Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

05.01.2022 | 2021 SAGES Oral

Post-operative outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer: a comparison of operative approach

verfasst von: Keegan Guidolin, Deanna Ng, Sami Chadi, Fayez A. Quereshy

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Surgeons may choose an open approach to locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) because of the elevated conversion rate (minimally invasive to open) in these patients (resulting in part from a judgment of the technical feasibility of a minimally invasive approach). Poorer outcomes have been suggested in those requiring conversion from a minimal access to an open approach; however, the influence of conversion has not been studied in LACC. We sought to compare perioperative outcomes in patients with T4aN2 colon cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS), planned open (PO), and converted (CN) procedures to evaluate the influence of conversion in this subgroup.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the NSQIP database. Patients with T4aN2 colon cancer undergoing elective resection were included; rectal/unknown tumor location, and T4b disease were excluded (to ensure homogeneity in surgical management). Patients were divided into cohorts based on approach: PO, MIS, and CN. Summary statistics were compared between groups. Multivariable analysis was conducted for mortality and morbidity outcomes.

Results

1286 cases were included (313 PO, 842 MIS, 131 CN); 10.2% underwent conversion. Those undergoing MIS had a shorter length of stay than those undergoing PO or CN (p < 0.0001). On univariable analysis, CN resulted in increased rates of any complication (p < 0.0001). CN also had a greater rate of anastomotic leak (p = 0.0046) and death (p = 0.05). On multivariable analysis, significant predictors of any complication included age, ASA class, M stage, and approach; however, CN did not increase the risk of complication compared with MIS, whereas PO nearly doubled the risk of complication (OR = 1.98, p = 0.0083). The only significant predictor of mortality on multivariable analysis was age (HR = 1.09, p = 0.0002)—approach was not associated with mortality.

