Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2019

Open Access 27.11.2018 | Original Article

Pre-to-post diagnosis weight trajectories in colorectal cancer patients with non-metastatic disease

verfasst von: Moniek van Zutphen, Anouk Geelen, Hendriek C. Boshuizen, Renate M. Winkels, Anne J.M.R. Geijsen, Evertine Wesselink, Merel Snellen, Dieuwertje E. Kok, Johannes H.W. de Wilt, Paul C. van de Meeberg, Ewout A. Kouwenhoven, Henk K. van Halteren, Ernst J. Spillenaar Bilgen, Ellen Kampman, Fränzel J.B. van Duijnhoven

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 4/2019

Abstract

Purpose

Previous studies have shown that > 50% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy gain weight after diagnosis. This may affect long-term health. Therefore, prevention of weight gain has been incorporated in oncological guidelines for CRC with a focus on patients that undergo adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. It is, however, unknown how changes in weight after diagnosis relate to weight before diagnosis and whether weight changes from pre-to-post diagnosis are restricted to chemotherapy treatment. We therefore examined pre-to-post diagnosis weight trajectories and compared them between those treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

We included 1184 patients diagnosed with stages I–III CRC between 2010 and 2015 from an ongoing observational prospective study. At diagnosis, patients reported current weight and usual weight 2 years before diagnosis. In the 2 years following diagnosis, weight was self-reported repeatedly. We used linear mixed models to analyse weight trajectories.

Results

Mean pre-to-post diagnosis weight change was −0.8 (95% CI −1.1, −0.4) kg. Post-diagnosis weight gain was + 3.5 (95% CI 2.7, 4.3) kg in patients who had lost ≥ 5% weight before diagnosis, while on average clinically relevant weight gain after diagnosis was absent in the groups without pre-diagnosis weight loss. Pre-to-post diagnosis weight change was similar in patients treated with (−0.1 kg (95%CI −0.8, 0.6)) and without adjuvant chemotherapy (−0.9 kg (95%CI −1.4, −0.5)).

Conclusions

Overall, hardly any pre-to-post diagnosis weight change was observed among CRC patients, because post-diagnosis weight gain was mainly observed in patients who lost weight before diagnosis. This was observed independent of treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Introduction

Survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) has markedly improved over recent decades, which underlines the importance to study factors that can affect long-term health and quality of life of CRC survivors. One of the factors that may affect health and quality of life is body weight. Weight loss, either before diagnosis or during cancer treatment, is an important negative prognostic marker [14]. Therefore, in the hospital nutritional advice to cancer patients is mainly focused on prevention and/or treatment of unintentional weight loss. However, overweight and obesity are also affecting long-term health and quality of life among patients with non-metastatic disease. Therefore, prevention of weight gain after CRC diagnosis has recently been incorporated in the Dutch oncological nutritional therapy guidelines [5].
Many CRC patients are overweight or obese at diagnosis, as excess body weight is a risk factor for CRC [6]. Overweight/obese CRC survivors have an elevated risk of co-morbid disease, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, both at diagnosis and in the years following a diagnosis [79]. Weight gain after diagnosis might exacerbate existing co-morbid disease progression and further increase the risk of developing such diseases. Several studies reported that weight gain after diagnosis is common among CRC patients [13, 10, 11]. All these studies showed that weight gain after diagnosis was more common than weight loss after diagnosis [13, 10, 11]. The proportion of weight gain after diagnosis typically ranged from 25% to over 50% of patients [13, 10, 11]. In these studies, weight gain was defined as either a weight gain of ≥ 5 kg [1, 10] or ≥ 5% [2, 3, 11].
Although body weight may increase after CRC diagnosis, studies so far did not assess how body weight changed relative to usual body weight before diagnosis. Weight loss before CRC diagnosis is common [4, 12] as unintended weight loss could be one of the reasons for patients to see a physician, leading to the diagnosis of CRC. Thus, it is possible that patients catch up for this pre-diagnostic weight loss in the period during and after treatment. It is currently unknown if post-diagnosis weight change is different for patients with pre-diagnosis weight change compared to patients who were weight stable before diagnosis. Post-diagnosis weight gain might be more problematic in terms of long-term health if it results in overall weight gain compared to usual weight than when it reflects catching up for pre-diagnostic weight loss.
Weight gain is a common side-effect of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients [13], but weight gain is also common among non-metastatic CRC patients during and after chemotherapy. Two studies that both included > 500 colon cancer patients with stage III disease treated with adjuvant chemotherapy reported that the majority (51–65%) of patients experienced weight gain [3, 10]. Weight gain is observed both during and after adjuvant chemotherapy [11]. Therefore, prevention of weight gain in oncological guidelines has a focus on patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy [5]. However, there is only indirect evidence that weight gain after diagnosis is more prevalent among patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy than among patients treated without adjuvant chemotherapy. Studies that included non-metastatic CRC patients irrespective of chemotherapy treatment reported lower proportions (28%) of weight gain [1, 2] than studies among CRC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (51–65%) [3, 10]. There are no studies that directly compared weight changes between patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy.
Weight trajectories should ideally include data on weight at multiple time points, both before and after diagnosis, to fully capture weight changes among CRC patients. This information is currently lacking and therefore it remains unclear whether post-diagnosis weight eventually surpasses usual pre-diagnosis weight. Our aim was to examine pre-to-post diagnosis weight trajectories in CRC patients with non-metastatic disease and to compare these weight trajectories among patients treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

