Population-based trends and risk factors of early- and late-onset preeclampsia in Taiwan 2001–2014

Worldwide 2.0 to 8.0% pregnancies were complicated by preeclampsia [1‐5] with variation across regions [2]. Preeclampsia, the progressive disorder during pregnancy is strongly associated with maternal and fetal complications including eclampsia, acute renal failure, coagulopathy, placenta abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, intrauterine growth restriction, medically indicated preterm birth, and maternal and fetal death [1, 6, 7]. In a systemic analysis from World Health Organization (WHO), hypertensive disorders including preeclampsia accounted for 14.0% maternal death between 2003 and 2009 [8]. Moreover, the risk of severe obstetric morbidities in women with eclampsia or severe preeclampsia was increasing [9]. Although most of the maternal dysfunctions resolved gradually in postpartum, these women were at higher risk of developing chronic hypertension, recurrent preeclampsia in the next pregnancy, and later-life cardiovascular diseases [10].

Preeclampsia is recognized as a heterogenous syndrome with different pathophysiology and be divided in two subtypes according to the disease onset [7, 11, 12]. Early-onset preeclampsia, diagnosed less than 34 gestational weeks was less prevalent than late-onset preeclampsia, occurring at 34 or more weeks of gestation [13]. The incidences of early- and late-onset preeclampsia were 0.3 and 2.7%, respectively [14, 15]; nevertheless, the early-onset disease contributed to more unfavorable maternal and fetal outcomes [14, 16, 17]. Around ten-fold increased risk of perinatal death and maternal death in women with early-onset preeclampsia and twofold higher risk of perinatal death and threefold increased risks of maternal death in women with late-onset disease were observed, comparing with normal pregnancy [14, 15]. In addition, some studies showed biological variations and different spectrums of pathophysiology between early- and late-onset preeclampsia [18‐20].

Clinical factors associated with risk of preeclampsia included primiparity, advanced maternal age, previous preeclampsia, family history of preeclampsia, multiple gestation, obesity, African-American race, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, chronic renal disease, and presence of antiphospholipid antibodies were identified [21, 22]. Besides, there were evidences that stroke and hyperthyroidism increased the risk of preeclampsia [23, 24]. Further studies comparing predisposing factors of early- versus late-onset preeclampsia demonstrated similar risk factors but the strengths of association were differed among the factors. There were only two population-based studies, to our knowledge to evaluate each risk factor between early- and late-onset preeclampsia [14, 16]. One study, carried out by Lisonkova et al. revealed African-American race, chronic hypertension, and older age were more strongly associated with early-onset disease, whereas women with nulliparity and diabetes mellitus had higher risk to develop late-onset disease [14]. The other study conducted by Iacobelli et al. showed older age and higher prevalence of chronic hypertension in the group of early-onset disease [16].

The incidence of preeclampsia in Taiwan was significantly increased from 0.87 to 1.21% between 1998 and 2010 [25]. However, there was limited data of early- and late-onset preeclampsia rate and the associated factors in Taiwan has not been determined yet. The aim of the study was to investigate the population-based trends of early- and late-onset preeclampsia and examine the maternal risk factors in Taiwanese population.

Among 2,973,989 delivers over the 14 years period, 2,884,347 delivers were included and 32,742 preeclampsia events were identified. The subgroups of early- and late- onset preeclampsia were 13,833 (42.3%) and 18,909 (57.6%) deliveries, respectively (Fig. 1).

The overall preeclampsia incidence increased from 1.1% (95%CI, 1.1–1.2) in 2001 to 1.7% (95%CI, 1.6–1.8) in 2014. Table 1 reveals crude and age-adjusted overall preeclampsia rates each year in the study period. The analysis of the overall, early-onset, and late-onset incidence trends through average annual percentage change is presented in Table 2. The overall preeclampsia rate was slightly increased from 1.1% (95%CI, 1.1–1.2) in 2001 to 1.3% (95%CI, 1.2–1.3) in 2012 with average annual percentage change (AAPC) 0.1%/year (95%CI, 0–0.2%). However, the incidence was remarkably increased from 1.3% (95%CI, 1.3–1.4) in 2012 to 1.7% (95%CI, 1.6–1.8) in 2014 with AAPC 1.3%/year (95%CI,0.3–2.5).

Over the 14 years study period, the incidence trends in late-onset preeclampsia was steadily increasing from 0.7% (95%CI, 0.6–0.7) in 2001 to 0.9% (95%CI, 0.8–0.9) in 2014 with AAPC 0.2%/year (95%CI, 0.2–0.3). However, in early-onset preeclampsia, similar to the trend of overall preeclampsia, the incidence was relatively steady around 0.5% (95%CI, 0.4–0.5) in 2001 and 0.5% (95%CI, 0.5–0.6) in 2012 but predominantly increase from 0.5% (95%CI, 0.4–0.5) in 2012 to 0.8% (95%CI, 0.8–0.9) in 2014 with AAPC 2.3%/year (95%CI, 0.8–4.0). Figure 2 illustrates the trends in overall preeclampsia, early-onset, and late-onset disease.

