Sie können Operatoren mit Ihrer Suchanfrage kombinieren, um diese noch präziser einzugrenzen. Klicken Sie auf den Suchoperator, um eine Erklärung seiner Funktionsweise anzuzeigen.
Findet Dokumente, in denen beide Begriffe in beliebiger Reihenfolge innerhalb von maximal n Worten zueinander stehen. Empfehlung: Wählen Sie zwischen 15 und 30 als maximale Wortanzahl (z.B. NEAR(hybrid, antrieb, 20)).
Findet Dokumente, in denen der Begriff in Wortvarianten vorkommt, wobei diese VOR, HINTER oder VOR und HINTER dem Suchbegriff anschließen können (z.B., leichtbau*, *leichtbau, *leichtbau*).
COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is one of the most known pandemics ever affecting human life and global economics. Recently, it has shown several symptoms related to different organ systems, including the nervous system, represented in some reported neurological manifestations. Therefore, a smart prediction system that can determine the likelihood and certainty of having COVID-19 based on those neurological manifestations can help in early detection of the disease, which helps in diagnosis and limiting the prevalence of COVID-19.
Patients and methods
This study involved a comprehensive data collection process. We gathered information from thousands of patients, encompassing both neurological and non-neurological manifestations of COVID-19. This data, derived from various research works, including mild and moderate cases, was then subjected to rigorous statistical analysis. The results of this analysis formed the basis for the design of a fuzzy interference system (FIS), which utilizes a fuzzy logic approach to determine the certainty of COVID-19 based on neurological symptoms.
Results
Statistical analysis of the collected data showed neurological symptoms in all surveyed cases in the first week of the COVID-19 presentation. Headache has been reported in 70–80% of all cases; anosmia–dysgeusia showed up in 50–60% of total cases; Myalgia presented in 40–45% of all cases; Fatigue was there in 30–35% of the surveyed cases; dizziness was recorded in 30–35% of patients; 0–10% of subjects showed noncommon symptoms like numbness, migraine, loss of concentration, and seizures. By applying these statistical results to the fuzzification process and developing the rulesets, the fuzzy logic-based forecasting system could determine the certainty of COVID-19 with high accuracy, reaching 95% by comparing it with the clinical data.
Conclusions
Surveying neurological and non-neurological symptoms of thousands of COVID-19 patients in many related literature showed neurological manifestations in all patients with different ratios and weights, including mild and moderate cases, by statistically analyzing these data to form the rulesets of a predesigned fuzzy logic-based forecasting system. The fuzzy logic system was able to yield a successful prediction of the likelihood of having COVID-19 in a group of patients based on their neurological symptoms with an accuracy of 95% by comparing the predicted data with the clinical data.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
BBB
The blood–brain barrier
COVID-19
Coronavirus disease of 2019
SARS
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
SARS-CoV-2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2
MERS
The Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
H1N1
Hemagglutinin 1 Neuraminidase 1 (Influenza A virus subtype H1N1)
ACE2
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
TMPRSS2
Transmembrane protease serine 2
CK
Creatine kinase
GBS
Guillain–Barre syndrome
CNS
Central nervous system
MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
TNF
Tumor necrosis factor
Introduction
The COVID-19 disease, caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, becomes one of the most fatal diseases that have ever affected human life and global economies, which has been reported in ranges from mild to severe in clinical representation [1]. The disease does not only have respiratory symptoms but also shows symptoms related to many organ systems, including the nervous system [2]. Clinical reports showed that neurological symptoms had presented a significant frequency of extrapulmonary manifestations [3]. For example, headache is given between signs in 13.6% of total COVID-19 patients with range means ranging between 4 and 24%) [4]. In addition, myalgia has shown a frequency of 20.4%, with an average ranging between 11 and 44%. [5] Furthermore, anosmia has been reported in the range of 5–88% [6]. In addition, some studies reported the frequency of neurological manifestations in severe illness cases of COVID-19 patients as 84%, while it was 36.4% in hospitalized cases [7,8]. In these studies, neurological manifestations showed up more frequently in severe cases. However, the prognoses’ influences are still not apparent [9].
