Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 9/2018

03.04.2018 | Original Contributions

Practices Concerning Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a Survey of 460 Surgeons

verfasst von: Kamal K. Mahawar, Abdelrahman Nimeri, Marco Adamo, Cynthia-Michelle Borg, Rishi Singhal, Omar Khan, Peter K. Small

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is currently little evidence available on various aspects of Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) and no published consensus amongst experts. The purpose of this study was to understand variation in practices concerning RBS.

Methods

Bariatric surgeons from around the world who perform RBS were invited to participate in a questionnaire-based survey on SurveyMonkey®.

Results

A total of 460 respondents from 62 countries took the survey. For revision after gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (75.5%, n = 345) emerged as the commonest choice followed by sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (56.9%, n = 260) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (37.2%, n = 170). For revision after SG, RYGB (77.7%, n = 355) was the commonest option followed by OAGB (42.45%, n = 194) and re-sleeve (22.32%, n = 102). For revision after RYGB, surgical pouch reduction (49.1%, n = 223), prolongation of bilio-pancreatic limb (30.0%, n = 136), and surgical stoma size reduction (26.43%, n = 120) were the most preferred options. Approximately 90.0% of respondents (n = 406/454) routinely perform an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before an RBS, and 85.6% (n = 388/453) routinely perform a contrast study. Ninety percent (n = 403/445) reported that the demand for RBS was usually patient-driven, and there was wide variation in criteria used to define successful response, non-responders, and significant weight regain.

Conclusions

This survey is the first attempt to understand various aspects of RBS. The findings will help in identifying areas for research and allow consensus building amongst experts.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long-term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155(3):385–94.PubMed Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long-term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;155(3):385–94.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kowalewski PK, Olszewski R, Walędziak MS, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy-a single-center, retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):130–4.CrossRef Kowalewski PK, Olszewski R, Walędziak MS, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy-a single-center, retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):130–4.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hawkins RB, Mehaffey JH, McMurry TL, et al. Clinical significance of failure to lose weight 10 years after roux-en-y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(10):1710–6.CrossRef Hawkins RB, Mehaffey JH, McMurry TL, et al. Clinical significance of failure to lose weight 10 years after roux-en-y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(10):1710–6.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Comparison of weight loss and body composition changes with four surgical procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(5):582–7.CrossRef Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Comparison of weight loss and body composition changes with four surgical procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(5):582–7.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Magkos F, Fraterrigo G, Yoshino J, et al. Effects of moderate and subsequent progressive weight loss on metabolic function and adipose tissue biology in humans with obesity. Cell Metab. 2016;23(4):591–601.CrossRef Magkos F, Fraterrigo G, Yoshino J, et al. Effects of moderate and subsequent progressive weight loss on metabolic function and adipose tissue biology in humans with obesity. Cell Metab. 2016;23(4):591–601.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chowbey PK, Soni V, Kantharia NS, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: outcomes of a case-matched comparison of primary versus revisional surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):52–7.CrossRef Chowbey PK, Soni V, Kantharia NS, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: outcomes of a case-matched comparison of primary versus revisional surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):52–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahawar KK, Graham Y, Carr WR, et al. Revisional roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review of comparative outcomes with respective primary procedures. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1271–80.CrossRef Mahawar KK, Graham Y, Carr WR, et al. Revisional roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review of comparative outcomes with respective primary procedures. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1271–80.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.CrossRef Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Welbourn R, Small P, Finlay, I, Sarela A, Somers S, Mahawar K. Second National Bariatric Surgery Report. http://www.bomss.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Extract_from_the_NBSR_2014_Report.pdf Last Accessed on 22nd August’ 2015 Welbourn R, Small P, Finlay, I, Sarela A, Somers S, Mahawar K. Second National Bariatric Surgery Report. http://​www.​bomss.​org.​uk/​wp-content/​uploads/​2014/​04/​Extract_​from_​the_​NBSR_​2014_​Report.​pdf Last Accessed on 22nd August’ 2015
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):740–5.CrossRef Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, et al. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):740–5.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):240–5.CrossRef Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):240–5.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dang JT, Switzer NJ, Wu J, et al. Gastric band removal in revisional bariatric surgery, one-step versus two-step: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):866–73.CrossRef Dang JT, Switzer NJ, Wu J, et al. Gastric band removal in revisional bariatric surgery, one-step versus two-step: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):866–73.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheung D, Switzer NJ, Gill RS, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery following failed primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1757–63.CrossRef Cheung D, Switzer NJ, Gill RS, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery following failed primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1757–63.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran DD, Nwokeabia ID, Purnell S, et al. Revision of roux-en-y gastric bypass for weight regain: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Obes Surg. 2016l;26(7):1627–34.CrossRef Tran DD, Nwokeabia ID, Purnell S, et al. Revision of roux-en-y gastric bypass for weight regain: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Obes Surg. 2016l;26(7):1627–34.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuzminov A, Palmer AJ, Wilkinson S, et al. Re-operations after secondary bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2237–47.CrossRef Kuzminov A, Palmer AJ, Wilkinson S, et al. Re-operations after secondary bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2237–47.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Coulman KD, Howes N, Hopkins J, et al. A comparison of health professionals’ and patients’ views of the importance of outcomes of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2738–46.CrossRef Coulman KD, Howes N, Hopkins J, et al. A comparison of health professionals’ and patients’ views of the importance of outcomes of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2738–46.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopkins JC, Howes N, Chalmers K, et al. Outcome reporting in bariatric surgery: an in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set, the BARIACT Study. Obes Rev. 2015;16(1):88–106.CrossRef Hopkins JC, Howes N, Chalmers K, et al. Outcome reporting in bariatric surgery: an in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set, the BARIACT Study. Obes Rev. 2015;16(1):88–106.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.CrossRef Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD. Weight gain after short- and long-limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):734–40.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Practices Concerning Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a Survey of 460 Surgeons
verfasst von
Kamal K. Mahawar
Abdelrahman Nimeri
Marco Adamo
Cynthia-Michelle Borg
Rishi Singhal
Omar Khan
Peter K. Small
Publikationsdatum
03.04.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3226-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Obesity Surgery 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to Editor/LED Reply

Letter to the Editor: MGB and OAGB

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.