nach oben

Erschienen in:

06.06.2019

Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) using PROMIS-29 in a national sample of lumbar spine surgery patients

verfasst von: Jacquelyn S. Pennings, Clinton J. Devin, Inamullah Khan, Mohamad Bydon, Anthony L. Asher, Kristin R. Archer

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The primary purpose was to examine the measurement properties of the PROMIS-29 to better understand its use in patients undergoing spine surgery. A secondary objective was to calculate a predictive equation between PROMIS-29 and ODI, to allow clinicians and researchers to determine a predicted ODI score based on PROMIS short form scores.

Methods

719 patients with PROMIS v2.0 and ODI responses were queried from the quality outcomes database. Validity was assessed using coefficient omega, ceiling/floor effects, and confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariable regression predicting ODI scores from PROMIS-29 domains was used to create a predictive equation. Predicted ODI scores were plotted against ODI scores to determine how well PROMIS-29 domains predicted ODI.

Results

Results showed good reliability and validity of PROMIS-29 in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: convergent and discriminant validity, low floor/ceiling effects, and unidimensional domains. The conversion equation used 6 PROMIS-29 domains (ODI_% = 37.847− 1.475*[PF_raw] + 1.842*[PAIN_raw] + 0.557*[SD_raw] − 0.642*[SR_raw] + 0.478*[PI_raw] + 0.295*[DEP_raw]). Correlation between the predicted and actual ODI scores was R = 0.88, R² = 0.78, suggesting that the equation predicted ODI scores that are strongly correlated with actual ODI scores.

Conclusions

Good measurement properties support the use of PROMIS-29 in spine surgery patients. Findings suggest accurate ODI scores can be derived from PROMIS-29 domains. Clinicians who want to move from ODI to PROMIS-29 can use this equation to obtain estimated ODI scores when only collecting PROMIS-29. These results support the idea that PROMIS-29 domains have the potential to replace disease-specific traditional PROMs.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

DeVine, J., Norvell, D. C., Ecker, E., Fourney, D. R., Vaccaro, A., Wang, J., et al. (2011). Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery. Spine, 36(21 Suppl), S69–S74. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31822ef6de.PubMedCrossRef

Chiarotto, A., Ostelo, R. W., Turk, D. C., Buchbinder, R., & Boers, M. (2017). Core outcome sets for research and clinical practice. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 21(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.03.001.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Chiarotto, A., Deyo, R. A., Terwee, C. B., Boers, M., Buchbinder, R., Corbin, T. P., et al. (2015). Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain. European Spine Journal, 24(6), 1127–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3892-3.PubMedCrossRef

Chiarotto, A., Terwee, C. B., & Ostelo, R. W. (2016). Choosing the right outcome measurement instruments for patients with low back pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 30(6), 1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2017.07.001.PubMedCrossRef

Davidson, M., & Keating, J. L. (2002). A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Physical Therapy, 82(1), 8–24.PubMedCrossRef

Goldsmith, E. S., Taylor, B. C., Greer, N., Murdoch, M., MacDonald, R., McKenzie, L., et al. (2018). Focused evidence review: Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for chronic musculoskeletal Pain. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33(Suppl 1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4327-8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Grotle, M., Brox, J. I., & Vollestad, N. K. (2005). Functional status and disability questionnaires: What do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine, 30(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000149184.16509.73.PubMedCrossRef

Stokes, O. M., Cole, A. A., Breakwell, L. M., Lloyd, A. J., Leonard, C. M., & Grevitt, M. (2017). Do we have the right PROMs for measuring outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery? European Spine Journal, 26(3), 816–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4938-x.PubMedCrossRef

McCormick, J. D., Werner, B. C., & Shimer, A. L. (2013). Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 21(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-02-99.CrossRef

10.

Ferrer, M., Pellise, F., Escudero, O., Alvarez, L., Pont, A., Alonso, J., et al. (2006). Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine, 31(12), 1372–1379. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000218477.53318.bc. discussion 1380.PubMedCrossRef

11.

McGirt, M. J., Speroff, T., Dittus, R. S., Harrell, F. E., Jr., & Asher, A. L. (2013). The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): General overview and pilot-year project description. Neurosurgical Focus, 34(1), E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.10.FOCUS12297.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Daltroy, L. H., Cats-Baril, W. L., Katz, J. N., Fossel, A. H., & Liang, M. H. (1996). The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: Reliability and validity tests. Spine, 21(6), 741–749.PubMedCrossRef

13.

van Hooff, M. L., Jacobs, W. C., Willems, P. C., Wouters, M. W., de Kleuver, M., Peul, W. C., et al. (2015). Evidence and practice in spine registries. Acta Orthopaedica, 86(5), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1043174.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

14.

Clement, R. C., Welander, A., Stowell, C., Cha, T. D., Chen, J. L., Davies, M., et al. (2015). A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthopaedica, 86(5), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1036696.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

15.

