Zum Inhalt

Potential use of microRNA-590 biomarkers verses plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide for diagnosis of migraine

  • Open Access
  • 01.12.2024
  • Research
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Background

Many biomarkers have been investigated for migraine diagnosis, giving insights into the pathophysiology of migraine, treatment response, and for the development of new treatment strategies. Over the years, many substances, for example, neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, glio transmitters, and hormones, have been suggested as possible biomarkers for migraine. The literature demonstrates that miRNAs may play a role in migraine. The aim of this study was to compare serum mi RNA and calcitonin gene-related peptide in Migraineurs. 43 Migraineurs and 43 age and sex-matched controls were included in the study serum miRNA 590 of Migraineurs and controls were assessed by high content serum miRNA arrays. miRNA was compared to serum calcitonin gene-related peptide in both groups. Expression of miRNA-590 in serum is detected by real time PCR (q-PCR) Measurement of serum CGRP by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) technique.

Results

43 patients (86% females) mean age was 35.56 ± 9.45 and 43 controls (93% females) mean age was37.26 ± 9.15 which were age and sex matched with no statistically significant difference regarding age and sex (fisher extract) FE p = 0.483, p = 0.400, respectively. Regarding the level of miR-590-5p among patients and controls, Table 1 shows that miR-590-5p was significantly higher among cases (mean = 5.90 ± 21.22) than among controls mean = 3.32 ± 5.73 and *p = 0.027 reading the level of CGRP among patients and controls Table 2 shows that CGRP was significantly higher among cases (mean = 172 ± 110) than among controls mean = 66.43 ± 8.89 and *p ≤ 0.001. Regarding the relation between migraine type with miR-590-5p and CGRP among cases miR-590-5p had a higher mean among cases with episodic migraine mean = 11.58 ± 32.40 in comparison with chronic migraine mean = 1.81 ± 1.68 and this was statistically significant *p = 0.013.
Table 1
Comparison between the two studied groups according to miR-590-5p and CGRP
 
Cases
(n = 43)
Control
(n = 43)
U
P
miR-590-5p
       
 Mean ± SD
5.90 ± 21.22
3.32 ± 5.73
669.0*
0.027*
 Median (Min.–Max.)
1.56 (0.25–140)
0.58 (0.06–22.32)
CGRP
       
 Mean ± SD
172 ± 110
66.43 ± 8.89
0.0*
 < 0.001*
 Median (Min.–Max.)
148 (99.5–813)
63.0 (54.1–82.4)
SD: Standard deviation; U: Mann Whitney test; p: p value for comparing between the two studied groups
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Table 2
Distribution of the studied cases according to different parameters in cases group (n = 43)
 
n. (%)
Migraine type
 
 Chronic
25 (58.1%)
 Episodic
18 (41.9%)
Chronic illness
13 (30.2%)
 Type of illness (n = 13)
 
  Diabetes
2 (15.4%)
  Hypertension
3 (23.1%)
  Cholesterol
2 (15.4%)
  Thyroid
3 (23.1%)
  Polyarthralgia
1 (7.7%)
  Osteo Malacia
1 (7.7%)
  Facial palsy
1 (7.7%)
Drugs
 
 Abortive
29 (67.4%)
 Prophylactic
26 (60.5%)
 Topiramate
21 (48.8%)
 Tryptizol
10 (23.3%)
 Ketolac
8 (18.6%)
 Oral contraceptives
4 (9.3%)
 Triptan
18 (41.9%)
 Inderal
3 (7%)
 Compliance
20 (46.5%)
 Status migrainosis
11 (25.6%)
Duration of migraine (years)
 
 Mean ± SD
8.81 ± 7.81
 Median (Min.–Max.)
6 (1–30)
Number of headache /months
 
 Mean ± SD
15.86 ± 10.54
 Median (Min.–Max.)
15 (1–30)
Severity of migraine
 
 Mean ± SD
8.26 ± 1.33
 Median (Min.–Max.)
8 (5–10)

