Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control 6/2016

22.04.2016 | Original paper

Predictors of biospecimen donation in the Black Women’s Health Study

verfasst von: Lucile L. Adams-Campbell, Chiranjeev Dash, Julie R. Palmer, Manuela V. Wiedemeier, Cordelia W. Russell, Lynn Rosenberg, Yvette C. Cozier

Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Although African-Americans experience higher cancer morbidity and mortality rates compared to their White counterparts, their participation in biospecimen research is lower than that of their white peers. This study investigated the prevalence and predictors of biospecimen donation in a large, cohort study of Black women.

Methods

The BWHS is a follow-up study of U.S. Black women aged 21–69 years enrolled through postal health questionnaires. Between January 2004 and December 2007, participants were sent a consent form with a postage-paid return envelope, and a mouthwash collection kit. Univariate and age- and educational status-adjusted logistic regression models were used to estimate the association of socio-demographic, lifestyle and medical factors with donation of biospecimens.

Results

Buccal cells with consent forms were obtained from 26,790 women, for a response rate of 51 %. The strongest predictors of biospecimen donation were age: response increased from 48.6 % among those aged <40 to 63.1 % among those aged 60 and older [RR 1.30 (95 % CI 1.27, 1.34)]; multivitamin use [RR (95 % CI) 1.32 (1.30, 1.34)]; physician visit in the previous 2 years [RR (95 % CI) 1.61 (1.58, 1.65)], and a history of breast [RR (95 % CI) 1.59 (1.56, 1.63)], colon [RR (95 % CI) 1.18 (1.16, 1.20)], and cervical [RR (95 % CI) 1.63 (1.60, 1.67)] cancer screening.