In addition, surveying dozens of research works in the literature [10‐20] showed a significant presence of neurological symptoms in COVID-19 patients, including mild and severe cases. For example, headache has been reported in 70–80% of all cases; anosmia–dysgeusia showed up in 50–60% of total cases; myalgia presented in 40–45% of all cases; fatigue was there in 30–35% of the surveyed cases; dizziness was recorded in 30–35% of patients; and 0–10% of subjects showed noncommon symptoms like numbness, migraine, loss of concentration, and seizure. The obvious correlation between some neurological symptoms and COVID-19 with variable ratio and weight can be utilized to predict the likelihood of having COVID-19 or not based on neurological symptoms. Therefore, this study analyzes thousands of COVID patients with neurological symptoms reported in the literature by surveying a couple of related research works to achieve twofold objectives. First, it determines statistically the weight of each neurological symptom in COVID-19 cases. Second, the obtained statistics of neurological manifestations are used to design the ruleset of a fuzzy logic-based model for predicting the likelihood of having COVID-19 based on neurological symptoms. To sum up, the survey of dozens of related research works yields thousands of records showing the neurological symptoms that appeared in COVID-19 cases. Then, the weight and percentage ratio of these symptoms are statistically calculated. Afterward, these data are utilized to form the ruleset of a fuzzy-logic-based system. As a result, the fuzzy logic system can decide the likelihood and certainty of having COVID-19 or not for patients based on their neurological symptoms.
Anzeige
Patients and methods
Study design and participants
In this study, the data of thousands of COVID-19 patients, including their neurological symptoms, have been collected by surveying dozens of related works in the literature. For example, in one study [10] of the surveyed literature, a group of 107 confirmed COVID-19 patients who do not require admission to the hospital were surveyed continuously for ten sequence days, reporting all their symptoms, including neurological and non-neurological symptoms, based on the predesigned questionnaire. The survey conducted for this study was performed in the city of Benisuef in Egypt. It started in the middle of June 2020 and ended in July 2020 [10].
Study variables
Table 1 lists the demographic data of the patient group participating in one study [10] that has been surveyed for collecting data for this research, including the distribution of the central and peripheral neurological manifestations.
Table 1
Demographic data of one of the surveyed studies for data collection [10]
Parameter
Value
Number of patients
107
Age
41.5
Male
51(47.6%)
Female
56(52.4%)
Neurological complications central
84(78.5%)
Peripheral
89(83.17%)
The collected data of the patients included but were not limited to age, gender, the onset of symptoms, diagnostic method, and location, i.e., hospital, clinic or institution of diagnosis, history of chronic illness, such as hypertension, diabetes, pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, history of headache, epilepsy, stroke, or dementia. The survey included ten neurological symptoms during the first 10 days of COVID-19 symptoms. That included headache (regarding its type and criteria), loss of smell and taste, myalgia, dizziness, and encephalopathy (delirium, confusion, and disturbed attention). In addition, seizures, numbness, and fatigue were registered. On the other hand, the survey included non-neurological symptoms. That was the febrile onset and pulmonary or gastrointestinal symptoms. Laboratory results were collected via e-mail, i.e., leukocyte count, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, serum ferritin, and reports of CT chest imaging. All patients consented to share their data during the period of home isolation after diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. In another study11 of the surveyed literature for collecting data for this research, Table 2 lists the demographics and comorbidities by SARS-CoV-2 result of 100 cases, including positive and negative COVID including the neurological and non-neurological symptoms manifestations. Similarly to the listed data in Tables 1 and 2, data have been collected from dozens of surveyed related research work 11–20 to be analyzed and designing the ruleset of the fuzzy logic system that will be used in forecasting the likelihood of COVID-19 based on the neurological symptoms.