Study population

We used data of the COLON study, an ongoing prospective multicentre cohort study among CRC patients in the Netherlands [14]. Eligible participants with newly diagnosed colon or rectal cancer were invited by hospital staff to participate in the study during a routine clinical visit before scheduled surgery. Data were collected shortly after diagnosis, before treatment started, and at two or three time points in the first 2 years after diagnosis (see “Assessment of body weight”). Follow-up data were available until January 2018. All study participants provided written informed consent and the study was approved by the local review board.
This study was performed among all participants diagnosed with stage I–III CRC between 2010 and 2015 who had a surgical resection (n = 1225). We excluded 70 participants who had information on weight available for < 2 time points. Thus, data of 1152 participants remained for analyses. Of these participants, 16 (1%) had missing self-reported weight before diagnosis and 217 (19%) did not complete 2 years of follow-up. We chose to exclude patients with stage IV disease a priori, because survival for these patients is generally poor and weight loss and cachexia are common at the end of life.

Assessment of body weight

At diagnosis, participants completed a survey with questions on body weight 2 years prior to diagnosis, and current weight. Participants repetitively answered surveys about their current body weight at 6 months, 1 year (only for the subsample treated with adjuvant chemotherapy), and 2 years after diagnosis.

Assessment of covariates

We obtained information on clinical factors, including disease stage, tumour site, receipt of neo-adjuvant treatment, type of surgery, stoma placement after surgery, complications within 30 days after surgery, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, type of chemotherapy, and presence of comorbidities from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit [15]. At diagnosis, all participants completed a questionnaire on demographic and lifestyle information, including education, smoking behaviour, and height. Body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis was computed in kg/m2.

