Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 6/2018

14.02.2018 | Original Article

Postoperative K-line conversion from negative to positive is independently associated with a better surgical outcome after posterior decompression with instrumented fusion for K-line negative cervical ossification of the posterior ligament

verfasst von: Masao Koda, Takeo Furuya, Junya Saito, Yasushi Ijima, Mitsuhiro Kitamura, Seiji Ohtori, Sumihisa Orita, Kazuhide Inage, Tetsuya Abe, Hiroshi Noguchi, Toru Funayama, Hiroshi Kumagai, Kosei Miura, Katsuya Nagashima, Masashi Yamazaki

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Addition of posterior instrumented fusion to laminoplasty (posterior decompression with instrumented fusion: PDF) can improve the surgical outcome of patients with K-line (−) cervical ossification of the longitudinal ligament (OPLL) compared with laminoplasty alone. We sought to elucidate the factors that are significantly associated with a better outcome after PDF for K-line (−) OPLL.

Methods

The present study included 38 patients who underwent PDF for K-line (−) OPLL and were followed up for at least 1 year after surgery. Clinical outcome was assessed using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores for cervical myelopathy and the recovery rate was calculated. Patients who belonged to the upper quartile of all the patients according to rank order of the JOA score recovery rate were considered to have a good outcome. The correlations between good outcome, patient factors and imaging assessments were analyzed statistically.