Table 2
Demographics and comorbidities by SARS-CoV-2 result [11]
Parameter
Overall
SARS-CoV-2 +
SARS-CoV-2-
p
N
100
50
50
N/A
Age, years (mean (1 SD))
43.2 (11.3)
43.7 (11.8)
42.6 (10.8)
0.62
Male, n (%)
30 (30)
17 (34)
13 (26)
0.51
Female, n (%)
70 (70)
33 (66)
37 (74)
N/A
BMI (median [IQR])
25.4 [22.2–30.1]
25.8 [23.6–30.0]
24.7 [21.3–30.2]
0.25
BMI > 25, n (%)
55 (55)
30 (60)
25 (50)
0.42
BMI > 30, n (%)
26 (26)
13 (26)
13 (26)
1
Race, n (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
White
88 (88)
44 (88)
44 (88)
N/A
Black or African American
6 (6)
2 (4)
4 (8)
N/A
Asian
2 (2)
2 (4)
0 (0)
N/A
American Indian or Alaskan Native
1 (1)
0 (0)
1 (2)
N/A
Other
3 (3)
2 (4)
1 (2)
N/A
Ethnicity, n (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
Not Hispanic or Latino
88 (88)
44 (88)
44 (88)
N/A
Hispanic or Latino
12 (12)
6 (12)
6 (12)
N/A
Visit type, n (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.32
In-Person
52 (52)
29 (58)
23 (46)
N/A
Tele visit
48 (48)
21 (42)
27 (54)
N/A
SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, n (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
< 0.0001
Positive
38 (38)
38 (76)
0 (0)
N/A
Negative
46 (46)
6 (12)
40 (80)
N/A
Not performed
16 (16)
6 (12)
10 (20)
N/A
SARS-CoV-2 Serology, n (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
< 0.0001
Positive
28 (28)
28 (56)
0 (0)
N/A
Negative
48 (48)
4 (8)
44 (88)
N/A
Not performed
24 (24)
18 (36)
6 (12)
N/A
Positive RT-PCR and serology, n (%)
16 (16)
16 (32)
0 (0)
< 0.0001
Any preexisting comorbidity n (%)
42 (42)
22 (44)
20 (40)
0.84
Depression/anxiety
42 (42)
26 (52)
16 (36)
0.07
Autoimmune disease
16 (16)
7 (14)
9 (18)
0.79
Insomnia
16 (16)
10 (20)
6 (12)
0.25
Lung disease
16 (16)
9 (18)
7 (14)
0.79
Headache
14 (14)
5 (10)
9 (18)
0.39
Dyslipidemia
10 (10)
6 (12)
4 (8)
0.74
Cardiovascular disease
9 (9)
6 (12)
3 (6)
0.49
Traumatic brain injury
8 (8)
3 (6)
5 (10)
0.72
Cancer
7 (7)
5 (10)
2 (4)
0.44
Dysautonomia
4 (4)
3 (6)
1 (2)
0.62
Type2Diabetes
2 (2)
1 (2)
1 (2)
1
Other
17 (17)
9 (18)
8 (16)
1
SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile ratio
Data analysis and statistical methods
The collected data from surveyed-related research work [11‐20] have been analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. After the data have been analyzed statistically, the input data to the statistical analysis include the neurological and non-neurological symptoms with COVID-19 positive and negative cases, as listed in Tables 1 and 2. The outcomes of that analysis represented the frequency of neurological and non-neurological manifestations associated with COVID-19, representing the weight and percentage ratio of the symptoms. This weight and percentages will be used to design the rulesets of the fuzzification process of a developed fussy logic model, as listed in Table 3. It tabulates all input and output parameters of the fuzzy model and the related member function. The table lists the inputs and output parameters of the process in the first column. For example, the COVID-19 likelihood is an output of the fuzzification process, while all symptoms, such as headache, migraine, etc., are the inputs. The output and input are represented as percentages of certainty. The second column lists the possible values of the membership functions. For example, the production of COVID-19 likelihood could be yes if its certainty is greater than 50% but No if its likelihood is less than 50%. The third column shows the type of parameters as an input or output.
Table 3
Input and output parameters of FIS "Neurological manifestations with covid-19"
Parameters (%)
Membership functions
Parameter type
COVID-19 likelihood
Yes, No
Output
Headache
Low, Medium, High
Input
Migraine
Low, Normal, High
Input
Dizziness
Low, Normal, High
Input
loss of concentration
Low, Medium, High
Input
Numbness
Low, Normal, High
Input
Anosmia
Low, Normal, High
Input
loss of taste
Low, Medium, High
Input
Fatigue
Low, Normal, High
Input
Myalgia
Low, Normal, High
Input
Weakness
Low, Normal, High
Input
Seizures
Low, Medium, High
Input
behavioral changes
Low, Normal, High
Input
Fuzzy logic system to forecast the likelihood of COVID-19
The fuzzy logic model aims to forecast the likelihood of COVID-19 in patients with such neurological symptoms, as depicted in Fig. 1. It shows the frequency of each symptom of the neurological and non-neurological symptoms that will be fed inputs to the fuzzy system on the left-hand side. In the middle, the rulesets interpret the input symptoms into the output on the right, which is the likelihood of COVID-19.
