Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 12/2016

08.06.2016 | Original Contributions

Postoperative Bleeding and Leakage After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Experience

verfasst von: Mousa Khoursheed, Ibtisam Al-Bader, Ali Mouzannar, Aqeel Ashraf, Yousef Bahzad, Abdulla Al-Haddad, Ali Sayed, Abe Fingerhut

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Sleeve gastrectomy is being performed increasingly, mainly due to its low morbidity and mortality, but complications do occur. The aim of this study was to evaluate bleeding and leakage rates of primary and revisional sleeve gastrectomy in a personal series of 664 consecutive patients.

Methods

Medical charts of all patients undergoing a primary or revisional sleeve gastrectomy between August 2008 and December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Subgroup analysis compared bleeding in patients after reduced port versus multiport technique and primary versus revisional sleeve gastrectomy.

Results

A total of 664 sleeve gastrectomies (489 women and 175 men) were performed. Mean age and body mass index were 36.03 ± 11.4 years and 42.9 ± 8.3 kg/m2, respectively. Mean operative time was 58.5 ± 20.0 min, with a 0.15 % conversion rate. Mean hospital stay was 2.1 ± 0.3 days. The overall 30-day complication rate was 7.5 %. Thirteen patients sustained postoperative bleeding (2 %), three of whom required reoperation (0.5 %). Staple line leakage and mortality were both nil in this series. No difference in postoperative complications was found between the subgroups.

