Background
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder characterized by the proliferation in the bone marrow of clonal plasma cells [
1,
2]. Around 30,280 new multiple myeloma cases are expected to be diagnosed in 2017 [
3]. Meanwhile, MM is an incurable disease using conventional treatment, which results in a median overall survival of 3 to 4 years [
4,
5]. Nevertheless, treatment outcome in MM has improved significantly in the last decade, partially due to the introduction of novel agents, such as the proteasome inhibitors (e.g. bortezomib) and immunomodulatory drugs (e.g. thalidomide) [
6]. In spite of that, the heterogeneity exists in the patients’ response to those new treatments and molecular features responsible for the variability in response remain undefined [
7‐
9]. It urges more efforts to identify biomarkers from numerous molecular features and build predictive models for identifying patients that can benefit from a certain treatment scheme [
7].
MM, like other cancers, is caused by the accumulation of genetic abnormalities [
2,
10]. Various molecular analyses suggest that myeloma is composed of distinct subtypes that have different molecular pathologies and prognosis [
10]. For example, cytogenetic studies reveal that 60 to 80% of myeloma cases reveal chromosomal translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy (IgH) locus [
10]. The most prevalent of these translocations are t(11;14)(q13;q32) and t(4;14)(p16;q32), where the former has better survival than the latter. Another chromosomal translocation in t(8;14)(q24;q32), causing MYC activation, is considered as a secondary hit. Other genetic abnormalities include mutations and copy number changes. Mutational spectrum reveals a heterogeneous landscape with few recurrently affected genes. Only three genes have been reported in more than 10% patients, including
KRAS,
NRAS, and
FAM46C [
11‐
14]. For copy number changes, the most common ones being gains are on 1q, 3p, 6p, 9p, 11q, 19p, 19q and 21q along with deletions of 1p, 4q, 16q and 22q, among which candidate oncogenes and tumor suppressors have been identified [
15‐
18]. Thus, it is anticipated that identifying and applying molecular biomarkers to predict clinical response to drugs will help to provide more precise prognostic and predictive classifiers for a specific therapy in MM.
With the emergence of high-throughput sequencing technology, it is expected that the number of biomarkers will rise. The markers in predicting drug response will become more reproducible as well [
19,
20]. However, the effect sizes of the discovered markers are usually small, which only could contribute a relatively trivial portion to the drug response since it is typically a complex trait, generally influenced by many genomic and environmental factors [
19]. Thus, predictive modeling with multiple markers should be used to predict complex traits, such as drug response [
19].
Distinct gene expression profiling is believed to be associated with the drug response variability of bortezomib, leading to various disease prognoses [
10]. The relationships between the heterogeneity of drug response in bortezomib or its combined therapy with the genomic background of multiple myeloma patients have been investigated [
2,
10]. Mulligan et al. [
10] generated gene expression data from a national and international phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of bortezomib to develop a genomic classifier for prediction of drug response in relapsed MM. Terragna et al. [
2] analyzed the gene expression from MM patients to explore predictors of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) first-line therapy. According to European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation criteria, drug responses in MM were classified as achieving complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), no change (NC) and Progressive Disease (PD) [
21]. However, in Mulligan et al. [
10], the five-level ordinal drug response was categorized as a binary response where only responsive and non-responsive groups were considered. Terragna et al. [
2] focused on CR vs non-CR groups by converting the ordinal outcome to a binary outcome. To provide more informative prediction and more efficiently identify biomarkers, it is desirable to analyze multi-level drug response, rather than combining the response to two groups. To address this shortcoming in the previous analyses, we here present a novel approach to identify significantly associated biomarkers and develop genomic classifier using hierarchical ordinal logistic regression. We apply our approach to two public available datasets [
2,
10]. Our results show that our hierarchical ordinal regression approach is able to identify genes associated with the multi-level response and to generate predictive models for predicting the multi-level response.
Discussion
It is highly important to identify genetic biomarkers to predict drug response with a narrow therapeutic index [
19,
26]. Chemotherapeutic agents are medications in that category, since the response is variable with potentially lethal side effects [
19,
26]. Many studies have been conducted and a large number of biomarkers have been reported [
19]. However, a complex outcome, such as drug response, is generally affected by many genomic and environmental factors [
19]. Thus, it is desirable that a predictive procedure will possess the capability to consider mutual effects of various biomarkers for drug response [
19].
