Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2018

20.10.2017 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Prediction of vaginal birth after one ceasarean delivery for non-progressive labor

verfasst von: Yossi Mizrachi, Elad Barber, Michal Kovo, Jacob Bar, Samuel Lurie

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

A model exists that predicts the probability of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). That model is not stratified by indication at first cesarean. The aim of the study was to identify factors that may predict successful VBAC in patients operated for arrest of dilatation or descent at their first cesarean.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of all women with trials of labor after one cesarean (TOLAC) for non-progressive labor between November 2008 and October 2015 was performed (n = 231). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to generate a prediction model for VBAC at hospital admission for planned TOLAC.

Results

During the study period, we had 231 parturient women who chose to undergo TOLAC following one previous cesarean delivery for non-progressive labor. Successful VBAC occurred in 155 (67.0%) parturient women. A model consisting of previous successful VBAC, lower head station on decision at previous cesarean delivery, lower newborn weight at previous cesarean delivery and larger cervical effacement on admission at delivery planned for TOLAC correctly classified 75.3% of cases (R 2 = 0.324, AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.89, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A predictive model, which incorporates four variables available at hospital admission for the planned TOLAC, has been developed that allows the determination of likelihood of successful VBAC following one cesarean delivery for non-progressive labor.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat MacDorman MF, Osterman MJK, Declercq E (2012) The epidemiology of cesarean delivery in the United States: trends, characteristic’s, and outcomes. In: Sheiner E (ed) Cesarean section: procedures, complications and recovery. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 21–38 MacDorman MF, Osterman MJK, Declercq E (2012) The epidemiology of cesarean delivery in the United States: trends, characteristic’s, and outcomes. In: Sheiner E (ed) Cesarean section: procedures, complications and recovery. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 21–38
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kupari M, Talola N, Luukkaala T, Tihtonen K (2016) Does an increased cesarean section rate improve neonatal outcome in term pregnancies? Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:41–46CrossRefPubMed Kupari M, Talola N, Luukkaala T, Tihtonen K (2016) Does an increased cesarean section rate improve neonatal outcome in term pregnancies? Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:41–46CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Makoha FW, Felimban HM, Fathuddien MA, Roomi F, Ghabra T (2004) Multiple cesarean section morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 87:227–232CrossRefPubMed Makoha FW, Felimban HM, Fathuddien MA, Roomi F, Ghabra T (2004) Multiple cesarean section morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 87:227–232CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA et al (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 107:1226–1232CrossRefPubMed Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA et al (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 107:1226–1232CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R (2006) Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 108:21–26CrossRefPubMed Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R (2006) Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 108:21–26CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Andolf E, Thorsell M, Källén K (2010) Cesarean delivery and risk for postoperative adhesions and intestinal obstruction: a nested case-control study of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:406.e1–406.e6CrossRef Andolf E, Thorsell M, Källén K (2010) Cesarean delivery and risk for postoperative adhesions and intestinal obstruction: a nested case-control study of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:406.e1–406.e6CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng WY, Eden KB, Marshall N, Pereira L, Caughey AB, Guise JM (2011) Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Perinatol 38:297–309CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheng WY, Eden KB, Marshall N, Pereira L, Caughey AB, Guise JM (2011) Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Perinatol 38:297–309CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR (2012) Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 120:1181–1193PubMedPubMedCentral Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR (2012) Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 120:1181–1193PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Walfisch A (2012) Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery. In: Sheiner E (ed) Cesarean section: procedures, complications and recovery. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 251–271 Walfisch A (2012) Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery. In: Sheiner E (ed) Cesarean section: procedures, complications and recovery. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 251–271