Maternal characteristics (age, parity, place of residence, and income) and clinical factors (acute coronary syndrome, chronic ischemic heart disease, stroke, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, and hyperthyroidism) are described in Table 3. In multivariate logistic regression, all maternal characteristics and clinical factors listed in Table 3 were adjusted as possible confounders. Women with older age, nulliparity, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, stroke, and hyperthyroidism were more likely to develop preeclampsia (all p values< 0.01), while acute coronary syndrome and chronic ischemic heart disease were not significantly associated with preeclampsia. The ARR of each clinical factor of overall preeclampsia are displayed in Table 4. Of note, women with chronic hypertension had much higher risk of preeclampsia (ARR, 12.1; 95%CI, 11.5–12.8).

For subgroup analysis of early- and late-onset preeclampsia, the clinical factors associated with early- or late-onset diseases were identical to overall preeclampsia, detailed in Table 5. To compare the strength of the association among the risk factors between early- and late-onset preeclampsia, RRR of each clinical factor was calculated according to the ARR of early- and late preeclampsia. Advanced maternal age (> 35 years) (RRR, 1.4; 95%CI, 1.3–1.5, p < 0.01) and chronic hypertension (RRR, 1.7; 95%CI, 1.6–1.9, p < 0.01) had higher risk to develop early-onset preeclampsia. In the contrary, primiparity (RRR, 0.7; 95%CI, 0.7–0.8, p < 0.01) was more strongly associated with late-onset disease. Other risk factors of preeclampsia including diabetes mellitus, stroke, and hyperthyroidism revealed no statistical difference in the association of early- and late-onset preeclampsia (Table 5).

The incidences of overall, and early- and late-onset preeclampsia were increasing in Taiwan between 2001 and 2014, predominantly for early-onset disease. Pregnant women with advanced maternal age, primiparity, chronic hypertension, stroke, diabetes mellitus, and hyperthyroidism had significantly higher risk of developing preeclampsia. Among the factors, older age and hypertension were more strongly associated with early-onset disease.

Our study has certain limitations. First, overall preeclampsia was identified by diagnostic codes; thus, the artificial coding error and misclassification bias could not be avoided. Second, NHIRD included 99% of Taiwanese residents, which led to around 1.2% deliveries in birth registration not be linked to hospital records. The missing data could be susceptible to underascertainment, resulting in slightly underestimation of the incidence. Third, if a patient had neither antenatal exam nor delivered in hospitals, or developed postpartum preeclampsia without hospitalization, the diagnostic code could not be obtained from the hospital record. The such undetermined were few and less severe but may cause underestimation as well. Fourth, we did not classify the severity of preeclampsia or determine the subgroup using aspirin for prevention, both of which may give more information to interpretate the trends of preeclampsia. In addition, we failed to assess certain risk factors including BMI, preeclampsia history in prior pregnancy, and family history of preeclampsia, as well as the maternal and neonatal outcomes due to limited information.

The overall preeclampsia rate in Taiwan was relatively lower than the worldwide studies though, 42.3% preeclampsia events identified as early-onset disease was remarkable. The incidence of preeclampsia was 1.1 to 1.7% in Taiwan compared with 2 to 8% incidence of preeclampsia worldwide with regional variations [2]. The lower incidence could be owing to the majority of Asian race in the population, which had lower risk of developing preeclampsia, 2.0–3.0%according to previous studies [26, 30]. We did not collect data of races in this study but over 95% of the population is Han Chinese, who are regarded as East Asian ethnic group based on the data in Ministry of Interior. Besides, there could possibly be slight underestimation because of missing data in NHIRD or the artificial bias of disease coding. Nevertheless, NHIRD was one of the powerful tools in assessment of the epidemiology in Taiwan because of the high coverage of National Health Insurance program, financing around 99% Taiwanese residents [31]. In the current study, the unidentified anonymous identification between birth register system and NHIRD was around 1.2%. In addition, compared with the study by Chan et al., who revealed the increased incidence of preeclampsia in Taiwan was notable from 0.87 to 1.21% between 1998 and 2010 [25]. Therefore, the interpretation of exact preeclampsia rate could be somewhat underestimated owing to the unavoidable bias but the persisted increasing incidence of preeclampsia in the population-based study was thoroughly informative.