Conclusions

MicroRNA-590 can be used as a biomarker of migraine and has a comparable result to CGRP.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
RNA
Ribonucleic acid
ICHD-3
3rd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders
ELISA
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
CGRP
Calcitonin gene-related peptide
TNC
Trigeminal nucleus caudalis

Background

Migraine has been included among the top ten cause of disability [1].
The diagnosis of migraine is based upon the classification of headaches by the International Headache Society (3rd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders [ICHD-3]) [2] .
Many biomarkers have been investigated for migraine diagnosis, giving insights into the pathophysiology of migraine, treatment response, and for the development of new treatment strategies. Over the years, many substances, for example, neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, glio transmitters, and hormones, have been suggested as possible biomarkers for migraine [3].
The literature demonstrates that miRNAs play a role in migraine [4].
RNA molecules that do not code for proteins control the expression of genes. MiRNAs are a large class of non-coding RNA molecules that have been the subject of much research in recent years. Through their formation of RNA-induced silencing complexes, miRNAs contribute significantly to post-transcriptional gene control by lowering the levels of mRNA. miRNAs seem to have a role in pain signaling as well: patients with fibromyalgia and complicated regional pain syndrome have all been shown to have dysregulated miRNAs [5].
The plasma CGRP level can differentiate migraine from non-migraine headache. It may also serve as a reference for the therapeutic strategy [6].
CGRP levels are valuable peripheral indicators of migraine because they are linked to the expression of several miRNAs in plasma. It is possible that CGRP plays an epigenetically controlled basic function in the transmission of inflammatory pain [7].
Several clinical pharmacological studies also support the notion that CGRP plays a causative role in migraine. First, intravenous infusion of CGRP produces a migraine-like headache in volunteers [8]. Second, a CGRP receptor antagonist, olcegepant (BIBN4096BS), is effective in treating acute migraine attacks [9] and anti-CGRP or anti-CGRP receptor monoclonal antibodies are approved for migraine prevention [10, 11].
MiR-590-5p, a density-sensitive microRNA, has been shown to prevent tumorigenesis in colorectal cancer [12]; in addition, miR-590-5p has the power to inhibit the inflammatory molecular transmission cascades [13, 14].
Furthermore, alterations in miRNA expression patterns may control neuroinflammation, nerve regeneration, and aberrant ion channel expression, contributing to the etiology of both inflammatory and also neuropathic pain [15] The aim of this study is to compare serum mi RNA and calcitonin gene-related peptide in Migraineurs.

Methods

43 Migraineurs and 43 age and sex-matched controls were included in the study serum miRNA 590 of Migraineurs and controls was assessed by high content serum miRNA arrays. miRNA was compared to serum calcitonin gene-related peptide in both groups.
The diagnosis of migraine is based upon the classification of headaches by the International Headache Society (3rd edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3).
Any history of any tumor was an exclusion criteria.
Expression of miRNA-590 in serum is detected by real time PCR (q-PCR).
Measurement of serum CGRP by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) technique.
Ethical approval was obtained from the University ethical committee (EC) which operates according to the International Conference of Harmonization Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) and applicable local and institutional regulations and guidelines [16].
A written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to recruitment to the study.

Results

Regarding the sociodemographic data, Table 3 shows that we studied 43 patients (86% females) mean age was 35.56 ± 9.45 and 43 controls (93% females) mean age was37.26 ± 9.15 which were age and sex matched with no statistically significant difference regarding age and sex(fisher extract) FEp = 0.483, p = 0.400, respectively.
Table 3
Comparison between the two studied groups according to different parameter
 
Cases
(n = 43)
Control
(n = 43)
P
Gender
   
 Male
6 (14%)
3 (7%)
FEp = 
0.483
 Female
37 (86%)
40 (93%)
Age (years)
   
 Mean ± SD
35.56 ± 9.45
37.26 ± 9.15
0.400
 Median (Min.–Max.)
37 (16–61)
40 (18–51)
Residence
   