Another potential issue is that the multi-level ordinal drug response is usually recoded in clinical practice. For analytic simplicity, however, such multi-level ordinal outcome is usually combined as just two levels, as in the original papers [
2,
10] that we reanalyzed in this study. However, this strategy not only risks both the loss of information in the data and arbitrary to select the recode strategy, but also cannot provide informative prediction [
27].
We here utilized a more efficient approach by combining the standard ordinal logistic regression and the hierarchical modeling. Our method can jointly analyze numerous variables for detecting important predictors and for predicting multi-level drug response. We applied our method to reanalyze two publicly available clinical trial datasets, which assessed response to bortezomib in relapsed MM patients [
10] and VTD in newly diagnosed MM patients [
2]. The original studies both treated the five-level ordinal drug responses as binary responses. To address the drawback of the potential loss of information from recoding, we reanalyzed the datasets by using the original ordinal drug responses. To avoid low frequencies in several levels of the five-level drug responses, we redefined the five-level drug response as a three-level ordinal drug response in both datasets. The results reveal that the predictive performance from VTD in new MM patients is more powerful than treating relapsed MM patients with bortezomib alone. Meanwhile, comparing the analysis results between five-level ordinal drug response and reduced three-level ordinal drug response, AUC increased and deviance decreased for the combined ordinal outcome with a trade-off in MSE and misclassification rate. Our analyses show that the combining ordinal outcome could result in higher MSE and misclassification rate, thus, potential loss of information and misleading interpretation. Although we only compared the five-level ordinal outcome with three-level ordinal outcome, it is anticipated that similar differences will exist if compared with binary outcome. It also implies that the original approach to analyze ordinal outcome as binary outcome will possibly lead to information loss.
Furthermore, we identified probes that represent genes of known function. In Mulligan et al. [
10], for both five level and three level ordinal drug response, most of the top significant probes are overexpressed in patients with PR or CR, including ribosomal protein (RPL11, RPL15, RPS7, RPS13), mitochondrial (COX7C), eukaryotic translation initiation factors (EIF3D, EIF3E, EIF3F, EIF3H) genes. Among them, ribosomal protein has been investigated by multiple studies to show that mutations in ribosomal protein genes have been found in endometrial cancer (RPL22), T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RPL10, RPL5 and RPL11), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (RPS15), colorectal cancer (RPS20), and glioma (RPL5) [
28]. Moreover, it has also been discussed that eukaryotic initiation factors (EIFs) play an important role in translation initiation and protein synthesis which could alter angiogenesis, tumor development, and apoptosis in cancer progression [
29]. Two of the probes are under-expressed in patients achieving PR or CR, which represent the gene ATP2B4. ATP2B4 plays a critical role in intracellular calcium homeostasis by regulating the enzymes to remove bivalent calcium ions from eukaryotic cells against very large concentration gradients [
30]. In Terragna et al. [
2], we carried a function enrichment analysis to identify the functional annotation of the top probes with KEGG [
31] using the Bioinformatics tool
DAVID [
32,
33]. The top 30 probes for the five-level ordinal drug response also cover various gene functions which belong to multiple important pathways, e.g., Metabolic pathways, p53 signaling pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, AMPK signaling pathway, Wnt signaling pathway, Jak-STAT signaling pathway, Viral carcinogenesis and MAPK signaling pathway. For the three-level ordinal drug response, the top 50 significant probes cover similar functions as the top 30 probes for the five-level ordinal drug response, with several additional functions such as Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, NF-kappa B signaling pathway, Intestinal immune network for IgA production, HTLV-I infection and Primary immunodeficiency. This suggests that the probes we identified are correlated biologically. Based on the functional enrichment analysis results, the probes could be grouped to multiple pathways. One plausible solution is to utilize a pathway-structured model to incorporate that biological information into the predictive model to include more probe information into the prediction, which will be considered in our further work.
Although the predictive classifier and genetic biomarkers described here are promising, further research is necessary to assess the relevance of these genomic predictors with more data from other trials or other trials with novel or multi-agent therapy. Our analysis strategy is directly applicable to new data with bortezomib or other therapies in multiple myeloma for patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed cancer. This analysis will help to quickly identify the patient groups that could benefit from the proposed drug therapy or in need of other novel therapies.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by research grants from USA National Institutes of Health (R03-DE025646), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81673448), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province China (BK 20161218), and The Applied Basic Research Programs of Suzhou City (SYS201546).