Statistical analyses

We calculated pre-diagnosis, post-diagnosis, and pre-to-post diagnosis weight changes as weight at the end of the period minus weight at the start of the period, so negative differences indicate weight loss and positive differences indicate weight gain. Pre-diagnostic weight changes were grouped in three pre-defined categories: weight loss ≥ 5%, weight stable −5 to +5%, and weight gain ≥ 5%. Characteristics of the study population were compared across pre-diagnosis weight change groups and across adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Differences in categorical variables were assessed by using a chi-squared test, and differences in means of continuous variables were tested by using analysis of variance or a t-test.
We fitted linear mixed models to examine weight trajectories over 4 years (2 years pre-diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis). Linear mixed models take into account both the individual trajectories of change (random effects) and population averages (fixed effects) by using all available measurements and including participants with incomplete data [16]. Time was scaled in years (continuous) with the date of study enrolment (shortly after diagnosis) defined as time is zero. Time for each post-diagnosis weight was calculated as date of self-reported weight collection minus the date of study enrolment. Time for pre-diagnosis weight was set at −2 years for all subjects.
The final model included a random intercept, a random slope for time, and a random curvature for time (i.e. taking into account each participant’s weight at diagnosis and the linear and quadratic slope). Using a step-up model building strategy, the random curvature model had much better fit than a random intercept model and a random slope model.
As fixed factors, we included baseline demographic determinants (sex, age, height, education, and smoking) and clinical factors (stage, tumour site, neo-adjuvant treatment, stoma, type of surgery, complications after surgery, and comorbidities). Age and height were centred to aid the interpretability of intercepts. The clinical factors neo-adjuvant treatment, stoma, and surgical complications were coded as not present before and at diagnosis. All fixed effects were included in the model as an interaction term with time. Only significant covariates and/or interactions were retained. Including additional interactions with time*time for the remaining covariates did not improve the model. The final model used in all analyses included the following fixed factors: time, sex, age, height, education, smoking, complications, stoma, type of surgery, comorbidities, time*time, education*time, and complications*time. The coefficient for time represents average annual linear change and the coefficient for time*time captures additional quadratic (curvilinear) change in weight in kilogrammes.
Additionally, we performed several stratified weight trajectory analyses. First, we stratified by pre-diagnosis weight change category (≥ 5% loss, stable, ≥ 5% gain) to further explore if weight gain after diagnosis differed by pre-diagnosis weight change. Second, we stratified by receipt of chemotherapy to compare weight trajectories among those treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. Third, as an exploratory analysis, we stratified by BMI at diagnosis to compare weight trajectories among survivors with a healthy BMI (18.5–25 kg/m2) and those with overweight or obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2). Weight trajectories were depicted based on predicted values by using the average study population, except for type of surgery in which laparoscopic surgery served as reference category. Two sensitivity analyses were performed to reduce heterogeneity between patients in the analyses stratified by chemotherapy. First by excluding patients with other adjuvant chemotherapy regimens than capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin and second by excluding patients with rectal tumours from the analyses. In the Netherlands, rectal tumours are generally not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, which is in line with the Dutch oncological guidelines.
In all analyses, a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Characteristics of the study population according to pre-diagnosis weight change and adjuvant chemotherapy are shown in Table 1. Participants with ≥ 5% weight gain before diagnosis were on average slightly younger, more commonly female, obese at diagnosis (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), and presenting with one or more comorbidities compared to those with either stable weight or ≥ 5% weight loss before diagnosis. Participants with ≥ 5% weight loss before diagnosis had more often a tumour located in the colon compared to those with stable weight or weight gain. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were slightly younger and had unfavourable clinical characteristics compared to patients not treated with chemotherapy; other characteristics, such as BMI, were similar between the two groups.
Table 1
Clinical and personal characteristics of 1152 non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients according to pre-diagnosis weight change and adjuvant chemotherapy1
  
Weight change in the 2 years before diagnosis
 
Adjuvant chemotherapy
 
 
Overall2
Loss (≥ 5%)
Stable (−5% to 5%)
Gain (≥ 5%)
p value weight change group
No
Yes
p value chemo therapy
N (%)
1152 (100%)
279 (25%)
788 (69%)
69 (6%)
 
844 (75%)
282 (25%)
 
Sex
    
< 0.001
  
0.21
 Men
737 (64%)
179 (64%)
527 (67%)
19 (28%)
 
547 (65%)
171 (61%)
 
Age at diagnosis (mean ± SD), years
66 ± 9
66 ± 9
66 ± 8
63 ± 11
0.029
67 ± 9
63 ± 8
< 0.001
BMI at diagnosis (mean ± SD), kg/m2
26.5 ± 4.0
26.0 ± 4.0
26.5 ± 3.9
29.2 ± 4.1
< 0.001
26.5 ± 3.9
26.6 ± 4.3
0.66
BMI at diagnosis, kg/m2
    
< 0.001
  
0.64
 < 18.5
10 (1%)
3 (1%)
6 (1%)
0 (0%)
 
6 (1%)
4 (1%)
 
 18.5–25
447 (39%)
130 (47%)
301 (38%)
13 (19%)
 
331 (39%)
107 (38%)
 