Conclusion

PO confers the greatest risk of suffering any complication. Surgical approach was not associated with death. Results of our study challenge the notion that conversion is associated with the worst perioperative outcomes and an MIS approach should be considered in patients with LACC.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Arezzo A, Arolfo S, Morino M (2013) Does conversion affect short-term and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopy for colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 27(12):4596–4607CrossRef Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Arezzo A, Arolfo S, Morino M (2013) Does conversion affect short-term and oncologic outcomes after laparoscopy for colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 27(12):4596–4607CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Guo H, Guan XD, Cai CN, Yang LK, Li YC, Zhu YH, Li PP, Liu XL, Yang DJ (2015) The impact of laparoscopic converted to open colectomy on short-term and oncologic outcomes for colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19(2):335–343CrossRef Li J, Guo H, Guan XD, Cai CN, Yang LK, Li YC, Zhu YH, Li PP, Liu XL, Yang DJ (2015) The impact of laparoscopic converted to open colectomy on short-term and oncologic outcomes for colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19(2):335–343CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 47(10):1680–1685CrossRef Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 47(10):1680–1685CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N, Okuda J, Konishi F, Watanabe M, Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal S (2009) Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):383–389CrossRef Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N, Okuda J, Konishi F, Watanabe M, Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal S (2009) Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):383–389CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20(6):947–951CrossRef Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20(6):947–951CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Kohler L, Barlehner E, Kockerling F, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study G (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):207–214CrossRef Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Kohler L, Barlehner E, Kockerling F, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study G (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):207–214CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ptok H, Kube R, Schmidt U, Kockerling F, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Colon/Rectum Carcinoma Study G (2009) Conversion from laparoscopic to open colonic cancer resection—associated factors and their influence on long-term oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(12):1273–1279CrossRef Ptok H, Kube R, Schmidt U, Kockerling F, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Colon/Rectum Carcinoma Study G (2009) Conversion from laparoscopic to open colonic cancer resection—associated factors and their influence on long-term oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(12):1273–1279CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC, Burpee SE, Bendavid Y, Klein L, Gregoire R, Schlachta CM (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival? Surg Endosc 18(5):732–735CrossRef Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC, Burpee SE, Bendavid Y, Klein L, Gregoire R, Schlachta CM (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival? Surg Endosc 18(5):732–735CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat de Neree Tot Babberich MPM, van Groningen JT, Dekker E, Wiggers T, Wouters M, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Dutch Surgical Colorectal A (2018) Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level? Surg Endosc 32(7):3234–3246CrossRef de Neree Tot Babberich MPM, van Groningen JT, Dekker E, Wiggers T, Wouters M, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, Dutch Surgical Colorectal A (2018) Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level? Surg Endosc 32(7):3234–3246CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Clancy C, O’Leary DP, Burke JP, Redmond HP, Coffey JC, Kerin MJ, Myers E (2015) A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 17(6):482–490CrossRef Clancy C, O’Leary DP, Burke JP, Redmond HP, Coffey JC, Kerin MJ, Myers E (2015) A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 17(6):482–490CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleary RK, Mullard AJ, Ferraro J, Regenbogen SE (2018) The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 32(3):1515–1524CrossRef Cleary RK, Mullard AJ, Ferraro J, Regenbogen SE (2018) The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 32(3):1515–1524CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamanashi T, Nakamura T, Sato T, Naito M, Miura H, Tsutsui A, Shimazu M, Watanabe M (2018) Laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced T4 colon cancer: the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. Surg Today 48(5):534–544CrossRef Yamanashi T, Nakamura T, Sato T, Naito M, Miura H, Tsutsui A, Shimazu M, Watanabe M (2018) Laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced T4 colon cancer: the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. Surg Today 48(5):534–544CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu ZH, Wang N, Wang FQ, Dong Q, Ding J (2018) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in pT4 colon cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 56:221–233CrossRef Liu ZH, Wang N, Wang FQ, Dong Q, Ding J (2018) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in pT4 colon cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 56:221–233CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Leon P, Iovino MG, Giudici F, Sciuto A, de Manzini N, Cuccurullo D, Corcione F (2018) Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic colon cancer resection for T4 lesions: a case-control analysis of 7-years’ experience. Surg Endosc 32(3):1133–1140CrossRef Leon P, Iovino MG, Giudici F, Sciuto A, de Manzini N, Cuccurullo D, Corcione F (2018) Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic colon cancer resection for T4 lesions: a case-control analysis of 7-years’ experience. Surg Endosc 32(3):1133–1140CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi R, Hasegawa S, Hirai K, Hisamori S, Hida K, Kawada K, Sakai Y (2017) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic multivisceral resection for surgical T4b colon cancers: retrospective analyses. Asian J Endosc Surg 10(2):154–161CrossRef Takahashi R, Hasegawa S, Hirai K, Hisamori S, Hida K, Kawada K, Sakai Y (2017) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic multivisceral resection for surgical T4b colon cancers: retrospective analyses. Asian J Endosc Surg 10(2):154–161CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg AE, Chesney TR, Acuna SA, Sammour T, Quereshy FA (2017) Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic versus open resection of pT4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 60(1):116–125CrossRef Feinberg AE, Chesney TR, Acuna SA, Sammour T, Quereshy FA (2017) Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic versus open resection of pT4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 60(1):116–125CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shida D, Ochiai H, Tsukamoto S, Kanemitsu Y (2018) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: results of propensity score analyses. Eur J Surg Oncol 44(7):1025–1030CrossRef Shida D, Ochiai H, Tsukamoto S, Kanemitsu Y (2018) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: results of propensity score analyses. Eur J Surg Oncol 44(7):1025–1030CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitano S, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Ito M, Saito S, Fujii S, Konishi F, Saida Y, Hasegawa H, Akagi T, Sugihara K, Yamaguchi T, Masaki T, Fukunaga Y, Murata K, Okajima M, Moriya Y, Shimada Y (2017) Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(4):261–268CrossRef Kitano S, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Ito M, Saito S, Fujii S, Konishi F, Saida Y, Hasegawa H, Akagi T, Sugihara K, Yamaguchi T, Masaki T, Fukunaga Y, Murata K, Okajima M, Moriya Y, Shimada Y (2017) Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(4):261–268CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Guidolin K, Spence R, Chadi S, Quereshy F (2021) Minimally invasive surgical approaches are safe and appropriate in N2 colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 64:293–300CrossRef Guidolin K, Spence R, Chadi S, Quereshy F (2021) Minimally invasive surgical approaches are safe and appropriate in N2 colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 64:293–300CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Giglio MC, Celentano V, Tarquini R, Luglio G, De Palma GD, Bucci L (2015) Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(11):1445–1455CrossRef Giglio MC, Celentano V, Tarquini R, Luglio G, De Palma GD, Bucci L (2015) Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(11):1445–1455CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dehal AN, Graff-Baker AN, Vuong B, Nelson D, Chang SC, Lee DY, Goldfarb M, Bilchik AJ (2018) Correlation between clinical and pathologic staging in colon cancer: implications for neoadjuvant treatment. J Gastrointest Surg 22(10):1764–1771CrossRef Dehal AN, Graff-Baker AN, Vuong B, Nelson D, Chang SC, Lee DY, Goldfarb M, Bilchik AJ (2018) Correlation between clinical and pathologic staging in colon cancer: implications for neoadjuvant treatment. J Gastrointest Surg 22(10):1764–1771CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Post-operative outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer: a comparison of operative approach
verfasst von
Keegan Guidolin
Deanna Ng
Sami Chadi
Fayez A. Quereshy
Publikationsdatum
05.01.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08772-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Mit Lidocain kommt der Darm nicht schneller in Schwung

Verzögertes Wiederanspringen der Darmfunktion ist ein Hauptfaktor dafür, wenn Patientinnen und Patienten nach einer Kolonresektion länger als geplant im Krankenhaus bleiben müssen. Ob man diesem Problem mit Lidocain vorbeugen kann, war Thema einer Studie.

Kein Unterschied bei inadäquaten Schocks zwischen ICD-Typen

Inadäquate Schockabgaben sind ein unerwünschter Effekt der Therapie mit implantierbaren Kardioverter-Defibrillatoren. Subkutanen Geräten haftet dabei der Ruf an, dafür besonders anfällig zu sein. Die PRAETORIAN-Forschungsgruppe ist dem nachgegangen.

DCIS: Ist ein Verzicht auf eine Operation möglich?

Die COMET-Studie zeigt, dass aktives Monitoring bei Patientinnen mit duktalem Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) hinsichtlich der kumulativen Zwei-Jahres-Rate an ipsilateralen invasiven Karzinomen der leitliniengerechten Standardbehandlung nicht unterlegen ist. Dennoch wird von einem Verzicht auf eine Operation abgeraten, wie in einem begleitenden Editorial betont wird.

Soll man bei Cholezystektomie routinemäßig cholangiografieren?

Eine US-Studie scheint den Befürwortern einer routinemäßigen intraoperativen Cholangiografie im Rahmen einer Cholezystektomie Recht zu geben. Die Studienkommentatoren in JAMA Surgery sparen jedoch nicht mit Kritik.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.