Fig. 1
Fuzzy logic model for neurological symptoms of COVID-19
Figure 2 shows the design of the member functions of all inputs and outputs of the COVID-19 design. For example, headache is an input to the system that varies from 0 to 100%. That represents the headache severity. In addition, it shows the ranges for low, medium, and high severity of the headache the patient suffers from. Based on the inputs of these symptoms, the system can determine the likelihood of COVID-19.
Because the research planned to perform statistical analysis as a first stage and use its outcomes to build the rulesets of the fuzzy logic system to predict the likelihood of COVID-19 based on the neurological manifestations, the results are expected to be for the statistical and fuzzy logic results. Starting with the statistical results, the outcome, as represented in Fig. 3. depicts the neurological manifestations of COVID-19, showing headache is the highest percentage with 71.96. Anosmia and loss of taste come next with 52.34%, and all other symptoms are shown in the graph.
Fig. 3
Neurological manifestations associated with COVID-19
Based on the results of the statistical analysis, as shown in Fig. 3, by applying the resulting values of the neurological manifestations of COVID in the predesigned fuzzy logic rule set shown in Fig. 4, the likelihood of COVID-19 based on the neurological symptoms can be determined. The shaded areas in yellow in Fig. 4 mean that the parameter is realized at that area. For example, to have the output that represents the likelihood of COVID-19 realized, the headache manifestation should be more meaningful than 50%, and loss of taste and anosmia be mild from 25 to 75%, as shown in the second row in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4
Rule viewer showing the rule set of the designed fuzzy for forecasting COVID-19
Two test cases are tested by the developed fuzzy logic system that forecasts the COVID-19 likelihood based on neurological manifestations. In the first scenario, one patient comes with a headache at a level of 50% and no other symptoms and the second case is for another patient who comes with a headache of 50% and loss of taste at a level of 80%. The system decided the likelihood of COVID-19 for the first patient to be zero or no COVID-19; for the second case, it decided the case as COVID-19 diagnosed. In addition, 20 test cases of the given data have been tested by the developed fuzzy logic. The results are reported in Table 3, showing the data of all symptoms, the results predicted by the developed fuzzy system, and the actual results based on clinical and laboratory investigations for validation. When the redevelopment test reports “yes,” that means it is confirmed covid by clinical and laboratory analysis or the likelihood of COVID-19 is true. But when the result states “NO,” that means no covid confirmed by laboratory or clinical investigation. The possibility of COVID-19 is reported false by the fuzzy system based on the given symptoms.
Discussion
There are no clinical tests specific to COVID-19 apart from laboratory confirmation. Under pandemic conditions, complete blood count, CT imaging, pneumonia specific to COVID-19, and saturation values are predictive values in cases of severe disease. Nevertheless, the known symptoms are not typical for achieving a reliable diagnosis of non-severe cases of COVID-19 [21]. At the same time, the testing capability under real conditions is not enough to meet current needs. Therefore, forming target groups for self-isolation and outpatient treatment is an important issue . [22]
Anzeige
Since the first series of COVID-19 cases, neurological symptoms have been considered the most frequent extrapulmonary reported manifestations [2,3,5]. Neurological symptoms in COVID-19 patients generally arise between 1 and 14 days after the onset of SARS-CoV2 infectious symptoms [23]..
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of neurological symptoms early in the course of the disease and their predictive values in patients with suspected COVID-19, which is expected to make a clinical diagnosis. Therefore, the data of thousands of COVID-19 patients, including their neurological symptoms, have been collected by surveying dozens of related works in literature. Then, we investigated the association between neurological manifestations in one of those studies10 in which 107 COVID-19 patients were self-isolated during the initial 10 days of disease onset to determine the type and frequency of symptoms in COVID-19 cases. After that, we applied the results of statistically analyzing the collected data to a developed fuzzy logic-based model aiming to forecast the certainty of the likelihood of COVID-19 in patients with neurological manifestations.