Forsth, P., Michaelsson, K., & Sanden, B. (2013). Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis? A two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients. The Bone & Joint Journal, 95(7), 960–965. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.95b7.30776.CrossRef

16.

Cleland, J. A., Whitman, J. M., Houser, J. L., Wainner, R. S., & Childs, J. D. (2012). Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The Spine Journal, 12(10), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.05.004.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Hill, J. C., Dunn, K. M., Lewis, M., Mullis, R., Main, C. J., Foster, N. E., et al. (2008). A primary care back pain screening tool: Identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Care & Research, 59(5), 632–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23563.CrossRef

18.

Copay, A. G., Glassman, S. D., Subach, B. R., Berven, S., Schuler, T. C., & Carreon, L. Y. (2008). Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: A choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. The Spine Journal, 8(6), 968–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006.PubMedCrossRef

19.

van Hooff, M. L., Mannion, A. F., Staub, L. P., Ostelo, R. W., & Fairbank, J. C. (2016). Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a “satisfactory symptom state” in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study. The Spine Journal, 16(10), 1221–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.06.010.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Niskanen, R. O. (2002). The oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. A two-year follow-up of spine surgery patients. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 91(2), 208–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690209100214.PubMedCrossRef

21.

McGirt, M. J., Bydon, M., Archer, K. R., Devin, C. J., Chotai, S., Parker, S. L., et al. (2017). An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: Predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making. Journal of Neurosurgery, 27(4), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.11.spine16526.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Gabel, C. P., Cuesta-Vargas, A., Qian, M., Vengust, R., Berlemann, U., Aghayev, E., et al. (2017). The Oswestry Disability Index, confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of 35,263 verifies a one-factor structure but practicality issues remain. European Spine Journal, 26(8), 2007–2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5179-3.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Saltychev, M., Mattie, R., McCormick, Z., Barlund, E., & Laimi, K. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Oswestry Disability Index. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 40(3), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000226.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Walsh, T. L., Hanscom, B., Lurie, J. D., & Weinstein, J. N. (2003). Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36. Spine, 28(6), 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000050654.97387.df.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Chiarotto, A., Ostelo, R. W., Boers, M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). A systematic review highlights the need to investigate the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures for physical functioning in patients with low back pain. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 95, 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.005.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Deyo, R. A., Dworkin, S. F., Amtmann, D., Andersson, G., Borenstein, D., Carragee, E., et al. (2014). Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Physical Therapy, 15(8), 1249–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12538.CrossRef

27.

Shaw, B. E., Syrjala, K. L., Onstad, L. E., Chow, E. J., Flowers, M. E., Jim, H., et al. (2018). PROMIS measures can be used to assess symptoms and function in long-term hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors. Cancer, 124(4), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31089.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Hung, M., Saltzman, C. L., Kendall, R., Bounsanga, J., Voss, M. W., Lawrence, B., et al. (2018). What are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 476(10), 2027–2036. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

29.

Amtmann, D., Kim, J., Chung, H., Askew, R. L., Park, R., & Cook, K. F. (2016). Minimally important differences for patient reported outcomes measurement information system pain interference for individuals with back pain. Journal of Pain Research, 9, 251–255. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S93391.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Papuga, M. O., Mesfin, A., Molinari, R., & Rubery, P. T. (2016). Correlation of PROMIS physical function and pain CAT instruments with Oswestry Disability Index and neck disability index in spine patients. Spine, 41(14), 1153–1159. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001518.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

31.

Hung, M., Baumhauer, J. F., Latt, L. D., Saltzman, C. L., SooHoo, N. F., Hunt, K. J., et al. (2013). Validation of PROMIS (R) Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 471(11), 3466–3474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3097-1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

32.

Haws, B. E., Khechen, B., Guntin, J. A., Cardinal, K. L., Bohl, D. D., & Singh, K. (2018). Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation. Journal of Neurosurgery, 29(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.11.SPINE17989.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Brodke, D. S., Lawrence, B. D., Ryan Spiker, W., Neese, A., & Hung, M. (2014). Converting ODI or SF-36 physical function domain scores to a PROMIS PF score. The Spine Journal, 14(11), S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.131.CrossRef

34.

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

35.

Asher, A. L., McCormick, P. C., Selden, N. R., Ghogawala, Z., & McGirt, M. J. (2013). The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database and NeuroPoint Alliance: rationale, development, and implementation. Neurosurgical Focus, 34(1), E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.10.FOCUS12311.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Asher, A. L., Speroff, T., Dittus, R. S., Parker, S. L., Davies, J. M., Selden, N., et al. (2014). The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care. Spine, 39(22 Suppl 1), S106–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000579.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Bevans, M., Ross, A., & Cella, D. (2014). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Efficient, standardized tools to measure self-reported health and quality of life. Nursing Outlook, 62(5), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2014.05.009.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

38.