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, Marshall N, Emeis C, Fu R et al (2010) New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol 116:967–981CrossRefPubMed Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, Marshall N, Emeis C, Fu R et al (2010) New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol 116:967–981CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ et al (2007) Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109:806–812CrossRefPubMed Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ et al (2007) Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109:806–812CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaillet N, Bujold E, Dubé E, Grobman WA (2013) Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 35:119–124CrossRefPubMed Chaillet N, Bujold E, Dubé E, Grobman WA (2013) Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 35:119–124CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoorel EN, Melman S, van Kuijk SM, Grobman WA, Kwee A, Mol BW et al (2014) Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate. BJOG 121:840–847CrossRefPubMed Schoorel EN, Melman S, van Kuijk SM, Grobman WA, Kwee A, Mol BW et al (2014) Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate. BJOG 121:840–847CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Annessi E, Del Giovane C, Magnani L, Carossino E, Baldoni G, Battagliarin G et al (2016) A modified prediction model for VBAC, in a European population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29:435–439CrossRefPubMed Annessi E, Del Giovane C, Magnani L, Carossino E, Baldoni G, Battagliarin G et al (2016) A modified prediction model for VBAC, in a European population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 29:435–439CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lurie S, Shalev A, Sadan O, Golan A (2016) The changing indications and rates of cesarean section in one academic center over a 16-years period (1997–2012). Taiwan J Obtet Gynecol 55:499–502CrossRef Lurie S, Shalev A, Sadan O, Golan A (2016) The changing indications and rates of cesarean section in one academic center over a 16-years period (1997–2012). Taiwan J Obtet Gynecol 55:499–502CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115 (2010) Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 116 (2 Pt 1):450–463 ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115 (2010) Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 116 (2 Pt 1):450–463
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhide A, Caric V, Arulkumaran S (2016) Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 133:297–300CrossRefPubMed Bhide A, Caric V, Arulkumaran S (2016) Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 133:297–300CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mardy AH, Ananth CV, Grobman WA, Gyamfi-Bannerman C (2016) A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215:513.e1–513.e7CrossRef Mardy AH, Ananth CV, Grobman WA, Gyamfi-Bannerman C (2016) A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215:513.e1–513.e7CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Grobman WA (2010) Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 34:244–248CrossRefPubMed Grobman WA (2010) Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 34:244–248CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel Aziz A, Abd Rabbo A, Sayed Ahmed WA, Khamees RE, Atwa KA (2016) Validation of the close-to-delivery prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a Middle Eastern cohort. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 134:75–78CrossRefPubMed Abdel Aziz A, Abd Rabbo A, Sayed Ahmed WA, Khamees RE, Atwa KA (2016) Validation of the close-to-delivery prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a Middle Eastern cohort. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 134:75–78CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Stevens EJ, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Macones GA (2007) Predicting failure of a vaginal birth attempt after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109:800–805CrossRefPubMed Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Stevens EJ, Odibo AO, Peipert JF, Macones GA (2007) Predicting failure of a vaginal birth attempt after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109:800–805CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadan O, Leshno M, Gottreich A, Golan A, Lurie S (2007) Once a cesarean always a cesarean? A computer-assisted decision analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:517–521CrossRefPubMed Sadan O, Leshno M, Gottreich A, Golan A, Lurie S (2007) Once a cesarean always a cesarean? A computer-assisted decision analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:517–521CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Christmann-Schmid C, Raio L, Scheibner K, Müller M, Surbek D (2016) Back to “once a caesarean: always a caesarean”? A trend analysis in Switzerland. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:905–910CrossRefPubMed Christmann-Schmid C, Raio L, Scheibner K, Müller M, Surbek D (2016) Back to “once a caesarean: always a caesarean”? A trend analysis in Switzerland. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:905–910CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Craigin EB (1916) Conservatism in obstetrics. NY Med J 104:1–3 Craigin EB (1916) Conservatism in obstetrics. NY Med J 104:1–3
Metadaten
Titel
Prediction of vaginal birth after one ceasarean delivery for non-progressive labor
verfasst von
Yossi Mizrachi
Elad Barber
Michal Kovo
Jacob Bar
Samuel Lurie
Publikationsdatum
20.10.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4569-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Acknowledgement to Referees

Acknowledgement to reviewers

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.