: an integrated analysis of Phases 2 and 3 trials. Mod Rheumatol. 2020;30:36–43.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pooled Safety Analysis of Baricitinib in Adult Participants with Atopic Dermatitis in the Japanese Subpopulation from Six Randomized Clinical Trials
verfasst von
Norito Katoh
Yasushi Takita
Yoshitaka Isaka
Atsushi Nishikawa
Hitoe Torisu-Itakura
Hidehisa Saeki
Publikationsdatum
18.10.2022
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Dermatology and Therapy / Ausgabe 12/2022
Print ISSN: 2193-8210
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-9172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00828-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2022

Dermatology and Therapy 12/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.