Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 6/2017

29.12.2016 | Original Contributions

Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery in Older Obese Patients: a Matched Case-Control Study

verfasst von: Damien Bergeat, David Lechaux, Adil Ghaina, Ronan Thibault, Vianney Bouygues

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) in older obese patients remains debated regarding postoperative outcomes.

Objectives

The aim of this case-control study is to evaluate global results of LBS in patients ≥60 years (yr) with a matched case control study.

Methods

All patients ≥60 years who benefited from LBS in our center between January 2009 and January 2014 were included in this retrospective study. They were matched (1:2) to patients <40 and 40–59 years on BMI, surgical procedure and year, and history of previous LBS. Postoperative complications in the first 90 days following LBS, micronutrient and mineral deficiencies, and Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) were analyzed.

Results

Fifty-five patients ≥60 year (40 sleeve gastrectomy, 14 one anastomosis gastric bypass, 1 gastric bypass revision) were matched to patients <40 year and patients 40–59 year (n = 55 each). Patients ≥60 year presented more obesity-related comorbidities at baseline. Except for bleeding complications (P = 0.01), no difference in major complication rate was observed (P = 0.43). At 24 months, %EWL was lower in older patients compared to others (76.3, 82.2 and 89.7, respectively, P = 0.009). Iron and vitamin B12 deficiencies were less prevalent in patients ≥60 year After a mean follow-up of 27 months, BAROS score (filled in by 82% of patients) was lower in patients ≥60 years (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

