Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Pediatrics 5/2018

21.03.2018 | Review

Predictors and outcomes of the Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS) performance: a systematic review

verfasst von: Laura Longoni, Livio Provenzi, Anna Cavallini, Daniela Sacchi, Giunia Scotto di Minico, Renato Borgatti

Erschienen in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The NOMAS is by far the most used tool to screen early oral-motor skills in newborns. Here we provide an updated review of scientific literature on the use of the Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS) to screen early oral-motor skills in newborns. An integrative review has been carried out consistent with PRISMA guidelines and standardized qualitative appraisal. Data abstracting and synthesis were executed by two independent co-authors who solved disagreement in conference. Twenty records have been included and reviewed. The efficacy of the NOMAS in screening and identifying precocious oral-motor skills received inconsistent support. Moderate validity and low reliability emerged. Moreover, despite the NOMAS’ adequately screen efficient and inefficient feeders, limited evidence emerged for predictive value of NOMAS score on feeding and psychomotor developmental trajectories during the first 2 years of age.
Conclusion: The present review highlights benefits and limitations of the NOMAS. Future research is needed to develop observational and clinically-relevant tools to better identify newborns which are at lower- and higher-risk of developing less-than-optimal feeding behaviors and to guide with greater precision the diagnostic and therapeutic journey of these newborns.
What is Known:
The assessment of oral-motor skills in newborns and infants is critical for early intervention
• The NOMAS is the most adopted tool to assess oral-motor skills in newborns and infants
What is New:
The ability of the NOMAS to target newborn at risk for feeding disorders is confirmed
• Nonetheless, the capacity to predict long-term developmental outcomes is limited
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Manikam R, Perman JA (2000) Pediatric feeding disorders. J Clin Gastroenerol 30:34–46CrossRef Manikam R, Perman JA (2000) Pediatric feeding disorders. J Clin Gastroenerol 30:34–46CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman LA, Keckley C, Petersen MC (2001) Swallowing function and medical diagnoses in infants suspected of dysphagia. Pediatrics 108:E106CrossRefPubMed Newman LA, Keckley C, Petersen MC (2001) Swallowing function and medical diagnoses in infants suspected of dysphagia. Pediatrics 108:E106CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bickell M, Barton C, Dow K et al (2017) A systematic review of clinical and psychometric properties of infant oral motor feeding assessments. Dev Neurorehabil 8:1–11CrossRef Bickell M, Barton C, Dow K et al (2017) A systematic review of clinical and psychometric properties of infant oral motor feeding assessments. Dev Neurorehabil 8:1–11CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Braun MA, Palmer MM (1985) A pilot study of oral-motor dysfunction in “at risk” infants. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 5:13–26CrossRef Braun MA, Palmer MM (1985) A pilot study of oral-motor dysfunction in “at risk” infants. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 5:13–26CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer MM, Crawley K, Blanco IA (1993) Neonatal oral-motor assessment scale: a reliability study. J Perinatol 13:28–35PubMed Palmer MM, Crawley K, Blanco IA (1993) Neonatal oral-motor assessment scale: a reliability study. J Perinatol 13:28–35PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 339:b2700 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open 339:b2700
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Case Smith J, Cooper P, Scala V (1989) Feeding efficiency of premature neonates. Am J Occup Ther 43:245–250CrossRefPubMed Case Smith J, Cooper P, Scala V (1989) Feeding efficiency of premature neonates. Am J Occup Ther 43:245–250CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferguson A, Blaymore Bier JA, Cucca J et al (1996) The quality of sucking in infants with colic. Infant Ment Health J 17:161–169CrossRef Ferguson A, Blaymore Bier JA, Cucca J et al (1996) The quality of sucking in infants with colic. Infant Ment Health J 17:161–169CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer MM, Heyman MB (1999) Developmental outcome for neonates with dysfunctional and disorganized sucking patterns: preliminary findings. Infant-Toddler Interv 9:299–308 Palmer MM, Heyman MB (1999) Developmental outcome for neonates with dysfunctional and disorganized sucking patterns: preliminary findings. Infant-Toddler Interv 9:299–308
16.
Zurück zum Zitat MacMullen NJ, Dulski LA (2000) Factors related to sucking ability in healthy newborns. JOGNN 29:390–396CrossRefPubMed MacMullen NJ, Dulski LA (2000) Factors related to sucking ability in healthy newborns. JOGNN 29:390–396CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Howe TH, Sheu CF, Hsieh YW et al (2007) Psychometric characteristics of the neonatal oral–motor assessment scale in healthy preterm infants. Dev Med Chi Neurol 2:915–919CrossRef Howe TH, Sheu CF, Hsieh YW et al (2007) Psychometric characteristics of the neonatal oral–motor assessment scale in healthy preterm infants. Dev Med Chi Neurol 2:915–919CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat da Costa SP, van der Schans CP, Boelema SR, van der Meij E, Boerman MA, Bos AF (2010) Sucking patterns in fullterm infants between birth and 10 weeks of age. Inf Behav Dev 33:61–67CrossRef da Costa SP, van der Schans CP, Boelema SR, van der Meij E, Boerman MA, Bos AF (2010) Sucking patterns in fullterm infants between birth and 10 weeks of age. Inf Behav Dev 33:61–67CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai SW, Chen CH, Lin MC (2010) Prediction for developmental delay on neonatal oral motor assessment scale in preterm infants without brain lesion. Pediatr Int 52:65–68CrossRefPubMed Tsai SW, Chen CH, Lin MC (2010) Prediction for developmental delay on neonatal oral motor assessment scale in preterm infants without brain lesion. Pediatr Int 52:65–68CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nieuwenhuis T, da Costa SP, Bilderbeek E et al (2008) Uncoordinated sucking patterns in preterm infants are associated with abnormal general movements. J Pediatr 161:792–798CrossRef Nieuwenhuis T, da Costa SP, Bilderbeek E et al (2008) Uncoordinated sucking patterns in preterm infants are associated with abnormal general movements. J Pediatr 161:792–798CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolthuis-Stigter MI, Luinge MR, Da Costa SP et al (2015) The association between sucking behavior in preterm infants and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. J Pediatr 166:26–30CrossRefPubMed Wolthuis-Stigter MI, Luinge MR, Da Costa SP et al (2015) The association between sucking behavior in preterm infants and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. J Pediatr 166:26–30CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors and outcomes of the Neonatal Oral Motor Assessment Scale (NOMAS) performance: a systematic review
verfasst von
Laura Longoni
Livio Provenzi
Anna Cavallini
Daniela Sacchi
Giunia Scotto di Minico
Renato Borgatti
Publikationsdatum
21.03.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3130-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

European Journal of Pediatrics 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Pädiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.