 Alexandria
39 (90.7%)
39 (90.7%)
FEp = 
1.000
 Rural
4 (9.3%)
4 (9.3%)
Marital status
   
 Single
6 (14%)
6 (14%)
MCp = 
1.000
 Married
36 (83.7%)
37 (86%)
 Divorced
1 (23%)
0 (0%)
Education
   
 High school
10 (23.3%)
6 (14%)
0.598
 Collage
21 (48.8%)
21 (48.8%)
 Can read
8 (18.6%)
9 (20.9%)
 Illiterate
4 (9.3%)
7 (16.3%)
Employment
18 (41.9%)
21 (48.8%)
0.516
Smoking
6 (14%)
12 (27.9%)
0.122
Weight (kg)
   
 Mean ± SD
81.36 ± 15.05
83.35 ± 11.88
0.498
 Median (Min.–Max.)
80 (58–125)
84 (65–100)
Height (cm2)
   
 Mean ± SD
166 ± 6.56
164 ± 8.63
0.510
 Median (Min.–Max.)
166 (146–183)
165 (146–183)
SD: Standard deviation; t: Student t-test; U: Mann Whitney test; χ2: Chi square test; MC: Monte Carlo; FE: Fisher Exact; p: p value for comparing between the two studied groups
There was no statistically significant difference regarding weight and height, mean weight among cases was 81.36 ± 15.05 kg, while among controls was 83.35 ± 11.88 kg. mean height among cases was 166 ± 6.56 cm, while among controls was 164 ± 8.63 cm, P = 0.498, p = 0.510, respectively.
Regarding the clinical characteristics of the patients, 58.1% of cases were classified as chronic migraine, while 41.9% were episodic.
30.2% of patients suffered from chronic illnesses.
67.4% of patients were treated with abortive medication, while 60.5% were on prophylactic medication.
Mean duration of migraine was 8.81 ± 7.81 years, while the severity of migraine using visual analogue score was 8.26 ± 1.33.
Regarding the level of miR-590-5p among patients and controls, Table 1 shows that miR-590-5p was significantly higher among cases (mean = 5.90 ± 21.22) than among controls mean = 3.32 ± 5.73 and *p = 0.027.
Regarding the level of CGRP among patients and controls, Table 2 shows that CGRP was significantly higher among cases (mean = 172 ± 110) than among controls mean = 66.43 ± 8.89 and *p ≤ 0.001
Regarding the relation between migraine type with miR-590-5p and CGRP among cases miR-590-5p had a higher mean among cases with episodic migraine mean = 11.58 ± 32.40 in comparison with chronic migraine mean = 1.81 ± 1.68 and this was statistically significant, *p = 0.013.
In addition, CGRP was higher among episodic migraine mean = 192 ± 157 than chronic migraine mean = 158 ± 56.42, yet this was not statistically significant p = 0.15 (see Table 4).
Table 4
Relation between migraine type with miR-590-5p and CGRP in cases group (n = 43)
 
Migraine type
U
P
Chronic
(n = 25)
Episodic
(n = 18)
miR-590-5p
    
 Mean ± SD
1.81 ± 1.68
11.58 ± 32.40
124.5*
0.013*
 Median (Min.–Max.)
0.87 (0.25–6.0)
2.69 (0.50–140)
CGRP
    
 Mean ± SD
158 ± 56.42
192 ± 157
167.5
0.157
 Median (Min.–Max.)
142 (124–418)
160 (99.5–813)
SD: Standard deviation; U: Mann Whitney test; p: p value for comparing between Chronic and Episodic
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Regarding the Correlation between miR-590-5p, CGRP and different parameters, Table 5 shows that as the number of attacks of headache increases, both miR-590-5p (*p ≤ 0.001) and CGRP increase (*p = 0.042), and this was statistically significant.
Table 5
C or relation between miR-590-5p, CGRP and different parameters in cases group (n = 43)
 
miR-590-5p
CGRP
rs
P
rs
p
Duration of migraine (years)
− 0.154
0.324
− 0.076
0.626
Number of headache/months
0.534
 < 0.001*
0.311
0.042*
Severity of migraine
0.046
0.772
− 0.158
0.310
rs: Spearman coefficient; *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05