Our data suggested that the trend of preeclampsia was increasing between 2001 and 2014 after age ajustment, especially in early-onset disease from 2012 to 2014. We analyzed the subgroup trends of preeclampsia depend on maternal age and women with or without hypertension, respectively [Additional file 1 and Additional file 2]. Additional file 1 shows increased trend in all three age groups (age 15–25, 25–35, and 35–55). However, Additional file 2 reveals no significant incidence change in women with our without hypertension during the study period. The subgroup analysis indicated that the increasing trend of preeclampsia occurred in all age groups and possibly the growing number of women with hypertension. Interestingly, the rise rate of preeclampsia was not universally consistent, for instance, studies for the entire USA from 1999 to 2004 showed plateaued rate [32] and in Western New York from 1999 to 2003 [33] and European countries during the past ten years [34] reported slight declines in preeclampsia. However, the increase in preeclampsia in our population could partially affected by the revision of diagnostic criteria. American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologist (ACOG) in2013 and ISSHP in 2014 have excluded proteinuria as an necessary condition to establish diagnosis of preeclampsia in women presence of organ dysfunction of uteroplacental dysfunction [35, 36]. Therefore, the observation of significant rise in early-onset preeclampsia from 2012 to 2014 in this study was a conservative indication of increasing trend but the true percentage change should be followed since overall revision of the criteria in Taiwan.

The proportion of early-onset preeclampsia was significantly higher (42.3% in early-onset and 57.6% in late onset disease) than previous studies conducted other than Taiwan [14‐16], about twofold to nine-fold of late-onset disease than early-onset preeclampsia. The difference could attributed to increasing prevalence of chronic hypertension as a result of a surge of risk rates of prehypertension, obesity and metabolic syndrome in Taiwan [37]. Genetic variation or epigenetic regulation such as DNA methylation or microRNA expression associated with preeclampsia in the population [18, 38‐40], and the theory of developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) that the early life environment impacting the risk of chronic disease from childhood to adulthood [41] could possibly cause the population vulnerable to early- or late-onset preeclampsia. However, none of the hypotheses has been verified. Therefore, higher proportion, almost half of early-onset preeclampsia women in the population warranted further investigation to provide addition insights into the variation of early- and late-onset preeclampsia incidences.

In the population between 2001 and 2014, our findings of the risk factors including advanced maternal age, primiparity, stroke, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, or hyperthyroidism were consistent with commonly quoted clinical factors of preeclampsia [14, 16, 21, 22]. The subgroups of women with early- and late-onset preeclampsia were similar in terms of maternal risk factors but different association in age, parity, and chronic hypertension. Among the risk factors, advanced maternal age and chronic hypertension revealed stronger association with early-onset disease, while primiparity had higher risk of late-onset preeclampsia. The findings were similar to previous studies [14, 16]. To assess the possible interaction of old age and hypertension. We divided women according to different age groups (age 15–25. age 25–35, age 35–55)and women with or without hypertension, respectively [Additional file 3]. In Additional file 3: Table S6 reveals that chronic hypertension had highest ARR in all age groups and demonstrates old age was an independent risk factor either in women with or without hypertension. The different strength of association among the specific risk factors between early- and late-onset preeclampsia could be associated with the different pathophysiologic mechanisms including histology, hemodynamic change, or vascular adaption between early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Several evidences supported more typical histological change of defective trophoblast invasion and higher percentage of altered uterine artery Doppler in early-onset disease [18‐20]. Cheng et al. revealed maternal serum markers associated with cardiovascular inflammatory response such as high-sensitive C-reactive protein and homocysteine were significantly higher in early-onset preeclampsia, which could be related to direct injury to vascular endothelial cells or increased oxidative stress and resulting in the sequence of placenta dysfunction and poorer outcomes [42]. Despite those evidences, there was yet no definite pathophysiology and mechanism to explain the development towards early- or late-onset preeclampsia. Thus, more investigations are needed to identify the specific correlation between old age or chronic hypertension and early-onset preeclampsia, and clinicians should be aware of preeclampsia prediction in women with clinical risk factors, particularly chronic hypertension, which had highest risk (ARR, 16.8, 95%CI, 15.7–18.0) of early-onset preeclampsia in the current study. Furthermore, early intervention such as aspirin prophylaxis may be considered in patients with evidence of higher risk, according to the ASPRE trial [43] to prevent severe maternal morbidities and poorer birth outcomes of early-onset preeclampsia [14, 16, 17]. On the other hand, Valensise et al. have found late-onset preeclampsia appeared to be more frequent in patients with high body mass index (BMI) compared with early-onset disease [19]. However, we had no data of maternal BMI to assess and the mechanism between preeclampsia and obesity was yet completely understood. In general, maternal risk factors between early- and late- onset preeclampsia were similar but old age and chronic hypertension appeared stronger association to early-onset disease and primiparity had higher risk of late-onset preeclampsia.

This study was the first documented the increasing trend of preeclampsia in Taiwan between 2001 and 2014, predominantly in early-onset disease. The strength of the study includes a large cohort sample from a specific geographic area which is very representative of the regional population and the large study size provided reliability in statistics.

In conclusion, the population-base study showed a rise in the incidence of preeclampsia, particularly in early-onset disease in Taiwan from 2001 to 2014, suggesting the clinical early prediction, identification, and management of the diseases will increasingly challenge obstetricians. As increasing number of advanced maternal age and chronic hypertension in delivering population in Taiwan, preconceptional counseling and surveillance is warranted in pregnant women with higher risk of early-onset preeclampsia. Further study of the predominance of early-onset preeclampsia in the population and the stronger association with old age and hypertension and early-onset preeclampsia is required.