One hundred percent of patients present at least one neurological manifestation early in the disease. The most prevalent was headache which was reported by 72% of patients. The next was the loss of smell and taste which was reported as 52%. Then, muscle pain was reported at 44%, followed by fatigue at 33%, and dizziness at 32%. In addition to being frequent, the neurological symptoms had an early presentation. In addition, headache criteria were dull, aching, moderate intensity, like tension headache in most patients compared to migraine (67% vs. 10% migraine-like). In addition, two patients had occipital headache. Overall, none of the patients had a history of primary headaches. Hence, headaches in those patients could be attributed to SARS-CoV2 infection, not an aggravation of the previous primary headache. Anosmia and dysgeusia have arisen as the chief predictors of COVID-19. In a multicenter case–control study on 777 COVID-19 cases, anosmia and dysgeusia had higher odds ratios of 6.21 and 2.42, respectively, for positive SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, the application of machine learning algorithms achieved an accuracy of an average of 80% (82% sensitivity and 78% specificity), with anosmia and dysgeusia being the most prevalent symptoms to accurately predict COVID-19 [24].Even though the mechanisms are still not clear, correlation of anosmia linked with nasal obstruction or rhinorrhea, gives a clue for the importance of olfactory epithelium in COVID-19 [25‐27]. The overexpression of ACE2 receptors in the airway (the route facilitates SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells) in the olfactory neuroepithelium might be responsible for the nervous system manifestations reported in COVID-19 disease and the entry zone through which the virus reaches the central nervous system [28]. Furthermore, there might be other routes the virus uses to reach the brain, such as the gastrointestinal tract and respiratory system. 29 Besides, the eyes could be a site for the virus to reach the CNS through the trigeminal nerve [30] as evidenced by the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in tears and conjunctival secretions. [31]
Prediction models that combine several variables or features to estimate the risk of being infected with COVID-19 have been proposed as valuable tools to assist medical staff in triaging patients, especially when allocating limited healthcare resources [25]. For the validation of the fuzzy logic system, 20 cases of the original given data that have been used in this study were tested; these tests came up with matched decisions between the one taken based on clinical and laboratory investigation, which is represented by the 9th column in Table 4 and the results produced by the developed fuzzy logic which meant in the 12th a last column in the same table (Table 4). Statistical results confirmed the association between COVID-19 in its first week and neurological manifestations having different frequency rates for each symptom. The headache was the most significant frequency, and then anosmia and loss of taste came next. After that, myalgia and fatigue took the following order. The results showed that 19 out of 20 tests are matched between the lab results and the prediction results. That proved an accuracy of 95% of the designed system based on neurological manifestations and a fuzzy logic system in predicting COVID-19 diagnosis. Hence, increasing the awareness that COVID-19 patients may present with non-specific neurological manifestations among general practitioners, emergency department physicians, and neurologists is very crucial [32]. According to the results of the conducted survey of dozens of related research works, neurological symptoms have not yet been investigated regarding the prediction and diagnosis of COVID-19. So far, studies for predicting mild COVID-19 depend on non-specific manifestations: fever, cough, malaise, nasal obstruction, sore throat, headache, and myalgia [21]. These symptoms are typical for mild acute upper respiratory tract viral infections, particularly acute nasopharyngitis, caused by already known human coronaviruses [33]. Anosmia was proven to be a clinical marker for COVID-19 under pandemic conditions [34‐36]. In Germany, 2 of 3 confirmed cases are reported to have anosmia [37]. Popovich V and colleagues analyzed clinical symptoms' interaction and predictive importance to determine the diagnosis of mild COVID-19 using the ordinal regression method. Of the 120 patients who underwent testing, COVID-19 diagnosis was established in 96 patients and ruled out in 24. When assessing symptoms by a physician, according to the correlation analysis, fever, muscle pain, nasal congestion, and rhinolalia have a positive predictive value of more than 0.6 significance values. Nasal discharge, cough, and sore throat have negative predictive values [38]. However, most prediction models for COVID-19, according to a recent systematic review, were considered poorly reported, at high risk of bias, and probably report an over-optimistic performance [39]. Therefore, there are many limitations when transferring the prediction models into clinical practice, which cast uncertainty on their actual applicability, especially for different outbreak scenarios and populations which was similar in different applications that have used different prediction methods [40‐43].