 25–30
497 (43%)
110 (39%)
352 (45%)
27 (39%)
 
362 (43%)
122 (43%)
 
 30–35
161 (14%)
27 (10%)
107 (14%)
23 (33%)
 
120 (14%)
37 (13%)
 
> 35
37 (3%)
9 (3%)
22 (3%)
6 (9%)
 
25 (3%)
12 (4%)
 
Education level
    
0.061
  
0.37
 Low
505 (44%)
133 (48%)
330 (42%)
36 (52%)
 
383 (45%)
115 (41%)
 
 Medium
277 (24%)
58 (21%)
198 (25%)
20 (29%)
 
195 (23%)
72 (26%)
 
 High
365 (32%)
87 (31%)
260 (33%)
13 (19%)
 
262 (31%)
95 (34%)
 
Smoking at diagnosis
    
0.005
  
0.27
 Yes
133 (11%)
47 (17%)
73 (9%)
11 (16%)
 
102 (12%)
25 (9%)
 
 Former
682 (59%)
166 (60%)
468 (59%)
40 (58%)
 
498 (59%)
168 (59%)
 
 Never
334 (29%)
67 (24%)
247 (32%)
18 (26%)
 
240 (28%)
89 (32%)
 
Tumour stage
    
0.26
  
< 0.001
 I
299 (26%)
60 (22%)
218 (28%)
19 (28%)
 
297 (35%)
 
 II
350 (30%)
96 (34%)
229 (29%)
19 (28%)
 
311 (37%)
27 (10%)
 
 III
503 (44%)
123 (44%)
341 (43%)
31 (45%)
 
236 (28%)
255 (90%)
 
Tumour location
    
0.038
  
< 0.001
 Colon
778 (68%)
206 (74%)
517 (66%)
45 (65%)
 
499 (59%)
259 (92%)
 
 Rectum
374 (32%)
73 (26%)
271 (34%)
24 (35%)
 
345 (41%)
23 (8%)
 
Adjuvant chemotherapy
    
0.18
  
 Yes
282 (24%)
80 (29%)
184 (23%)
16 (23%)
 
282 (100%)
 
 No
844 (73%)
192 (69%)
587 (74%)
52 (75%)
 
844 (100%)
 
Adjuvant chemotherapy regimen
    
0.94
  
 Capecitabine + oxaliplatin
214 (19%)
61 (22%)
140 (18%)
12 (17%)
 
214 (76%)
 
 Capecitabine
37 (3%)
12 (4%)
22 (3%)
2 (3%)
 
37 (13%)
 
 Other
7 (1%)
2 (1%)
5 (1%)
0 (0%)
 
7 (2%)
 
Neo-adjuvant treatment
    
0.34
  
< 0.001
 Yes
270 (23%)
57 (20%)
189 (24%)
19 (28%)
 
250 (30%)
15 (5%)
 
 No
882 (77%)
222 (79%)
599 (76%)
50 (72%)
 
594 (70%)
267 (95%)
 
Stoma
    
0.061
  
< 0.001
 Yes
340 (30%)
67 (24%)
245 (31%)
22 (32%)
 
309 (37%)
25 (9%)
 
 No
783 (68%)
207 (74%)
521 (66%)
46 (67%)
 
508 (60%)
255 (90%)
 
Surgery
    
0.054
  
0.67
 Laparoscopic
725 (63%)
162 (58%)
512 (65%)
38 (55%)
 
538 (64%)
177 (62%)
 
 Conversion
73 (6%)
18 (6%)
46 (6%)
9 (13%)
 
51 (6%)
21 (7%)
 
 Open
303 (26%)
84 (30%)
198 (25%)
19 (28%)
 
213 (25%)
76 (27%)
 
Complications after surgery
    
< 0.001
  
< 0.001
 Yes
323 (28%)
96 (35%)
195 (25%)
26 (37%)
 
257 (30%)
55 (20%)
 
 No
787 (68%)
170 (61%)
569 (72%)
40 (58%)
 
553 (66%)
220 (78%)
 
Comorbidity
    
0.023
  
0.018
 Yes
773 (67%)
182 (65%)
524 (67%)
56 (81%)
 
581 (69%)
173 (61%)
 
