Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2017

30.12.2015 | Knee

Posterolateral portal tibial tunnel drilling for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: technique and evaluation of safety and tunnel position

verfasst von: Eduard Alentorn-Geli, Joseph J. Stuart, J. H. James Choi, Alison P. Toth, Claude T. Moorman III, Dean C. Taylor

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 8/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the safety for neurovascular structures and accuracy for tunnel placement of the posterolateral portal tibial tunnel drilling technique in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.

Methods

Fifteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were used. The tibial tunnel for the PCL was created using a flexible reamer from the posterolateral portal. Then, the flexible pin was left in place, and the distance from the posterolateral portal, the flexible pin, and the tibial tunnel to the peroneal nerve and popliteal artery was measured. Additionally, the distance between the tibial tunnel and several landmarks related to the PCL footprint was measured, along with the distance from the exit point of the flexible pin to the superficial medial collateral ligament and gracilis tendon.

Results

The peroneal nerve and the popliteal neurovascular bundle were not damaged in any of the specimens. The median (range) distance in mm from the peroneal nerve and popliteal artery to the posterolateral portal and flexible pin was: 52 (40–80) and 50 (40–61), and 35 (26–51) and 22 (16–32), respectively. The median (range) distance from the tibial tunnel to the popliteal artery was 21 mm (15–38). The tibial tunnel was located at a median (range) distance in mm of 3 (2–6), 6 (3–12), 5 (2–7), 4 (1–8), 9 (3–10), 10 (4–19), and 19 (6–24) to the champagne-glass drop-off, lateral cartilage point, shiny white fibre point, medial groove, medial meniscus posterior root, lateral meniscus posterior root, and posterior aspect of the anterior cruciate ligament, respectively.

Conclusions

The posterolateral portal tibial tunnel technique is safe relative to neurovascular structures and creates an anatomically appropriate tibial tunnel location. The clinical relevance of study is that this technique may be safely and accurately used in PCL reconstruction to decrease the risk of neurovascular damage (avoid use of a posteriorly directed pin), avoid the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and avoid the sharp turn during graft passage.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn JH, Lee SH, Jung HJ, Koo KH, Kim SH (2011) The relationship of neural structures to arthroscopic posterior portals according to knee positioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:646–652CrossRefPubMed Ahn JH, Lee SH, Jung HJ, Koo KH, Kim SH (2011) The relationship of neural structures to arthroscopic posterior portals according to knee positioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:646–652CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson CJ, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2012) Arthroscopically pertinent anatomy of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1936–1945CrossRefPubMed Anderson CJ, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF (2012) Arthroscopically pertinent anatomy of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1936–1945CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergfeld JA, McAllister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE (2001) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 29:129–136CrossRefPubMed Bergfeld JA, McAllister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE (2001) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 29:129–136CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell RB, Jordan SS, Sekiya JK (2007) Arthroscopic tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23(1356):e1351–e1354 Campbell RB, Jordan SS, Sekiya JK (2007) Arthroscopic tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23(1356):e1351–e1354
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Greiner P, Magnussen RA, Lustig S, Demey G, Neyret P, Servien E (2011) Computed tomography evaluation of the femoral and tibial attachments of the posterior cruciate ligament in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1876–1883CrossRefPubMed Greiner P, Magnussen RA, Lustig S, Demey G, Neyret P, Servien E (2011) Computed tomography evaluation of the femoral and tibial attachments of the posterior cruciate ligament in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1876–1883CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammoud S, Reinhardt KR, Marx RG (2010) Outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament treatment: a review of the evidence. Sports Med Arthrosc 18:280–291CrossRefPubMed Hammoud S, Reinhardt KR, Marx RG (2010) Outcomes of posterior cruciate ligament treatment: a review of the evidence. Sports Med Arthrosc 18:280–291CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Li B, Wang JS, He M, Wang GB, Shen P, Bai LH (2014) Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3077–3084CrossRefPubMed Li B, Wang JS, He M, Wang GB, Shen P, Bai LH (2014) Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3077–3084CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Makridis KG, Wajsfisz A, Agrawal N, Basdekis G, Djian P (2013) Neurovascular anatomic relationships to arthroscopic posterior and transseptal portals in different knee positions. Am J Sports Med 41:1559–1564CrossRefPubMed Makridis KG, Wajsfisz A, Agrawal N, Basdekis G, Djian P (2013) Neurovascular anatomic relationships to arthroscopic posterior and transseptal portals in different knee positions. Am J Sports Med 41:1559–1564CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat May JH, Gillette BP, Morgan JA, Krych AJ, Stuart MJ, Levy BA (2010) Transtibial versus inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evidence-based systematic review. J Knee Surg 23:73–80CrossRefPubMed May JH, Gillette BP, Morgan JA, Krych AJ, Stuart MJ, Levy BA (2010) Transtibial versus inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evidence-based systematic review. J Knee Surg 23:73–80CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorman CT 3rd, Murphy Zane MS, Bansai S, Cina SJ, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF, Kaseta MK (2008) Tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament: a sagittal plane analysis using gross, histologic, and radiographic methods. Arthroscopy 24:269–275CrossRefPubMed Moorman CT 3rd, Murphy Zane MS, Bansai S, Cina SJ, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF, Kaseta MK (2008) Tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament: a sagittal plane analysis using gross, histologic, and radiographic methods. Arthroscopy 24:269–275CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pace JL, Wahl CJ (2010) Arthroscopy of the posterior knee compartments: neurovascular anatomic relationships during arthroscopic transverse capsulotomy. Arthroscopy 26:637–642CrossRefPubMed Pace JL, Wahl CJ (2010) Arthroscopy of the posterior knee compartments: neurovascular anatomic relationships during arthroscopic transverse capsulotomy. Arthroscopy 26:637–642CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Panchal HB, Sekiya JK (2011) Open tibial inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 27:1289–1295CrossRefPubMed Panchal HB, Sekiya JK (2011) Open tibial inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 27:1289–1295CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos LA, de Carvalho RT, Cohen M, Abdalla RJ (2008) Anatomic relation between the posterior cruciate ligament and the joint capsule. Arthroscopy 24:1367–1372CrossRefPubMed Ramos LA, de Carvalho RT, Cohen M, Abdalla RJ (2008) Anatomic relation between the posterior cruciate ligament and the joint capsule. Arthroscopy 24:1367–1372CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Salata MJ, Sekiya JK (2011) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction: a surgical technique that may influence rehabilitation. Sports Health 3:52–58CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salata MJ, Sekiya JK (2011) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction: a surgical technique that may influence rehabilitation. Sports Health 3:52–58CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zawodny SR, Miller MD (2010) Complications of posterior cruciate ligament surgery. Sports Med Arthrosc 18:269–274CrossRefPubMed Zawodny SR, Miller MD (2010) Complications of posterior cruciate ligament surgery. Sports Med Arthrosc 18:269–274CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Posterolateral portal tibial tunnel drilling for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: technique and evaluation of safety and tunnel position
verfasst von
Eduard Alentorn-Geli
Joseph J. Stuart
J. H. James Choi
Alison P. Toth
Claude T. Moorman III
Dean C. Taylor
Publikationsdatum
30.12.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3958-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.