Table 4
Results of fuzzy logic test cases
Headache
Migraine
Dizziness
Numbness
Anosmia
Loss of taste
Fatigue
Myalgia
Clinic
Fuzzy
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Conclusion
Surveying data of neurological and non-neurological symptoms of thousands of COVID-19 patients in many related literature showed neurological manifestations in all patients with different ratios and weights, including mild and moderate cases. By statistically analyzing these data aiming to form the rulesets of a predesigned fuzzy logic-based forecasting system, the fuzzy logic system was able to yield a prediction of the likelihood of having COVID-19 in a group of patients based on their neurological symptoms with an accuracy of 95% by comparing the predicted data with the clinical data.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the patients for their participation and cooperation in this study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures performed in the study followed the ethical standards of The Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Cairo, Al Azhar University (FMG–IRB), and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. We obtained approval from research ethics committee no. 202012530 on 6 December 2020. Verbal informed consent was obtained from each patient who participated in the study as they were in the period of home isolation after diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. This consent was approved by the research ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Cairo, Al Azhar University (FMG–IRB). All data obtained from every patient were confidential and were not used outside the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Anzeige
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Chang DE, Lin M, Wei L, Xie L, Zhu G, Dela Cruz CS, et al. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus infections involving 13 patients outside Wuhan. China JAMA. 2020;323:1092–3.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu YU, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–20.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, Cao Y, Alwalid O, Gu J, et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:425–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel Coronavirus in Wuhan. China Lancet. 2020;395:497–506.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Angelo Vaira L, Deiana G, Fois AG, Pirina P, Madeddu G, De Vito A, et al. Objective evaluation of anosmia and ageusia in COVID-19 patients: single-center experience on 72 cases. Head Neck. 2020;42:1252–8.CrossRef
7.
Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan China. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:e201127.CrossRef
Abdel Azim GS, Osman MA. Neurological manifestations in mild and moderate cases of COVID-19. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg. 2021;57(1):109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Frontera JA, Yang D, Lewis A, Patel P, Medicherla C, Arena V, et al. A prospective study of long-term outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with and without neurological complications. J Neurol Sci. 2021;15(426): 117486.CrossRef
12.
Doyle MF. Central nervous system outcomes of COVID-19. Transl Res. 2022;241:41–51.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Blomberg B, Mohn KG, Brokstad KA, Zhou F, Linchausen DW, Hansen BA, et al. Long COVID in a prospective cohort of home-isolated patients. Nat Med. 2021;27(9):1607–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Graham EL, Clark JR, Orban ZS, Lim PH, Szymanski AL, Taylor C, et al. Persistent neurologic symptoms and cognitive dysfunction in non-hospitalized Covid-19 “long haulers.” Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021;8:1073–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Nasserie T, Hittle M, Goodman SN. Assessment of the frequency and variety of persistent symptoms among patients with COVID-19: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2111417.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Harapan BN, Yoo HJ. Neurological symptoms, manifestations, and complications associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). J Neurol. 2021;268(9):3059–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(6):683–90.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Ousseiran ZH, Fares Y, Chamoun WT. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review and detailed comprehension. Int J Neurosci. 2023;133(7):754–69.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Liotta EM, Batra A, Clark JR, Shlobin NA, Hoffman SC, Orban ZS, et al. Frequent neurologic manifestations and encephalopathy-associated morbidity in Covid-19 patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020;7(11):2221–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Tang D, Comish P, Kang R. The Hallmarks of COVID-19 Disease. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16: e1008536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–42.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Li R, Pei S, Chen B, Song Y, Zhang T, Yang W, et al. Substantial Undocumented Infection Facilitates the Rapid Dissemination of Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Science. 2020;368:489–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
García-Azorín D, Sierra A, TrigoJ Alberdi A, Blanco M, Calcerrada I, et al. Frequency and phenotype of headache in covid-19: a study of 2194 patients. Sci Rep. 2021;11:14674.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Callejon-Leblic MA, Moreno-Luna R, Del Cuvillo A, Reyes-Tejero IM, Garcia-Villaran MA, Santos-Peña M, et al. Loss of Smell and taste can accurately predict COVID-19 infection: a machine-learning approach. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):570.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zhou Z, Kang H, Li S, Zou X, et al. Understanding the neurotropic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2: From neurological manifestations of COVID-19 to potential neurotrophic mechanisms. J Neurol. 2020;267:2179–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Dubé M, Coupanec AL, Wong AH, Rini JM, Desforges M, Talbot PJ, et al. Axonal transport enables neuron-to-neuron propa-gation of human coronavirus OC43. J Virol. 2018;92(17):1–21.CrossRef
Chen M, Shen W, Rowan NR, Kulaga HM, Hillel AT, Ramanathan M, et al. Elevated ACE-2 expression in the olfactory neuroepithelium: Implications for anosmia and upper respiratory SARS-CoV-2 entry and replication. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:1–3.CrossRef
30.