Discussion

In the current study, we aimed to identify new factors that can aid in diagnosis and might be targets for treatment in migraine. We aimed to identify the relation between migraine and CGRP and micro-RNA590, if it had a potential relation to acute and chronic migraine.
The current study showed that micro-RNA 590 had a positive correlation with migraine headache and correlated positively with number of headache attacks.
Long acknowledged for their worth and significance, viable biomarkers for migraine have been proposed in a variety of forms, including biological samples, electrophysiological patterns, and brain imaging.
The ability to objectively test migraine biomarkers can help with diagnosis, deepen our understanding of its pathophysiology, and increase the effectiveness of therapy.
However, to the best of our knowledge, scarce studies in literature studied micro-RNA in relation to migraine headache.
A short-chain noncoding RNA molecule called microRNA (miRNA) is (about 22 nucleotides in length). It controls the translation of the target gene's protein from a specific mRNA by inhibiting complete base pairing [17].
Gallelli and colleagues [4] in 2017 mentioned that miR-590-5p was found to be altered in migraine patients. This micro-RNA, in mice, is modulated by celecoxib, while in human is dysregulated in the complex regional pain syndrome, condition where migraine assumes a risk factor for its development.
For a clinical perspective, miR-590-5p can have an interesting double meaning. It can be used as a biomarker for all types of pain, including migraines, as well to gauge how well a pharmacological treatment is working. In the juvenile group, where disease diagnosis and monitoring might be difficult, this may be relevant [18].
In 2015 a study by Reham and colleagues, in a mouse model, showed that miR-590-5p,represents miRNAs that were drastically upregulated only in the mice treated with celecoxib alone [19].
This is contrary to our results which show that micro RNA 590 correlated positively with severity and frequency of headache.
In a recent study by Wen Q and colleagues in 2021, this study was performed on mice and found upregulated miR-155-5p in the TNC (trigeminal nucleus caudalis) participates in the central sensitization of chronic migraine [20].
Small sample size was a limitation to our study, also we were not to specify if micro-RNA was upregulated due to migraine or due to pain medication, so further studies are needed to compare drug naïve and patients under treatment.