PROMIS. (2018). PROMIS adult profile scoring manual.

39.

PROMIS. (2018). PROMIS ability to participate in social roles and activities scoring manual.

40.

PROMIS. (2018). PROMIS depression scoring manual.

41.

PROMIS. (2018). PROMIS fatigue scoring manual.

42.

PROMIS. (2018). PROMIS physical function scoring manual.

43.

PROMIS. (2018). PROMIS sleep disturbance scoring manual.

44.

PROMIS. (2018). PROMIS pain interference scoring manual.

45.

PROMIS. (2018). PROMIS anxiety scoring manual.

46.

Fairbank, J. C., & Pynsent, P. B. (2000). The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine, 25(22), 2940–2952. discussion 2952.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Bono, C., Ried, L. D., Kimberlin, C., & Vogel, B. (2007). Missing data on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a comparison of 4 imputation techniques. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 3(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2006.04.001.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Choi, S. W., Schalet, B., Cook, K. F., & Cella, D. (2014). Establishing a common metric for depressive symptoms: linking the BDI-II, CES-D, and PHQ-9 to PROMIS depression. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035768.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

49.

Schalet, B. D., Revicki, D. A., Cook, K. F., Krishnan, E., Fries, J. F., & Cella, D. (2015). Establishing a common metric for physical function: Linking the HAQ-DI and SF-36 PF subscale to PROMIS((R)) physical function. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(10), 1517–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3360-0.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

50.

Yves, R. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.

51.

Bentler, P. M. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74(1), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

52.

John, O. P., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 339–370). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Taber, K. S. (2017). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.CrossRef

54.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

56.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312.CrossRef

57.

Tang, E., Ekundayo, O., Peipert, J. D., Edwards, N., Bansal, A., Richardson, C., et al. (2019). Validation of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)-57 and -29 item short forms among kidney transplant recipients. Quality of Life Research, 28(3), 815–827.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Fairbank, J. C. T. (2007). Use and abuse of Oswestry Disability Index. Spine, 32(25), 2787–2789. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b9e9d.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Rose, A. J., Bayliss, E., Huang, W., Baseman, L., Butcher, E., Garcia, R. E., et al. (2018). Evaluating the PROMIS-29 v2.0 for use among older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Quality of Life Research, 27(11), 2935–2944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1958-5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

60.

Hinchcliff, M. E., Beaumont, J. L., Carns, M. A., Podlusky, S., Thavarajah, K., Varga, J., et al. (2015). Longitudinal evaluation of PROMIS-29 and FACIT-dyspnea short forms in systemic sclerosis. The Journal of Rheumatology, 42(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.140143.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Schalet, B. D., Hays, R. D., Jensen, S. E., Beaumont, J. L., Fries, J. F., & Cella, D. (2016). Validity of PROMIS physical function measured in diverse clinical samples. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.039.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

62.

Scholle, S. H., Morton, S., Homco, J., Rodriguez, K., Anderson, D., Hahn, E., et al. (2018). Implementation of the PROMIS-29 in routine care for people with diabetes: Challenges and opportunities. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 41(4), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000248.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. The Journal of Rheumatology, 36(9), 2061–2066. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090358.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Junghaenel, D. U., Schneider, S., & Schwartz, J. E. (2016). PROMIS fatigue, pain intensity, pain interference, pain behavior, physical function, depression, anxiety, and anger scales demonstrate ecological validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 74, 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.029.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Alexander, D. L., Tropsha, A., & Winkler, D. A. (2015). Beware of R(2): Simple, unambiguous assessment of the prediction accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 55(7), 1316–1322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00206.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

66.

Brodke, D. S., Goz, V., Voss, M. W., Lawrence, B. D., Spiker, W. R., & Hung, M. (2017). PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 physical function domain in spine patients. Spine, 42(12), 921–929. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001965.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

67.

Hung, M., Saltzman, C. L., Voss, M. W., Bounsanga, J., Kendall, R., Spiker, R., et al. (2017). Responsiveness of the Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), neck disability index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) instruments in patients with spinal disorders. Spine J, 224(3), 245–254.

Titel: Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) using PROMIS-29 in a national sample of lumbar spine surgery patients
verfasst von: Jacquelyn S. Pennings
Clinton J. Devin
Inamullah Khan
Mohamad Bydon
Anthony L. Asher
Kristin R. Archer
Publikationsdatum: 06.06.2019
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02223-8

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) using PROMIS-29 in a national sample of lumbar spine surgery patients

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Introduction to “Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift”

Cancer-related symptoms, mental well-being, and psychological distress in men diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy

Relating response shift and cognitive appraisal to measurement validation

Measurement of appraisal is a valuable adjunct to the current spine outcome tools: a clinician’s perspective on the Rapkin and Schwartz commentary

Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients

Comparing life satisfaction and functioning 15 years after September 11, 2001 among survivors with and without injuries: a mixed-method study