Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Breast Cancer Reports 2/2019

26.04.2019 | Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Practical Perspectives Regarding Patient Selection and Technical Considerations in Oncoplastic Surgery

verfasst von: Abhishek Chatterjee, Mengdi Yao, Yurie Sekigami, Yuanxin Liang, Salvatore Nardello

Erschienen in: Current Breast Cancer Reports | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Oncoplastic surgery is a form of breast conservation surgery that involves volume displacement and replacement techniques to reconstruct the breast after a partial mastectomy. We aimed to report our clinical experiences with support from the literature as to the optimal application of oncoplastic surgery with regard to patient and disease selection and presentation, and discuss common technical considerations.

Recent Findings

Based on clinical experience and recent literature, oncoplastic surgery has several oncologic and reconstructive strengths including a decreased positive margin rate, high patient satisfaction, and additional benefit when applied to patients with both breast cancer and symptomatic macromastia.

Summary

Oncoplastic surgery constitutes an additional breast conservation option that is safe, well tolerated, and can provide autologous reconstruction after a large oncologic resection in a one-staged surgical effort that adds value for the appropriate breast cancer patient.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(5):1375–91.CrossRef Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(5):1375–91.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(3):145–57.CrossRef Anderson BO, Masetti R, Silverstein MJ. Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniques. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(3):145–57.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu J, Rainsbury RM, Segaran A, Predescu O, Roy PG. Objective assessment of clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes following volume replacement in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e020859.CrossRef Hu J, Rainsbury RM, Segaran A, Predescu O, Roy PG. Objective assessment of clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes following volume replacement in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e020859.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Losken A, Hart AM, Chatterjee A. Updated evidence on the oncoplastic approach to breast conservation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):14S–22S.CrossRef Losken A, Hart AM, Chatterjee A. Updated evidence on the oncoplastic approach to breast conservation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):14S–22S.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rainsbury RM. Surgery insight: oncoplastic breast-conserving reconstruction—indications, benefits, choices and outcomes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2007;4(11):657–64.CrossRef Rainsbury RM. Surgery insight: oncoplastic breast-conserving reconstruction—indications, benefits, choices and outcomes. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2007;4(11):657–64.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee A, Gass J, Burke MB, Kopkash K, El-Tamer MB, Holmes DR, et al. Results from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Oncoplastic Surgery Committee 2017 survey: current practice and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2790–4.CrossRef Chatterjee A, Gass J, Burke MB, Kopkash K, El-Tamer MB, Holmes DR, et al. Results from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Oncoplastic Surgery Committee 2017 survey: current practice and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2790–4.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonczyk MM, Jean J, Graham R, Chatterjee A. Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12 year analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;1–8. Jonczyk MM, Jean J, Graham R, Chatterjee A. Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12 year analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;1–8.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Cruz MLDL, Blankenship MSA, MPH, MS, Chatterjee MA, Geha MR, et al. Outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a systematic literature review. 0(0):1–12. This review confirmed the oncologic safety of oncoplastic surgery in patients with T1-T2 disease by revealing high rates of overall survival and disease-free survival with low local recurrence, distant recurrence, positive margin rate, re-excision rate, conversion to mastectomy rate and complication rates. •• Cruz MLDL, Blankenship MSA, MPH, MS, Chatterjee MA, Geha MR, et al. Outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a systematic literature review. 0(0):1–12. This review confirmed the oncologic safety of oncoplastic surgery in patients with T1-T2 disease by revealing high rates of overall survival and disease-free survival with low local recurrence, distant recurrence, positive margin rate, re-excision rate, conversion to mastectomy rate and complication rates.