 No
370 (32%)
97 (35%)
256 (32%)
12 (17%)
 
256 (30%)
107 (38%)
 
1Some counts do not add to totals because of missing data
2Includes 16 participants with missing pre-diagnosis weight and 26 with missing chemotherapy status
Compared to pre-diagnosis weight, mean weight change was −0.8 (95% CI −1.1, −0.4) kg over the 4-year period (Table 2). Over this total period, weight change was < 5% for the majority of people (66%), while 14% of all patients experienced pre-to-post diagnosis weight gain of ≥ 5% and 20% experienced weight loss of ≥ 5%. When only the 2 years post-diagnosis were taken into account, mean weight change in the 2 years after diagnosis was + 1.2 (95%CI 0.9, 1.5) kg.
Table 2
Two-year post-diagnosis and 4-year pre-to-post diagnosis weight changes by pre-diagnosis weight change groups and by adjuvant chemotherapy1
  
Weight change during 2 years before diagnosis
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Overall
Loss (≥ 5%)
Stable (−5% to 5%)
Gain (≥ 5%)
No
Yes
N (%)
922 (100%)
221 (24%)
644 (70%)
57 (6%)
687 (75%)
215 (23%)
Pre-diagnosis weight change (mean (95% CI)), kg
−1.9 (−2.3, −1.6)
−8.3 (−9.1, −7,5)
−0.5 (−0.6, −0.3)
+6.2 (5.5, 6.8)
−1.9 (−2.2, −1.5)
−2.2 (−2.8, −1.5)
Pre-to-post diagnosis weight change (4 years)
 Absolute weight change (mean (95% CI)), kg
−0.8 (−1.1, −0.4)
−4.8 (−5.7, −3.9)
+0.0 (−0.3, 0.4)
+6.1 (4.5, 7.6)
−0.9 (−1.4, −0.5)
−0.1 (−0.8, 0.6)
 Weight loss (%)
20
48
11
4
21
16
 Weight stable (%)
66
47
76
30
65
69
 Weight gain (%)
14
5
12
67
14
15
Post-diagnosis weight change (2 years)
 Absolute weight change (mean (95% CI)), kg
+1.2 (0.9, 1.5)
+3.5 (2.7, 4.3)
+0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
−0.1 (−1.7, 1.5)
+0.9 (0.5, 1.3)
+2.1 (1.5, 2.7)
 Weight loss (%)
9
5
9
26
10
6
 Weight stable (%)
70
54
77
55
71
67
 Weight gain (%)
21
42
14
19
19
27
1230 participants with pre-diagnosis weight and/or 2-year post-diagnosis weight information missing omitted from table (n = 16 and n = 217, respectively)
The estimated 4-year weight trajectory in the entire cohort is presented in Fig. 1A. The full model showed a clear positive quadratic relationship of weight changes in the entire cohort (p < 0.001), but no linear effect was present (+ 0.04 kg annual weight gain, p = 0.68). In other words, weight decreased before diagnosis while weight increased after diagnosis. Overall, weight 2 years after diagnosis was similar to weight 2 years before diagnosis.
To explore if post-diagnosis weight trajectories differed by pre-diagnosis weight change, we stratified the weight trajectory analyses by pre-diagnosis weight change. A mean gain in body weight after diagnosis was most prominent in the group that had lost weight before diagnosis (Fig. 1B; Table 2). In this group, 42% gained weight after diagnosis and this proportion was much larger than that seen for the pre-diagnosis weight stable and weight gain groups (14% and 19%, respectively; Table 2). In absolute numbers, post-diagnosis weight gain was on average + 3.5 (95% CI 2.7, 4.3) kg in the group that had lost weight pre-diagnosis. However, taking the 2 years before diagnosis into account, mean weight change was −4.8 (95% CI −5.7, −3.9) kg in this group. On average, clinically relevant weight change after diagnosis was absent when pre-diagnosis weight was stable or when pre-diagnosis weight gain ≥ 5% was present.
Weight trajectories were similar for those treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy (Fig. 1C; Table 2). In both groups, overall weight 2 years after diagnosis was similar to overall weight 2 years before diagnosis. Sensitivity analyses excluding patients with other adjuvant chemotherapy regimens than capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin or excluding patients with rectal tumours did not change the results (data not shown). Weight trajectories were similar for those with a BMI of 18.5–25 kg/m2 and a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 at diagnosis (data not shown).