Results

Univariate analyses showed that postoperative conversion of K-line from (−) to (+) (p = 0.004), no increase in the sagittal vertical axis from the center of gravity of the head to C7 (p = 0.07), and a lower grade of preoperative intramedullary T2-signal intensity (p = 0.03) were candidates for the association. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that postoperative K-line conversion from (−) to (+) is an independent factor that is significantly associated with a better surgical outcome (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Postoperative K-line conversion from (−) to (+) is a factor independently associated with a better surgical outcome.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2012) Surgical treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and its outcomes: posterior surgery by laminoplasty. Spine 37:E303–E308CrossRefPubMed Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2012) Surgical treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and its outcomes: posterior surgery by laminoplasty. Spine 37:E303–E308CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Aita I, Hayashi K, Wadano Y, Yabuki T (1998) Posterior movement and enlargement of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80:33–37CrossRef Aita I, Hayashi K, Wadano Y, Yabuki T (1998) Posterior movement and enlargement of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80:33–37CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sodeyama T, Goto S, Mochizuki M et al (1999) Effect of decompression enlargement laminoplasty for posterior shifting of the spinal cord. Spine 24:1527–1531CrossRefPubMed Sodeyama T, Goto S, Mochizuki M et al (1999) Effect of decompression enlargement laminoplasty for posterior shifting of the spinal cord. Spine 24:1527–1531CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakai K, Okawa A, Takahashi M et al (2012) Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty. Spine 37:367–376CrossRefPubMed Sakai K, Okawa A, Takahashi M et al (2012) Five-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression and fusion with floating method versus laminoplasty. Spine 37:367–376CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishida N, Kanchiku T, Kato Y et al (2014) Biomechanical analysis of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects of posterior decompression and kyphosis following decompression. Exp Ther Med 7:1095–1099CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nishida N, Kanchiku T, Kato Y et al (2014) Biomechanical analysis of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects of posterior decompression and kyphosis following decompression. Exp Ther Med 7:1095–1099CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A et al (2007) Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part 1: clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine 32:647–653CrossRefPubMed Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A et al (2007) Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: part 1: clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine 32:647–653CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Okuda S et al (2014) Long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with an occupying ratio of 60% or more. Spine 39:58–67CrossRefPubMed Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Okuda S et al (2014) Long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with an occupying ratio of 60% or more. Spine 39:58–67CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J et al (2008) A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine 33:E990–E993CrossRefPubMed Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J et al (2008) A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine 33:E990–E993CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Okawa A et al (2011) Outcome of posterior decompression surgery for cervical OPLL patients of the K-line (−) group: laminoplasty versus posterior decompression with instrumented fusion. J Spine Res 2:231–235 Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Okawa A et al (2011) Outcome of posterior decompression surgery for cervical OPLL patients of the K-line (−) group: laminoplasty versus posterior decompression with instrumented fusion. J Spine Res 2:231–235
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H et al (2016) Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (−) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 25:2294–2301CrossRefPubMed Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H et al (2016) Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (−) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J 25:2294–2301CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Orthopaedic Association (1994) Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 68:490–503 (in Japanese) Japanese Orthopaedic Association (1994) Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 68:490–503 (in Japanese)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y (1997) Choice of surgical procedure for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. In: Yonenobu K, Sakou T, Ono K (eds) ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 135–142 Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y (1997) Choice of surgical procedure for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. In: Yonenobu K, Sakou T, Ono K (eds) ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp 135–142
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuyama N (1984) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:71–84 Tsuyama N (1984) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 184:71–84
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito J, Maki S, Kamiya K et al (2016) Outcome of posterior decompression with instrumented fusion surgery for K-line (−) cervical ossification of the longitudinal ligament. J Clin Neurosci 32:57–60CrossRefPubMed Saito J, Maki S, Kamiya K et al (2016) Outcome of posterior decompression with instrumented fusion surgery for K-line (−) cervical ossification of the longitudinal ligament. J Clin Neurosci 32:57–60CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H et al (2007) MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes. Spine 32:1675–1678CrossRefPubMed Yukawa Y, Kato F, Yoshihara H et al (2007) MR T2 image classification in cervical compression myelopathy: predictor of surgical outcomes. Spine 32:1675–1678CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshii T, Sakai K, Hirai T et al (2016) Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥ 50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study. Spine J 16:1351–1357CrossRefPubMed Yoshii T, Sakai K, Hirai T et al (2016) Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥ 50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study. Spine J 16:1351–1357CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu X, Chen Y, Yang H et al (2017) Expansive open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cases with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and straight lordosis. Eur Spine J 26:1173–1180CrossRefPubMed Liu X, Chen Y, Yang H et al (2017) Expansive open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cases with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and straight lordosis. Eur Spine J 26:1173–1180CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsumi K, Yamazaki A, Watanabe K et al (2012) Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty? a prospective study. Spine 37:748–754CrossRefPubMed Katsumi K, Yamazaki A, Watanabe K et al (2012) Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty? a prospective study. Spine 37:748–754CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu FL, Sun Y, Pan SF et al (2014) Risk factors associated with upper extremity palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. Spine J 14:909–915CrossRefPubMed Wu FL, Sun Y, Pan SF et al (2014) Risk factors associated with upper extremity palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. Spine J 14:909–915CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurakawa T, Miyamoto H, Kaneyama S et al (2016) C5 nerve palsy after posterior reconstruction surgery: predictive risk factors of the incidence and critical range of correction for kyphosis. Eur Spine J 25:2060–2067CrossRefPubMed Kurakawa T, Miyamoto H, Kaneyama S et al (2016) C5 nerve palsy after posterior reconstruction surgery: predictive risk factors of the incidence and critical range of correction for kyphosis. Eur Spine J 25:2060–2067CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Postoperative K-line conversion from negative to positive is independently associated with a better surgical outcome after posterior decompression with instrumented fusion for K-line negative cervical ossification of the posterior ligament
verfasst von
Masao Koda
Takeo Furuya
Junya Saito
Yasushi Ijima
Mitsuhiro Kitamura
Seiji Ohtori
Sumihisa Orita
Kazuhide Inage
Tetsuya Abe
Hiroshi Noguchi
Toru Funayama
Hiroshi Kumagai
Kosei Miura
Katsuya Nagashima
Masashi Yamazaki
Publikationsdatum
14.02.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5505-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

European Spine Journal 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.