Li Z, Liu T, Yang N, Han D, Mi X, Li Y, et al. Neurological manifestations of patients with COVID-19: Potential routes of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion from the periphery to the brain. Front Med. 2020;14(5):533–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Wu P, Duan F, Luo C, Liu Q, Qu X, Liang L, et al. Characteristics of Ocular Findings of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei Province. China JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138:575–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Xia J, Tong J, Liu M, Shen Y, Guo D. Evaluation of coronavirus in tears and conjunctival secretions of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Med Virol. 2020;92:589–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Asadi-Pooya AA, Simani L. Central nervous system manifestations of COVID-19: A systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2020;43: 116832.CrossRef
Cao Z, Li T, Liang L, Wei F, Meng S, Cai M, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Beijing, China. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6): e0234764.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Edward Livingston E, Coronavirus BK, Disease,. (COVID-19) in Italy. JAMA. 2019;2020323:1335.
37.
Barbarossa MV, Fuhrmann J, Heidecke J, Vinod Varma H, Meinke CN, et al. Modeling the Spread of COVID-19 in Germany: early assessment and possible scenarios. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0238559.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Popovych V, Koshel I, Haman Y, Leschak V, Duplikhin R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of clinical symptoms for the diagnosis of Mild COVID-19. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines. 2021;9:137–49.CrossRef
39.
Wynants L, Van Calster B, Collins GS, Riley RD, Heinze G, Schuit E, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 2020;369: m1328.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Elsayed Y, Saad N, Zekry A. Enhancing the energy utilization of hybrid renewable energy systems. Int J Renew Energy Res. 2020;10(4):1972–85.
41.
Elsayed Y, Gabbar H. FBG sensing technology for an enhanced microgrid performance. Energies. 2022;15(24):9273.CrossRef
42.
Elsayed Y, Gabbar H. Enhancing FBG sensing in the industrial application by optimizing the grating parameters based on NSGA-II. Sensors. 2022;22(21):8203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Gabbar HA, Elsayed Y, Abu Bakar S, Abdalrahman E, Ajibola A. Design of Fast charging station with energy management for eBuses. Vehicles. 2021;3(4):807–20.CrossRef
Wer insgesamt zuversichtlicher aufs Leben blickt, trägt ein geringeres Risiko, später einmal an Demenz zu erkranken als pessimistischere Zeitgenossen. Dafür sprechen zumindest Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittdatenanalyse aus den USA. Ob mehr Optimismus allerdings tatsächlich einer Demenz vorbeugt, bleibt unklar.
Eine hochdosierte Influenza-Vakzine geht mit einer verzögerten Demenzdiagnose einher. Darauf deutet eine Auswertung von US-Gesundheitsdaten hin. Besonders auffällig sind die Effekte in den ersten Monaten nach der Impfung.
Intensive Senkung eines erhöhten Blutdrucks kann nach einer intrazerebralen Blutung die funktionelle Erholung verbessern – mutmaßlich über eine Reduktion der Hämatomausdehnung. Offenbar hängt das aber vom Ausgangsvolumen ab, wie eine Analyse ergeben hat.
Da schmeckt das Rinderfilet gleich doppelt so gut: Fleisch beugt einer aktuellen Studie zufolge einer Demenz vor. Allerdings gilt das nur für ApoE4-Träger. Diese haben sich im Laufe der Evolution offenbar an einen hohen Fleischkonsum angepasst – und brauchen ihre Steak-Rationen.