Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2021

17.04.2021 | Original Article

Postoperative complications and recurrence rates after rectal prolapse surgery versus combined rectal prolapse and pelvic organ prolapse surgery

verfasst von: Shannon L. Wallace, Ekene A. Enemchukwu, Kavita Mishra, Leila Neshatian, Bertha Chen, Lisa Rogo-Gupta, Eric R. Sokol, Brooke H. Gurland

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 9/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Our primary objectives were to compare < 30-day postoperative complications and RP recurrence rates after RP-only surgery and combined surgery. Our secondary objectives were to determine preoperative predictors of < 30-day complications and RP recurrence.

Methods

A prospective IRB-approved cohort study was performed at a single tertiary care center from 2017 to 2020. Female patients with symptomatic RP underwent either RP-only surgery or combined surgery based on the discretion of the colorectal and FPMRS surgeons. Primary outcome measures were < 30-day complications separated into Clavien-Dindo (CD) classes and rectal prolapse on physical examination.

Results

Seventy women had RP-only surgery and 45 had combined surgery with a mean follow-up time of 208 days. Sixty-eight percent underwent abdominal RP repair, and 32% underwent perineal RP repair. Twenty percent had one or more complications, 14% in the RP-only group and 29% in the combined surgery group (p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, combined surgery patients had a 30% increased risk of complications compared to RP-only surgery patients (RR = 1.3). Most of these complications were minor (14/17, 82.4%) and categorized as CD I or II, including urinary retention and UTI. Twelve percent of this cohort had RP recurrence, 11% in the RP-only group and 13% in the combined surgery group (p = 0.76). Preoperative risk factors for RP recurrence included a primary complaint of rectal bleeding (RR 5.5) and reporting stools consistent with Bristol Stool Scale of 1 (RR 2.1).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing combined RP + POP surgery had a higher risk of complications and equivalent RP recurrence rates compared to patients undergoing RP-only surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bordeianou L, et al. Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(5):1059–69.CrossRef Bordeianou L, et al. Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(5):1059–69.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman D, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in women with surgically managed rectal prolapse: a population-based case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(1):28–35.CrossRef Altman D, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in women with surgically managed rectal prolapse: a population-based case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(1):28–35.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygaard I, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1311–6.CrossRef Nygaard I, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1311–6.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Naldini G, et al. Complex pelvic organ prolapse: decision-making algorithm. Int J Color Dis. 2019;34(1):189–92.CrossRef Naldini G, et al. Complex pelvic organ prolapse: decision-making algorithm. Int J Color Dis. 2019;34(1):189–92.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Geltzeiler CB, et al. Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Color Dis. 2018;33(10):1453–9.CrossRef Geltzeiler CB, et al. Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Color Dis. 2018;33(10):1453–9.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;11:CD001758. Tou S, Brown SR, Nelson RL. Surgery for complete (full-thickness) rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;11:CD001758.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD004014. Maher C, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD004014.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui NY, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44–55.CrossRef Siddiqui NY, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44–55.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim M, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in females: functional outcome of mesh sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy as a combined procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(9):1412–21.CrossRef Lim M, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in females: functional outcome of mesh sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy as a combined procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(9):1412–21.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat van Zanten F, et al. Long-term anatomical and functional results of robot-assisted pelvic floor surgery for the management of multicompartment prolapse: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020. van Zanten F, et al. Long-term anatomical and functional results of robot-assisted pelvic floor surgery for the management of multicompartment prolapse: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, et al. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRef Dindo D, et al. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Unger CA, et al. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:547:e1–8.CrossRef Unger CA, et al. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:547:e1–8.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat van Iersel JJ, et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for multicompartment prolapse of the pelvic floor: a prospective cohort study evaluating functional and sexual outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(10):968–74.CrossRef van Iersel JJ, et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for multicompartment prolapse of the pelvic floor: a prospective cohort study evaluating functional and sexual outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(10):968–74.