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat • Kelsall JE, McCulley SJ, Brock L, Akerlund MTE, Macmillan RD. Comparing oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: case-matched patient reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. This paper compared outcomes between women undergoing oncoplastic breast conserving surgery and those undergoing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with regards to body image scale scores of psychosocial function and patient reported outcome measures for breast appearance and return to function. Better psychosocial and self-rated satisfaction with breast appearance was achieved for oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. • Kelsall JE, McCulley SJ, Brock L, Akerlund MTE, Macmillan RD. Comparing oncoplastic breast conserving surgery with mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: case-matched patient reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. This paper compared outcomes between women undergoing oncoplastic breast conserving surgery and those undergoing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with regards to body image scale scores of psychosocial function and patient reported outcome measures for breast appearance and return to function. Better psychosocial and self-rated satisfaction with breast appearance was achieved for oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee A. Long term effects of modern breast cancer surgery. Gland Surg. 2017. Chatterjee A. Long term effects of modern breast cancer surgery. Gland Surg. 2017.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnea Y, Friedman O, Arad E, Barsuk D, Menes T, Zaretski A, et al. An oncoplastic breast augmentation technique for immediate partial breast reconstruction following breast conservation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):348e–57e.CrossRef Barnea Y, Friedman O, Arad E, Barsuk D, Menes T, Zaretski A, et al. An oncoplastic breast augmentation technique for immediate partial breast reconstruction following breast conservation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):348e–57e.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Almasad JK, Salah B. Breast reconstruction by local flaps after conserving surgery for breast cancer: an added asset to oncoplastic techniques. Breast J. 2008;14(4):340–4.CrossRef Almasad JK, Salah B. Breast reconstruction by local flaps after conserving surgery for breast cancer: an added asset to oncoplastic techniques. Breast J. 2008;14(4):340–4.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(6):503–10.CrossRef Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(6):503–10.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber WP, Soysal SD, El-Tamer M, Sacchini V, Knauer M, Tausch C, et al. First international consensus conference on standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165(1):139–49.CrossRef Weber WP, Soysal SD, El-Tamer M, Sacchini V, Knauer M, Tausch C, et al. First international consensus conference on standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165(1):139–49.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat • Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(2):145–9. This paper compared literature outcomes between BCT alone and BCT with the oncoplastic approach and found lower positive margin rate, reexcision rate, and local recurrence rate in the oncoplastic group. Satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome was also significantly higher in the oncoplastic group. CrossRef • Losken A, Dugal CS, Styblo TM, Carlson GW. A meta-analysis comparing breast conservation therapy alone to the oncoplastic technique. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(2):145–9. This paper compared literature outcomes between BCT alone and BCT with the oncoplastic approach and found lower positive margin rate, reexcision rate, and local recurrence rate in the oncoplastic group. Satisfaction with the aesthetic outcome was also significantly higher in the oncoplastic group. CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel KM, Hannan CM, Gatti ME, Nahabedian MY. A head-to-head comparison of quality of life and aesthetic outcomes following immediate, staged-immediate, and delayed oncoplastic reduction mammaplasty [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2167–75.CrossRef Patel KM, Hannan CM, Gatti ME, Nahabedian MY. A head-to-head comparison of quality of life and aesthetic outcomes following immediate, staged-immediate, and delayed oncoplastic reduction mammaplasty [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2167–75.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Roughton MC, Shenaq D, Jaskowiak N, Park JE, Song DH. Optimizing delivery of breast conservation therapy: a multidisciplinary approach to oncoplastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69(3):250–5.CrossRef Roughton MC, Shenaq D, Jaskowiak N, Park JE, Song DH. Optimizing delivery of breast conservation therapy: a multidisciplinary approach to oncoplastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69(3):250–5.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rezai M, Knispel S, Kellersmann S, Lax H, Kimmig R, Kern P. Systematization of oncoplastic surgery: selection of surgical techniques and patient-reported outcome in a cohort of 1,035 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(11):3730–7.CrossRef Rezai M, Knispel S, Kellersmann S, Lax H, Kimmig R, Kern P. Systematization of oncoplastic surgery: selection of surgical techniques and patient-reported outcome in a cohort of 1,035 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(11):3730–7.