Conclusion

MicroRNA-590 can be used as a biomarker of migraine and has a comparable result to CGRP.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee (EC) of Faculty of Medicine which is constituted and operates according to the International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice ICH GCP guidelines (Food and Drug Administration guideline) and applicable local and institutional regulations and guidelines which govern EC operation. IRB NO 0304988.
A written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to recruitment to the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
Potential use of microRNA-590 biomarkers verses plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide for diagnosis of migraine
Verfasst von
Hany Mohamed El Deeb
Rasha Said Amr
Dina Elsayed Gaber
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00815-x
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Vos T, Jensen R, Katsarava Z. Migraine is first cause of disability in under 50s: will health politicians now take notice? J Headache Pain. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0846-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold M. Headache classification committee of the international headache society (ihs) the international classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211.MathSciNetCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Durham P, Papapetropoulos S. Biomarkers associated with migraine and their potential role in migraine management. Headache. 2013;53(8):1262–77.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallelli L, Cione E, Caroleo MC, Carotenuto M, Lagana P, Siniscalchi A, et al. microRNAs to monitor pain-migraine and drug treatment. MicroRna. 2017;6(3):152–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cámara M, Bujanda MM, Iriarte MM. Epigenetic changes in headache. Neurología (English Edition). 2021;36(5):369–76.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan P-C, Kuo P-H, Lee MT, Chang S-H, Chiou L-C. Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide: a potential biomarker for diagnosis and therapeutic responses in pediatric migraine. Front neurol. 2019;10:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fila M, Sobczuk A, Pawlowska E, Blasiak J. Epigenetic connection of the calcitonin gene-related peptide and its potential in migraine. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(11):6151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassen L, Haderslev P, Jacobsen V, Iversen HK, Sperling B, Olesen J. CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2002;22(1):54–61.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Olesen J, Diener H-C, Husstedt IW, Goadsby PJ, Hall D, Meier U, et al. Calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(11):1104–10.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, Krause DN. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies—successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(6):338–50.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Walter S, Bigal ME. TEV-48125: a review of a monoclonal CGRP antibody in development for the preventive treatment of migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2015;19(3):6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ou C, Sun Z, Li X, Li X, Ren W, Qin Z, et al. MiR-590-5p, a density-sensitive microRNA, inhibits tumorigenesis by targeting YAP1 in colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2017;399:53–63.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheikholeslami A, Nabiuni M, Arefian E. Suppressing the molecular signaling pathways involved in inflammation and cancer in breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 by miR-590. Tumor Biol. 2017;39(4):1010428317697570.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao S, Yang G, Liu P-N, Deng Y-Y, Zhao Z, Sun T, et al. miR-590-3p is a novel microRNA in myocarditis by targeting nuclear factor kappa-B in vivo. Cardiology. 2015;132(3):182–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao Y-Y, Wu Z-J, Zhu L-J, Niu T-X, Liu B, Li J. Emerging roles of miRNAs in neuropathic pain: from new findings to novel mechanisms. Front Mol Neurosci. 2023;16:1110975.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat GCP I. ICH GCP (good clinical practice) training course. 2011.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–97.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gazerani P. Current evidence on potential uses of MicroRNA biomarkers for migraine: from diagnosis to treatment. Mol Diagn Ther. 2019;23(6):681–94.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Qureshi RA, Tian Y, McDonald MK, Capasso KE, Douglas SR, Gao R, et al. Circulating microRNA signatures in rodent models of pain. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(5):3416–27.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wen Q, Wang Y, Pan Q, Tian R, Zhang D, Qin G, et al. MicroRNA-155-5p promotes neuroinflammation and central sensitization via inhibiting SIRT1 in a nitroglycerin-induced chronic migraine mouse model. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18(1):1–25.CrossRef

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Neurologie (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

KI-Chatbots bieten 24/7-Sprechstunde für Patienten

Medizinischen Rat von Chatbots auf der Basis sogenannter künstlicher Intelligenz haben laut Umfragen bereits knapp die Hälfte aller Erwachsenen schon einmal eingeholt. Welche Chancen und Risiken birgt das?

Schützt Optimismus vor Demenz?

  • 14.04.2026
  • Demenz
  • Nachrichten

Wer insgesamt zuversichtlicher aufs Leben blickt, trägt ein geringeres Risiko, später einmal an Demenz zu erkranken als pessimistischere Zeitgenossen. Dafür sprechen zumindest Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittdatenanalyse aus den USA. Ob mehr Optimismus allerdings tatsächlich einer Demenz vorbeugt, bleibt unklar.   

Verzögert eine hochdosierte Influenza-Vakzine eine Demenz?

  • 10.04.2026
  • Demenz
  • Nachrichten

Eine hochdosierte Influenza-Vakzine geht mit einer verzögerten Demenzdiagnose einher. Darauf deutet eine Auswertung von US-Gesundheitsdaten hin. Besonders auffällig sind die Effekte in den ersten Monaten nach der Impfung.

Intensive Drucksenkung zeigt U-förmigen Nutzen nach Hirnblutung

Intensive Senkung eines erhöhten Blutdrucks kann nach einer intrazerebralen Blutung die funktionelle Erholung verbessern – mutmaßlich über eine Reduktion der Hämatomausdehnung. Offenbar hängt das aber vom Ausgangsvolumen ab, wie eine Analyse ergeben hat.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Alter Mann entspannt sich im Grünen/© koldunova_anna / stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodell), Hirn-MRT zeigt bilaterale subdurale Blutung (blaue Pfeile)/© Salvatore Perrone et al doi.org/10.1007/s00277-023-05392-2 unter CC-BY 4.0