Discussion

We examined pre-to-post diagnosis weight trajectories among patients with non-metastatic CRC. Overall, hardly any pre-to-post diagnosis weight change was observed among CRC patients, because post-diagnosis weight gain was mainly observed in patients who lost weight before diagnosis. This was observed independent of treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy.
This was the first study that examined pre-to-post diagnosis weight changes in CRC patients, therefore we can only compare our results on post-diagnosis weight changes with previous studies. All previous studies on post-diagnosis weight change in CRC patients with non-metastatic disease showed that weight gain was more common than weight loss [13, 10, 11, 17], which is in line with our study. We found that 21% of patients with non-metastatic CRC experienced ≥ 5% weight gain in the first 2 years after diagnosis, which is slightly lower than the 28% reported in previous studies [1, 2]. Among patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, 27% of patients experienced ≥ 5% weight gain in our study. Although the proportion of patients treated with chemotherapy who experienced weight gain in the current study was lower compared with other studies (36–65%) [3, 10, 11], the mean post-diagnosis weight gain of + 2.1 kg in patients treated with chemotherapy was similar to the mean weight gain of + 2.0 kg reported in a previous study based on body weights retrieved from medical records [11]. Weight gain was seen both during and after adjuvant chemotherapy [11], although in this study we were not able to make this distinction. While previous studies focussed on post-diagnosis weight changes, the current study also included usual weight pre-diagnosis into the analysis of weight changes. Our analyses revealed that post-diagnosis weight gain was most prominent in patients who lost ≥ 5% weight before diagnosis and therefore mean pre-to-post diagnosis weight gain was absent in the overall population.
The current study was the first that compared weight changes between CRC patients treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. By including weight data at multiple time points during the course of the disease, both before and after diagnosis, we showed that weight trajectories were similar for those treated with and without chemotherapy. In both groups, weight 2 years post-diagnosis diagnosis did on average not surpass usual pre-diagnosis weight. However, in both groups, about 15% experienced pre-to-post diagnosis weight gain of ≥ 5%. It was unexpected that weight trajectories over the course of CRC were independent of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Previous studies showed that post-diagnosis weight gain was more common in studies among patients treated with adjuvant therapy than in studies that included patients irrespective of adjuvant chemotherapy (36–65% versus 28%, respectively) [13, 10, 11]. Our results imply that weight gain is not a common side-effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in CRC patients with non-metastatic disease.
A limitation of this study is that body weight was self-reported at each time point, perhaps leading to measurement error with regard to weight change. Cross-sectional data show that self-reported weight values are typically slightly lower than directly measured values [18], although bias may differ by weight status and gender [18, 19]. However, good-to-excellent agreement was reported for self-reported and directly measured values of body weight in studies with similar demographic characteristics to this study [20, 21]. Participants are also likely to have internal consistency in their reporting, such that the degree of underreporting will be similar each time [19]. Therefore, changes in weight may be less prone to such bias than individual weight measurements. In our study, weight 2 years prior to diagnosis was recalled while post-diagnosis weights were collected prospectively, which may decrease internal consistency. However, good-to-excellent agreement was also reported for pre-diagnosis weight recalled shortly after diagnosis and directly measured values of pre-diagnosis body weight [22]. We assume that weight 2 years before CRC diagnosis reflects usual pre-diagnosis weight, since the median time from onset of symptoms (such as weight loss) until the start of treatment is usually 4 to 5 months [23, 24]. Another limitation is that we did not have information on changes in body composition. Even when pre-to-post diagnosis weight gain is not present, post-diagnosis weight gain may still lead to an increase in fat mass with a loss in muscle mass. Future research should be done to determine how post-diagnosis weight gain affects body composition.