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang HT, Barone CM, Steigelman MB, Kahlenberg M, Rousseau D, Berger J, et al. Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28(2):165–70.CrossRef Wang HT, Barone CM, Steigelman MB, Kahlenberg M, Rousseau D, Berger J, et al. Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28(2):165–70.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor AJ, Tate D, Brandberg Y, Blomqvist L. Cost-effectiveness of reduction mammaplasty. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(3):269–73.CrossRef Taylor AJ, Tate D, Brandberg Y, Blomqvist L. Cost-effectiveness of reduction mammaplasty. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(3):269–73.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tykkä E, Räsänen P, Tukiainen E, Asko-Seljavaara S, Heikkilä A, Sintonen H, et al. Cost-utility of breast reduction surgery-a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(1):87–92.CrossRef Tykkä E, Räsänen P, Tukiainen E, Asko-Seljavaara S, Heikkilä A, Sintonen H, et al. Cost-utility of breast reduction surgery-a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(1):87–92.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat De La Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A, Geha R, Nocera N, Czerniecki BJ, et al. Outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3247–58.CrossRef De La Cruz L, Blankenship SA, Chatterjee A, Geha R, Nocera N, Czerniecki BJ, et al. Outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients: a systematic literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3247–58.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chand ND, Browne V, Paramanathan N, Peiris LJ, Laws SA, Rainsbury RM. Patient-reported outcomes are better after oncoplastic breast conservation than after mastectomy and autologous reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(7):e1419.CrossRef Chand ND, Browne V, Paramanathan N, Peiris LJ, Laws SA, Rainsbury RM. Patient-reported outcomes are better after oncoplastic breast conservation than after mastectomy and autologous reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(7):e1419.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Asban A, Homsy C, Chen L, Fisher C, Losken A, Chatterjee A. A cost-utility analysis comparing large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery to mastectomy with single stage implant reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. Breast. 2018;41:159–64. This paper investigated the cost-utility of large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery versus mastectomy with single stage implant reconstruction and found large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery to be cost-effective compared to mastectomy with single staged implant reconstruction. CrossRef •• Asban A, Homsy C, Chen L, Fisher C, Losken A, Chatterjee A. A cost-utility analysis comparing large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery to mastectomy with single stage implant reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. Breast. 2018;41:159–64. This paper investigated the cost-utility of large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery versus mastectomy with single stage implant reconstruction and found large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery to be cost-effective compared to mastectomy with single staged implant reconstruction. CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee A, Offodile AC II, Asban A, Minasian RA, Losken A, Graham R, et al. A cost-utility analysis comparing oncoplastic breast surgery to standard lumpectomy in large breasted women. Adv Breast Cancer Res. 2018;07(02):14.CrossRef Chatterjee A, Offodile AC II, Asban A, Minasian RA, Losken A, Graham R, et al. A cost-utility analysis comparing oncoplastic breast surgery to standard lumpectomy in large breasted women. Adv Breast Cancer Res. 2018;07(02):14.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee A, Asban A, Chen L, Fisher C. Abstract 56. A cost-utility analysis comparing large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery to mastectomy with free flap reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(2 Suppl).CrossRef Chatterjee A, Asban A, Chen L, Fisher C. Abstract 56. A cost-utility analysis comparing large volume displacement oncoplastic surgery to mastectomy with free flap reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(2 Suppl).CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Practical Perspectives Regarding Patient Selection and Technical Considerations in Oncoplastic Surgery
verfasst von
Abhishek Chatterjee
Mengdi Yao
Yurie Sekigami
Yuanxin Liang
Salvatore Nardello
Publikationsdatum
26.04.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Breast Cancer Reports / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1943-4588
Elektronische ISSN: 1943-4596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-019-0305-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Current Breast Cancer Reports 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Breast Cancer Imaging and Screening (N Sharma, Section Editor)

Management of B3 Lesions—Practical Issues

Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Role of Liquid Biopsy in Clinical Decision-Making for Breast Cancer

Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (D Euhus, Section Editor)

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.