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Campagna G, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(6):573–84.CrossRef Campagna G, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(6):573–84.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinberg D, et al. Safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent rectopexy: peri-operative morbidity in a nationwide cohort. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(3):385–92.CrossRef Weinberg D, et al. Safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent rectopexy: peri-operative morbidity in a nationwide cohort. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(3):385–92.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Reddy J, et al. Robotic sacrocolpoperineopexy with ventral rectopexy for the combined treatment of rectal and pelvic organ prolapse: initial report and technique. J Robot Surg. 2011;5(3):167–73.CrossRef Reddy J, et al. Robotic sacrocolpoperineopexy with ventral rectopexy for the combined treatment of rectal and pelvic organ prolapse: initial report and technique. J Robot Surg. 2011;5(3):167–73.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jallad K, et al. The effect of surgical start time in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1535–9.CrossRef Jallad K, et al. The effect of surgical start time in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1535–9.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayav A, et al. Surgical management of combined rectal and genital prolapse in young patients: transabdominal approach. Int J Color Dis. 2005;20(2):173–9.CrossRef Ayav A, et al. Surgical management of combined rectal and genital prolapse in young patients: transabdominal approach. Int J Color Dis. 2005;20(2):173–9.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Collopy BT, et al. Abdominal colporectopexy with pelvic cul-de-sac closure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(4):522–9.CrossRef Collopy BT, et al. Abdominal colporectopexy with pelvic cul-de-sac closure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(4):522–9.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiyasu Y, et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy with sacrocolpopexy for coexisting pelvic organ prolapse and external rectal prolapse. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018;1(4):141–6.CrossRef Kiyasu Y, et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy with sacrocolpopexy for coexisting pelvic organ prolapse and external rectal prolapse. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018;1(4):141–6.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Popp L, et al. Pelvic floor-lifting: an interdisciplinary repair of combined rectal and vaginal prolapse-5 years’ experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(1):83–90.CrossRef Popp L, et al. Pelvic floor-lifting: an interdisciplinary repair of combined rectal and vaginal prolapse-5 years’ experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(1):83–90.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Riansuwan W, et al. Combined surgery in pelvic organ prolapse is safe and effective. Color Dis. 2010;12(3):188–92.CrossRef Riansuwan W, et al. Combined surgery in pelvic organ prolapse is safe and effective. Color Dis. 2010;12(3):188–92.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagar PM, et al. Feasibility and functional outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolporectopexy for combined vaginal and rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(9):1414–20.CrossRef Sagar PM, et al. Feasibility and functional outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolporectopexy for combined vaginal and rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(9):1414–20.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Slawik S, et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Color Dis. 2008;10(2):138–43. Slawik S, et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Color Dis. 2008;10(2):138–43.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallace SL, et al. Surgical approach, complications, and reoperation rates of combined rectal and pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):2101–8.CrossRef Wallace SL, et al. Surgical approach, complications, and reoperation rates of combined rectal and pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):2101–8.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Watadani Y, et al. Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy for pelvic floor prolapse improves bowel function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(12):1415–22.CrossRef Watadani Y, et al. Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy for pelvic floor prolapse improves bowel function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(12):1415–22.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang SJ, et al. Laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):64–9.CrossRef Yang SJ, et al. Laparoscopic vaginal suspension and rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):64–9.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Speed, J.M., et al., Trends in the Diagnosis and Management of Combined Rectal and Vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse. [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 19] Urology. 2020. Speed, J.M., et al., Trends in the Diagnosis and Management of Combined Rectal and Vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse. [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 19] Urology. 2020.
Metadaten
Titel
Postoperative complications and recurrence rates after rectal prolapse surgery versus combined rectal prolapse and pelvic organ prolapse surgery
verfasst von
Shannon L. Wallace
Ekene A. Enemchukwu
Kavita Mishra
Leila Neshatian
Bertha Chen
Lisa Rogo-Gupta
Eric R. Sokol
Brooke H. Gurland
Publikationsdatum
17.04.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 9/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04778-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2021

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.