Conclusions

In this single-surgeon, single-center experience, sleeve gastrectomy was a safe and effective bariatric procedure with a low complication rate. Staple line reinforcement by oversewing was associated with low bleeding complications and no leakage. The majority of patients with postoperative bleeding could be managed conservatively. In our experience, reduced port technique and revisional sleeve gastrectomy had similar complication rates compared to multiport and primary sleeve gastrectomy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23. Discussion 524.CrossRefPubMed Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23. Discussion 524.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittermair R, Sucher R, Perathoner A. Results and complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Today. 2014;44:1307–12.CrossRefPubMed Mittermair R, Sucher R, Perathoner A. Results and complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Today. 2014;44:1307–12.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1450–6.CrossRefPubMed Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1450–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Consten EC, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Decreased bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch for morbid obesity using a stapled buttressed absorbable polymer membrane. Obes Surg. 2004;14:1360–6.CrossRefPubMed Consten EC, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Decreased bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch for morbid obesity using a stapled buttressed absorbable polymer membrane. Obes Surg. 2004;14:1360–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Aggarwal S, Sharma AP, Ramaswamy N. Outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with and without staple line oversewing in morbidly obese patients: a randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:895–9. doi:10.1089/lap.2013.0137.CrossRefPubMed Aggarwal S, Sharma AP, Ramaswamy N. Outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with and without staple line oversewing in morbidly obese patients: a randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:895–9. doi:10.​1089/​lap.​2013.​0137.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Flessas J, et al. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing two different techniques. Preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2012;22:42–6. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0421-2.CrossRefPubMed Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Flessas J, et al. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing two different techniques. Preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2012;22:42–6. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-011-0421-2.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing three different techniques. Obes Surg. 2010;20:462–7. doi:10.1007/s11695-009-0047-9.CrossRefPubMed Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J. Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing three different techniques. Obes Surg. 2010;20:462–7. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-009-0047-9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen B, Kiriakopolous A, Tsakayannis D, et al. Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences. Obes Surg. 2009;19:166–72. doi:10.1007/s11695-008-9668-7.CrossRefPubMed Chen B, Kiriakopolous A, Tsakayannis D, et al. Reinforcement does not necessarily reduce the rate of staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy. A review of the literature and clinical experiences. Obes Surg. 2009;19:166–72. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-008-9668-7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Giannopoulos GA, Tzanakis NE, Rallis GE, et al. Staple line reinforcement in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: does it actually make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2782–8. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1047-5.CrossRefPubMed Giannopoulos GA, Tzanakis NE, Rallis GE, et al. Staple line reinforcement in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: does it actually make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2782–8. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1047-5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Inabnet 3rd WB, Belle SH, Bessler M, et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after non-LapBand primary and revisional bariatric surgical procedures from the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:22–30. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2009.10.007.CrossRefPubMed Inabnet 3rd WB, Belle SH, Bessler M, et al. Comparison of 30-day outcomes after non-LapBand primary and revisional bariatric surgical procedures from the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:22–30. doi:10.​1016/​j.​soard.​2009.​10.​007.CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, et al. Comparison of reduced port Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (Duet TLDG) and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2567–72. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-4333-y.CrossRefPubMed Kim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, et al. Comparison of reduced port Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (Duet TLDG) and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2567–72. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-014-4333-y.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sucher R, Resch T, Mohr E, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of 80 cases in a single center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24:83–8. doi:10.1089/lap.2013.0250.CrossRefPubMed Sucher R, Resch T, Mohr E, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of 80 cases in a single center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014;24:83–8. doi:10.​1089/​lap.​2013.​0250.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lalor PF, Tucker ON, Szomstein S, et al. Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:33–8.CrossRefPubMed Lalor PF, Tucker ON, Szomstein S, et al. Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:33–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoursheed M, Al-Bader I, Al-Asfar F, et al. Therapeutic effect of low-molecular weight heparin and incidence of lower limb deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:491–3. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828e3c92.CrossRefPubMed Khoursheed M, Al-Bader I, Al-Asfar F, et al. Therapeutic effect of low-molecular weight heparin and incidence of lower limb deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:491–3. doi:10.​1097/​SLE.​0b013e31828e3c92​.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Dallal RM, Bailey L, Nahmias N. Back to basics—clinical diagnosis in bariatric surgery: routine drains and upper GI series are unnecessary. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2268–71.CrossRefPubMed Dallal RM, Bailey L, Nahmias N. Back to basics—clinical diagnosis in bariatric surgery: routine drains and upper GI series are unnecessary. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:2268–71.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Alvarez Uslar R, Molina H, Torres O, et al. Total gastrectomy with or without abdominal drains. A prospective randomized trial. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2005;97:562–9. Article in English, Spanish.CrossRefPubMed Alvarez Uslar R, Molina H, Torres O, et al. Total gastrectomy with or without abdominal drains. A prospective randomized trial. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2005;97:562–9. Article in English, Spanish.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Lee J, Hyung WJ, et al. Gastric cancer surgery without drains: a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:727–32.CrossRefPubMed Kim J, Lee J, Hyung WJ, et al. Gastric cancer surgery without drains: a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:727–32.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenthal RJ, International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel, Diaz AA, et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8–19. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019.CrossRefPubMed Rosenthal RJ, International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel, Diaz AA, et al. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:8–19. doi:10.​1016/​j.​soard.​2011.​10.​019.CrossRefPubMed
40.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper JD. Technique to reduce air leaks after resection of emphysematous lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:1038–9.PubMed Cooper JD. Technique to reduce air leaks after resection of emphysematous lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:1038–9.PubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinheiro JS, Correa JL, Cohen RV, et al. Staple line reinforcement with new biomaterial increased burst strength pressure: an animal study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:397–9. discussion 400.CrossRefPubMed Pinheiro JS, Correa JL, Cohen RV, et al. Staple line reinforcement with new biomaterial increased burst strength pressure: an animal study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:397–9. discussion 400.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Yazbek T, Safa N, Denis R, et al. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG)—a good bariatric option for failed Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB): a review of 90 patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23:300–5. doi:10.1007/s11695-012-0825-7.CrossRefPubMed Yazbek T, Safa N, Denis R, et al. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG)—a good bariatric option for failed Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB): a review of 90 patients. Obes Surg. 2013;23:300–5. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-012-0825-7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Postoperative Bleeding and Leakage After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Experience
verfasst von
Mousa Khoursheed
Ibtisam Al-Bader
Ali Mouzannar
Aqeel Ashraf
Yousef Bahzad
Abdulla Al-Haddad
Ali Sayed
Abe Fingerhut
Publikationsdatum
08.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2215-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

Obesity Surgery 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.