Conclusions

We found that 51 % of women in the geographically-dispersed Black Women’s Health Study cohort were willing to provide mouthwash samples to be used for genetic analyses. The response in this study is encouraging given published findings of low overall participation rates of African-Americans in genetic studies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaught J, Rogers J, Myers K, Lim MD, Lockhart N, Moore H et al (2011) An NCI perspective on creating sustainable biospecimen resources. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (42):1–7 Vaught J, Rogers J, Myers K, Lim MD, Lockhart N, Moore H et al (2011) An NCI perspective on creating sustainable biospecimen resources. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (42):1–7
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hewitt RE (2011) Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol 23(1):112–119CrossRefPubMed Hewitt RE (2011) Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol 23(1):112–119CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore HM, Compton CC, Lim MD, Vaught J, Christiansen KN, Alper J (2009) Biospecimen research network symposium: advancing cancer research through biospecimen science. Cancer Res 69(17):6770–6772CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moore HM, Compton CC, Lim MD, Vaught J, Christiansen KN, Alper J (2009) Biospecimen research network symposium: advancing cancer research through biospecimen science. Cancer Res 69(17):6770–6772CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Luque JS, Quinn GP, Montel-Ishino FA, Arevalo M, Bynum SA, Noel-Thomas S et al (2012) Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think. J Cancer Educ 27(1):91–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luque JS, Quinn GP, Montel-Ishino FA, Arevalo M, Bynum SA, Noel-Thomas S et al (2012) Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think. J Cancer Educ 27(1):91–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiviniemi MT, Saad-Harfouche FG, Ciupak GL, Davis W, Moysich K, Hargrave NC et al (2013) Pilot intervention outcomes of an educational program for biospecimen research participation. J Cancer Educ 28(1):52–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kiviniemi MT, Saad-Harfouche FG, Ciupak GL, Davis W, Moysich K, Hargrave NC et al (2013) Pilot intervention outcomes of an educational program for biospecimen research participation. J Cancer Educ 28(1):52–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Royal C, Baffoe-Bonnie A, Kittles R, Powell I, Bennett J, Hoke G et al (2000) Recruitment experience in the first phase of the African American Hereditary Prostate Cancer (AAHPC) study. Ann Epidemiol 10(8 Suppl):S68–S77CrossRefPubMed Royal C, Baffoe-Bonnie A, Kittles R, Powell I, Bennett J, Hoke G et al (2000) Recruitment experience in the first phase of the African American Hereditary Prostate Cancer (AAHPC) study. Ann Epidemiol 10(8 Suppl):S68–S77CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shavers VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF (2002) Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies. Ann Epidemiol 12(4):248–256CrossRefPubMed Shavers VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF (2002) Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies. Ann Epidemiol 12(4):248–256CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Shavers-Hornaday VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF, Torner JC (1997) Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation. Ethn Health 2(1–2):31–45CrossRefPubMed Shavers-Hornaday VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF, Torner JC (1997) Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation. Ethn Health 2(1–2):31–45CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gamble VN (1993) A legacy of distrust: African Americans and medical research. Am J Prev Med 9(6 Suppl):35–38PubMed Gamble VN (1993) A legacy of distrust: African Americans and medical research. Am J Prev Med 9(6 Suppl):35–38PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cozier YC, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L (2004) Comparison of methods for collection of DNA samples by mail in the Black Women’s Health Study. Ann Epidemiol 14(2):117–122CrossRefPubMed Cozier YC, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L (2004) Comparison of methods for collection of DNA samples by mail in the Black Women’s Health Study. Ann Epidemiol 14(2):117–122CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Marchand L, Lum-Jones A, Saltzman B, Visaya V, Nomura AM, Kolonel LN (2001) Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(6):701–703PubMed Le Marchand L, Lum-Jones A, Saltzman B, Visaya V, Nomura AM, Kolonel LN (2001) Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(6):701–703PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman B, Powell J, Ball D, Hill L, Craig I, Plomin R (1997) DNA by mail: an inexpensive and noninvasive method for collecting DNA samples from widely dispersed populations. Behav Genet 27(3):251–257CrossRefPubMed Freeman B, Powell J, Ball D, Hill L, Craig I, Plomin R (1997) DNA by mail: an inexpensive and noninvasive method for collecting DNA samples from widely dispersed populations. Behav Genet 27(3):251–257CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Abruzzo J, Newcomb PA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Franklin T et al (2001) Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(6):687–696PubMed Garcia-Closas M, Egan KM, Abruzzo J, Newcomb PA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Franklin T et al (2001) Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(6):687–696PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers NL, Cole SA, Lan HC, Crossa A, Demerath EW (2007) New saliva DNA collection method compared to buccal cell collection techniques for epidemiological studies. Am J Hum Biol 19(3):319–326CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rogers NL, Cole SA, Lan HC, Crossa A, Demerath EW (2007) New saliva DNA collection method compared to buccal cell collection techniques for epidemiological studies. Am J Hum Biol 19(3):319–326CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lum A, Le Marchand L (1998) A simple mouthwash method for obtaining genomic DNA in molecular epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7(8):719–724PubMed Lum A, Le Marchand L (1998) A simple mouthwash method for obtaining genomic DNA in molecular epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7(8):719–724PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrisin TE, Humma LM, Johnson JA (2002) Collection of genomic DNA by the noninvasive mouthwash method for use in pharmacogenetic studies. Pharmacotherapy 22(8):954–960CrossRefPubMed Andrisin TE, Humma LM, Johnson JA (2002) Collection of genomic DNA by the noninvasive mouthwash method for use in pharmacogenetic studies. Pharmacotherapy 22(8):954–960CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Feigelson HS, Rodriguez C, Robertson AS, Jacobs EJ, Calle EE, Reid YA et al (2001) Determinants of DNA yield and quality from buccal cell samples collected with mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(9):1005–1008PubMed Feigelson HS, Rodriguez C, Robertson AS, Jacobs EJ, Calle EE, Reid YA et al (2001) Determinants of DNA yield and quality from buccal cell samples collected with mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(9):1005–1008PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell C, Palmer JR, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L (2001) Follow-up of a large cohort of Black women. Am J Epidemiol 154(9):845–853CrossRefPubMed Russell C, Palmer JR, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L (2001) Follow-up of a large cohort of Black women. Am J Epidemiol 154(9):845–853CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer JR, Ruiz-Narvaez EA, Rotimi CN, Cupples LA, Cozier YC, Adams-Campbell LL et al (2013) Genetic susceptibility loci for subtypes of breast cancer in an African American population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22(1):127–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Palmer JR, Ruiz-Narvaez EA, Rotimi CN, Cupples LA, Cozier YC, Adams-Campbell LL et al (2013) Genetic susceptibility loci for subtypes of breast cancer in an African American population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22(1):127–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Furr LA (2002) Perceptions of genetics research as harmful to society: differences among samples of African-Americans and European-Americans. Genet Test 6(1):25–30CrossRefPubMed Furr LA (2002) Perceptions of genetics research as harmful to society: differences among samples of African-Americans and European-Americans. Genet Test 6(1):25–30CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Jandorf L, Redd W (2003) Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women. Patient Educ Couns 51(3):217–227CrossRefPubMed Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Jandorf L, Redd W (2003) Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women. Patient Educ Couns 51(3):217–227CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Moorman PG, Skinner CS, Evans JP, Newman B, Sorenson JR, Calingaert B et al (2004) Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(8):1349–1354PubMed Moorman PG, Skinner CS, Evans JP, Newman B, Sorenson JR, Calingaert B et al (2004) Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(8):1349–1354PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dash C, Wallington SF, Muthra S, Dodson E, Mandelblatt J, Adams-Campbell LL (2014) Disparities in knowledge and willingness to donate research biospecimens: a mixed-methods study in an underserved urban community. J Community Genet 5(4):329–336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dash C, Wallington SF, Muthra S, Dodson E, Mandelblatt J, Adams-Campbell LL (2014) Disparities in knowledge and willingness to donate research biospecimens: a mixed-methods study in an underserved urban community. J Community Genet 5(4):329–336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Stern AM (2005) Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California. Am J Public Health 95(7):1128–1138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stern AM (2005) Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California. Am J Public Health 95(7):1128–1138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Randall VR (1996) Slavery, segregation and racism: trusting the health care system ain’t always easy! An African American perspective on bioethics. St Louis Univ Public Law Rev 15(2):191–235PubMed Randall VR (1996) Slavery, segregation and racism: trusting the health care system ain’t always easy! An African American perspective on bioethics. St Louis Univ Public Law Rev 15(2):191–235PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Day JC, Curry AE (1998) Educational attainment in the United States. Current Population Reports. US Department of Commerce, March 1998 (update) Day JC, Curry AE (1998) Educational attainment in the United States. Current Population Reports. US Department of Commerce, March 1998 (update)
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Liard PW (2010) Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet 11:191–203CrossRef Liard PW (2010) Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet 11:191–203CrossRef
31.
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of biospecimen donation in the Black Women’s Health Study
verfasst von
Lucile L. Adams-Campbell
Chiranjeev Dash
Julie R. Palmer
Manuela V. Wiedemeier
Cordelia W. Russell
Lynn Rosenberg
Yvette C. Cozier
Publikationsdatum
22.04.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Cancer Causes & Control / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0747-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Cancer Causes & Control 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.