Despite less weight loss, postoperative complications rate, and lower BAROS results, LBS keeps an acceptable benefit-risk balance in selected older patients and should not be rejected on the sole argument of age. Additional studies are needed to assess the long-term benefits of LBS in older patients.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zamboni M, Mazzali G, Zoico E, et al. Health consequences of obesity in the elderly: a review of four unresolved questions. Int J Obes. 2005;29:1011–29.CrossRef Zamboni M, Mazzali G, Zoico E, et al. Health consequences of obesity in the elderly: a review of four unresolved questions. Int J Obes. 2005;29:1011–29.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaap LA, Koster A, Visser M. Adiposity, muscle mass, and muscle strength in relation to functional decline in older persons. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:51–65.CrossRefPubMed Schaap LA, Koster A, Visser M. Adiposity, muscle mass, and muscle strength in relation to functional decline in older persons. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:51–65.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2002–13.CrossRefPubMed Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2002–13.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Giordano S, Victorzon M. Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1627–35.PubMedPubMedCentral Giordano S, Victorzon M. Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:1627–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT. Outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly. Am Surg. 2006;72:865–9.PubMed Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT. Outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly. Am Surg. 2006;72:865–9.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Flum DR, Salem L, Broeckel Elrod J, et al. Early mortality among medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.CrossRefPubMed Flum DR, Salem L, Broeckel Elrod J, et al. Early mortality among medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, et al. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:755–63.CrossRefPubMed Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, et al. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:755–63.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Heim N, Snijder MB, Heymans MW, et al. Optimal cutoff values for high-risk waist circumference in older adults based on related health outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:479–89.CrossRefPubMed Heim N, Snijder MB, Heymans MW, et al. Optimal cutoff values for high-risk waist circumference in older adults based on related health outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:479–89.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Laville M, Romon M, Chavrier G, et al. Recommendations regarding obesity surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1476–80.CrossRefPubMed Laville M, Romon M, Chavrier G, et al. Recommendations regarding obesity surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1476–80.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorehead MK, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, et al. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt quality of life questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13:684–92.CrossRefPubMed Moorehead MK, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, et al. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt quality of life questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13:684–92.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.CrossRefPubMed Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:741–52.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorman RB, Abraham AA, Al-Refaie WB, et al. Bariatric surgery outcomes in the elderly: an ACS NSQIP study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. Off. J. Soc. Surg. Aliment Tract. 2012;16:35–44. discussion 44CrossRef Dorman RB, Abraham AA, Al-Refaie WB, et al. Bariatric surgery outcomes in the elderly: an ACS NSQIP study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. Off. J. Soc. Surg. Aliment Tract. 2012;16:35–44. discussion 44CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanommeslaeghe H, Deylgat B, Van Cauwenberge S, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the elderly: feasibility, short-term safety, and impact on comorbidity and weight in 250 cases. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:910–5.CrossRefPubMed Vanommeslaeghe H, Deylgat B, Van Cauwenberge S, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the elderly: feasibility, short-term safety, and impact on comorbidity and weight in 250 cases. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:910–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pequignot A, Prevot F, Dhahri A, et al. Is sleeve gastrectomy still contraindicated for patients aged ≥60 years? A case-matched study with 24 months of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11:1008–13.CrossRef Pequignot A, Prevot F, Dhahri A, et al. Is sleeve gastrectomy still contraindicated for patients aged ≥60 years? A case-matched study with 24 months of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11:1008–13.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbas M, Cumella L, Zhang Y, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients older than 60. Obes Surg. 2015;25:2251–6.CrossRefPubMed Abbas M, Cumella L, Zhang Y, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients older than 60. Obes Surg. 2015;25:2251–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert M, Pasquer A, Espalieu P, et al. Gastric bypass for obesity in the elderly: is it as appropriate as for young and middle-aged populations? Obes Surg. 2014;24:1662–9.CrossRefPubMed Robert M, Pasquer A, Espalieu P, et al. Gastric bypass for obesity in the elderly: is it as appropriate as for young and middle-aged populations? Obes Surg. 2014;24:1662–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon RC, Kreimer F, Teixeira AF, et al. Morbidity rates and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding in patients older than 60 years old: which procedure to choose? Surg: Obes; 2015. Moon RC, Kreimer F, Teixeira AF, et al. Morbidity rates and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding in patients older than 60 years old: which procedure to choose? Surg: Obes; 2015.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Spaniolas K, Trus TL, Adrales GL, et al. Early morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the elderly: a NSQIP analysis. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bariatr Surg. 2014;10:584–8.CrossRef Spaniolas K, Trus TL, Adrales GL, et al. Early morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the elderly: a NSQIP analysis. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bariatr Surg. 2014;10:584–8.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Peraglie C. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in patients age 60 and older. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:38–43.CrossRefPubMed Peraglie C. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in patients age 60 and older. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:38–43.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 1998;8:487–99.CrossRefPubMed Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 1998;8:487–99.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Navez J, Dardamanis D, Thissen J-P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: comparison of primary versus Revisional bypass by using the BAROS score. Obes Surg. 2015;25:812–7.CrossRefPubMed Navez J, Dardamanis D, Thissen J-P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: comparison of primary versus Revisional bypass by using the BAROS score. Obes Surg. 2015;25:812–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jr IR, Coelho TH, Ravelli MN, et al. A comparative, prospective and randomized evaluation of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with and without the silastic ring: a 2-year follow up preliminary report on weight loss and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2015;1–7 Jr IR, Coelho TH, Ravelli MN, et al. A comparative, prospective and randomized evaluation of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with and without the silastic ring: a 2-year follow up preliminary report on weight loss and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2015;1–7
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor CJ, Layani L. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients ≥60 years old: is it worthwhile? Obes Surg. 2006;16:1579–83.CrossRefPubMed Taylor CJ, Layani L. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients ≥60 years old: is it worthwhile? Obes Surg. 2006;16:1579–83.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fatima J, Houghton SG, Iqbal CW, et al. Bariatric surgery at the extremes of age. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1392–6.CrossRefPubMed Fatima J, Houghton SG, Iqbal CW, et al. Bariatric surgery at the extremes of age. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1392–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Quebbemann B, Engstrom D, Siegfried T, et al. Bariatric surgery in patients older than 65 years is safe and effective. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bariatr. Surg. 2005;1:389–92. discussion 392–3CrossRef Quebbemann B, Engstrom D, Siegfried T, et al. Bariatric surgery in patients older than 65 years is safe and effective. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bariatr. Surg. 2005;1:389–92. discussion 392–3CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schweiger C, Weiss R, Berry E, et al. Nutritional deficiencies in bariatric surgery candidates. Obes Surg. 2009;20:193–7.CrossRefPubMed Schweiger C, Weiss R, Berry E, et al. Nutritional deficiencies in bariatric surgery candidates. Obes Surg. 2009;20:193–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Thibault R, Huber O, Azagury DE, et al. Twelve key nutritional issues in bariatric surgery. Clin Nutr. 2016;35:12–7.CrossRefPubMed Thibault R, Huber O, Azagury DE, et al. Twelve key nutritional issues in bariatric surgery. Clin Nutr. 2016;35:12–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery in Older Obese Patients: a Matched Case-Control Study
verfasst von
Damien Bergeat
David Lechaux
Adil Ghaina
Ronan Thibault
Vianney Bouygues
Publikationsdatum
29.12.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2517-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Obesity Surgery 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.