nach oben

International Urogynecology Journal

Erschienen in:

01.05.2011 | Original Article

Posterior intravaginal slingplasty: efficacy and complications in a continuous series of 118 cases

verfasst von: Stefano Cosma, Mario Preti, Marco Mitidieri, Paolo Petruzzelli, Federica Possavino, Guido Menato

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (PIVS) is a minimally invasive procedure that aims to suspend vaginal vault. Our study evaluated efficacy and complications of PIVS at long-term follow-up.

Methods

One hundred eighteen consecutive women underwent PIVS operation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage 3 or 4 vaginal cuff prolapse (VCP; 25 patients) or utero-vaginal prolapse (UVP; 93 patients). Apical vaginal wall at stage 0 or 1 was considered as cured.

Results

Follow-up mean duration was 58.6 months (range, 24–84 months). The success rate of PIVS was 96.6%. Some 8.5% mesh erosion (20% in patients with VCP and 5.4% with UVP), 2.5% vaginal–perineal fistula, and 3.4% paravaginal hematoma occurred. Neither erosion nor fistulas occurred with monofilament polypropylene mesh.

Conclusion

PIVS seems a safe and effective procedure for VCP and UVP. Vaginal erosion was mainly observed in patients with VCP treated with multifilament polypropylene mesh.

Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506PubMedCrossRef

Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:20–26PubMedCrossRef

Lovatsis D, Drutz HP (2002) Safety and efficacy of sacrospinous vault suspension. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:308–313PubMedCrossRef

Papa Petros PE (2001) Vault prolapse II: restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:296–303CrossRef

Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef

Digesu GA, Santamato S, Khullar V, Santillo V, Digesu A, Cormio G et al (2003) Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 106:184–192PubMedCrossRef

Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103–113PubMedCrossRef

Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685PubMedCrossRef

Rechberger T, Rzezniczuk K, Skorupski P, Adamiak A, Tomaszewski J, Baranowski W et al (2003) A randomized comparison between monofilament and multifilament tapes for stress incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:432–436PubMedCrossRef

10.

Long CY, Hsu CS, Jang MY, Liu CM, Chiang PH, Tsai EM (2010) Comparison of clinical outcome and urodynamic findings using “Perigee and/or Apogee” versus “Prolift anterior and/or posterior” system devices for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1262-6

11.

Feiner B, Jelovsek JE, Maher C (2009) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 116:15–24PubMed

12.

Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL 2nd, Schaffer J, Chen Z et al (2009) Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 114:600–609PubMedCrossRef

13.

Von Theobald P, Labbè E (2003) Three-way prosthetic repair of the pelvic floor. J Gynécol Obstét Biol Reprod 32:562–570

14.

Neuman M, Lavy Y (2007) Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:889–893PubMedCrossRef

15.

Luck AM, Steele AC, Leong FC, McLennan MT (2008) Short-term efficacy and complications of posterior intravaginal slingplasty. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:795–799PubMedCrossRef

16.

Riccetto C, Miyaoka R, de Fraga R, Barbosa R, Dambros M, Teixeira A et al (2008) Impact of the structure of polypropylene meshes in local tissue reaction: in vivo stereological study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1117–1123PubMedCrossRef

17.

De Tayrac R, Mathé ML, Bader G, Deffieux X, Fazel A, Fernandez H (2008) Infracoccygeal sacropexy or sacrospinous suspension for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 100:154–159PubMedCrossRef

18.

Farnsworth BN (2002) Posterior Intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse - a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:4–8PubMedCrossRef

19.

Biertho I, Dallemagne B, Dewandre JM, Markiewicz S, Monami B, Wahlen C et al (2004) Intravaginal slingplasty: short term results. Acta Chir Belg 104:700–704PubMed

20.

Sivaslioglu AA, Gelisen O, Dolen I, Dede H, Dilbaz S, Haberal A (2005) Posterior sling (infracoccygeal sacropexy): an alternative procedure for vaginal vault prolapse. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:159–160PubMedCrossRef

21.

Jordaan DJ, Prollius A, Cronjé HS, Nel M (2006) Posterior intravaginal slingplasty for vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:326–329PubMedCrossRef

22.

Ghanbari Z, Baratali BH, Mireshghi MS (2006) Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 94:147–148PubMedCrossRef

23.

Foote AJ, Ralph J (2007) Infracoccygeal sacropexy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 47:250–251PubMedCrossRef

24.

Hefni M, Yousri N, El-Toukhy T, Koutromanis P, Mossa M, Davies A (2007) Morbidity associated with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:499–504PubMedCrossRef

25.

Vardy MD, Brodman M, Olivera CK, Zhou HS, Flisser AJ, Bercik RS (2007) Anterior intravaginal slingplasty tunneller device for stress incontinence and posterior intravaginal slingplasty for apical vault prolapse: a 2-year prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(104):e1–e8PubMed

26.

Sentilhes L, Sergent F, Resch B, Verspyck E, Descamps P, Marpeau L (2008) Infracoccygeal sacropexy reinforced with posterior mesh interposition for apical and posterior compartment prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 137:108–113PubMedCrossRef

27.

Kim MR, Kim JH, Cho HH (2008) Infracoccygeal sacropexy improves the quality of life of women with uterine prolapse. Maturitas 20; 59:158–162CrossRef

28.

Deffieux X, Desseaux K, De Tayrac R, Faivre E, Frydman R, Fernandez H (2009) Infracoccygeal sacropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 104:56–59PubMedCrossRef

29.

Bjelic-Radisic V, Hartmann G, Abendstein B, Tamussino K, Riss PA (2009) Austrian Urogynecology Working Group. The posterior intravaginal slingplasty operation: results of the Austrian registry. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 144:88–91PubMedCrossRef

30.

Kolusari A, Yildizhan R, Adali E, Kurdoglu M, Sahin HG, Kamaci M et al (2010) Short-term results of posterior intravaginal slingplasty in grade 4 uterine prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:55–58CrossRef

Titel: Posterior intravaginal slingplasty: efficacy and complications in a continuous series of 118 cases
verfasst von: Stefano Cosma
Mario Preti
Marco Mitidieri
Paolo Petruzzelli
Federica Possavino
Guido Menato
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1350-7

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Posterior intravaginal slingplasty: efficacy and complications in a continuous series of 118 cases

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Update Gynäkologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Long-term outcomes of modified high uterosacral ligament vault suspension (HUSLS) at vaginal hysterectomy

Impact of Prolift procedure on bladder function and symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse

Treatment strategies for pelvic organ prolapse: a cost-effectiveness analysis

One-day versus 3-day suprapubic catheterization after vaginal prolapse surgery: a prospective randomized trial

The prevalence and risk factors of overactive bladder symptoms and its relation to pelvic organ prolapse symptoms in a general female population

Bladder mass “collagenoma”

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Update Gynäkologie