This study has several strengths. First, the COLON study provided an opportunity to explore weight trajectories over the course of the disease in a large group of CRC patients, since we prospectively collected weight several times after diagnosis and also had pre-diagnosis weight available. We used mixed models to examine weight trajectories over 4 years. An advantage of mixed models is that participants with incomplete weight data were still included in the analyses. Second, we had detailed treatment information available so we were able to compare weight trajectories between those treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. Third, we were able to adjust for many covariates that could potentially affect weight change. Although other factors, such as physical activity and physical functioning, not included in the multivariate analyses could also affect weight change. However, both the adjusted weight trajectories (Fig. 1) and the crude weight changes (Table 2) showed similar results. Lastly, the study population was representative of the total population of Dutch stage I–III CRC survivors with respect to stage of disease and location of the tumour (colon or rectum), but the proportion of females and the mean age were slightly lower as compared to the total population of CRC survivors [25, 26]. Although not perfectly comparable, we believe our findings are generalizable to the total Dutch population of stage I–III CRC survivors, but they cannot be generalised to stage IV CRC survivors.
In clinical practice, not only weight loss, but also weight gain should receive attention as is stated in the Dutch Dieticians Oncology Group guidelines for bowel cancer therapy [5]. Based on our results, weight changes should be monitored over the course of the disease in all patients, taking pre-diagnosis weight change into account. A previous study suggested that pre-to-post diagnosis weight change, weight loss as well as weight gain, may be associated with a higher mortality risk among CRC patients with non-metastatic disease [1]. In contrast, post-diagnosis weight gain did not seem to be associated with mortality risk [1, 2, 10]. Our results, together with these other studies [1, 2, 10], emphasise the importance of taking pre-diagnosis weight into account when examining weight changes in CRC patients. Our study showed that 14% of all patients experienced pre-to-post diagnosis weight gain and pre-to-post diagnosis weight gain was equally prevalent among patients treated with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, weight gain prevention should not only be targeted at patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, but at all CRC patients with non-metastatic disease.
In conclusion, pre-to-post diagnosis weight change was largely absent among CRC patients with non-metastatic disease, because post-diagnosis weight gain was mainly observed in patients who lost weight before diagnosis. This was observed independent of treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings and to assess how weight change relates to survival and the development of co-morbidities to provide a solid basis for future recommendations directed towards managing weight during the course of CRC.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants for their time to participate in the study. Furthermore, we would like to thank the co-workers from the following hospitals for their involvement in recruitment for the COLON study: Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede; RadboudUMC, Nijmegen; Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem; Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem; Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn/Zutphen; Hospital Bernhoven, Uden; Isala, Zwolle; Hospital Group Twente ZGT, Almelo; Martini Hospital, Groningen; and Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes/Vlissingen, all in the Netherlands. Also we would like to thank Joeri Kalter for his help with data management.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. P.C. van de Meeberg is also affiliated to the Dutch Obesity Clinic as a paid advisor. We have full control of all primary data and we agree to allow the journal to review our data if requested.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhardt JA, Kroenke CH, Prado CM, Kwan ML, Castillo A, Weltzien E, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Xiao J, Caan BJ (2017) Association of Weight Change after Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Outcomes in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 26(1):30–37. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0145 CrossRef Meyerhardt JA, Kroenke CH, Prado CM, Kwan ML, Castillo A, Weltzien E, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Xiao J, Caan BJ (2017) Association of Weight Change after Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Outcomes in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 26(1):30–37. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-16-0145 CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2017) Continuous update project report: diet, nutrition, physical activity and colorectal cancer. Available at: wcrf.org/colorectal-cancer-2017 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2017) Continuous update project report: diet, nutrition, physical activity and colorectal cancer. Available at: wcrf.​org/​colorectal-cancer-2017
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Leach CR, Weaver KE, Aziz NM, Alfano CM, Bellizzi KM, Kent EE, Forsythe LP, Rowland JH (2015) The complex health profile of long-term cancer survivors: prevalence and predictors of comorbid conditions. Journal of Cancer Survivorship: Research and Practice 9(2):239–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0403-1 CrossRef Leach CR, Weaver KE, Aziz NM, Alfano CM, Bellizzi KM, Kent EE, Forsythe LP, Rowland JH (2015) The complex health profile of long-term cancer survivors: prevalence and predictors of comorbid conditions. Journal of Cancer Survivorship: Research and Practice 9(2):239–251. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11764-014-0403-1 CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Nelson H, Whittom R, Hantel A, Thomas J, Fuchs CS, Cancer, Leukemia Group B (2008) Impact of body mass index and weight change after treatment on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from Cancer and leukemia group B 89803. J Clin Oncol 26(25):4109–4115. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6687 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Nelson H, Whittom R, Hantel A, Thomas J, Fuchs CS, Cancer, Leukemia Group B (2008) Impact of body mass index and weight change after treatment on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from Cancer and leukemia group B 89803. J Clin Oncol 26(25):4109–4115. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2007.​15.​6687 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Winkels RM, Snetselaar T, Adriaans A, van Warmerdam LJC, Vreugdenhil A, Slooter GD, Straathof JW, Kampman E, van Lieshout R, Beijer S (2016) Changes in body weight in patients with colorectal cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy: an observational study. Cancer Treat Res Commun 9:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2016.09.002 CrossRef Winkels RM, Snetselaar T, Adriaans A, van Warmerdam LJC, Vreugdenhil A, Slooter GD, Straathof JW, Kampman E, van Lieshout R, Beijer S (2016) Changes in body weight in patients with colorectal cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy: an observational study. Cancer Treat Res Commun 9:111–115. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ctarc.​2016.​09.​002 CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Caan BJ, Meyerhardt JA, Kroenke CH, Alexeeff S, Xiao J, Weltzien E, Feliciano EC, Castillo AL, Quesenberry CP, Kwan ML, Prado CM (2017) Explaining the obesity paradox: the association between body composition and colorectal cancer survival (C-SCANS study). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 26(7):1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0200 CrossRef Caan BJ, Meyerhardt JA, Kroenke CH, Alexeeff S, Xiao J, Weltzien E, Feliciano EC, Castillo AL, Quesenberry CP, Kwan ML, Prado CM (2017) Explaining the obesity paradox: the association between body composition and colorectal cancer survival (C-SCANS study). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 26(7):1008–1015. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-17-0200 CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Henneman D, Kolfschoten NE, Gooiker GA, ten Berge MG, Eddes EH, Wouters MW, Tollenaar RA, Dutch Surgical Colorectal Cancer Audit G, Bemelman WA, van Dam RM, Elferink MA, Karsten TM, van Krieken JH, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, Manusama ER, van de Velde CJ, Meijerink WJ, Wiggers T, van der Harst E, Dekker JW, Boerma D (2013) The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(10):1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.008 CrossRefPubMed Van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Henneman D, Kolfschoten NE, Gooiker GA, ten Berge MG, Eddes EH, Wouters MW, Tollenaar RA, Dutch Surgical Colorectal Cancer Audit G, Bemelman WA, van Dam RM, Elferink MA, Karsten TM, van Krieken JH, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, Manusama ER, van de Velde CJ, Meijerink WJ, Wiggers T, van der Harst E, Dekker JW, Boerma D (2013) The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(10):1063–1070. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejso.​2013.​05.​008 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Olivarius NF, Andreasen AH, Loken J (1997) Accuracy of 1-, 5- and 10-year body weight recall given in a standard questionnaire. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 21(1):67–71CrossRef Olivarius NF, Andreasen AH, Loken J (1997) Accuracy of 1-, 5- and 10-year body weight recall given in a standard questionnaire. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 21(1):67–71CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pre-to-post diagnosis weight trajectories in colorectal cancer patients with non-metastatic disease
verfasst von
Moniek van Zutphen
Anouk Geelen
Hendriek C. Boshuizen
Renate M. Winkels
Anne J.M.R. Geijsen
Evertine Wesselink
Merel Snellen
Dieuwertje E. Kok
Johannes H.W. de Wilt
Paul C. van de Meeberg
Ewout A. Kouwenhoven
Henk K. van Halteren
Ernst J. Spillenaar Bilgen
Ellen Kampman
Fränzel J.B. van Duijnhoven
Publikationsdatum
27.11.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4560-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.